Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A
s
I
s
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
L
o
o
s
e
F
i
t
T
i
g
h
t
F
i
t
As Is Requirements
Analysis is Critical
As Is Requirements
Analysis is not
Necessary
165
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
As Is
Consider a firm that performs an as is analysis
and finds a loose fit between existing processes
and the ERP software they choose.
If minimal reengineering is planned, then there may be
a lost chance to choose software that matches their
processes
If extensive reengineering is planned and there is a tight
fit with existing processes, then that close match can
limit their ability to do reengineering and may result in
backsliding.
166
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extent of Change to Organizational Processes Planned
Minimal Extensive
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
F
i
t
o
f
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
t
o
A
s
I
s
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
L
o
o
s
e
F
i
t
T
i
g
h
t
F
i
t
Lost Chance to
Choose Software
that Meets Needs
Potential to Back-
Slide to Existing
Processes
167
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
To Be
If there is only limited change of the
software planned then the To Be model is
basically constrained to the processes
available in the software
If the software is to be modified, then the
to be model becomes more like a clean
slate analysis, since the choices are beyond
the software.
168
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extent of Change to Software Planned
Minimal Extensive
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
F
i
t
o
f
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
t
o
T
o
B
e
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
L
o
o
s
e
F
i
t
T
i
g
h
t
F
i
t
To Be Analysis is
Technology-Enabled
Portfolio Choice
To Be Analysis
is Clean Sheet
Reengineering
169
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Two Dimensions ...
There are two dimensions of change
Change in Software
Change in Organizational Processes
Resulting in reengineering ranging from
little r to big R reengineering.
170
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extent of Change to Software
Minimal Extensive
E
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
Small r
Big R
171
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Minimal Organization and
Software Change
Small r reengineering offers fast and
cheaper implementation
However, with small r, you miss the chance
to be a champion
Extent of Change to Software
Minimal Extensive
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
O
r
g
.
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
Small r
Big R
172
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extensive Organizational and
Minimal Software
SAP customers often have to change their
businesses to use the software, but the cost
and the change is worth it because the
software lets the company operate more
efficiently.
Extent of Change to Software
Minimal Extensive
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
O
r
g
.
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
Small r
Big R
173
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extensive Organizational and
Minimal Software
Trash Hauler industry taking SAP software to the
dump. Allied Waste and Waste Management have
abandoned their SAP initiatives because
SAP expects you to change
your business to go with
the way the software
works.
Extent of Change to Software
Minimal Extensive
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
O
r
g
.
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
Small r
Big R
174
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Minimal Organizational and
Extensive Software
A project manager at Nestles indicated that their
choice of processes for their SAP implementations
included best practices beyond those included in
the software.
Some of their existing processes
and best practices from their consultants
database of best practices
were chosen, forcing a
change in the software.
Extent of Change to Software
Minimal Extensive
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
O
r
g
.
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
Small r
Big R
175
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Disadvantages
We have learned the hard way, if you modify the software
there will be a cost. The cost comes when you do the
modification initially, when you do an upgrade, and when
you support the software over time. ...
Customization to different divisional requirements also can
make it difficult to implement the software in other
divisions. Although the manager of SAP services at Deere
Co. indicated that for their ERP project, the customizations
went well, it was also noted (Lamonica 1998)
... what hasnt worked well is establishing standards and templates
that can be rolled out to other divisions.
176
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extensive Organization and
Extensive Software
Boeing and BAAN What was the payoff?
As noted by one Boeing
consultant (Busse 1998),
Prior to ... (the new system)
... people had tunnel vision,
now people see up and
downstream ...
Extent of Change to Software
Minimal Extensive
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
O
r
g
.
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
Small r
Big R
177
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extensive Organization and
Extensive Software
Advantages: First mover advantages for the
adopter; development of a package that can
be sold to similar firms to the ERP firm;
costs and risks are shared by both
Disadvantages: Changing software is
expensive and inhibits ability to get to next
version. Adopters are likely large firms
with market power.
178
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Evolution from Big R to Small r
Reengineering
In some cases, ERP firms partner with
implementing firm in an effort to expand
the product capabilities.
Extensive software changes can result in
industry specific versions of the software
As the software is made to conform with
unique industry requirements, it becomes
small r for those on the third or fourth wave.
179
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Implementation Failure and
Success Factors
The highest probability of a successful
implementation is when there is minimal
change to both organization and software.
This does not mean all organizations should
pursue that approach.
Change to organization processes can mean
resistance to change, choice of the wrong
best practices, etc.
180
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Implementation Failure and
Success Factors
Extensive change to software draws heavily
on the organization to implement large IT
projects and IT change management
See diagram
Bottom line, firms must assess what will
make their implementation successful?
181
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Which Quadrant Which
Approach?
Depends which is best for your firm?
