Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Installations
Power Quality Partnership
David Chapman, CDA
Ken West, Fluke UK
David Bradley, Rhopoint Systems
Shri Karve, MGE UPS Systems
Copper Development Association
Programme
Introduction to the Power Quality Partnership & LPQI
David Chapman, CDA
$ 13 B/yr
$ 119 - 188 B/yr
Eurelectric 2002
Canada $ 650 m
France $ 25 B
Germany $ 20-25 B
Spain
$ 6-7 B
World
several 100 B$/yr
ECI 2000
Europe
15 - 20 B/yr
Probability Density
Total supply
network
disturbance
Immunity
(test) levels
Emission
limits for
individual
sources
Disturbance Level
Copper Development Association
Susceptibility of
local equipment
EMC
Voltage stability
Tolerance (long term)
Unbalance (long or short term)
Disturbances (shorter term)
Dips and surges
Outages, Blackouts
Transients
Flicker
Copper Development Association
Embedded generation
Copper Development Association
Transformers
homopolar components cause excess heat in delta
windings
negative sequence transformed normally
Copper Development Association
e.g:
..a 120 ms dip to 32%..
Copper Development Association
tens up
thousand in a year
tens to up to several
hundreds
The duration of approximately 70% of the short
interruptions may
10 or up to 50
Best
Avg
Worst
Transients
19
164
Swells
164
6,714
Sags
90
7,121
Interruptions
16
146
Total
289
Voltage stability
Causes of Voltage Dips
Installation issues
starting of heavy loads
Distribution and transmission
Faults on the distribution network
line damage
bird strikes
vandalism
equipment failure
weather
Copper Development Association
Area of Vulnerability
Plant
Area of Vulnerability
Plant
Area of Vulnerability
Plant
Plant
Voltage stability
Responsibility
Network can never be fault free
Reducing number of dips would require
enormous investment to reduce number and
impact of faults
Relatively few customers (by number, not load)
would benefit
Copper Development Association
ITIC
Required immunity
2001
2002
1999
2000
1997
1998
Voltage stability
VSD - Dip in a single phase
Voltage stability
VSD - dip in all three phases
Dynamic voltage
restorer (DVR)
Grid upgrade
Small UPS
CVT
Voltage regulator
Transients
Transients are
high speed
microseconds
large magnitude
few hundred to several thousand volts
Transients
Transients originate from
network switching
capacitor compensation
load switching
dynamic power factor correction
arc welding
lightning - not direct strike
Transients
Transients are high frequency signals
magnitude reduces quickly as they travel
across network
close transients important
distant transients less important
Effects of Transients
Transients can cause
instantaneous equipment damage
equipment degradation
temporary loss of functionality
communications blackout
permanent data loss
Transients - mitigation
Switching effects
reduced by proper equipment design
Lightning effects
reduced by surge arrestors on network, incoming
services, etc.
Causes
rapidly fluctuating cyclic loads
e.g. spot welders
Copper Development Association
Flicker mitigation
reduce supply source impedance for problem load
fast-acting power electronics solutions
Harmonic currents
Harmonic currents are caused by non-linear loads
Switched mode power supplies (SMPS)
Electronic fluorescent lighting ballasts
Variable speed drives
Un-interruptible power supplies (UPS)
Harmonic currents
Typical Switched mode power supply current waveform
Harmonic currents
Harmonic spectrum of SMPS current
Harmonic currents
Harmonic profile of a three phase 6-pulse load
Six pulse bridge - harmonic current
25
20
15
%
10
0
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Harmonic number
Harmonic currents
Equivalent circuit of a non-linear load
Harmonic currents
Problems caused by harmonic currents:
currents within the installation
overloading of neutrals
overheating of transformers
nuisance tripping of circuit breakers
over-stressing of power factor correction capacitors
skin effect
Harmonic currents
Neutral conductor sizing IEC standard 60364-52
Harmonic currents
Effect on transformers
Transformers supplying harmonic loads must be
appropriately de-rated
Harmonic currents, being of higher frequency, cause
increased magnetic losses in the core and increased
eddy current and skin effect losses in the windings
Triple-n harmonic currents circulate in delta windings,
increasing resistive losses, operating temperature and
reducing effective load capacity
Harmonic currents
Harmonic currents in the supply
Harmonic currents flowing back into the supply
cause harmonic voltages that spread around the
network
Suppliers limit the level of harmonic current that a
user can allow back onto the supply network
G5/4 covers these limits
Harmonic compatibility
Planning levels
Probability Density
Total supply
network
disturbance
Compatibility Level
Immunity
(test) levels
Emission
limits for
individual
sources
Disturbance Level
Copper Development Association
Susceptibility of
local equipment
Harmonics
Standard EN50160
Harmonic voltage
Under normal operation conditions, during each period
of one week, 95% of the 10 minute mean rms values of
each individual harmonic voltage shall be less than or
equal to the value given...
Moreover, the THD of the supply voltage (including all
harmonics up to the order 40) shall be less than or
equal to 8%.
