Sunteți pe pagina 1din 104

Chapter 3

Consumer Behavior

Consumer Behavior
The theory of consumer behavior can be
used to help answer these and many
more questions
Theory of consumer behavior
The explanation of how consumers allocate
income to the purchase of different goods
and services

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Consumer Behavior
There are three steps involved in the
study of consumer behavior
1. Consumer Preferences
To describe how and why people prefer one
good to another

2. Budget Constraints
People have limited incomes

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Consumer Behavior
3. Given preference sand limited incomes,
what amount and type of goods will be
purchased?
What combination of goods will consumers
buy to maximize their satisfaction?

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Consumer Preferences
How might a consumer compare different
groups of items available for purchase?
A market basket is a collection of one or
more commodities.
Individuals can choose between market
baskets containing different goods

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Consumer Preferences Basic


Assumptions
1. Preferences are complete.
Consumers can rank market baskets

2. Preferences are transitive.


If prefer A to B, and B to C, the must prefer
A to C

3. Consumers always prefer more of any


good to less.
More is better

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Consumer Preferences
Consumer preferences can be
represented graphically using
indifference curves
Indifference curves represent all
combinations of market baskets that the
person is indifferent to
A person will be equally satisfied with either
choice

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Indifference Curves: An
Example
Market Basket

Units of Food

Units of Clothing

20

30

10

50

40

20

30

40

10

20

10

40

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Indifference Curves: An
Example
Graph the points with one good on the xaxis and one good on the y-axis
Plotting the points we can make some
immediate observations about
preferences
More is better

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Indifference Curves: An
Example
Clothin 50
g

The consumer prefers


A to all combinations
in the blue box, while
all those in the pink
box are preferred to A.

40

30

E
A

20

10
10
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

20

30

Chapter 3

40

Food
10

Indifference Curves: An
Example
Points such as B & D have more of one
good but less of another compared to A
Need more information about consumer
ranking

Consumer may decide they are


indifference between B, A and D
We can then connect those points with an
indifference curve

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

11

Indifference Curves: An
Example
Clothin
g

50
40

E
A

30

20

10

Indifferent
between B,
A, & D
E is
preferred to
U1
U1 is
preferred to
UH & G
1

10
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

20

30

Chapter 3

40

Food
12

Indifference Curves
Any market basket lying northeast of an
indifference curve is preferred to any
market basket that lies on the
indifference curve.
Points on the curve are preferred to
points southwest of the curve

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

13

Indifference Curves
Indifference curves slope downward to
the right.
If it sloped upward it would violate the
assumption that more is preferred to less.
Some

points that had more of both goods would


be indifferent to a basket with less of both goods

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

14

Indifference Curves
To describe preferences for all
combinations of goods/services, we have
a set of indifference curves an
indifference map
Each indifference curve in the map shows
the market baskets among which the person
is indifferent.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

15

Indifference Map
Clothing

Market basket A
is preferred to B.
Market basket B is
preferred to D.

D
B

A
U3
U2
U1
Food

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

16

Indifference Maps
Indifference maps give more information
about shapes of indifference curves
Indifference curves can not cross
Violates

assumption that more is better

Why? What if we assume they can cross.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

17

Indifference Maps
Clothing

U1

B is preferred to D
A is indifferent to B
&D
B must be
indifferent to D but
that cant be if B is
preferred to D

A
B
D

U2
U1
Food

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

18

Indifference Curves
The shapes of indifference curves
describes how a consumer is willing to
substitute one good for another
A to B, give up 6 clothing to get 1 food
D to E, give up 2 clothing to get 1 food

The more clothing and less food a


person has, the more clothing they will
give up to get more food
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

19

Indifference Curves
A

Clothing 16

14
12

Observation: The amount


of clothing given up for
1 unit of food decreases
from 6 to 1

-6

10

1
-4

8
6

B
D
1
-2

E
1 -1

2
1
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

4
Chapter 3

Food
20

Indifference Curves
We measure how a person trades one
good for another using the marginal rate
of substitution (MRS)
It quantifies the amount of one good a
consumer will give up to obtain more of
another good.
It is measured by the slope of the
indifference curve.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

21

Marginal Rate of Substitution


A

Clothing 16

14
12

MRS C

MRS =
6

-6

10
1
-4

8
6

B
D
1
-2

MRS = 2
E

1 -1

1
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

4
Chapter 3

G
Food
22

Marginal Rate of Substitution


Indifference curves are convex
As more of one good is consumed, a
consumer would prefer to give up fewer units
of a second good to get additional units of
the first one.

