Sunteți pe pagina 1din 65

Final Project Presentation

Design and Development of Power Factor


Corrected, High Efficiency, Automatic AC Voltage
Regulator System for Wide Input Range
Vijaya Gandhi M
CWB0411010, PT11
M. Sc. [Engg.] in Electronic System Design Engineering

Academic Guide : Mr. Ugra Mohan Roy

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Aim and Objectives of the Project


Aim :
To design, develop and verify a high efficiency,
automatic, wide input AC voltage (85V to 265V)
regulator system with Power Factor Correction - for
1000W electric load.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Aim and Objectives of the Project


Objectives :
To review literature on AC voltage regulator technologies,
PFC(Power Factor Correction) topologies, inverter technologies.
To arrive at design specifications of the proposed
AVR(Automatic Voltage Regulator) system.
To select and design appropriate active PFC topology and its
required control circuitry.
To select and design appropriate DC(PFC output) to AC
conversion topology and its control circuitry.
To integrate and verify the designed AVR system functionality
for 1000W electric load.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Methods and Methodology


Literature review and analysis for voltage regulator design, PFC
and inverter is carried out by referring reviewed journals, books,
manuals and related documents.
AVR system specifications are arrived at based on input
requirements and output requirements for connected loads.
The control signals, voltage sense and current sense circuits are
designed and developed to meet the individual specifications of
PFC functional blocks.
MOSFET driver and control circuitry is designed for PFC
topology.
All design calculations for PFC are carried out, components and
necessary custom parts are selected and designed.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Methods and Methodology


The control signals, voltage sense and current sense circuits are
designed and developed to meet the individual specifications of
inverter functional blocks.
IGBT driver and control circuitry is designed for inverter.
Heatsink design for PFC and inverter switches are carried out.
All design calculations for inverter are carried out, components
and necessary custom parts are selected and designed.
Schematic of the functional block diagram of PFC and inverter are
developed by using OrCAD software.
PADS PCB design tool has been used to develop the gerber file of
the PCB conforming to the developed schematic and High AC
voltage and DC voltage design guidelines.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Methods and Methodology


Firmware is developed for the chosen microcontroller which
controls the AVR system.
Designed PCB is reviewed as per standard set of guidelines.
Gerber files are supplied for the PCB fabrication.
The fabricated PCBs are assembled.
The AVR system is programmed with developed firmware and
tested for its functionality through the development of necessary
test setup and test cases.
System performance reports are generated.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Introduction

With the development in advanced power semiconductor devices, more


and more switched mode power supplies(SMPSs) and other power
switching circuits are used in modern systems. Due to the nonlinear
behavior of power switched circuits, distorted currents are normally
drawn from the AC line, resulting in low power factor (usually less than
0.67) and high total harmonic distortion(THD).

In order to address the above stated issues, the voltage regulator systems
must be power factor corrected, high efficient and with less total
harmonic distortion.
Adding active Power Factor Correction in AC voltage regulators
found to have not been addressed.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Need Analysis for PFC in Regulators


AC Voltage
AC Current

Power
Factor left
un-corrected

Input voltage and current waveforms without PFC. The voltage waveform is a sine wave
and the current waveform is a pulse or spike. PF<1(0.65 or less for SMPS loads in general)

Power
Factor
corrected
Voltage and current waveforms are sinusoidal and in phase. PF= 0.99
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Need Analysis for PFC in Regulators


PFC Increases the Supplys Output Power Capability
The PF, much like the power supplys efficiency rating,
determines the amount of useful power a switch mode power
supply can draw from the AC line and then deliver to its output
load.
Specifically, the formula that determines this is:
VLrms x ILrms x PF x Eff = Pout
As an example, if a power supply is operating off 120VAC line,
which is protected by 15A circuit breaker, UL(Underwriters
Laboratories) guidelines say you should not draw more than
12A.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

