Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
11-1
Outline
Performance Measurement
11-2
Performance Management
Goal: Improve the effectiveness & efficiency of the organization by:
Aligning the employees work behaviors & results with the organizations goals Improving the employees work behaviors & results
11-3
11-4
Evaluate HRM policies and programs Example: before-after study (pretest-posttest design)
11-6
11-7
11-8
Makes sense for many jobs Use it where how the employee produces results matters
11-9
Challenges: Difficult to capture the full range of relevant behaviors Different behaviors can lead to the same results do we always care which behaviors were used?
11-10
11-13
best to worst
Example:
1. Bob 2. Carol 3. Ted 4. Alice
11-14
11-15
use words? Label all the points in the scale, or just label the endpoints of the scale? Odd or even number of points in the scale? Fewer points in the scale, or more points in the scale?
11-17
Disadvantages:
More work to develop BARS (time & money) Employees may not consistently fit into one of the BARS categories (solution to this problem is BOS)
11-20
employee behaviors, check off the ones that apply to the employee
11-21
employee and, for each goal, determine if the goal has been achieved
11-22
Performance Raters
Who should we ask to rate an employees
job performance?
11-23
Performance Raters
Options for performance raters: Supervisors Self-evaluation Peers (co-workers) Subordinates Customers 360-Degrees
11-24
'multi-rater feedback', is the most comprehensive appraisal where the feedback about the employees performance comes from all the sources that come in contact with the employee on his job.
11-25
(commonly), it become difficult to separate, calculate and eliminate personal biasness and differences. It is often time consuming and difficult to analyze the information gathered. The results can be manipulated by the employees towards their desired ratings with the help of the raters. The 360 degree appraisal mechanism can have a adversely effect the motivation and the performance of the employees.
11-26
requires commitment of top management and the HR, resources(time, financial resources etc), planned implementation and follow up.
11-27
Rater Biases
The halo effect The error of central tendency The leniency and strictness biases Personal prejudice
affected by the customers perception of the organisation and their incomplete knowledge about the process and the clarity of the process.
Often, the process suffers because of the lack of knowledge on the part of the participants or the raters.
11-29
Performance Feedback
Employees need good feedback
11-30
Performance Feedback
Doesnt hurt to cover both administrative
(e.g., pay increase) and developmental (e.g., future goals) issues in one feedback session Provide specific feedback
Dont say: Youre always late. Do say: You were more than 5 minutes late on
25 separate occasions in the last 3 months. This is unacceptable. We need to develop (1) a specific goal concerning prompt attendance, and (2) an action plan that you will follow to achieve the goal.
11-31