Consumers generally prefer a balanced


market basket

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

23

Marginal Rate of Substitution


The MRS decreases as we move down
the indifference curve
Along an indifference curve there is a
diminishing marginal rate of substitution.
The MRS went from 6 to 4 to 1

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

24

Marginal Rate of Substitution


Indifference curves with different shapes
imply a different willingness to substitute
Two polar cases are of interest
Perfect substitutes
Perfect complements

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

25

Marginal Rate of Substitution


Perfect Substitutes
Two goods are perfect substitutes when the
marginal rate of substitution of one good for
the other is constant.
Example: a person might consider apple
juice and orange juice perfect substitutes
They

would always trade 1 glass of OJ for 1


glass of Apple Juice

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

26

Consumer Preferences
Apple
4
Juice
(glasses)

Perfect
Substitute
s

1
0

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

3
Chapter 3

Orange Juice
(glasses)
27

Consumer Preferences
Perfect Complements
Two goods are perfect complements when
the indifference curves for the goods are
shaped as right angles.
Example: If have 1 left shoe and 1 right
shoe, you are indifferent between having
more left shoes only
Must

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

have one right for one left

Chapter 3

28

Consumer Preferences
Left
Shoes

Perfect
Complements

4
3
2
1
0

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

3
Chapter 3

Right Shoes
29

Consumer Preferences
We have assumed all our commodities
are goods
There are commodities we dont want
more of - bads
Things for which less is preferred to more

Examples
Air pollution
Asbestos

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

30

Consumer Preferences
How do we account for bads in our
preference analysis?
We redefine the commodity
Clean

air
Pollution reduction
Asbestos removal

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

31

Consumer Preferences: An
Application
In designing new cars, automobile
executives must determine how much
time and money to invest in restyling
versus increased performance
Higher demand for car with better styling and
performance
Both cost more to improve

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

32

Consumer Preferences: An
Application
An analysis of consumer preferences
would help to determine where to spend
more on change: performance or styling
Some consumers will prefer better styling
and some will prefer better performance

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

33

Consumer Preferences: An
Application
Styling
These
consumers
place a
greater value
on
performance
than styling

Performance
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

34

Consumer Preferences: An
Application
Styling
These consumers
place a greater
value on styling
than performance

Performance
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

35

Consumer Preferences: An
Application
Knowing which groups dominates the
market will help decide where
redesigning dollars should go
A recent study in the US shows that over
the past two decades most consumers
have preferred styling over performance.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

36

Consumer Preferences
The theory of consumer behavior does
not required assigning a numerical value
to the level of satisfaction
Although ranking of market baskets are
good, sometimes numerical value are
useful

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

37

Consumer Preferences
Utility
A numerical score representing the
satisfaction that a consumer gets from a
given market basket.
If buying 3 copies of Microeconomics makes
you happier than buying one shirt, then we
say that the books give you more utility than
the shirt.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

38

Utility
Utility function
Formula that assigns a level of utility to
individual market baskets
If the utility function is

U(F,C) = F + 2C
A market basket with 8 units of food and 3 units of
clothing gives a utility of

14 = 8 + 2(3)

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

39

Utility - Example
Market
Basket

Food

Clothing

Utility

8 + 2(3) = 14

6 + 2(4) = 14

4 + 2(4) = 12

Consumer is indifferent between A & B and


prefers both to C
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

40

Utility - Example
Baskets for each level of utility can be
plotted to get an indifference curve
To find the indifference curve for a utility of
14, we can change the combinations of food
and clothing that give us a utility of 14

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

41

Utility - Example
Clothing

Basket
C
2.5(10)
A
B
10(2.5)

15

10

0
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

25 = 5(5)
25 =

U3 = 100

U = FC
25 =

10
Chapter 3

U2 = 50

15

U1 = 25
Food
42

Utility
Although we numerically rank baskets
and indifference curves, numbers are
ONLY for ranking
A utility of 4 is not necessarily twice as
good as utility of 2
There are two types of ranking
Ordinal ranking
Cardinal ranking

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

43

Utility
Ordinal Utility Function
Places market baskets in the order of most
preferred to least preferred, but it does not
indicate how much one market basket is
preferred to another.

