Nutritional and antioxidant contributions of Laurus nobilis L.
leaves:Would be more suitable a wild or a cultivated
sample? Maria Ins Dias, Lillian Barros, Montserrat Dueas, Rita C. Alves, M. Beatriz P.P. Oliveira,Celestino Santos-Buelga, Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira.
Mountain Research Center (CIMO), ESA, Polytechnic Institute of Bragana, Campus de Santa Apolnia, 1172, 5301-855 Bragana, Portugal. REQUIMTE, Science Chemical Department, Faculty of Pharmacy of University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal GIP-USAL, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Food Chemistry 156 (2014) 339346 Elsevier Publishing Group
PONTIFCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATLICA DO PARAN ESCOLA DE SADE E BIOCINCIAS FARMCIA E BIOQUMICA INTRODUCTION
Laurus nobilis, commonly known as bay leaves, belongs to Laureacea family
It is widely used as a spicy fragrance and flavour in traditional meat dishes, stews and rice (Ouchikh et al. 2011)
Its leaves and extracts are used to suppress high blood sugar, fungal and bacterial infections, to treat eructation, flatulence and gastrointestinal problems. It also exhibits anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsive, antiepileptic and antioxidant properties (Conforti et al. 2006)
Apigenin Quercetina Eugenol Laurus nobilis
OBJECTIVE
In the present work, L. nobilis wild and cultivated samples were chemically characterized regarding, free sugars, organic acids, fatty acids and tocopherols.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Samples
Sugar determination HPLC-RI acetonitrile/deionized water, 70:30 (v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Organics Acids Reverse phase C18 column. The elution was performed with sulphuric acid 3.6 mM using a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Detection was carried out in a PDA, using 215 nm and 245 nm (for ascorbic acid) as preferred wavelengths.
Fatty Acids Fatty acids were determined by gasliquid chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID). The carrier gas (hydrogen) flow-rate was 4.0 mL/min
MATERIALS AND METHODS Tocopherols Analysis was performed by HPLC, and a fluorescence detector (FP-2020) programmed for excitation at 290 nm and emission at 330 nm. The mobile phase used was a mixture of n-hexane and ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION The wild sample gave higher nutritional contribution, but it was the cultivated sample that showed higher bioactivity. REFERENCES
Nutritional and antioxidant contributions of Laurus nobilis L. leaves:Would be more suitable a wild or a cultivated sample? Maria Ins Dias, Lillian Barros, Montserrat Dueas, Rita C. Alves, M. Beatriz P.P. Oliveira,Celestino Santos-Buelga, Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira.
Mountain Research Center (CIMO), ESA, Polytechnic Institute of Bragana, Campus de Santa Apolnia, 1172, 5301-855 Bragana, Portugal. REQUIMTE, Science Chemical Department, Faculty of Pharmacy of University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal GIP-USAL, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Food Chemistry 156 (2014) 339346 Elsevier Publishing Group
PONTIFCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATLICA DO PARAN ESCOLA DE SADE E BIOCINCIAS FARMCIA E BIOQUMICA
Kanchan Chopra, C H Hanumantha Rao-Growth, Equity, Environment and Population - Economic and Sociological Perspectives (Studies in Economic and Social Development) (2008)