Need Analysis for PFC in Regulators


So, using the formula above, we can compare two power supply
examples with different Power Factors, as follows:
Example A: No PFC, PF = 0.65, 85% Efficiency, 120VAC input,
12A max. current:
Therefore: 120VAC x 12A x 0.65 x 0.85 = 796 Watts Output Power
Example B: PFC used, PF=0.98, 85% Efficiency, 120VAC input,
12A max. current:
Therefore: 120VAC x 12A x 0.98 x 0.85 = 1200 Watts Output
Power
As can be seen above, the power supply in Example B (with PFC)
can deliver 404 Watts or 51% more power to its output load than
the non-PFC supply, a significant increase.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

10

Need Analysis for PFC in Regulators


PFC is Required by International Regulations.
PFC is needed to comply with international regulations, especially
in Europe.
Since 2001, the European Union (EU) established limits on
harmonic currents that can appear on the mains (AC line) of
switched mode power supplies.
Today, the most important regulation is the European Norm
EN61000-3-2.
This regulation applies to power supplies with input power of 75
watts or greater, and that pull up to 16 amps off the mains.
It sets severe limits on the harmonic currents up to the 39th, when
measured at the input of switch mode power supplies.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

11

Literature Review
Kuo- Kai Shyu, Ming-Ji Yang, Jing-Heng Hong and Bau- Hung Lin(2004) present a conference paper
on Automatic Voltage Regulator Using a novel Phase shifted PWM is proposed. This system uses a
bulky transformer for series voltage compensation. This method doesnt operate for wide AC input.
This method doesnt address the PFC, hence doesnt address the bulky EMI filter components and
Total Harmonic Distortions.
(Dong-Hee Lee, Jin-Woo Ahn, and Tae-Won Chun(2007) presented variable gain control scheme of
digital automatic voltage regulator for AC brushless generator.
a PID controller with a simple gain adjustor is used. And the gains of PID controller are updated by
the terminal voltage and load current in order to improve dynamic response and stability. The structure
of the proposed gain adjustor is designed by a simple linear function and the gain is increased inproportional to load current and terminal voltage.
Hamdy Ahmed Ashour(2004) presented a new electronic voltage stabilizer topology utilizes four
AC switches in a form that may be named as "AC H-bridge connection, and based on pulse width
modulation (PWM) AC chopper combined with a single low power compensating transformer.
Such topology eliminates the need of the main input multi-tapping transformer, hence
reducing the overall size, weight and cost.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

12

Literature Review continued..


Jinn-Chang Wu(2011) presented a AVR in which the power electronic switches of only one arm are
switched in high frequency, while those of the other arms are switched in low frequency. Hence, the
switching loss of this AVR can be reduced. Moreover, the capacitance of the dc capacitor in the threearm power converter is very small. Hence, the size and cost can be reduced.
Nang Kaythi Hlaing, LwinLwin(2010) presented microcontroller based AVR. A triac, a step-up
transformer, a zero crossing circuitry and a load voltage sensing circuitry. This design is based on
the principle of phase control of ac voltage using a triac. The trigger pulse for the triac is delayed
by the microcontroller to provide the desired regulator terminal voltage.
Chin-Yuan Hsu(2011) presented an analysis design of the LLC resonant half-bridge converter with
natural interleaving power factor correction circuit. Then, the impact of Q and parameters on the
LLC resonant half-bridge transfer function is analyzed.
Yong-Seong Roh(2012) presented a two-phase interleaved critical conduction mode (CRM) power
factor correction (PFC) boost converter with a variation-tolerant phase shifter (VTPS) which
ensures accurate 180 deg phase shift between the two interleaved converters. A feedback loop
similar to a phase locked loop (PLL) controls the amount of the phase shifting of the VTPS.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

13

Literature Review continued..


