Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Hua YIN
1|
References
This presentation make reference to:
Pharmaceutical packaging - an overview including some considerations
for paediatrics
Dr. Simon Mills .Training workshop: pharmaceutical development with
focus on paediatric formulations, Beijing June 2010.)
Container closure system and product labels
Wondifraw Z. Worku. WHO workshop on assessment of interchangeable
multisource medicines, April 2010. Addis Ababa
2|
References
Generic guidance
Guidelines on packaging for pharmaceutical products (TRS 902, Annex 9)
Container closure systems for packaging human drugs and biologics (FDA,
may 1999)
Guideline on Plastic immediate packaging materials specific to plastics
only
USP /EP
3|
Overview
The role of packaging
Types of containers and closures
Moisture permeation
Oxygen permeation
Light protection
4|
Packaging Terminology
Immediate (Primary) Pack
Contains and protects the dosage form so is normally in contact with it.
It bears appropriate label(s) providing content and usage information.
Immediate pack components are considered essential to the stability of their contents,
whether or not in contact with them.
Secondary Pack
A pack component with no product contact but may add protection to that provided by the
immediate pack.
Marketing Pack
Combination of primary and secondary packaging, labeling, associated components (e.g.,
dosing cups, droppers, spoons), and external packaging (e.g., cartons or shrink wrap).
5|
6|
7|
Types of containers
Primary containers including fillers, absorbents, and desiccants
Secondary functional (e.g, fibre drums, HDPE bottles for products which
are immediately packaged with LDPE bag etc).
Secondary non functional
Accessories such as measuring cap
8|
9|
10 |
11 |
Types of containers--Bags
LDPE bag
as primary container for bulk packs which is further placed in
HDPE/PE bottles
as primary container for bulk product or intermediates
as primary container for API and excipients, which is further placed in
Alu, fiber or steel drum
considered safe
less protective than HDPE and PET
Triple laminated LDPE/PET/Al bag
three layers 'sandwiched', LDPE film as inner layer
Protection from oxygen, water vapor, UV
Protection from other contaiminants, e.g. oils, acid, alkalines
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
Oxygen permeation
18 |
Light protection
Plastic materials, e.g. HDPE bottles, opacified with titanium dioxide
pigment can still allow significant light to be transmitted through because
light scatters internally as well as externally
Brown glass is a barrier to the more damaging short wave-length light but
is transparent at longer wavelengths
Aluminium foil provides the best option for assured protection from light
A secondary pack component can augment light protection
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
Suitability
Suitability information should be located in 3.2.P.2. One time tests usually
performed at the stage of packaging development:
Compatibility, e.g. Extraction/leaching/Sorption (packaging-product
interaction)
Safety
Protection (from moisture, oxygen, light, etc.)
performance
The type and extent of information that should be provided will depend on
the dosage form and the rout of administration
24 |
Safety (Contd)
25 |
Suitability--Compatibility
The container closure system should be compatible with the product
components, not cause unacceptable changes in the quality due to
adsorption/absorption of the API/excipients
leachables / extractables
precipitation
pH changes
discoloration of the product or the packaging
Likelihood of interaction depends on the type of the dosage form to be
packaged with
26 |
Suitability--Compatibility
Demonstration of compatibility
For plastic components: USP <661>, physicochemical tests
For glass components: USP <660>, chemical resistance
For elastomeric components: USP <381> elastomeric closures for
injections, evaluation of swelling effects
Some interactions will be detected during qualification studies on the
container closure system. Others may not show up except in the
stability studies (may be addressed by stability studies).
27 |
Suitability--Safety
Packaging materials should not leach harmful or undesirable amounts of
substances
for example, unreacted monomers and process impurities such as
antioxidants in plastics
particularly for those containers which are in direct contact with the
product
in some cases, substances may migrate from secondary components
( eg. Ink and adhesives)
Concern for safety depends on the type of dosage form
28 |
Suitability--Safety (Contd)
Demonstration of safety
For injectables, inhalations
Extraction studies and toxicological evaluation on leachables and
extractables
USP biological reactivity tests <87> and Elastomeric losures for
injections tests <381> are acceptable for many injectable and
ophthalmic products
for oral solid and liquid dosage forms a declaration by the supplier
that the material of construction complies with the USFDA or EU
requirements for packaging of food items is acceptable.
29 |
Suitability--Protection
The container closure system should protect the product from factors that
cause deterioration
exposure to light
exposure to reactive gases such as oxygen
absorption of water vapour
loss of solvent
microbial contamination
exposure to other contamination sources such as dirt
Demonstration of protection
depends on the product (sensitivity of the product to the particular degradation
factor)
usually general pharmacopoeial test procedures are used (eg USP<661>, <671>)
Validation of packaging procedure, such as leak testing (for seal integrity)
30 |
Suitability
31 |
Specification
Signed and dated specification for each packaging component specially for
primary containers and functional secondary containers
identity of primary packaging components is an essential routine test
dimensional criteria (eg, area weight for film and foil materials, wall
thinkness, shape, neck finish, capacity for bottles,)
performance characteristics (eg, ease of movements of syringe plunger)
The FPP manufacturer must have their own specs (to be tested upon receipt
at the site of packaging) with at least identity, dimensions, and
thickness/area weight (for blisters).
32 |
Dosing Devices
Devices: Required for oral solutions, emulsions, suspensions (or liquid
API) and powders/granules for multiple doses
Required collaboration between Q and WHOPAR experts
Quality part:
Specification of the material (with IR identification)
Data to demonstrate the uniformity of mass of doses delivered at the
lowest intended dose (weigh 20 doses, not more than 2 of the
individual masses deviate by more than 10% from the average mass,
and none deviates by more than 20%.)
A sample of device to be reviewed (may consult with WHOPAR
experts)
33 |
Labelling
Pharmaceutical issues to be reviewed by quality assessor: refer to internal
labelling guideline "Quality review of labelling"
Check the information of Labels (immediate container and Outer labels)
Confirm the name, product description, excipients, packaging, pack size,
storage condition, shelf life, MA holder for PIL/SmPC (Items 1, 2, 3, 6 of
SmPC).
Copy the Section 6 (composition) into the assessment report is highly
encouraged, as it allows subsequent assessors to ensure that all the
necessary elements are included.
34 |
Labelling
Pay attention to:
Scoreline check uniformity of half dosing if appropriate
Pack sizeclearly state the number of each blister, each box
SmPC composition should include ink solids, opadry components
35 |
Thank you!
36 |