Highest Probability
of Successful
Implementation
Small r
Potential Project
Failure because of
Process Changes
Potential Project
Failure because of
Process Changes and
IT Changes to Software
BIG R
Potential Project
Failure because of IT
Changes to Software
Extent of Change to Software
Minimal Extensive
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
O
r
g
.
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
182
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Chapter 10
Designing ERP Systems
Part II
183
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Models
Organization models (e.g., B2C, B2B,
Auctions, Centralized, Decentralized)
Artifacts
(e.g., Charts of accounts and Vendor numbering
schemes)
Processes
(Sales order, Customer management,
Procurement)
What are MAPs?
184
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Why are MAPs important?
MAPs (Models, Artifacts and Processes)
The quality of the MAPs will have a huge impact
on the overall success of the ERP implementation.
MAPs that are not efficient or effective for a particular
firm can drag down the overall performance of that
firm.
Similarly, MAPs that meet the needs of a firm can push
it to better performance, giving it a competitive edge.
185
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Where do MAPs come from?
Nestles decided that it would implement common MAPs
in all three of its United States divisions.
Each of the three divisions existing MAPs became
candidates, that would be evaluated.
Both SAP and the advising consultants best practices
databases were used to generate candidates MAPs.
In some cases, hybrid MAPs were developed, based on
multiple sources of information.
A multifunctional team used both sets of inputs to decide
on company standard artifacts and business processes.
186
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Why didnt firms have common
MAPs prior to ERP systems?
There are at least three reasons:
1) technology,
2) exploitation of local differences, and
3) divisional control.
Technology limitations meant each division made their own
decisions
Since each made their own decisions they exploited local
phenomena (e.g., few vendors)
Even common software and computing was hard to integrate.
187
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Why do firms need common
MAPs for ERP?
Basically, the software requires it
Improved customer response
To get control of an out of control process
Generate a common view of the data
Create value and reduce costs
188
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Software Requires it
Owens-Corning traditionally had operated as a
collection of autonomous fiefs. Each plant had
its own product lines, says Domenico Cecere,
president of the roofing and asphalt units. Each
plant also had its own pricing schedules, built up
over the years of cutting unique deals with
customers. ... (SAPs) R/3, however, effectively
demanded that Mr. Ceceres staff come up with a
single product list and a single price list.
189
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Improved Customer Response
Up until now, customers called an Owens -
Corning shingle plant to get a load of shingles,
placed a separate call to order siding, and another
call to order the companys well-known pink
insulation.
(The companys new vision was that) Owens -
Corning should offer one stop shopping for all the
exterior siding, insulation, pipes and roofing
material that builders need.
(SAPs) R/3 will give Owens-Corning the ability
to make that happen by allowing sales people to
see what is available at any plant or warehouse
and quickly assemble orders for customers.
190
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Get Control of Out of Control
Processes
Vandelays sites operations practices were as varied as
their information systems. There was no uniformly
recognized best way to invoice customers, close the
accounts at month end, reserve warehouse inventory for a
customer order or carry out an of the hundreds of other
activities in the production process that required computer
usage or input. ...To alleviate ... problems with systems and
practices, Vandelay decided to purchase and install a single
ERP system, which would incorporate the functions of all
the previously fragmented software. The company would
also standardize practices across sites.
191
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Common View of the Data
Elf Atochem North America Inc.,
Philadelphia ... is moving 13 business units
over to SAP software. ... he came to SAP
because its various companies had been
reorganized to work as one. (As a result,
the company) ... had inherited a lot of
different computer systems, a lot of
different ways of doing business, and a lot
of hand-offs. A common view of diverse
data was important ...
192
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Value Creation and Cost
Reduction
As noted by Pirellis director of information
technology The more standardization there is, the
easier it is to implement new ideas and respond to
new opportunities. In addition, Andreoni notes
that standardization can reduce costs. As an
example, before standardization, Pirelli had a full
service back office and customized software in
each of five countries. ERP software was used to
replace the multiple back office staffs with a
single back office staff in Switzerland, cutting
costs by 25%.
193
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Why is it difficult to choose
common standards?
A Vice President of Red Pepper Software, who
admits that standard ERP artifacts are ... useful
where financial viewers want to consolidate
information across diverse operating units, but ...
the common view may not be optimum for
individual divisions.
Although standardization coming from
implementation of enterprise software by
standardizing processes and artifacts has global
benefits, it comes from sacrificing local
customized capabilities.
194
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How seriously do divisions take
the choice process?
SAP, however, effectively demanded that
Mr. Ceceres staff come up with a single
product list and a single price list. The staff
initially fought ceding control over pricing
and marketing to a computer-wielding
central command. My team would have
killed if wed let them, he says.
195
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
What are some choice
motivations?