Copper Development Association
Harmonics
The Challenge:
to keep harmonic currents below levels
that cause equipment overload and damage within the
installation
that are permitted by G5/4
to keep the harmonic voltage distortion at the point of common
coupling below levels permitted by G5/4
Harmonic standards
Electricity Association Engineering Recommendation
G 5/4 (2001)
BS EN 61000
IEEE Std 519-1992 Recommended Practices and
Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical
Power Systems
ISBN
1 - 55937 - 239 - 7
Harmonic mitigation
Steps to be taken to reduce voltage distortion on the
supply include, for example:
Passive harmonic filters
Isolation transformers
Active harmonic conditioners
Harmonic mitigation
Passive filters are useful when
the harmonic profile is well defined such as motor
controllers
the lowest harmonic is well above the fundamental
frequency
- but filter design can be difficult and, especially for
lower harmonics, the filters can be bulky and
expensive
Harmonic mitigation
Harmonic mitigation
Delta - Zigzag transformers
R
N
Copper Development Association
Harmonic mitigation
Delta - Zig zag transformers
Load
I3
Interconnected Star
Transformer sized for
harmonic currents only
Harmonic mitigation
Delta-star transformers
Harmonic mitigation
Active conditioners
Where the harmonic profile is unpredictable or
contains a high level of lower harmonics, active
filters are useful
Active harmonic conditioners operate by injecting a
compensating current to cancel the harmonic
current
Harmonic mitigation
Is + Ih
Is
CT
Ih
AHC
Introduction to Reliability
Reliability
Availability
Resilience
Redundancy
Reliability
1 .1
1 .0
(t)
0 .9
F a ilu r e
R a te
(t)
0 .8
0 .7
0 .6
0 .5
0 .4
0 .3
0 .2
0 .1
3
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
E la p s e d T im e ( d a y s )
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
Reliability
Reliability is measured in terms of Mean
time to failure or MTTF.
What is Availability?
Availability is the proportion time for which a
system is serviceable. It is defined as:
MTBF
Availabili ty
MTBF MTTR
Availability
Availability, expressed as a simple percentage,
tells us nothing!
e.g. Availability of 99.9% may mean that the
system is unavailable for:
~9 hours every year
1.5 minutes every day
3.6 seconds every hour
Availability
Availability depends on both MTTF and MTTR
MTTF is a function of original design and
manufacturing quality, but MTTR can be
controlled by the user by:
Setting up on-site servicing and support
contracts
Holding key spares on-site or regionally
Planning maintenance to reduce failures
Copper Development Association
Availability
Very high availability is difficult to achieve
Repair times cannot be further reduced:
engineers travel time
restart (or re-boot) time
process clean-up time
Mean times to failure are statistics, not fact!
Long MTTF figures are difficult to verify
Copper Development Association
What is Resilience?
Resilience is the ability a system to withstand a
failure in any individual component of the system
It is achieved by a combination of:
high reliability
redundancy
In effect, redundancy is used to improve
availability
Copper Development Association
Redundancy
In a redundant system key elements are
duplicated so that, in the event of a single failure,
the system as a whole can still operate
Reliability - MTBF - is greatly increased
MTTR is potentially reduced to zero
Availability is potentially 100%
- if the redundancy is correctly chosen!
Copper Development Association
Reliability R2(t)
Copper Development Association
System reliability
System reliability can be calculated from the
known reliabilities of the individual components
If the failure of any component causes the
system to fail, then, as far as reliability is
concerned, the components are in series
otherwise they are in parallel
System reliability
For example, if these two switches must be
closed for a process to operate, they are in series
as far as reliability of the process is concerned
Types of Redundancy
In many cases, such as communications links or
ventilation units, it is not necessary to provide
100% redundancy
For example, installing three links each with
50% capacity provides high reliability for full
traffic capacity and very high reliability for lower
demand periods where one link would be
sufficient
Types of Redundancy
In this example, each component is capable of
supporting 100% of the demand
Types of Redundancy
In this example, each component is capable of
supporting only 50% of the demand
Any two units must be functional at any time
Objectives
Identify and remove all single points of failure
Balance reliability throughout the system - the
system can be no more reliable than the least
reliable link
Prefer active redundancy
Verify that the stand-by systems can be switched in
as required
Coupling
system
45 % Load
45 % load
Coupling
system
End
Use
End
Use
Coupling
system
First Event : Breakdown of one
transformer due to over-voltage
90 %
Load
End
Use
End
Use
(Lot of power electronic with high
harmonics level)
Curative solution
Replace 1 250 kVA transformers by 1600 kVA
transformers.
Cost :
Cost of 2 transformers
Cost of emergency leasing of transformers
Cost of 3 days of no production
Total cost :
600 k EURO
Preventive solution
Use 1 600 kVA transformers instead of 1 250 kVA
(at initial construction)
Extra cost of 1 600 kVA compared to 1 250 KVA
10 k EURO
Extra cost for two 1 600 kVA transformers
< 20 k EURO
<