Cardinal Utility Function


Utility function describing the extent to which
one market basket is preferred to another.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

44

Utility
The actual unit of measurement for utility
is not important.
An ordinal ranking is sufficient to explain
how most individual decisions are made.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

45

Budget Constraints
Preferences do not explain all of
consumer behavior.
Budget constraints also limit an
individuals ability to consume in light of
the prices they must pay for various
goods and services.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

46

Budget Constraints
The Budget Line
Indicates all combinations of two
commodities for which total money spent
equals total income.
We assume only 2 goods are consumed, so
we do not consider savings

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

47

The Budget Line


Let F equal the amount of food
purchased, and C is the amount of
clothing.
Price of food = PF and price of
clothing = PC
Then PF F is the amount of money spent
on food, and PC C is the amount of
money spent on clothing.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

48

The Budget Line


The budget line then can be written:

PFF PCC I
All income is allocated to food (F) and/or clothing
(C)

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

49

The Budget Line


Different choices of food and clothing
can be calculated that use all income
These choices can be graphed as the budget
line

Example:
Assume income of $80/week, PF = $1 and PC
= $2

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

50

Budget Constraints
Market
Basket

Food
PF = $1

Clothing
PC = $2

I = PFF + PCC

40

$80

20

30

$80

40

20

$80

60

10

$80

80

$80

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Income

51

The Budget Line


Clothing

(I/PC) = 40

C
1
PF
Slope
- F
2
PC

30
10
20

D
20
E

10
G
0

20

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

40

60
Chapter 3

80 = (I/PF)

Food
52

The Budget Line


As consumption moves along a budget
line from the intercept, the consumer
spends less on one item and more on the
other.
The slope of the line measures the
relative cost of food and clothing.
The slope is the negative of the ratio of
the prices of the two goods.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

53

The Budget Line


The slope indicates the rate at which the
two goods can be substituted without
changing the amount of money spent.
We can rearrange the budget line
equation to make this more clear

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

54

The Budget Line

I PX X PY Y
I PX X PY Y
I PX

X Y
PY PY
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

55

Budget Constraints
The Budget Line
The vertical intercept (I/PC), illustrates the
maximum amount of C that can be
purchased with income I.
The horizontal intercept (I/PF), illustrates the
maximum amount of F that can be
purchased with income I.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

56

The Budget Line


As we know, income and prices can
change
As incomes and prices change, there are
changes in budget lines
We can show the effects of these
changes on budget lines and consumer
choices

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

57

The Budget Line - Changes


The Effects of Changes in Income
An increase in income causes the budget
line to shift outward, parallel to the original
line (holding prices constant).
Can buy more of both goods with more
income

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

58

The Budget Line - Changes


The Effects of Changes in Income
A decrease in income causes the budget line
to shift inward, parallel to the original line
(holding prices constant).
Can buy less of both goods with less income

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

59

The Budget Line - Changes


Clothing
(units
per week)

A increase in
income shifts
the budget line
outward

80
60

A decrease in
income shifts
the budget line
inward

40
20
0

L3

(I = L1
(I = $80)
$40)

40

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

80

120
Chapter 3

L2
(I = $160)

160

Food
(units per week)
60

The Budget Line - Changes


The Effects of Changes in Prices
If the price of one good increases, the
budget line shifts inward, pivoting from the
other goods intercept.
If price of food increases and you buy only
food (x-intercept), then cant buy as much
food. The point shifts in
If buy only clothing (y-intercept), can buy the
same amount. No change

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

61

The Budget Line - Changes


The Effects of Changes in Prices
If the price of one good decreases, the
budget line shifts outward, pivoting from the
other goods intercept.
If price of food decreases and you buy only
food (x-intercept), then can buy more food.
The point shifts out.
If buy only clothing (y-intercept), can buy the
same amount. No change

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

62

The Budget Line - Changes


Clothing
(units
per week)

A decrease in the
price of food to
$.50 changes
the slope of the
budget line and
rotates it outward.

40

L3

L2

L1

(PF = 1/2)

(PF = 1)
(PF = 2)

40

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

80

An increase in the
price of food to
$2.00 changes
the slope of the
budget line and
rotates it inward.