Maximize corporate benefits (global good)
Minimize divisional change costs (self
interest)
Rather than maximizing corporate benefits, a
division may work to minimize its change
costs, such as training or hiring.
Divisions unsuccessful in getting their MAPs
adopted can still work to get the MAPs closest
to theirs adopted
196
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Choosing Standard Artifacts and
Processes
Within an ERP, virtually the same processes and artifacts
are used in all locations, i.e., processes and artifacts are
standardized
As a result, potentially this can lead to conflicts
between different business units regarding the choice of
processes & artifacts
Firms refer to this choice as common ... and global
Firms make the choices to facilitate communication and
coordination
197
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Chapter 11
Implementation:
Big Bang vs. Phased
198
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Big Bang vs. Phased
Implementation
Big Bang and Phased are two primary
ways of implementing ERP systems
What do these terms mean?
What are properties of each?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of
each?
How do we take into account organizational
factors with respect to big bang or phased?
What are some additional terms?
199
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Big Bang
In a full big bang, an entire suite of ERP
applications is implemented in all locations
in a matter of days.
Big Bang employs a three step process.
Virtually all processes and artifacts are chosen and
implemented in the software (e.g., 8 months)
System is tested by process and then by interfaces
between processes (e.g., 8 months)
Old system is turned off. New system is then
implemented and minor changes made.
200
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Phased
At the extreme, modules are implemented one at a
time, possibly one location at a time
For example, one implementation did the following:
Phase 1 - Finance, controlling, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, and purchasing (12 months)
Phase 2 - Materials management, production planning and quality
planning (7 months)
Phase 3 - Remainder (5 months)
Using a phased approach, the new system is implemented in
a structure of legacy systems.
201
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Advantages of Big Bang
No Temporary User Interfaces
Limited Need to Maintain and Revise Legacy
Software
Some Risk is Lower
Functionality Linkage
Shorter Implementation Time
Continuity of Personnel
Cost
202
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
No Temporary User Interface
Temporary interfaces must be developed
and maintained for the duration of the
multiple systems with a phased approach,
however, with a big bang approach, there is
no need to build legacy system interfaces
and there is no need to change legacy
systems
203
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Limited Need to Maintain and
Revise Legacy Software
With Big Bang there is limited need to
maintain and revise legacy software.
As a result, all resources can be spent on the
development and testing of the new system.
204
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Some Risk is Lower
The phased approach is riskier, because
you wont get everyone involved.
Since people are not involved they can lose
interest
There is no back-up system with big bang,
so there is little risk of the attitude, Oh,
lets just forget it.
Attrition of critical personnel is lower
205
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Functionality Linkage
ERP systems modules are tightly linked.
Some capabilities require multiple modules
be implemented
As a result, in some cases the fastest way to
get full functionality is a big bang approach.
206
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Shorter Engagement
Implementation Time
Since there is no time spent on temporary
interfaces, the engagement duration time
can be shorter
As a result, there is less time for legacy system
maintenance is required
First Movers advantage is more rapidly attained
Catch-up can be facilitated
207
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Continuity of Personnel
Since engagement duration time is shorter
there is less likelihood of workers leaving in
the middle of the engagement
Also, since experience is not whole till
implementation, there is likely to be less
turnover, during the actual implementation
208
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Cost
Which approach is least costly?
If all goes well the big bang approach is
least costly since there are fewer costs for
interfaces, etc.
209
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Advantages of Phased
Peak Resources are Lower
More resources can be devoted to a particular
module
Some risk is lower
Legacy System Fallback
Personnel gain knowledge in each phase
Project managers can show the system works
Time between development and use is small
210
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Peak Resources are Lower
If a firm has limited resources, then a big
bang approach may not be feasible.
With a phased approach resource
requirements can be spread across multiple
time periods.
211
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
More Resources can be Devoted
to a Particular Module
If the organization is resource constrained
then a big bang approach may not be
possible because of those resource
constraints
However, with Phased, the resource
requirements can also be phased.
212
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Some Risk is Lower
One malfunctioning module in a big bang
can make the implementation fail. Since the
phased approach puts in one module at a
time, that risk is mitigated
If the implementation fails, the phased
approach always has the legacy system in
place until the very end.
213
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Legacy System Fallback
In a big bang, the legacy system is turned
off, there is no alternative if things dont go
well.
With a phased approach an organization can
see if the system works and then turn it off,
or it can run the systems in parallel in order
to check the results.
214
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Personnel gain Knowledge in
Each Phase
In a phased approach, workers gain
knowledge with each phase.
They can use knowledge gained in phase i,
in phase i+1.
215
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Project Managers can show the
System Works
With a phased approach, managers have a
chance to show that the implementation is
working and/or being accepted. As a result,
they can use these results to demonstrate the
quality of the investment to top
management.
