Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
: Advantages of SLN :
Use of biodegradable physiological lipids which decreases the danger of acute and chronic toxicity and avoidance of organic solvents in production methods . Improved bioavailability of poorly water soluble molecules . Site specific delivery of drugs, enhanced drug penetration into the skin via dermal application . Possibility of scaling up. SLNs have better stability compared to liposomes .
Lyophilization possible
: Disadvantages of SLN :
Poor drug loading capacity. Drug expulsion after polymeric transition during storage .
Methods of Preparation:
1.High pressure homogenization i. Hot homogenization ii. Cold homogenization 2.Ultrasonication homogenization
6.Supercritical Fluid technology
: Reason for choosing this type of system: There is Structural similarity between the components of my system. Brij-35 is easily biodegradable and non toxic as it is used as my surfactant.
: Applications of SLN :
Solid lipid nanoparticles in Drug delivery:
Fig.14:A chemotherapy-filled nanoparticle (lavender) is coated with targeting molecules (blue-purple) that bind to cancer cells. Once the nanoparticle is inside a cell, it releases the drugs (yellow). [Art: Nicolle Rager Fuller]
SLN for Parenteral Application: Cationic SLN has been demonstrated to bind genes directly via electrostatic interactions, and have potential benefits in targeted gene therapy in treatment of cancer.
Targeted delivery of solid lipid nanoparticles for the treatment of lung diseases:
Fig.15: Targeted delivery of solid lipid nanoparticles for the treatment of lung diseases
2.Electron microscopy:
: Plan of Work :
The present work aims at the following: To characterize the solid lipid nano particles.
: Experiment :
: Material :
Lipid soylecithin, tripalmitine and cetyl palmitate
Total(mL) 20 20 20 20 20 20
Table:1.Composition of System
: Result :
Table2: Variation in the hydrodynamic diameter of SLN at different time intervals. 1:1 SLC-TP and 5% CP Time/day 1 2 4 11 24 30 81 87 Size/nm 226.3 140.1 168.4 168.1 169 147.9 141.6 148.7 1:1 SLC-TP and 25% CP Time/day 1 7 14 20 71 77 Size/nm 215.5 196.4 176.5 179.4 146.1 138.2 1:1 SLC-TP and 30% CP Time/day 4 5 12 18 69 75 Size/nm 179.6 181.4 173.8 167.6 159.7 151.3 1:1 SLC-TP and 10% CP Time/day 2 7 13 20 26 77 83 Size/nm 183.6 206.3 218.7 160.6 159 153.9 144.7 1:1 SLC-TP and 15% CP Time/day 1 7 20 27 78 84 Size/nm 199.6 202.7 178.5 174.2 149.8 142.8
1:1 SLC-TP and 20% CP Time/day 2 8 15 21 72 78 Time/day 229.9 190.2 182.1 186.1 173.4 172.8
260
240
220
size/nm
200
180
160
140 0 20 40 60 80 100
time/day
Table3: Variation in the Zeta Potential of SLN with varying concentration of Wt % of CP:
Wt % of CP 5 10
15
20 25 30
-4.84
-13.5 -9.08 -16.7
zeta potential
-4 -6 -8
Zeta potential/mv
wt % of CP
: Conclusion :
From the graph 1 the solution containing 20% wt of CP is quite stable. It take 20 days to reach equllibrating position . Others show much fluctuation .
There is a net decrease of Zeta potential value with increasing concentration of CetylPalmitate(Graph:2) . Results are further evidenced through above Figure
-:FUTURE PROSPECTIVE:However, to draw final conclusion on this aspect, further studies using varios combination of lipids are warranted. This can be considered as the future perspective.
: Acknowledgment :
I wish to express my sincere thanks and gratitude to my teacher Dr. A.K. Panda for his immensely valuable guidance and suggestions to complete this work. My thanks and appreciation also goes to all the faculty members of the Department of Chemistry, University of North Bengal for their help and encouragement. I am also thankful to the research fellows Gourab Karmakar,Prasant Nahak, Manish Sapkota, Biplab , Banita Sinha, Moumita Chakraborty, Pritam Guha and my friends for their constant support and encouragement in every step.during this project work.
:References:
1. Coleman Anthony W., Jebors Said, et al. (2008). "para-Acylcalix[n]arenes: from molecular to macroscopic assemblies." Chem. Commun. 2. DA SILVA ADRIANA L. , SANTOS RAQUEL S. , et al. (2012). "Nanoparticle-based therapy for respiratory diseases." An. Acad. Bras. Cinc 85. 3. EKAMBARAM. P, S. A. A. HASAN, et al. (2012). "SOLID LIPID NANOPARTICLES: A REVIEW." Sci. Revs. Chem. Commun 2(1): 80-102. 4. Gambhire Makarand Suresh , Bhalekar Mangesh Ramesh , et al. "Statistical optimization of dithranolloaded solid lipid nanoparticles using factorial design." Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 47. 5. Garud Akanksha, Singh Deepti, et al. (2012). "Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLN): Method, Characterization and Applications." International Current Pharmaceutical Journal 1(11): 384-393. 6. EH, Korkmaz E, et al. (2012). "Resveratrol-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles versus nanostructured lipid carriers: evaluation of antioxidant potential for dermal applications." Int J Nanomedicine 7. Sahu MK, Soni GC, et al. (2012). "Nanostructured Lipid Carrier: The Second Generation of Solid Lipid Nanoparticle." International Journal for Pharmaceutical Research Scholars (IJPRS) 1(3). 8. Singhal Girish B., Patel Rakesh P., et al. (2011). "SOLID LIPID NANO PARTICLES AND NANO LIPID CARRIERS: AS NOVEL SOLID LIPID BASED DRUG CARRIER." International Reseach Journal Of Pharmacy 2(2): 40-52. 9. Wissinga S.A., Kayserb O. , et al. (2003). "Solid lipid nanoparticles for parenteral drug delivery." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews: 1257-1272.
THANK YOU