120
Chapter 3

160

Food
(units per week)
63

The Budget Line - Changes


The Effects of Changes in Prices
If the two goods increase in price, but the
ratio of the two prices is unchanged, the
slope will not change.
However, the budget line will shift inward to
a point parallel to the original budget line

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

64

The Budget Line - Changes


The Effects of Changes in Prices
If the two goods decrease in price, but the
ratio of the two prices is unchanged, the
slope will not change.
However, the budget line will shift outward to
a point parallel to the original budget line

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

65

Consumer Choice
Given preferences and budget
constraints, how do consumers choose
what to buy?
Consumers choose a combination of
goods that will maximize their
satisfaction, given the limited budget
available to them.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

66

Consumer Choice
The maximizing market basket must
satisfy two conditions:
1. It must be located on the budget line.
They spend all their income more is better

2. It must give the consumer the most


preferred combination of goods and
services.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

67

Consumer Choice
Graphically we can see different
indifference curves of a consumer
choosing between clothing and food
Remember that U3 > U2 > U1 for our
indifference curves
Consumer wants to choose highest utility
within their budget

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

68

Consumer Choice
Clothing
(units per
week)

A, B, C on budget line
D highest utility but
not affordable
C highest affordable
utility
Consumer chooses C

40
A
30

20

C
U3
U1

B
0

20

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

40

Chapter 3

80

U2

Food (units per week)

69

Consumer Choice
Consumer will choose highest
indifference curve on budget line
In previous graph, point C is where the
indifference curve is just tangent to the
budget line
Slope of the budget line equals the slope
of the indifference curve at this point

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

70

Consumer Choice
Recall, the slope of an indifference curve
is:
C
MRS
F
Further, the slope of the budget line is:

PF
Slope
PC
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

71

Consumer Choice
Therefore, it can be said at consumers
optimal consumption point,

PF
MRS
PC

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

72

Consumer Choice
It can be said that satisfaction is
maximized when marginal rate of
substitution (of F and C) is equal to the
ratio of the prices (of F and C).
Note this is ONLY true at the optimal
consumption point

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

73

Consumer Choice
Optimal consumption point is where
marginal benefits equal marginal costs
MB = MRS = benefit associated with
consumption of 1 more unit of food
MC = cost of additional unit of food
1 unit food = unit clothing
PF/PC

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

74

Consumer Choice
If MRS PF/PC then individuals can
reallocate basket to increase utility
If MRS > PF/PC
Will increase food and decrease clothing
until MRS = PF/PC

If MRS < PF/PC


Will increase clothing and decrease food until
MRS = PF/PC
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

75

Consumer Choice
Clothing
(units per
week)

Point B does not


maximize satisfaction
because the
MRS =-10/10 = 1
is greater than the
price ratio = 1/2

40
B

30
-10C

20

+10F

20

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

40

U1
Chapter 3

80

Food (units per week)

76

Consumer Choice: An
Application Revisited
Consider two groups of consumers, each
wishing to spend $10,000 on the styling
and performance of a car.
Each group has different preferences.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

77

Consumer Choice: An
Application Revisited
By finding the point of tangency between
a groups indifference curve and the
budget constraint auto companies can
see how much consumers value each
attribute.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

78

Consumer Choice: An
Application Revisited
Styling
$10,000

These consumers
Want performance
worth $7000 and
styling worth $3000

$3,000

$7,000
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

$10,000Performance
79

Consumer Choice: An
Application Revisited
Styling
These
consumers want
styling worth
$7000 and
performance
worth $3000

$10,000
$7,000

$10,000Performance

$3,000
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

80

Consumer Choice: An
Application Revisited
Once know preferences, can design a
production and marketing plan
Company can then make a sensible
strategic business decision on how to
allocate performance and styling on new
cars

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

81

Consumer Choice
A corner solution exists if a consumer
buys in extremes, and buys all of one
category of good and none of another.
MRS is not necessarily equal to PA/PB

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

82

A Corner Solution
Frozen
Yogurt
(cups
monthly)

A
U1 U2 U3

B
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

A corner solution
exists at point B.