216
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Time Between Use and
Development is Small
The linkage between doing the work and
when the module goes live is much tighter
with phased than big bang.
As a result, developers can more easily see the
linkages and the results of their work.
217
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
When should you use Big Bang?
When you have top managements support
When there are sufficient peak resources
available
When capabilities are needed ASAP.
When there is limited time to implement the
system, e.g., first mover or catch up.
218
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
When should you use Phased?
When you need to generate support from
top management
When there are insufficient peak resources
When the all or nothing risk of Big Bang is
too high
When there is plenty of time
219
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Organization Characteristics and
Implementation Approach
Size vs. Complexity
Complexity derives from a number of sources
including an organizations products and
customers. Large customers can dictate
processes, artifacts, etc.
Size of a firm can relate to a number of factors,
such as revenues, number of offices, geographic
regions, number of products or number of
customers.
220
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Large and Complex
Organizations
Its too difficult--especially for large (and
complex) companies--to run a big project ...
and the risks in terms of project
management are huge. ... Huge do-it-all at
once deals are quite tough, and most people
are looking for smaller piece-by-piece
implementations.
221
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Small Large
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
i
t
y
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
S
i
m
p
l
e
Big Bang
Phased
Linkages Between Organization Size and
Complexity and Implementation Approach
Organization Size
222
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Organization Characteristics and
Implementation Approach
Both Organization Structure vs. Organization
Controls influence whether a big bang or phased
would work better.
Organization structure can be very flat or tall and
hierarchical
Organizational controls can be loose or tight
If a company has a flat organization that is not tightly
controlled, its very difficult to sustain commitment
throughout a phased implementation.
223
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extent of Controls
Loose Tight
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
T
a
l
l
F
l
a
t
Big Bang
Phased
Linkages Between Organization Hierarchy
and Control, and Implementation Approach
224
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
System Change and
Reengineering
Number of Modules
Firms dont always put in all the modules.
With few modules, they can almost guarantee
the ability to go big bang
Extent of Reengineering, e.g., System Fit
To what extent does the system meet the needs
of the company as is?
225
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Extent of Change To Be Made
To ERP Modules
Minimal Extensive
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
M
o
d
u
l
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
y
F
e
w
Linkages Between Implementation
Approach and ERP Modules
Big
Bang
Phased
226
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Alternative Implementation
Issues
Waved Approach
Aggressive Implementation
Running in Parallel
Many big bangs
227
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Waved Approach
Each wave delivers functionality to a
different business unit or geographical area
Example:
Year One - implement G/L
Year Two - Convert A/R and cost management
228
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Waved Approach
Advantages of Waves
Waves provide feedback as to how the
implementation is proceeding
Employees learn in the beginning of the wave
and leverage that learning
Each successful wave keeps momentum going
Waves are flexible. If new releases occur then
they can be embedded in the waves
229
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Aggressive Implementation
Not big bang, but more aggressive than
phased
Temporary links really are temporary.
Aggressive plans are made to release legacy
system
230
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Run in Parallel
If the legacy system is allowed to run at the
same time as the new system then the two
systems can run in parallel.
There are some advantages and
disadvantages of this approach
Advantages: can go back, can check results
Disadvantages: costly, may inhibit new system
231
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Multiple Big Bangs
Increasingly, firms are beginning to say that
they are doing a big bang implementation,
in phases.
This is a break from the classic big bang
and phases, basically big banging around
the world, from one division to another.
232
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Chapter 12
Post-Implementation
233
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
The Stabilization Period
Lasts from 3 to 9 months
Most companies should expect some dip in
performance at the time they go live and should
expect that theyll need to manage through that
dip.
Why?
New software and processes for users
System bugs
Technical issues
234
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Post-Support from ERP Team
Detecting and responding to system bugs
Answering user questions
Changing system parameters
Responding to changing reporting needs
Upgrading the software/hardware
235
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
What Remains to be Done?
Data conversion (migration of data from
legacy to ERP system)
Cleansing data
Reconciling data
Process Bottlenecks
Talk to users about problems
Analyze error and complaint logs
Documentation and Training
236
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Linkages, Upgrades &
Extensions
Creating interfaces and linkages to other
systems
Upgrading to different system versions must
be made so that additional features can be
implemented
Building-in new features and functions
beyond upgrades
237
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Evaluate Success
Timing
When benefits could be realized and measured
During the 1
st
or 2
nd
year AFTER going live
Determining if the system meets the criteria
set out for it in the beginning (choice
rationale)
Independent measures or a weighted
portfolio of measures?