A. R. Prasad(1991) presented novel active power factor correction method for power supplies with
three-phase front-end diode rectifiers. The implementation of this method requires the use of an
additional single switch boost chopper. The combined front-end converter draws sinusoidal ac
currents from the ac source with nearly unity input power factor while operating at a fixed
switching frequency.
Anitha. U, Sampath kumar Boini(2012) presented microcontroller based AVR. an Active Power
Filter (APF) based on simple control technique to provide reactive power and harmonics
compensation or non-linear single-phase loads. A voltage source inverter with carrier less
hysteresis PWM current control is used to form an APF.
Jong C. Wang, Hon-Ji.Chen(2008) proposed two current sharing control schemes base on average
current mode control for interleaved Power Factor Correction (PFC) converter. The boost inductor
current of each phases of interleaved PFC must be sensed to achieve current sharing and power
limiting.
Jong-Hyun Kim(1998) proposed a novel pulse width modulation buckboost ac chopper using
regenerative dc snubbers is proposed and analyzed. Compared to the previous buckboost ac
choppers, ac snubbers causing power loss are eliminated using regenerative dc snubbers. Since proper
switching operation for solving the commutation problem is utilized, the proposed ac chopper is
reliable and power loss due to ac snubbers is eliminated.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

14

Literature Summary

Most of the existing solutions support different input voltages, collectively from 160250VAC range and do not support wide universal AC input (85 -265VAC) range.
Literature reviews refer to poor regulated output voltage i.e. voltages between 200 240VAC.
Literature review papers based solutions cut out the power if AC input is out of 160
250VAC range, which will trip the connected equipments.
Most of the solutions use line frequency transformer, which increases weight and
overall cost of the system.
None of the existing voltage stabilizers provide Power factor correction, hence causes
high electricity bill and PF penalty as well, reduce overall efficiency.
Some systems use tap change techniques to regulate the voltage, which interrupt the
output voltage momentarily and that can reset/trips the computer or other electronics
equipments.
None of the papers presented on regulators support for universal voltage (85 to
265VAC) and do not provide PFC.
In this case all load equipments should have its PFC correction taking place within.
The solutions presented are specific to some countries; they do not work in different
geographic regions.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

15

Application Diagram of AVR

Usage of AVR in day to day applications


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

16

Block Diagram of AVR

High level block diagram


of automatic
AC AC
converter system
M.S.Ramaiah
School of Advanced
Studies

17

AVR System Specs


Input:

AC Input Voltage Range


AC Input line frequency

85 - 265VAC, Single Phase


47Hz - 63Hz

220V+/- 1%
50Hz
0.99
>93% @ full load

Output:

AC output Voltage
AC output frequency
Power Factor
Efficiency

Protection Features:

Input under/over voltage protection


Over load protection
Output Short Circuit protection
Over temperature protection
Cooling

<85VAC, >265VAC
up to 300% of rated power for <0.5sec
Yes
Yes
Forced Cooling

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

18

Power Factor- Explanation


Special electrical requirement of inductive loads.
Most loads in modern electrical distribution systems are inductive. Examples
include motors, transformers, gaseous tube lighting ballasts, and induction
furnaces. Inductive loads need a magnetic field to operate .
Inductive loads require two kinds of current:
Working power (kW) to perform the actual work of creating heat, light,
motion, machine output, and so on .
Reactive power (kVAR) to sustain the magnetic field.
Working power consumes watts and can be read on a wattmeter. It is
measured in kilowatts (kW). Reactive power doesnt perform useful work,
but circulates between the generator and the load.
Working power and reactive power together make up apparent power .
Apparent power is measured in kilovolt-amperes (kVA) .
PF measures how effectively electrical power is being used. A high power
factor signals efficient utilization of electrical power, while a low power
factor indicates poor utilization of electrical power.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

19

Power Factor- Explanation Contd


Power factor is the ratio of working power to apparent power.
To determine power factor (PF), divide working power (kW) by apparent
power (kVA). In a linear or sinusoidal system, the result is also referred to as
the cosine .
PF = kW/kVA = cosine

Power Triangle
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

20

Active or Passive PFC


Power Factor Correction (PFC) allows power distribution to operate at its
maximum efficiency.
There are two types of PFC, Active PFC and Passive PFC.

