Sunteți pe pagina 1din 25

MEC 601

FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1


PRESENTATION

23
RD
DECEMBER 2013
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
THIN CAN SIMULATION EMPLOYING REVERSE
ENGINEERING AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

AFIZU BIN AZNAN
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

SUPERVISOR: JAMALUDDIN MAHMUD (ASSOC PROF DR.)

Contents
1. Problem Statements
2. Objectives
3. Scope of Study
4. Significances
5. Literature Review
6. Methodology
7. Gantt Chart (FYP 1 and 2)
Problem Statements
1. There is no guarantee that CAD Model using reverse
engineering approach could be ready to generate in finite
element analysis (ANSYS Workbench)
2. Geometry of regenerated CAD Model using CATIA v5 will
slightly different or inaccurate compare to real model
Objectives
To develop an accurate 3D CAD model of thin can
employing reverse engineering processes which consists
of conventional and non-conventional methods.
To perform the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for the 3D
CAD thin can model (crush test) from the reverse
engineering processed using ANSYS 14.0 Workbench
Finite Analysis.
To compare the reverse engineering methods applied
based on FEA.
Scope of study
CAD data of the thin can obtained from Reverse Engineering
(RE) methods

RE
Conventional
method
Non-
conventional
method
CAD Data
Conventional Method
Non-
conventional
Method
From developed CAD Data will be compute for Finite
Element Analysis using ANSYS 14 for thin can crush
analysis.
However, explicit analysis will NOT be the main
concern.
Reduce cost
Reduce time consuming in design the product
Increase efficiency of production
Reliable techniques for many engineering field nowadays

Literature Review
a process of capturing the geometry by existing physical
objects and used the data obtained as a foundation for re-
designing or designing something new.
Data acquisition
Data
capture
Data
editing
Data Fitting
Original Part
Points
of Cloud
Constructed
Surface
Reversed
Engineered
CAD Model
Stress
Distribution
using FEA
Software
Methodology
Reverse Engineering (Data Acquisition)
Conventional
Method
Non-Conventional
Method
Finite Element Analysis using ANSYS 14.0 Workbench
Compare result and solution
Conventional Method
Direct measurement using measuring tools such ruler,
vernier caliper, dial caliper and digital caliper
CAD data thin can developed using CATIA V5 Software
and saved into .iges format.
1. Sketch
2. Extrude
3. Editing
4. Wireframe/ Solid Modelling
5. Assembly
Non-Conventional Method
Preparation Konica Minolta VIVID 910i:
1. Connecting camera to the host computer
2. Selecting camera lens
3. Place the thin can on the projected area
(plateform)
Scanning the thin can physical model
Polygon Editing Tools (PET) Software
Rapidform 2004 Software
CAD Data developed
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using ANSYS 14.0
Workbench
Both 3D CAD of thin can exported into ANSYS Workbench
Setting 6 Analysis Features:
1. Engineering data
2. Geometry
3. Model
4. Setup
5. Solution
6. Result.
Compare the obtained results based on total
deformation and equivalent stress
My Journey FYP 1
Years
2013
Project Activities

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 2 3 4 5 6
Preparation and Title
Selection
F
Y
P
1


B
r
e
i
f
i
n
g




M
i
d
-
T
e
r
m

B
r
e
a
k


S
t
u
d
y

W
e
e
k

F
i
n
a
l

E
x
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n

E
n
d

o
f

S
e
m
e
s
t
e
r

B
r
e
a
k



Problem Identification

Literature Review


Project Methodology



Preparation of
Experimental Test



Simulation Process



Analyzing Data and
Report Writing


Final Presentation


Actual Planning
Milestones FYP 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18



M
i
d
-
T
e
r
m

B
r
e
a
k


S
t
u
d
y

W
e
e
k

F
i
n
a
l

E
x
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
































Project Activities
Preparation and Title Selection

Problem Identification

Literature Review

Project Methodology

Preparation of Experimental Test

Simulation Process

Analyzing Data and Report Writing

Final Presentation


Preliminary Result
Equipment

Konica Minolta
VIVID 910 and
connected host
computer that
fully function
and available at
Lab CADEM
(Level 5)
Sample: Rapidform 2004

Original surface
view of box
model in
Rapidform 2004
Software
Sample: Rapidform 2004

Point of Cloud
view from
Rapidform 2004
Sample: Rapidform 2004

Wireframe
zoom-in of the
box model
from
Rapidform
2004
Sample: Crash test
Punch (RED)
and Die
(PURPLE)
assigned some
specific data
of Fixed
Support and
Displacement
respectively
Sample: Crash test
Crash test on
the simple
aluminium tube
that had been
developed using
CATIA V5 and
analyzed in
ANSYS 14.0
Workbench
Conclusion
1. Hypothesis: VIVID 910i should be give more
accurate than direct measurement method
but at the same times, its much difficult to
approach
2. FYP 1 achieved.
3. Ready for the next stages of FYP progress
4. See you on the Full Presentation FYP next
year, InsyaAllah

Question or
Recommendation ?

S-ar putea să vă placă și