238
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Weighted Portfolio
Attribute Rating Weighting Product
Ease of use 4 .10 .40
Speed of closing 3 .20 .60
Internal Integration 5 .15 .75
Customer Satisfaction 4 .20 .80
Duration 4 .10 .40
Cost 2 .15 .30
Benefit 3 .10 .30
Total (Possible 5.0 points) 1.00 3.65
(1-5 Scale)
239
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Actual vs Expected Project Factors
(Austin and Cotteleer 1999)
Duration Cost Benefit
< 50% 0.0 0.0 6.0
50% - 100% 25.0 13.5 65.5
100% - 124% 5 27.5 43.0 8.5
125% - 149% 4 25.0 24.5 14.5
150% - 174% 3.0 8.0 0.0
175% - 199% 16.5 2.5 3.0
> 200% 3.0 8.0 3.0
240
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Balance Scorecard
Financial Customer
Learning &
Growth
Internal Business
Processes
241
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Post-Implementation Budget
There must be a budget and corresponding
plan to support the complete project.
Complete project management means
managing through the entire project life
cycle.
242
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Chapter 13
Training
243
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Importance of Training
The easiest mistake to make is underestimating
the time and cost of training end users.
An implementation will be a failure if the software
runs perfectly, but employees dont know how to
use it.
Despite the importance associated with the need
for ERP training, a recent survey found that in a
Benchmarking Partners survey of 150 sites, 43%
indicated that the amount of training was the
biggest surprise encountered.
244
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
FAQ Regarding Training
How should user training be timed?
How much training should users get?
How do you make up time spent on training?
When should you do training?
How do you get employees to do training?
How much should training cost?
What is in the training material: information technology or
business materials?
How should you structure training?
Can you develop faster training?
245
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How Should Training Be Timed?
Training that occurs too early before the go
live date will be forgotten.
Training that occurs too late, will not be
done in time, and can cause a lengthy
stabilization period.
As one example of trying to find the right
time, Purina Mills started to train users four
months in advance on SAPs R/3.
246
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How Much Training Should
Users Get?
The amount of training required is a function of
the particular module for which users are being
trained.
In some cases it can take up to six months for users to
get comfortable and proficient with the ERP software.
As another example, at Purina Mills during their SAP
R/3 implementation, a group of finance workers spent
seven hours per day during the last month before the
system went live.
247
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How Do You Make Up Time
Spent on Training?
Time spent on training is time not spent on day-to-
day activities.
Not surprisingly there have been a number of
different solutions used to ensure that workers get
enough time off for training.
At Purina Mills managers put in extra hours in order to
accommodate training hours.
At Microsoft users were expected to do both jobs by
putting in extra hours.
Still other firms have made use of temporary
employees.
248
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
When Should You Do Training?
Training scheduled during working hours
indicates the importance of the training. Training
scheduled outside working hours suggests training
is not as important as day-to-day responsibilities.
A CIO was told by corporate that eighty hours of
education was necessary. However, he felt that the
eighty hours of education would not be necessary for
his employees and that the training could not be done
during normal working hours. As a result, he was
planning for his employees come in on Saturday and
Sundays on three successive weekends in order to the
training.
249
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How Do You Get Employees to
Do Training?
User ERP training might get pushed aside if firms
do not ensure that users take it seriously. As a
result, firms have introduced different penalties
and incentives.
For example, during Microsofts SAP implementation,
training was deemed mandatory for certain critical
users. Users that did not attend training were
threatened with having their computer accounts turned
off. As noted by a senior accounting manager (Bashein
et al. 1997, p. 71), We only had to turn of 20 or so
accounts.
250
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How Much Should Training Cost?
How close was the cost of user training and other ERP
deployment expenses to your original estimate?
More than 50% above expectations 8%
10% to 50% above expectations 26%
Within 10% of expectations 58%
More than 10% below expectations 6%
Dont Know 2%
Based on 50 large United States Companies surveyed in August 1998.
Source Forrester Research. Inc., Cambridge Massachusetts.
251
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
What is in the Training Materials:
IT or Business?
Training users on how to use an ERP system is a
mix of technology, processes and domain area
content in order to provide a context for the
system.
ERP Hokey Pokey, where users are advised, you put
your right hand on the ...,
As part of the Microsoft SAP implementation, a senior
accounting manager noted (Bashein et al. 1997, p. 71),
Ive taught a six hour course on entering journal
entries into SAP 20 times now. It was as much a
general ledger course as a system tool course.
252
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How Should You Structure
Training?
One approach that consistently is well accepted is
when a member or a group of members of the
client organization are chosen as super users,
who then can be responsible for training others.
This approach has been found to facilitate buy-in from
the users, because the people doing the training are
people that the users know.
Because there are super users, the other users see that
learning about the system can be important.
Developing super users develops an important
understanding at the user level.
253
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Can You Develop Faster Training?
Because ERP engagements often are behind
schedule, firms try to speed their training.
The ability of firms to speed up training depends on the
firms needs, personnel and previous training. Some
personnel are likely to be quicker learners or able to
spend more time than other personnel. Further, in some
cases if system use is similar to other systems that have
been used then training is likely to be able to go faster.