Ice Cream (cup/month)


83

A Corner Solution
At point B, the MRS of ice cream for
frozen yogurt is greater than the slope of
the budget line.
f the consumer could give up more frozen
yogurt for ice cream he would do so.
However, there is no more frozen yogurt
to give up
Opposite is true if corner solution was at
point A
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

84

A Corner Solution
When a corner solution arises, the
consumers MRS does not necessarily
equal the price ratio.
In this instance it can be said that:

PIceCream
MRS
PFrozen Yogurt
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

85

A Corner Solution
If the MRS is, in fact, significantly greater
than the price ratio, then a small
decrease in the price of frozen yogurt will
not alter the consumers market basket.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

86

A Corner Solution - Example


Suppose Jane Does parents set up a
trust fund for her college education.
The money must be used only for
education.
Although a welcome gift, an unrestricted
gift might be better

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

87

A Corner Solution - Example


Original budget line, PQ, with a market
basket, A, of education and other goods
Trust fund shifts out the budget line as
long as trust fund, PB, spent on
education
Jane increases satisfaction moving to
higher indifference curve, U2

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

88

A Corner Solution - Example


Other
Consumption
($)

U2

Jane better off


on U2
B is corner
solution
MRS PE/POG

U1
Q
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Education ($)
89

A Corner Solution - Example


Other
Consumption
($)

C
U3

U2

If gift is
unrestricted,
Jane can be at
point C on U3
Better off
than with
restricted gift

U1
Q
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

Education ($)
90

Revealed Preferences
If we know the choices a consumer has
made, we can determine what their
preferences are if we have information
about a sufficient number of choices that
are made when prices and incomes vary.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

91

Revealed Preferences Two


Budget Lines
Clothing
(units per
month)

l1

I1: Chose A over B


A is revealed
preferred to B
l2: Choose B over
D
B is revealed
preferred to D

l2
A
B
D

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Food (units per month)


Chapter 3

92

Revealed Preferences-Two Budget Lines


Clothing
(units per
month)

l1

All market baskets


in the pink
shaded area are
preferred to A.

l2
A
B is
preferred
to
all market
baskets
in the
yellow
area
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

B
D

Food (units per month)


Chapter 3

93

Revealed Preference
As you continue to change the budget
line, individuals can tell you which basket
they prefer to others.
More the individual reveals, the more you
can discern about their preferences
Eventually you can map out an
indifference curve

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

94

Revealed Preferences Four


Budget Lines
I3: E revealed preferred to A
Clothing
(units per
month)

l3

l1

All market baskets in the


pink area preferred to A

l4
A

l2
B

A: preferred to all
market baskets in
the yellow area
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

I4: G revealed preferred to


Food (units per month)
Chapter 3

95

Marginal Utility and Consumer


Choice
Marginal utility measures the additional
satisfaction obtained from consuming
one additional unit of a good.
How much happier is the individual from
consuming one more unit of food

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

96

Marginal Utility - Example


The marginal utility derived from
increasing from 0 to 1 units of food might
be 9
Increasing from 1 to 2 might be 7
Increasing from 2 to 3 might be 5
Observation: Marginal utility is
diminishing as consumption increases

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

97

Marginal Utility
The principle of diminishing marginal
utility states that as more of a good is
consumed, the additional utility the
consumer gains will be smaller and
smaller.
Note that total utility will continue to
increase since consumer makes choices
that make them happier

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

98

Marginal Utility and Indifference


Curves
As consumption moves along an
indifference curve:
Additional utility derived from an increase in
the consumption one good, food (F), must
balance the loss of utility from the decrease
in the consumption in the other good,
clothing (C).

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

99

Marginal Utility and Consumer


Choice
Formally:

0 MUF(F) MUC(C)
No change in total utility along an indifference curve.
Trade off of one good to the other leaves the consumer
just as well off

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

100

Marginal Utility and Consumer


Choice
Rearranging:

C / F MU F / MU C
Since

C / F MRS of F for C
We can say
MRS MUF/MUC
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

101

Marginal Utility and Consumer


Choice
When consumers maximize satisfaction:

MRS PF/PC
Since the MRS is also equal to the ratio of
the marginal utility of consuming F and C

MUF/MUC PF/PC
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

102

Marginal Utility and Consumer


Choice
Rearranging, gives the equation for utility
maximization:

MU F / PF MU C / PC

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

103

Marginal Utility and Consumer


Choice
Total utility is maximized when the
budget is allocated so that the marginal
utility per dollar of expenditure is the
same for each good.
This is referred to as the equal marginal
principle.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 3

104

S-ar putea să vă placă și