Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Overview
Introduction Background Watermark Properties Embedding Detection The Project Introduction Embedding Detection Conclusions
Introduction
Watermark--an invisible signature embedded inside an image to show authenticity or proof of ownership Discourage unauthorized copying and distribution of images over the internet Ensure a digital picture has not been altered Software can be used to search for a specific watermark
Background
Watermark Properties
Watermark should appear random, noise-like sequence Appear Undetectable Good Correlation Properties High correlation with signals similar to watermark Low correlation with other watermarks or random noise Common sequences A) Normal distribution B) m-sequences
Project:
Introduction
Possible for watermark to be binary sequence Error-correction coding techniques Use convolutional codes Decode by Viterbi algorithm Compare with non-coding method See if it improves watermark detection More or less robust to attacks? Additive noise, JPEG Compression, Rescale, Unzign Performance assessed by correlation coefficient
Watermark Embedding
Watermark
Original Image
Watermarked image
Watermark placed into information content of Original Image to create Watermarked Image Image Content Spatial Domain (Least Significant Bit) FFT - Magnitude and Phase Wavelet Transforms DCT Coefficients
Setup-Watermark Embedding
Image
IDCT
Watermarked Image
Watermark
DC Component Excluded for 1000 Highest Coefficients Interleaving prevents burst errors Watermarked Image Similar to original image Without coding, ignore Conv Code and Interleave block
Original Image
512x512 Mandrill Image See Handout Both watermarks imperceptible Alterations to original image difficult to notice Watermarked Image with Coding
Watermark Detection
*
=
Original Watermark Correlation
Suspected Image
Extracted Watermark
Watermark Extracted from Suspected Image Compute correlation of Extracted and Original Watermark Threshold correlation to determine watermark existence
Watermark Detection
W2 Corrupted Image Deinterleave, Viterbi Decode Extracted Watermark W1 Original Image 1000 Highest DCT Coeff Owners watermark Correlation Coefficient
For no coding, deinterleave and decode block ignored =E[W1*W2]/{ E[W12]E[W22]} If W1=W2 then =1 if W1 and W2 are independent, then =0 if E[W1]=0 Corruptions are additive noise, JPEG Compression Image scaling, and UnZign
Convolutional Codes
C0
Input=[...1011010101100000000] G0 = [1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1] G1 = [1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1]
C1
Output C0 = conv(G0,Input); Output C1=conv(G1,Input) Convolutional code implemented using linear shift registers Adds redundancy for error-correction Encoding/Decoding well researched Good coding performance, very popular
State 0 1 2 3
Viterbi Decoding
Zero mean additive noise, variance=100, 400, 900 Both methods had high correlation Coding method performed slightly better For variance = 900 (no coding) = 77% p (coding) = 84%
JPEG Compression: 1.4:1, 2.2:1, 4:1 ratio Both methods resistant to JPEG compression Coding method outperformed non-coding method Perfect detection for coding method
Unzign--watermark removal software Image resized to 512x512 and convert to grayscale before detection Moderate detection for without coding: (no coding) = 57% (coding) = 23% Coding method sensitive to resizing
Conclusions
Convolutional coding more immune to additive noise and JPEG Compression Coding method fragile w.r.t. rescaled images Moderate detection levels for unzigned images Further Suggestion: Try block DCT Use Wavelet Transform Exploit Human Visual System
Questions