However, trying to speed training is potentially
dangerous, with a high cost of failure.
254
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Chapter 14
ERP: The Backbone of
Electronic Commerce
255
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Purpose of this Talk
The purpose of this talk is to discuss how
... ERP is a building block of E-business
(Director of E Business Applications-3Com)
Outline
Building Blocks of E-commerce
ERP and Customer Ordering
ERP and Vendor Managed Inventories
Integrating with Resellers
256
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Building Blocks of E-Commerce
E-commerce functions best if there is
Real Time Information
Ability to Communicate System to System
System Use is Widely Available
Can ERP meet those demands?
257
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Real Time Information
ERP provides a clearing house of real time
up-to-date information necessary for
e-commerce
Inventory Information (so they know what is
available to sell)
Pricing Information
Configuration Information (necessary for
requirements planning)
258
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Communication Between
Systems
Historically, EDI (electronic data
interchange) has been the source of
communication of information
Increasingly, WFT (web forms technology)
is the source of communication of
information
259
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
EDI
EDI uses data in standard chunks, sequence and
format (e.g., invoices)
EDI is typically done using a VAN (value added
network)
EDI is so important that in one survey it was
found to be the added on to ERP systems more
than any other additional solution.
Large-scale business-to-business customers will
integrate their purchasing and ERP systems with
our systems, so it will be completely computer-to-
computer. (Dell Computer)
260
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Problems with EDI
Since EDI is really a serial process and basically
dictates certain times that you do things, we will
eventually have to migrate to an Internet/web-
based type of transaction with our suppliers and
our customers. (Compaq)
Midsize and small businesses wont have
elaborate hookups ..., so theyll use Premier Pages
(WFT) as one of their predominant methods.
(Dell)
Traditional EDI is too costly. Increasingly firms
are using EDI over the Internet.
261
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
WFT
WFT is typically used in an Internet/
Intranet/Extranet environment
WFT may not be directly interfaced with
other applications and databases
WFT use has exploded
262
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Problems with WFT
WFT is primarily useful in those settings were the
originator has only a few orders, but the receiving
firm has many orders.
If the originator firm has many transactions then
the WFT ordering process may be too costly and
time consuming.
Not only must the order be made using WFT to the
vendor by the customer, but then the originator must
update their own system.
Thus, using WFT can cause double the data entry time,
and require a larger number of people.
263
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Widely Available and Easy to
Access
Ideally, users can access the ERP system
over the Internet in order to place orders.
Fujitsu PC Corporation uses its ERP and other
configuration software to allow the user (either
a Fujitsu sales representative, a reseller or end
user) to order over the web.
Cambridge Partners recently commented
that at the moment you need to be in the
office to use ERP.
264
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Emerging Environment
One approach has been to provide a different kind
of access to client server in an environment where
the user only needs a browser and Internet access.
The user has Internet access to a time shared
client, that interacts directly with a server in an
appropriate standard environment.
Using this approach, eliminates much of the
standardization that can be required at the user level in
client server computing. This approach also extends
classic client server to a timesharing model that is
analogous to mainframe computing.
265
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
ERP and Customer Ordering
Facilitating commerce is one of the most
important tasks in commerce
Unfortunately, it often is filled with errors.
For example, Cisco found that 25% to 33% of
the orders made by faxes had errors in them.
How could e-commerce solve the problem?
What was the problem?
266
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
What is the Impact of Errors?
Errors ultimately can delay the shipment or cause
an error in the pricing.
As customers found out about errors in the orders,
they found it necessary to contact Cisco about
their orders to make sure that orders got in the
system correctly
These requests required increases in Ciscos personnel
in order to respond to customer inquiries, raising costs
and slowing down the process of getting goods to the
customer.
267
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
One of Ciscos first E-Commerce
Applications
Using the web, customers were able to gather
information from Ciscos ERP system that would
allow them to track and price their orders to see if
they were correct and to see what the status was
Information was available seven days a week and
twenty-four hours per day.
This reduced Ciscos need to have personnel available
to help track the orders and answer customer questions.
Customer support had been shifted to the customer.
268
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
What was the next step?
Should it have been first?
Perhaps a more important question was
How can you eliminate errors to begin
with? In Ciscos second year, their goal
was to eliminate the errors and allow the
customer to make anytime anywhere
ordering over the Internet
Accessing information from the ERP
customers were permitted to originate,
configure, price and place the order.
269
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How did they get customers to
use it?
Cisco guaranteed that pricing and
configuration would be accurate, if the
customer used the web application. Within
only four months in 1996, 10% of the orders
were done over the Internet. By 1999, 85%
of the orders came in over the Internet
270
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How did they do it?