Active PFC
The preferable type of PFC since it provides more efficient power frequency.
Because Active PFC uses a circuit to correct power factor, Active PFC is able
to generate a theoretical power factor of over 0.95
Active Power Factor Correction also markedly diminishes total harmonics,
automatically corrects for AC input voltage, and is capable of a full range of
input voltage.
Since Active PFC is the more complex method of Power Factor Correction, it
is expensive to produce an Active PFC power supply.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

21

Active PFC or Passive PFC Contd


Passive PFC
The most common type of PFC is Passive Power Factor Correction (Passive
PFC).
Passive PFC uses a capacitive filter at the AC input to correct poor power
factor.
Passive PFC may be affected when environmental vibration occurs.
Passive PFC requires that the AC input voltage be set manually.
Passive PFC also does not use the full energy potential of the AC line.
SMPS with passive PFC can achieve power factor of about 0.6 to 0.75.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

22

Conventional Vs Interleaved PFC


General Comparison
Parameters
Power
EMI/Noise
Output Voltage Surge
Input Current Surge
Magnetics size
Efficiency

Conventional Active
PFC
<3000W
Normal
High
High
High
Low (<85%)

Interleaved Active
PFC
>3000W
Low
Low
Low
Low
Normal to High (>94%)

Simulation Parameters
Parameters
Vin
Vout
Pout
Fsw
Cout
L

Conventional Active
PFC
220+/-5%
400V+/-5%
Up to 3000W
100kHz
3300uF
270uH

Interleaved Active
PFC
220+/-5%
400V+/-5%
>3000W
50kHz
3300uF
270uH

Components Comparison
Parameters
Main Switch
Fast Diode
Bridge Diode
Inductance
Capacitor
Cost

Conventional Active Interleaved Active


PFC
PFC
1
2
1
2
4
4
1
2
M.S.Ramaiah
School
of
Advanced
Studies
1
1
Low
High

23

Advantages of Interleaved PFC


Interleaved PFC is gaining popularity in external and
embedded-type power supply architectures.
It is exceptionally flexible and provides many cost-saving
features such as passive-component(inductor and output
capacitor) size reductions, smaller EMI filtering components
and higher efficiencies.
Other benefits of interleaving include scalability and
ultrathin designs.
Scalability allows for addressing many different power
levels and applications.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

24

Interleaved PFC
In high power applications interleaving PFC stages can
reduce inductor area and reduce output capacitor ripple
current.
This is made possible through the inductor ripple current
cancellation that occurs with interleaving.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

25

Interleaved PFC Block Diagram


AC
Source

Bridge
Rectifier

EMI Filter

Interleaving
Channel1

FET Driver

Interleaving
Channel2

FET Driver

6W Fly-back
Power Supply
For house
keeping
12V, 0.5A
To supply PFC
controller chip and
FET driver chips

Output
Cap

Bridge O/P
Voltage Sense

Interleaved
PFC
Controller
UCC28070

Interleaving
Current Sense
Channel1
Interleaving
Current Sense
Channel2
PFC Output
Voltage Sense

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

26

Interleaved PFC Design Specs


Definition
RMS input Voltage(AC line)
Output Voltage(DC)
Vripple
Line Frequency
Power Factor at maximum load
Output Power
Full load efficiency

Minimum

Typical

Maximum

Units

85

110 or 220

265

344

390

425

30

47

63

Hz

0.95

1000

90

The Interleaved uses the UCC28070 PFC interleaved controller to shape


the input current waveform to provide power factor correction.
Interleaving boost pre-regulator stages enables the power supply designer to
reduce boost inductor area product by 50% and reduce boost capacitance
RMS current. This allows the designer to reduce the size of the PFC preregulator; as well as, use output filter capacitors with lower RMS ratings.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

27

Interleaved PFC-Design Inputs


Input Parameters
Vmin-rec=Rectified Vmin

120.21

Dmax=Max duty cycle

0.95

Efficiency

95%

Pout

1200

Vout

390

Vdc

F-line

50

Hz

Vin-min= minimum AC input

85

Vac

Dmin-LL= Minimum duty cycle


del IL= inductance current
ripple
fs=switching frequency
Vout-ripple

0.69
14.12

150000

Hz

29.25

PFC Design Input Parameters


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

28

Interleaved PFC- Design Calculations


1

Boost Inductors (L)


selection
L

Cout selection
Cout

Cout selection
Cout

max Cout
20% derated Cout

ESRmax selection
ESRmax

MOSFET selection
Ipft(flat top)
Ipft

Ipeak
Ipeak
Prds(on)

