Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
3368
PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC
RELATIONS
The PR Planning Process: Step 1
Agenda
1. Exam
2. Break
3. Housekeeping
4. The PR Planning Process
sues
5. Next week
Proactive
Functionary
Functional
The Four-Step
Public
Relations
Planning
Process
Evaluation
How did we do?
Situation
Analysis
Whats happening
now?
Implementatio
n
Putting the plan in
action.
Strategy
What should we do
and say? Why, how
and when?
Situation
Analysis
Assessment
Research
Whats happening
now?
Strategy
Planning
Analyze
What should we do
and say? Why, how
and when?
Implementation
Action
Communicate
Putting the plan in
action.
Step 4: Evaluating
the Program
Evaluation
Assessment
Evaluate
How did we do?
Research
The systematic gathering of information to
describe and understand situations
check out assumptions about publics and public
relations consequences
reduce uncertainty in decision making
The scientific alternative to intuition.
The foundation of effective public relations practice.
Time 1
Implementation
Time 1a
Time 1b
Before
During
Define problem
Formulate strategy
Impact
Time 2
After
Measure and
document impact
and effectiveness
Research
is critical to PR practitioners role as
environmental scanners
issues managers
involves
fact-finding
listening
asking and being prepared to listen
is a method of structuring systematic listening into the
communication process
Listening
the process of receiving, constructing meaning from and
responding to spoken or non/verbal messages
70-80% of our waking hours are spent communicating.
Listening is 45% of communication.
Opposing ideas passing each other across one-way
channels doesnt count as communication.
A failure to listen is a failure to communicate
often leading to purposeless pseudo-communication on
non-existent issues to unaffected publics.
Defining a PR problem
begins with a judgment that something
is wrong or could be wrong
could be better
needs to be addressed
uses the organizations mission, vision and goals as
benchmarks
Goal states serve as a basis for determining what needs
to happen.
1. Problem statement
A concise description of the situation
Written in the present tense
Whats happening now?
no will, should or could
Describes the situation in specific and measurable terms
What is the source of concern?
Where is this a problem?
When is it a problem?
Who is involved or affected?
How are they involved or affected?
Why is this a concern to the organization and its publics?
Does not imply solutions or place blame
2. Situational analysis
A collection of what is known about the situation,
providing needed background and detail
Internal factors
organizational procedures and policies
perceptions and actions by key internal players and
publics
history of the organizations relationship to this
issue
communications audit
2. Situational analysis
External factors (positive and negative)
Stakeholder analysis
o Who are the key stakeholders in this issue?
o What is the organizations current relationship with this public?
o How do organizational goals, decisions, policies, procedures,
actions affect this relationship?
Information issues
o How much do people use information in the problem situation?
o What kinds do they use or seek?
o How do people use information?
o What predicts information use?
o Why is often left out.
Programs are more effective when they respond to stakeholder
needs, not the organizations.
2. Situational Analysis
Weaknesses
Strengths
SWOT
Opportunities
Threats
SO strategies
build on
organizational
strengths to take
advantage of
opportunities in the
external environment
ST strategies
build on
organizational
strengths to counter
threats in the external
environment
WO strategies
attempt to minimize
organizational
weaknesses to take
advantage of external
opportunities
WT strategies
attempt to minimize
both organizational
weaknesses and
threats in the external
environment
Research
You cannot practice public relations today
successfully or effectively without research.
begins with a clear statement of the problem
two categories
informal
formal
Informal Research
exploratory in nature
Informal Research
Methods of informal research
Personal contact and observation
acquiring firsthand knowledge in the trenches
trade shows
stockholder meetings
meetings with media editorial boards
Key informants or key communicators
selecting and talking to opinion leaders and knowledgeable
experts
representatives key publics in a particular situation
opinions may not reflect those of less-informed people
Informal Research
Focus groups
structured approach to gathering data from a group (usually 612)
can result in open, spontaneous discussions and uncover
unexpected attitudes and opinions
relatively quick turn and inexpensive
needs a well-trained moderator
online community networks can utilize much larger groups
Community forums
public hearings
town hall meetings
community engagement meetings
pseudo-participation
participation
information-only
consultation
full
Informal Research
Advisory committees and boards
ongoing feedback measure
effective for increasing interaction, participation and indepth discussion of issues
organization must be sincere about input and guidance
Ombudspersons
investigate and solve problems
can facilitate feedback and awareness of issues
may be perceived as protecting the organization and its
policies
may actually be protecting the organization and its
policies
Informal Research
Call-in phone lines
instant information, feedback, monitoring
self-selected group giving feedback
have been largely replaced by websites
organizations still monitor incoming phone calls
Mail and email analysis
tends to skew to the critical
helpful in spotting, anticipating and addressing problem areas
can prompt personal responses
Social media and other online sources
Internet and social media monitoring detects whats being said
tap into and be part of rapidly expanding interactive communication
channels
Formal Research
research methodologies that allow the researcher to apply
data to a larger audience
follows scientific or social scientific method
deductive, rather than inductive, in nature
often fails to gain in-depth understanding of the client,
object, or product
Dictionary of Public Relations Measurement and Research, 3rd edition, 2013
Formal Research
uses objective measures
designed to gather data from
an entire population or group (census)
a representative portion of a population (sample)
yields information that describes issues and trends within
established ranges of accuracy and tolerance for error
helps practitioners make accurate statements about publics
based on evidence drawn from scientifically representative
samples
Formal Research
Methods of formal research
Secondary analysis and online databases
utilizes existing data
census data and other government statistic
national opinion poll data (Nielsen, Gallup, Roper, Harris)
state and municipal agencies
university research
news organizations
data published in research journals
online data bases
Formal Research
Content analysis
method of objectively determining what is being reported
in the media
more systematic approach than random scanning
no measure of what is read or heard, nor how audiences
react to content
provides insight into what might be on the public agenda
in the future
Formal Research
Surveys
systematic queries of the population under study
various forms
o mailed
o in-person
o telephone
o online
o longitudinal studies (trend and panel surveys)
Mail surveys
In person
Telephone
Longitudinal
Online
Panel Studies
relatively
inexpensive
greater anonymity
can choose when to
answer
no interviewer bias
access to
respondents
unavailable by
phone
no control over
return
low response rate
response may not
reflect a statistically
valid sample
lack of control over
conditions
no opportunity to
clarify questions
availability of
higher response
rates
greater flexibility in
dealing with
respondents
more control over
conditions, order of
questions
can observe and
record non-verbal
responses
higher cost
respondents reaction
to interviewer
greater
inconvenience for
respondents
difficulty of contacting
and reluctance
possibility of
interviewer bias
faster
more cost-effective
greater anonymity
for respondents
difficulties in sample
selection
difficulties in
reaching
respondents
possibility of
interviewer bias
very inexpensive
extremely fast
respondents accessed
via email
survey instrument
accessed via a URL
extremely easy to
prepare data
obtaining sampling
frames and emails
junk mail filters
low response rates
Trend Studies
uses different samples
from the same
population to track
changes in public
knowledge, opinion or
behavior
eliminates the
problems of mortality
and sensitization
Next week
Guest speaker
The Public Relations Process, Step 2: Planning
and Programming
Read Chapter 12 in text
Check Blackboard by Wednesday for reading
update
PR blog #5 is due