Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
DETECTIVE
PRESENTED BY:
ISHITA(22039)
PREETI(22048)
RADHIKA BHATNAGAR(22051)
MOUSUMI MAZUMDAR(22068)
ELECTRONICS
In the following case study ,
There are two electronics companies are shown as companies I and
J.
Both produced semiconductors, but one specialized in their
manufacture and also produced small desktop and hand held
computing equipment.
About half its electronic components were sold to the defense industry.
The other firm was financially conservative .
It specialized in radio and television equipment and made
semiconductors as a secondary, but increasingly important, line of
business (over 30 % of revenues).
RETURN ON ASSETS
RATIO
X
AVERAGE TOTAL
ASSETS
100
X
100
FUNDS
RETURN ON EQUITY
10
18
QUICK RATIO
QUICK RATIO = CASH & EQUIVALENTS+RECEIVABLES+ MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
FOR COMPANY I,
COMPANY J
QUICK RATIO= 5.8 +20.7/31.3 =0.84
15.6 + 19.9/29.3=1.21
FOR
QUICK RATIO=
CASH
&EQUIVALENT
S
RECEIVABLES
TOTAL
CURRENT
LIABLITIES
QUICK RATIO
5.8
20.7
31.3
0.84
15.6
19.9
29.3
1.21
QUICK RATIO specifies whether the assets can be quickly converted into cash
are sufficient cover current liabilities. Company aims to maintain a quick ratio
that provides sufficient leverage against liquidity risk given the level of
predictability volatility in specific business sector.
Electronic industry is comparatively stable and predictable in cash flows and
companies likes to keep quick ratio at low level.
As we see, company I is keeping its quick ratio is comparatively low at 0.84
unlike company J whose quick ratio is above at 1.21.Company I and J
must achieve the right balance between liquidity (from low quick ratio) and
risk of loss ( resulting from high quick ratio).
Company J with high quick ratio at 1.21 which is greater than 1 which is
normal industry average suggest that company J is investing too many
resources in working capital of business which may be profitable else where.
CURRENT RATIO
CURRENT RATIO =
6.09 times
6.60 times
365
DTR
60days
55days
If the credit policy of the firm is 60-65 days, then the average
collection period is of 60 days, then the collection period is
acceptable.
If the collection period is less then 60 days then it indicates
that the collection department is not operating efficiently. In
case of company I "the firm has collected its debtors in 60
days & in case of J they have collected their debtors in 55
days.
7.38
7.57
to the proportion of the EPS which has been distributed by the company as
dividends.
=(Dividend Per Share/Earnings Per Share)*100
From Exhibit 1
Company I=27%
Company J=24%
INTREPRETATION
Company J
=11.4/52.8
=0.215
= 0.22 * 100 = 22%
Here the ratios of the company I &J are less than 1.
Hence from creditors perspective, both companies are
favourable as they provide better security of money. Also
companies can raise funds from financial institutions very easily.
Price/Earning Ratio
This ratio is defined as A valuation ratio of a company's
current share price compared to its per-share earnings.
It indicates the expectations of the equity investors about
the earnings of the firm.
= Market Price Per Share
Earnings Per Share
Price/Earning Ratio
From Exhibit 1 ,Price/Earning ration for
Company I = 22.7
Company J = 19.6
Company I has a high growth prospects as it has a higher PE ratio as
compared to Company J whose growth prospects is slower than company J.
A high PE ratio may indicate that the share has a low risk and therefore the
investors are content with low prospective return.