Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Philippe Thébault (Stockholm Observatory/Paris Observatory) & Jean-Charles Augereau (Grenoble observatory)
philippe.thebault@obspm.fr augereau@obs.ujf-grenoble.fr
sized objects •« classical » particle-in-a-box statistical model in each annulus [a- Shattering Energy Q*
Q*ice=1/5 Q*sil. (Krivov et al., 2005) a b
da/2,a+da/2] Other explored prescriptions:
•Derive observational constraints: S.E.D, luminosity profiles •n boxes spaced by a factor 2 in mass (i.e. 1.26 in size) between RPR (cutoff size)
Housen&Holsapple + Davis et al.
fragmentation
•Fragment size distribution: 2 index power law q1 and q2 (to
I context
k i , j ,k i, j i j
i 1, n j 1, n avoid ”supercatastrophic impacts, see TAB03 )
Ecol>Q*
b1i M lfb1(i i )
M 1i
M lf 1(ib)1i M sl 1(ib)1i M lf ( i )
1 b1i
C
C2 i 3 b11i i b2 i
<v> = (5/4<e2>+<i2>) C1i 3b1i Rlf ( i )3 q1i Rsl ( i )
c d
• Threshold specific energy Q* : Benz & Asphaug (1999) (nominal case) C2i
Rsl 3( ib)2 i
M i M 1i
•Dust is usually observed in the m to mm range. In many discs, simple estimations show that this dust •Craterization-produced fragments power law: Petit & Farinella,1993 small scale craters Mcra=K.ρEcol-1.24 (Kice=4.2 10-9, Ksil=3.10-7)
(Ecol < 0.01 Q*)
cratering
(Koschny&Grün, 2001)
cannot be primordial and has to produced by collisional cascades from unseen parent bodies
Ecol<Q*
Cratered Mass Mcra intermidate case: interpolation
all particles
t=0
NEW MULTI-ANNULUS NUMERICAL MODEL 50μm<R<0.2mm
104yrs
105yrs
In Thébault et al.(2003) (TAB03) we quantitatively studied these effects for the specific case of 106yrs nominal case
107yrs
the inner (inside 10AU) β-Pic disc. For this purpose, a statistical numerical code was developed, neglecting
which quantitatively follows the size distribution evolution of a population of solid bodies, in a cratering impacts Fig4: Final size distribution, for the whole system,
wide μm to km size-range, taking into account the major effects induced by radiation pressure on for 3 different star masses and RPR value
the smaller grains (size cutoff, perturbed dynamical behaviour,...). Our main result was to identify Fig.2: final distribution in the 50<R<60AU
annulus, when neglecting specific types of impacts Fig.6:
an important departure from the dNαR-3.5dR law, especially in the to 10-4 to 1cm range. The main
nominal case
limitation of this code was that it was single annulus, i.e. that it could only study a limited region
at one given distance from the star (≈5AU) but not the system as a whole. To do so, a mutli- hard material
annulus approach is needed. Such multi-annulus codes have been recently developed by weak material
Kenyon&Bromley (2004,2005) who have applied them to various different contexts. These codes
are in some respect more sophisticated than the one used in TAB03, in particular because they Departure from the MMSN
follow the dynamical evolution of the system (which is fixed in TAB03). Nevertheless, the price in σ a-1.5 !
to pay for following the dynamics is that the modelisation of the small grain population is very
simplified, with all bodies<1m following an imposed R-qdR power law, thus implicitly overlooking Fig1: Nominal case (high mass case Mdust=0.1M ) : Evolution of the size
the aforementioned consequences of the specific behaviour of the smallest dust particles. More distribution for different radial annulii
<e>=0.1
(nominal case) bibliography
<e>=0.2
recently Krivov et al.(2006), using a different approach, developed a model able to follow the •Benz, W., Asphaug, E., 1999, Icarus, 142, 5
evolution of both physical size and spatial distribution (1D) of a collisionaly evolving idealized <e>=0.03 •Campo-Bagatin, Celino, Davis, Farinella, Paolicchi, 1994,
debris disc. This innovative approach gave promising result for the peculiar case of the Vega Most important Features: Fig5: Final size distribution, for the whole system,
for 3 different collision-outcome prescriptions
Planet. Space Sci., 42, 1079
•Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2004, AJ, 127, 1
system. However, the modelisation of collisional outcomes is, as acknowledged by the authors
themselves, very simplified, with for instance all cratering impacts being neglected. The present
•Steady state sets in in ~106yrs, with: •Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2004, ApJ, 602, L133
•Koschny, D., Grün, E., 2001, Icarus, 174, 105
work is much in the spirit of Krivov et al., although we chose to keep the classical particle-in-a- •Overabundance of bodies with R≈2RPR Fig3: Final size distribution, for the whole system (all Crucial Role of the collision- •Krivov, A., Sremcevic, Spahn, F., 2005, Icarus, 174, 105
11 annuli), for 3 different average <e> in the system
box approach and the advanced modeling of collision outcomes of TAB03. We have developed a outcome prescription (poorly •Krivov, A., Lohne, T., Sremcevic, M., 2006, A&A, in press
multi--annulus version of our earlier code in order to extend the approach of TAB03 to the general •Depletion (factor 10-100) of R≈100RPR bodies (~sub-mm) constrained parameter!) •Thébault, P., Augereau, JC, Beust, H, 2003, A&A, 408,775
study of complete debris disc. Wavy structure only weakly depends on <e>, •Thébault, P., Augereau, J-C, 2006, to be submitted to
because it is mostly imposed by small high-β grains A&A
•Wyatt, M., Dent, W., 2002, MNRAS, 334, 589