Sunteți pe pagina 1din 24

Correlations and

Copulas
Chapter 6

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.1

Coefficient of Correlation

The coefficient of correlation between two


variables V1 and V2 is defined as

E (V1V2 ) E (V1 ) E (V2 )


SD(V1 ) SD(V2 )
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.2

Independence

V1 and V2 are independent if the


knowledge of one does not affect the
probability distribution for the other

f (V2 V1 x) f (V2 )
where f(.) denotes the probability density
function
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.3

Independence is Not the Same as


Zero Correlation

Suppose V1 = 1, 0, or +1 (equally likely)


If V1 = -1 or V1 = +1 then V2 = 1
If V1 = 0 then V2 = 0
V2 is clearly dependent on V1 (and vice
versa) but the coefficient of correlation is
zero

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.4

Types of Dependence
E(Y)

E(Y)
X

(a)

(b)
E(Y)
X

(c)
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.5

Monitoring Correlation Between


Two Variables X and Y
Define xi=(Xi-Xi-1)/Xi-1 and yi=(Yi-Yi-1)/Yi-1
Also
varx,n: daily variance of X calculated on day n-1
vary,n: daily variance of Y calculated on day n-1
covn: covariance calculated on day n-1
The correlation is
covn
varx ,n vary ,n
Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.6

Monitoring Correlation continued


EWMA:
covn covn 1 (1 ) xn 1 yn 1

GARCH(1,1)
covn xn1 yn1 covn 1

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.7

Positive Finite Definite Condition


A variance-covariance matrix, W, is
internally consistent if the positive semidefinite condition

w Ww 0
T

holds for all vectors w

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.8

Example
The variance covariance matrix
1

0.9

0
1
0.9

0.9

0.9

is not internally consistent

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.9

V1 and V2 Bivariate Normal

Conditional on the value of V1, V2 is normal with


mean
V1 m1
m2 r
s1
and standard deviation s 2 1 r2 where m1,, m2,
s1, and s2 are the unconditional means and SDs
of V1 and V2 and r is the coefficient of correlation
between V1 and V2

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.10

Multivariate Normal

Many variables can be handled


A variance-covariance matrix defines the
variances of and correlations between
variables
To be internally consistent a variancecovariance matrix must be positive
semidefinite

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.11

Generating Random Samples for


Monte Carlo Simulation

An approximate sample from a standard normal


distribution is
12

Ri 6
i 1

where the Ri are random numbers between 0


and 1
For a multivariate normal distribution a method
known as Choleskys decomposition can be
used to generate random samples

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.12

Factor Models

When there are N variables, Vi (i=1,2,..N),


in a multivariate normal distribution there
are N(N-1)/2 correlations
We can reduce the number of correlation
parameters that have to be estimated with
a factor model

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.13

Factor Models continued

If Ui have standard normal distributions we


can set

U i ai F 1 a Zi
2
i

where the common factor F and the


idiosyncratic component Zi have
independent standard normal distributions
In a multifactor model this becomes
2
U i ai1F1 ai 2 F2 aiM FM 1 ai21 ai22 aiM
Zi

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.14

Gaussian Copula Models:


Creating a correlation structure for variables that are not
normally distributed

Suppose we wish to define a correlation structure


between two variable V1 and V2 that do not have normal
distributions
We transform the variable V1 to a new variable U1 that
has a standard normal distribution on a percentile-topercentile basis.
We transform the variable V2 to a new variable U2 that
has a standard normal distribution on a percentile-topercentile basis.
U1 and U2 are assumed to have a bivariate normal
distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.15

The Correlation structure between the


Vs is define by that between the Us

-0.2

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.2

-0.2

0.2

0.4

V2

V1

0.6

0.8

1.2

One-to-one
mappings

-6

-4

-2

-6

-4

-2

U2

U1
Correlation
Assumption

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.16

Other Copulas

Instead of a bivariate normal distribution


for U1 and U2 we can assume any other
joint distribution
One possibility is the bivariate Student t
distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.17

5000 Random Samples from the


Bivariate Normal
5
4
3
2
1
0
-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

-1
-2
-3
-4
-5

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.18

5000 Random Samples from the


Bivariate Student t
10

0
-10

-5

10

-5

-10

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.19

Multivariate Gaussian Copula

We can similarly define a correlation


structure between V1, V2,Vn
We transform each variable Vi to a new
variable Ui that has a standard normal
distribution on a percentile-to-percentile
basis.
The Us are assumed to have a
multivariate normal distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.20

Factor Copula Model


In a factor copula model the correlation
structure between the Us is generated by
assuming one or more factors.

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.21

Credit Default Correlation

The credit default correlation between two


companies is a measure of their tendency to
default at about the same time
Default correlation is important in risk
management when analyzing the benefits of
credit risk diversification
It is also important in the valuation of some
credit derivatives

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.22

The Model

We map the time to default for company i, Ti, to a


new variable Ui and assume

U i ai F 1 a Z i
2
i

where F and the Zi have independent standard


normal distributions
Define Qi as the cumulative probability distribution
of Ti
Prob(Ui<U) = Prob(Ti<T) when N(U) = Qi(T)

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.23

The Model continued


U a F
i

Prob(U i U F ) N
2
1 ai
Hence
N 1 Q (T ) a F
i
i

Prob(Ti T F ) N
2

1 ai
Assuming the Q ' s and a ' s are the same for all companies
N 1 Q(T ) r F
Prob(Ti T F ) N

1 r

In a large portfolio the1 - X percentile of F gives the X % worstcase


percentageof losses in time T
N 1 Q (T ) r N 1 ( X )
N

Risk Management and Financial Institutions, Chapter 6, Copyright John C. Hull 2006

6.24

S-ar putea să vă placă și