Writing Proposal

Writing Ideas

Ethical Issues to Anticipate

 Argumen yg disajikan dlm Proposal

Meliputi pertanyaan ttg:
1. What do readers need to better understand
your topic?
2. What do readers need to know about your
topic?
3. What do you propose to study?
4. What is the setting, and who are the people
you will study?
5. What methods do you plan to use to collect
data?
6. How will you analyze the data?
7. How will you validate your findings?
8. What ethical issues will your study present?
9. What do preliminary results show about the
practicability and value of the proposed
study?

Dasar penelitian
Memberikan struktur yg utuh secara
keseluruhan bagi proposal
Memfokuskan perhatian pembaca pd
elemen2 kunci yg sering dilewatkan dlm
diskusi ttg proyek yg diusulkan

Format for a Qualitative Proposal

Constructivist/interpretivist format
Transformative format

Format for a Quantitative Proposal

Conforms to sections typically found in quatitative studies
reported in journal articles.

Format for a Mixed Method Proposal

The researcher brings together approaches that are included on
both the quantitative and qualitative formats
Mixed components

Designing the Sections of a Proposal

o Specify the section in the design of a proposal

o Find proposal that other students have authored under
your adviser, and look at them closely
o Determine whether your program or institution offers a
course on proposal development or some similar topic
o Go over adviser preferred format for a proposal

Voice, Tense, & Fat

Use the active voice deleting the passive voice
Use strong active verbs

Pay close attention to the tense of your verbs

Keeping only one qualifier at best
Eliminating overused phrases completing striking these out
Reducing excessive quotations, use of italics, & parenthetical
comments
Expect to edit & revise drafts of a manuscript to trim the
fat

Where in the Process

of Research the
Ethical Issue Occurs
Prior to Beginning the
Study

Type of Ethical Issue

Beginning the Study

How to Address the Issue

Examine professional association standards

Seek college/university approval on campus
through an institutional review board (IRB)
Gain local permission from site & participants
Select a site without a vested interest in
outcome of study
Negotiate authorship for publication

Identify a research problem that will benefit

participants
Disclose purpose of the study
Do not pressure participants into signing consent
forms
Respect norms & charters of indigenous societies
Be sensitive to needs of vulnerable populations

Collecting Data

Respect the site, & disrupt as little as possible

Make certain that all participants receive the
same treatment
Avoid deceiving participants
Respect potential power imbalances & exploitation
of participants
Do not use participants by gathering data &
leaving site
Avoid collecting harmful information

Consult the code of ethics for professional association in your area

Submit proposal for IRB approval
Identify and go through local approval; find gatekeepers or key
personnel to help
Select sites that will not raise power issues with researchers
Give credit for work done on the project; decide on author order in
future publication
Conduct a needs assessment or informal conversation with
participants about their needs
Contact participants & inform them of the general purpose of the
study
Tell participants that they do not have to sign form
Find out about cultural, religious, gender & other differences that
need to be respected
Obtain appropriate consent
Build trust, & convey extent of anticipated disruption in gaining
access
Put into place wait list provisions for treatment for controls
Discuss purpose of the study & how data will be used
Avoid leading questions. Withold sharing personal impressions.
Avoid disclosing sensitive information. Involve participants as
collaborators
Provide rewards for participating
Stay to questions stated in an interview protocol

Where in the Process

of Research the
Ethical Issue Occurs

Type of Ethical Issue

How to Address the Issue

Analyzing the Data

Avoid siding with participants (going native)

Avoid disclosing only positive results
Respect the privacy & anonymity of
participants

Report multiple perspectives

Report contrary findings
Assign fictitious names or aliases; develop composite
profiles of participants

Reporting, Sharing, &

Storing Data

Avoid falsifying authorship, evidence, data,

findings, & conclusions
Do not plagiarize
Avoid disclosing information that would
harm participants
Communicate in clear, straightforward,
appropriate language
Share data with others
Keep raw data & other materials
Do not duplicate or piecemeal publications
Provide complete proof of compliance with
ethical issues & lack of conflict of interest,
if request
State who owns the data from a study

Report honestly
See APA (2010) guidelines for permissions needed to
reprint or adapt work of others
Use composite stories so that individuals cannot be
identified
Use unbiased language appropriate for audience of
research
Provide copies of report to participants & stakeholders.
Share results with other researchers. Consider website
distribution. Consider publishing in different languages
Store data & materials for 5 years
Refrain from using the same material for more than one
publication
Disclose funders for research. Disclose who will profit
from the research
Give credit for ownership to researcher, participants, &
advisers