Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SP10 EVIDENCE
Suzaki bin Supok (SP10) was the guard who on duty at the
condominium when the incident happen.
SP10 did not tell the police that he saw the accused and the
deceased that night or at any time until 18.12.2003.
He only disclosed these facts after he was arrested and
remanded as a suspect.
SP10 EVIDENCE
SP11 EVIDENCE
SP11 EVIDENCE
When the police interviewed him for the first time, he did not
tell the Ins. Mohan that he had seen the accused and deceased
talking the four person in the Kancil.
Later, for the second time he did not make any reference to the
accused.Only when he under remand, he made a reference to
the accused.
Later on he said that he saw the Kancil across the road and the
two men and women were chatting with the accused and
deceased for about 10 minutes.
SP11 EVIDENCE
SP11
Sleeveless T-shirt
Colour of The
Accuseds T-shirt
JUDGMENT
In this case both SP10 and SP11 had incredibly changed their
earlier statements to the police on the most crucial aspect of
this case, for reasons which are neither believable nor
acceptable to this court; not counting their legal duty to state
the truth to the police under s. 112 of the Criminal Procedure
Code.
Therefore, the judge rejected the evidence of these two SP10
and SP11 witnesses as being unreliable.