The systems accuracy derives from the
configuration engine (CE). The CE
examines orders to find common errors. If
errors are found then the engine wont let
the customer make the order. The CE
examines all available account information
and purchase information, in order to find,
e.g., incorrect part numbers.
What else can be done to facilitate orders?
271
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Problem
Purchasing is done using Ciscos system
and not the customers system so the
customer needs to put the same information
in their own ERP system.
272
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Solution: Eliminate Need for
Duplicate Entry
Cisco began working with their biggest customers
to integrate order information into the customers
purchasing system, e.g., the customers ERP
system.
Once a day, new configuration, order and pricing
information is made available to those special
customers.
Now those customers can place orders from the
familiar systems that they use every day.
273
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
ERP and Vendor Managed
Inventories (VMI)
Under Ciscos model, the customer does the
ordering.
However, in many settings, the order
process has been shifted from the customer
to the vendor.
For example, in the case of Procter & Gamble
(P&G), P&G ultimately monitored demand and
took responsibility for keeping its products on
the shelves
274
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
How is VMI Accomplished?
VMI is accomplished by providing vendors real
time access to necessary information.
Access must be electronic and the information must be
up-to-date or else the quality of the inventory decisions
can be limited, a particularly important limitation when
the vendor is managing the inventory.
In an ERP-based world there are two solutions
designed to facilitate VMI:
Integrating through access to ordering data
Direct ERP to ERP connection.
275
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Provide Vendor with Direct
Access to Data Warehouse
Weve also custom-developed some tools
that sit on top of the SAP ... system to give
us a data warehouse capability. ... We
developed an EDI capability that feeds into
our data warehouse. Every week our
suppliers use EDI to report on their delivery
capability and status (Compaq)
276
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
ERP to ERP Connections
Colgates plan is to use its network to get a
peek at customers stockpiles, while
allowing its supplier to look at Colgates
inventory as well. The company is even
supplying its most critical suppliers with
computers loaded with R/3 system and
plugged directly into the Colgate system.
277
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
BTF or BTI vs. BTO
BTF--Build to Forecast; BTI--Build to
Inventory
BTO -- Build to Order
Wait till there is an order before the goods are
built, e.g., computers.
BTO replaces inventory with information
systems technology
278
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
BTO and ERP
A critical part of BTO is the configuration engine,
that provides the detailed inventory items in the
product that is being built. For example, if a
computer is being built the configuration engine
would detail the processes, hard drive, etc.
The new configuration model links to Compaqs
SAP model with information on capacity to build
and components on hand. On-line real time
capability of ERP is necessary to provide the
information needed for BTO.
279
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
ERP to ERP BTO
Now picture an integrated world, where
essentially the ... customers ERP system
automatically creates an order. It is by definition
correct. The order cant be technically incorrect
because the systems are talking to each other --
theres no human element. The order goes straight
down to the production line and, potentially 20
seconds later, the machine starts getting built, so
youve eliminated a terrific amount of cycle time.
280
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
ERP to ERP BTO
On the back end of that, the moment the
machine is finished being built, it gets
shipped to the customer. The invoices get
electronically transmitted right back into the
customers system, so the credit collection
period starts immediately. The only limit is
how long it takes to physically build the
machine. (Dell)
281
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Integrating with Outsourcers or
Resellers
Rather than forwarding resellers orders
directly to the plants, orders can be routed
to a distributors ERP system. That way a
distributor can add features, such as offering
the reseller a discount if it purchases a
certain number of products. (Cisco)
282
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
E-Commerce
Effective e-commerce happens because of
information availability
ERP provides a wide range of information
availability in real time
ERP is the backbone of E-commerce
283
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Chapter 15
ERP Risk
284
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Types of Risk
Risk occurs throughout the ERP life cycle
Types of risk and extent of their impact vary as
we move through the ERP life cycle
Three basic types of risk
Technical
Business
Organizational
285
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding to
go ERP
Choosing an
ERP System
Designing
Implementing
After Going
Live
Training
Risk Matrix
286
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Risk Definitions
Technical risk - risks arising due to
information processing technology, sensor
technology, and telecommunication technology
Business risk - risks deriving from models,
artifacts and processes adopted as part of ERP
Do they match? Are they consistent? Do partners
processes match up?
Organizational risk - risks deriving from the
environment in which the system is placed -
including personnel and organization structure
287
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
What is the perceived risk of
ERP projects? (%s)
Risk Technical Business Organizational
Very Low 10.5 4.5 1.5
Low 22.5 23.0 8.5
Moderate 39.5 32.5 18.5
High 15.0 26.0 37.5
Very High 11.5 14.5 35.0
288
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Summary of Survey Findings
Organization risk is the biggest risk -- the
most likely to be seen as high or very
high
Business risk is the next biggest risk
Technical risk is the smallest of the bunch,
with 72.5% rated very low to moderate.
