Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
UMTS
KPI
to
Radio
Agenda
3G Network Optimization
Page 2
Relevant
Page 3
3G KPIs : Specific
Complete KPI definition include the formula combine with the check
point or procedure.
The example: RRC Connection Successful Rate
formula
RRCS_SR Service
RRCConnect ionSuccess
= RRCConnect ionAttemptservice 100%
service
Check point
The number of RRC Connection Attempt is A1
or A2?
A2 represent the effective number of
RRC Connection Attempt.
Page 4
Data analysis
Probe & Assistant is used
for analyzing test data
Page 5
Throughput KPI
Delay KPI
Quality KPI
Core Network
NodeB
RNC
NodeB
Transmission
Network construct
.
Radio network
planning
Special environment
condition
Page 6
Essential
OM system
Optimization team
Local networks
Page 7
iManagerTM M2000
obtaining test data
sharing of
analysis results
RNC
GENEX Probe
GENEX Assistant
3G
AGILENT
QUALCOMM
HUAWEI RNC
Node B
Node B
HLR/AC
RNS
GENEX Probe
WCDMA
MSC/SSP/
VLR
Node B
RNC
CN
GENEX UNet
Node B
Node B
network pre-planning/planning
Page 8
GMSC/SSP
RNS
PSTN
PLMN
ISDN
3G KPIs: Relevant
Examples of User Experience (QoE)
completion of a
download file
End-to-end response
is fast
Retainability
Integrity
Mobility
Utilization
Page 9
Availability
Accessability
Retainability
Call Setup
Success Rate
(Voice/VP)
Call Drop
Rate
(Voice/VP)
PDP Context
Activation
Success Rate
PDP
Context
Drop Rate
Service Integrity
PS Throughput
SHO
Success
Rate
Hard
Handover
Success
Rate
SMS/MMS
Success Rate
Mobility
Inter-RAT
Handove
r Success
Rate
Page 10
Delay/Latency
Availability
Worst Cell
Rate
PDP Context
Activation Time
RTT
Network Construct
Transmission
optimization
59.45%
10.02%
7.29%
4.56%
0.68%
Page 11
0.68%
3%
2.28%
11.94%
cause
3G KPIs: Attainable
3G KPI is output of combination with investment include technology,
HR, cost, competition strategy etc.
Cost
le
Cooperate with Mobilis to work out a Competitive KPI; t
Use the experience from other commercial network;
Page 12
Technical
3G KPIs: Time-bound
Mature Network
Drive Test KPIs
Stationary test KPIs
Network Statistics
Ongoing Optimization
10 90
80
50
40 30
20 10
Network Statistics
Benchmark test
Commercial Launch
Nastar
Probe & Assistant
Pre-Launch
KPI Acceptance
70 60
Network construct
Page 13
Site verification
Pre-launch Acceptance
On-going Optimization
Drive Test
Drive Test
Statistic Test
Drive Test
Statistic Test
Drive Test
Statistic Test
Drive Test
Statistic Test
Statistic Test
Statistic Test
Stationary
Stationary
R99 PS Throughput
Stationary
Stationary
HSPA Throughput
Stationary
Stationary
Drive Test
Statistic Test
Drive Test
Statistic Test
rate
Page 14
Contents
UMTS Radio KPI overview 3G
Radio Network Optimization
Case Study of KPI Optimization
Page 15
Drop call
Para. adjustment
Congestion
Poor quality
Access failure
Pre-launch optimization
Contingency planning
Network expansion
Customized and
differentiated
services
Single site verification
Billing strategies
Investment
RF plan review
Construction
phase
Troubleshooting
DT & CQT
Commercia
l launch
KPI
analysis
Complaints
Booming phase
Optimizing
Page 16
Return
Mature phase
Balancing
Time
RF optimization
80 sites in
the
cluster ready?
Acceptance criteria
satisfied?
