PROJECT OF BQT

Companies

KFC
AFC
HFC

Submitted
By
Syed Najaf Ali
Ali Zaheer

OBJECTIVE
Our objective of this project was to
apply our knowledge of business and
quantitative techniques that we have
been learning from our respected
teacher throughout the semester.
This project will help us in analyzing
condition of the respective companies.
Another objective of the project is to
analyze the competitive position of
companies and also in future if we do
some research work, this will help a lot.

Selected
Variables
Production
(D.V)

No. of
Customers (I.V)
Total Wage Exp
(I.V)

Descriptive
No. Of
Analysis
Customers

No. Of
Customers
Mean = 1824
Skewness =-0.74
S.D =136
C.V =7.44%
T. Wage Expenses
Mean =19734
Skewness =1.36
S.D =573
C.V =2.91%
Production
Mean =60982
Skewness =-0.74
S.D =5376
C.V =8.82%

Mean = 1673
Skewness =0.52
S.D =74
C.VWage
=4.44%
T.
Expenses
Mean =16445
Skewness =1.36
S.D =478
C.V =2.91%
Production
Mean =35378
Skewness =-0.65
S.D =4751
C.V =13.43%

No. Of
Customers
Mean = 1489
Skewness =0.52
S.D =66
C.V
=4.44%
T. Wage
Expenses
Mean =16105
Skewness =0.05
S.D =253
C.V
=1.57%
Production
Mean =31486
Skewness =0.65
S.D =4228
C.V =13.43%

Corelation Analysis with

Hypothesis
Production with
Customer r
=0.43

Production with
Customer r
=0.25

Production with
Customer r
=0.25

Production with
Wages r=
0.2956

Ho: = 0
H1: 0

Production with
Wages
r = 0.20

Ho: = 0
H1: 0

Production with
Wages r= 0.07

Ho: = 0
H1: 0

Tab-Value 0.361

We reject Ho if r is
greater than tab
value r > 0.361
So we dont reject
Ho.

Tab-Value 0.361

We reject Ho if r is
greater than tab
value r> 0.361
So we dont reject
Ho.

Tab-Value= 0.361
We reject Ho if r is
greater than tab
value r > 0.361
So we dont reject
Ho.

Corelation Analysis with

Hypothesis
HO:
1= 0
H

HO: 1 = 0
H1: 1 0

T cal = 36.72925
T tab = 2.04841
Reject if HO T cal is
greater than T tab.

So we reject.

HO: 2 = 0
H1: 2 0

T cal = 6.228520665
T tab = 2.04841
Reject if HO T cal is
greater than T tab.
So we reject.

H1: 1 0

T cal = 32.048676
T tab = 2.04841
Reject if HO T cal is
greater than T tab.

So we reject.

HO: 2 = 0
H1: 2 0

T cal = 39.71863
T tab = 2.04841
Reject if HO T cal is
greater than T tab.
So we reject.

1 = 0
H1: 1 0

T cal = 30.24538
T tab = 2.04841
Reject if HO T cal
is greater than T
tab.

So we reject.

HO: 2 = 0
H1: 2 0

T cal =
17.26943064
T tab = 2.04841
Reject if HO T cal
is greater than T
O:

Anova on Production
3 Comp.
Ho: (1=2=3)
H1: (1 = 2)(2 =3)
(1 = 3)

ANALYSIS OF
Anova
on NO. Of Cust. Anova on Wages 3
VARIANCE

3 Comp.
Comp.
Ho: (1=2=3)
Ho: (1=2=3)
H1: (1 = 2)(2 =3)(1 H1:(1 = 2)(2 =3)
= 3)
(1 = 3)
We are Rejecting ho,
We are Rejecting ho,
We are Rejecting ho,
because f cal > f tab.
because f cal > f tab. So because f cal > f tab. So
So we are in the favor
we are in the favor of H1 we are in the favor of H1
of H1 i.e. at least one
i.e. at least one mean is i.e. at least one mean is
mean is equal so to find
equal so to find out
equal so to find out which out which mean is
which mean is equal
mean is equal
equal
we apply L.S.D
we apply L.S.D
we apply L.S.D
After applying LSD test it
shows that none of the
means are equal to each
other.

After applying LSD test it

shows that none of the
means are equal to each
other.

After applying LSD test

it shows that none of
the means are equal to
each other

CRUX
In order to collect data for our project we
visited the following companies, which
were
*KFC
*HFC
*AFC
After getting data we applied various
statistical tools on the data, for the
application of tools we selected the
followong variables
*No of customers
*T.Wage expenses
*Production

CONCLUSION
By the comparison we
conclude that as there is not a
big difference in the effect of
wages and no of customers on
the production but KFC is on
the lead a little bit because it
has greater no of customers
and its C.V is less as compare
to its competitors. because of

RECOMMENDATIO
N
We recommend AFC and HFC to
increase the part of advertising and
promote different deals in order to
attract more customers.
KFC on the other hand is acting as
major share holder of market
because of its good reputation in
market and it is also a worldwide
recognized brand.