Technical risk is also the easiest to fix, e.g., just
choose more power.
289
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Technical Risks
As the firm adopts new technologies, there
are a number of risks that are common to
each phase of the life cycle
Operating Systems
Client Server Computing
Network Capabilities
Database
Links to other systems
290
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Operating Systems
Operating systems include Unix, Linux,
Windows NT, Windows 2000
Different systems require different
knowledge
Need to employ people who understand that
operating system
Microsofts SAP implementation was the
first to use NT as an operating system
291
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Client Server
Dominant form of computing used in ERP
However, firms expertise may be with mainframe
computing
As a result, there may be a limited set of personnel for
the new computing environment
Mainframes are typically bullet-proof, whereas
client servers are frequently at the opposite end of
the spectrum in terms of controls.
292
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Client/Server Configuration
Data
Management
Application
Function
Presentation
Presentation
Data
Management
Application
Function
Presentation
Data
Management
Application
Function
Presentation
Data
Management
Application
Function
Presentation
Data
Management
Presentation
Data
Management
Application
Function
Application
Function
Distributed
Presentation
(Thin Client)
Distributed
Presentation
(Fat Client)
Remote
Presentation
Distributed
Application
Remote
Data Mgmt
293
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Network Capabilities
Issues include security and capacity of the
network to facilitate use of the ERP system
294
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Not Linked Linked
Highest Risk
(Highest Potential Gain)
Lowest Risk
(Lowest Potential Gain)
Integrated
Stand Alone
Linked to Other Applications
C
o
m
p
u
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
295
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Technical Risks and
ERP Life Cycle
Deciding to go ERP
Firms that have kept up with technology are likely to
better understand the risks associated with ERP
systems.
Try to see what has worked in the past
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
296
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Technical Risks and
ERP Life Cycle
Choosing an ERP system
Virtually all software choice can be manipulated, since
it is a political process
Requirements change as new technology becomes
available.
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
297
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Technical Risks
and ERP Life Cycle
Designing
One company designed an ERP contract based
on computing capacity, so the vendor had to fix
any problems with insufficient capacity
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
298
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Technical Risks
and ERP Life Cycle
Implementing and Going-Live
Upon implementation and going-live, capacity
six transactions a minute 360 per hour
or 3600 for a ten hour day was not enough
Needed more network capacity
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
299
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Technical Risks
and ERP Life Cycle
Training
Risk that mainframe IS personnel might have to
be re-tooled to client-server technology
ERP system may require different technical
people with different skills
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
300
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Business Risks
Deciding whether or not to do ERP
Must have the resources to do the project
Firms get going on ERP and then find that they
dont have the resources.
This typically means that either the organization
fails or the project fails.
Must meet needs of the business
What is needed by the firms partners?
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
301
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Business Risks
Choosing an ERP System
Determine specific requirements, e.g.,
transaction handling capabilities
Fox Meyer - system could do 10,000 invoice lines,
but they needed 420,000
The business risk is that the ERP Vendor can
not meet the companys needs
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
302
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Business Risks
ERP Design
Design is a political process. As a result, there is a risk
that the design is sub-optimal.
There is also the risk that processes designed by one
group in the organization will not interface well with
processes designed by other groups.
There is the risk of project stopping
This project would have changed how people work and
reduced staffing by half. It was the easiest thing to cut because
people did not have the stomach for it
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
303
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Business Risks
Implementing
The project will take longer than expected
The project will cost more than expected
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
304
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Business Risks
Going Live
If the ERP is not working properly, there could
be problems with customers and suppliers.
Hershey Foods Inc. lost most of their
Halloween, Thanksgiving and Christmas sales
due to a poorly functioning ERP system.
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
305
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Business Risks
Training
Training should provide users with process and
system information
The main business risk is that timing is too
short and too late.
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
306
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Organizational Risks
Deciding whether or not to do ERP
Reportedly, one of the biggest risks is that top
management is not involved.
Another risk is that the domain areas are not
involved and committed (Microsoft)
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
307
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Organizational Risks
Choosing an ERP System
Choosing the right consultant is the biggest
challenge (Risk)
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
308
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Organizational Risks
ERP Design and Implementation
Models of organizations are built into the
software, as a result, there are risks that the
models do not match (e.g., Microsoft)
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
309
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Organizational Risks
Going Live
Cultural issues that relate to big R
reengineering create organizational risk.
One firm went from compensation based on number
of units sold to salary to accommodate the ERP
system
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training
310
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, D. E. OLeary, 2000
Organizational Risks
Training
Employees not accustomed to data input will
take on the task.
If users dont know how to use the system, it
will fail.
There may be inadequately trained personnel
after implementation due to poor training or
attrition.
Technical Business Organizational
Deciding
Choosing
Designing
Implementing
Going Live
Training