Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Advantages and
Shortcomings
By:
Devvrat Chowdhary
2010barc009
AIM
The basic aim of the presentation is to
identify various issues related to GRIHA
certification in India
METHODOLOGY
Establishing
Scope and aim
Establishing the
concept of
green building
Discussion and
comparison of
different Rating
systems
GRIHA
evaluation
study with the
help of Case
study
GRIHA plus
points
GRIHA
shortcomings
Conclusion and
Suggestions
Source: Paper presented on Green buildings" by Debajit Pal it from TERI, June 2004
GRIHA
GRIHA has been conceived by the Energy and
Resources Institute (TERI) and jointly developed
by Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE)
as the national rating system for buildings.
GRIHA attempts to quantify aspects such as
energy consumption, waste generation,
renewable energy adoption, etc. so as to manage,
control and optimise the same to the best
possible extent.
Points
scored
5060
61-70
71-80
81-90
91-100
Rating
One star
Two star
Three
star
Four star
Five star
Final submission
of documents
Final evaluation
by panel of
experts
Submission of
documentation
Preliminary
rating with
comments sent
to project team
Approval of
rating by
advisory
committee
Preliminary
evaluation by
TERI Technical
team
Evaluation by
panel of experts
Award of rating
Consultants:
Structure : Planning and design bureau , ND
Electrical : Kanwar Krishen Associates
Plumbing : Deolalikar consultants , New
Delhi
HVAC: Gupta Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Landscape : Yogesh Kapoor , New Delhi
Energy Efficiency : The energy and resources
institute (TERI)
Project Management: Institute works
department,
Contractors:
Gupta Enterprise, New Delhi
Kailash Electric , Kanpur
Hilltop refrigeration , New Delhi
Vishnu saran and Co. , Kanpur
TATA BP Solar, New Delhi
BHEL , Lucknow
Built Up Area: 4240 m2 (45640 ft2)
Project Cost : 11.5 Crore
Laboratories - 10 no's Faculty Rooms - 18 nos.
Meeting Rooms - 4 nos. Library ,
Seminar Hall - 100 cap. Class Rooms - 60 cap. &
40 cap.
Exhibition Area Amphitheatre integrated with
Water Body
Shaded Indoor Landscaped Court
Salient Features
1.
Sustainable
site
planning
has
been
integrated
to
maintain
favourable
microclimate. The architectural design has been optimized as per climate and
sun path analysis.
2.
Passive strategies such as an earth air tunnel have been incorporated in the
HVAC design to reduce the cooling load.
3.
The Centre has attempted to conserve and utilize resources efficiently; and
recycle, reuse, and recharge the systems at every stage of design and
construction.
4.
5.
6.
GRIHA advantages
Focus on non-air conditioned buildings:
GRIHAs criteria provide more credit to climate responsive
architecture and design to minimize energy use compared to
LEED criteria.
Mandatory minimum requirement for solar energy:
GRIHA requires, as a mandatory criterion, 1 per cent of the total
energy needs for the development to be sourced from solar
power.
Quality of ground water:
In India is not guaranteed as in other countries such as the U.S.
GRIHA mandates the treatment of ground water for drinking and
irrigation to the norms as prescribed by ISI.
Noise pollution:
LEED does not evaluate acoustical comfort. GRIHA requires
adherence to Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and NBC
guidelines for acceptable outdoor and indoor noise levels.
GRIHA advantages
The
BEFORE
AFTER