Y
Acceptance
Page 17
RF Optimization Target
To optimize coverage To
minimize pilot pollution To
optimize cell dominance To
optimize neighbor cell list To
resolve RF-related drop calls
Page 18
RF Parameters Optimization
Engineering parameters adjustment
To adjust antenna down tilt
To adjust antenna azimuth
To adjust antenna location
To adjust antenna height To
replace antenna To replace
site To add new cell
Page 19
(B)
Margin
-70
-75
Ways to optimize:
-62
-80
-66
-68
-69
-85
-90
SC1
SC2
Active Set
SC3
SC4
SC5
Pilot Pollution
SC6
Not
Pilot Pollution
Page 20
Page 21
Appearance
Poor coverage
High interference
Poor UL coverage
UE max Tx power
Poor dominance
Pilot pollution
Missing neighbors
Page 22
Para. optimization
is an important step
after RF optimization
Page 23
Parameters to be Optimized
CCCH power allocation para.
RL maximum power para.
Seldom
adjusted
An effective way to
reduce drop calls
Page 24
Qhyst2
CPICH_Ec/Io
CPICH_Ec/Io
Qhyst2
Qhyst2
Qhyst2
Qhyst2
UE doesnt camp
onto the best cells.
Sintrasearch
Qqualmin
UE doesnt camp
onto the best cells.
Qqualmin
Treselection
Treselection
Treselection Treselection
Treselection
Treselection
Page 25
Time
Contents
UMTS Radio KPI overview 3G
Radio Network Optimization
Case Study of KPI Optimization
Page 26
Page 27
Trouble-shooting of RRC
setup and RAB assignment
problems:
STEP1: Identify the counter with the
highest number
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.
Other.Cell
VS.RRC.Rej.Cod
Definition of Counters
L.Fail
e.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.IUB.Band: The number of
RABs unsuccessfully established in a cell due
to IUB resource congestion causes.
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.Other.Cell:
Pre-admission control module reports
a resource congestion.
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.
RIPFail
Page 28
VS.RRC.Rej.UL.C
RRC.FailConnEstab.
E.Cong
NoReply
VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong: RRC
setup failure due to lack of UL CE
resources
Analysis
The worst sites (cells) that have been found to have both IUB
and CE congestion issues:
0109TO (cell id 578/579/580)
0111TO (3882/3883/3884)
0070TO (18641/18642/18643)
UL CE Occupation Rate
NodeB
Name
2007-02-19
2007-02-20
2007-02-21
2007-02-22
0070TO
120.83%
132.29%
132.29%
171.88%
0109TO
142.71%
175.00%
175.00%
180.21%
0111TO
158.33%
132.29%
132.29%
148.96%
Page 29
Suggested solution
A comparative analysis shows that, if excluding the problematic
sites, the KPI would improve substantially, say, AMR RAB assignment
success rate from 97.79% to 98.09%:
Congestion sites)
Congestion sites)
99.17%(313992/316615)
99.35%(256449/258126)
97.79%(294499/301169)
98.09%(241127/245815)
CE/IUB expansion
98.31%(3314/3371)
98.67%(2891/2930)
84.93%(2462/2899)
83.10%(1981/2384)
98.48%(16674/16932)
98.80%(13638/13803)
97.53%(58114/59584)
97.81%(48854/49946)
Success Rate(>97%)
PS384 RAB Assignment
Success Rate(>97%)
Page 30
Page 31
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
Zone1
Solving Voice call drop
rate problems in
Top
3
zones
Zone2
Zone3
Page 32
Action time
Zone 1
Feb. 14-17
1.57%->1.27%
Zone 2
Feb. 23-25
1.38%->1.21%
Zone 3
Mar.2-6
1.34%->1.10%
Page 33
Optimization measures
Scrambling code planning
adjustment
System/handover
parameter tuning
Neighbour list optimization
RF optimization, etc.
Page 34
RNC 122
Page 36
UE handover to GSM
Page 37
Other causes
In addition to coverage and missing neighbour causes, the HSDPA
minimum throughput problem is due to:
DT route crosses the IUR area where HSDPA calls are reconfigured to
DCH (H2D)
UE moves from a non-hotspot to a hotspot site in HSDPA connected mode
RNC 122
RNC 123
RNC 122
RNC 123
RNC 121
RNC 121
Page 38
Thank You
www.huawei.com