Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(BCAPM)
(Literature:
(Literature: Paper
Paper Zou
Zou 1)
1)
Outline
The Variation-Around-Target
Preferences
Re-examination of Modern Portfolio
Theory
The Separation Theorem
Derivation of the BCAPM
Comparing the BCAPM with the CAPM
Applications
2006 by Liang Zou. All rights
reserved.
3-2
Introduction
Mean-variance (MV) CAPM has been with us for 40
years. Despite the lengthy debate over its
theoretical and empirical validity it remains a major
model for estimating cost of capital, discussing
market efficiency, and so on.
Empirical evidence suggests, however, that the
CAPM may entail pricing errors and that the market
index may not be mean-variance efficient.
Although many multifactor models are proposed,
these are empirically motivated models and are
likely to be subject to data mining. More seriously,
the factors that are reportedly useful for improving
the explanatory and predictive power of the CAPM
often
lack theoretical insights.
2006 by Liang Zou. All rights
reserved.
3-3
VE
kg
D First period dividend
3-4
3-5
What is Best-Beta?
The best-beta is defined as
E
(
xx
)
m
B
E ( x m2 )
x r r0 (asset' s excess return)
x m rm r0 (market' s excess return)
2006 by Liang Zou. All rights
reserved.
3-6
CAPM : E
MV
( x)
MV
E ( xm )
BCAPM : E ( x ) E ( xm )
B
MV
Cov ( x, xm ) B E ( xxm )
,
2
Var ( xm )
E ( xm )
3-7
E ( x ) E ( xm )
The pricing error of the CAPM and the
BCAPM are the difference between the
true and predicted expected return,
denoted by alpha:
MV E ( x) MV E ( x m )
B E ( x) B E ( x m )
3-8
Theorem
The relation between the MV beta and
the best beta is given by
(1 )
B
2
m
MV
2
m
2
[
E
(
x
)]
2
m
where m
(0,1)
2
E ( xm )
3-9
MV
MV
MV
B
B
3-10
2
E ( xm )
E ( xm2 )
B
Var ( xm ) MV [ E ( xm )]
2
2
E ( xm )
E ( xm )
(1 )
2
m
MV
2
m
3-11
Theorem
The preceding theorem implies
E ( x) (1 ) E
B
2
m
(1 )
B
2
m
MV
MV
thus either
B
or
MV
( x) E ( x )
2
m
MV
0
B
or MV B 0
2006 by Liang Zou. All rights
reserved.
3-12
Empirical Example
The U.S. equity annual returns on the
NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ have an
average risk premium of 7.67% (with
standard deviation of 16.03%) over the
period of 1952 to 1999 and 10.61%
(with standard deviation of 15.15%)
over 1983 to1999.
We then derive the eta ratio to be
0.18629 (over 1952-1999)
0.32907 (over 1983-1999)
2006 by Liang Zou. All rights
reserved.
3-13
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3 0.5
0.4
0.3
E(xm)
0.2
0.1
3-14
max E (rp )
p
E ( rp )
3-15
Separation Theorem
Then we can show that every one wants to
maximize the eta ratio:
2
P
E ( xP )
E ( xP2 )
3-16
a bxm , E ( x) 0
aE ( x) bE ( xxm )
aE ( xm ) bE ( xm2 )
E ( xxm )
E ( x)
E ( xm ) (BCAPM)
2
E ( xm )
3-17
Insights
Consider a zero-price investment
strategy with a long position in any
asset i and some short position in
market and cash:
ri brm (1 b)r0
3-18
E ( xxm )
B
b
2
E ( xm )
3-19
Further Insights
Without loss of generality, we can
always write out the equation:
xi i bi xm with E ( ) 0
The question is how we should
interpret alpha: Do we assume that it
belongs to a correctly specified linear
model, or do we assume that it
represents a source of pricing error
due to model uncertainty?
The BCAPM treats alpha as source of
error.
2006 by Liang Zou. All rights
reserved.
3-20
min b E ( xi bxm )
3-21
min ,b E ( ) b
2
i
MV
MV
min ,b E ( i i ) b ,
2
3-22
Var ( ) (1 )Var (
B
2
m
MV
Var ( ) (1 ) Var (
B
2 2
m
MV
3-23
Concluding Remarks
MPT can be entirely re-written without much
ado. Given that investors may indeed have
personal target returns, however, the
assumption of the BCAPM could be
considered to be more realistic.
The best-beta approach could be useful for
designing more powerful (or more sensible)
tests of the CAPM-like models.
The BCAPM can be readily extended to
multifactor models, and its improvement
over the MV models become increasingly
more significant as the factor number
increases.
2006 by Liang Zou. All rights
reserved.
3-24