Estimated AC-DC
Conversion loss
Estimated AC-DC
Conversion loss

Diode Parameters
Idiode
Idiode

Id-peak

( Vin-min* sqrt(2)*Dmin-LL)/(del IL *fs)


39.16782312

(2*Pout*(1/F-line))/(Vout^2-(Vout/2)^2)
421
1/4*(Pout/(Vout*Efficiency*0.637))/
(Vripple*0.8*3.141*fLine)
346

421
657

(Vout-ripple*0.2)/((Pout*Sqrt(2))/(Vinmin*efficiency))
0.28

micro Henry

*Based on Hold up
Energy
micro Farad
*Based on output
voltage ripple
micro Farad

micro Farad
micro Farad

Ohms

(Dmax/Efficiency)*((Pout/2)/Vmin-rec)
4.99
( (Pout* sqrt(2))/(2*Vin-min*Efficiency)+(del
Il1/2) )
17.6
Ifet(rms)*Rds(on)

((Pout/Efficiency)-Pout)*0.5

31.58

(Pout)/(2*Vout*Efficiency)
1.62
M.S.Ramaiah School
of Advanced Studies
( (Pout* sqrt(2))/(2*Vin-min*Efficiency)+(del
Il1/2) )

29

Interleaved PFC Switching

Switching Waveforms of Interleaved MOSFETs

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

30

AVR System Test Setup

AVR System Test Setup


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

31

AVR System Boards

AVR System Boards


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

32

PFC- Prototype Efficiency at Extreme Input

Interleaved PFC Prototype Efficiency Curve For Extreme Input Range


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

33

PFC- Prototype Efficiency at Typical Input

Interleaved PFC Prototype Efficiency Curve for Typical Input Voltages


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

34

PFC- Prototype PF at Extreme Input

Interleaved PFC Prototype PF for Extremes Input Voltages


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

35

PFC- Prototype PF at Typical Vin

Interleaved PFC Prototype PF for Typical Input Voltages


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

36

PFC- Prototype PF Waveform

System Output Voltage and Current Waveforms Show PF=0.99,


load connected to the system is a typical Switched Mode Lab
Power Supply
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

37

Selection of Inverter Topology

Among different inverter systems, there are 2 different types.


Type1: Voltage output type, which output the AC voltage as a
voltage source.
Ex: The inverter in the UPS system is a typical voltage type
inverter.
Type2: The current type, which output the AC current in a
specified power factor.
Ex: The motor control inverter and the solar inverter are the
current type inverters.
Full-bridge current type topology including 4 IGBTs, which is
easy to get started and transplant to the real product.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

38

Full-Bridge Current Type Inverter


D
C

Full bridge current type inverter topology

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

39

Inverter Block Diagram


390V DC BUS
Clean
Sine wave

BUS Voltage
Sense
12W Fly-back
Power Supply

12V, 1A
House Keeping
Power Supplies
for control
circuitry

3.3V, 1A

H-Bridge
Inverter
Switches

Sine wave
LC Filter

C
T

220V AC Relay
& Output
Connector

4
IG BT Drivers
4

O/P Current Sense


(Op-Amp based)

5V, 0.5A
Digital
Controller
TMS320F28027
JTAG

O/P Voltage Sense


(Op-Amp based)

Zero Crossing
Detector
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

40

Full-Bridge Current Type Inverter- PWM


When in the positive cycle of the sine wave,
the output voltage of the inverter is changing from
Vdc to 0, while the negative cycle, it is the Vdc to
0.
So in the positive cycle, if the duty of Q1 is d ,
then we can get the relation between the output
voltage Vo and the DC bus voltage Vbus.

Vo= d*Vbus

Single Polar Modulation Technique


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

41

Full-Bridge Current Type Inverter- PWM

PWMs for Inversion


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

42

Full-Bridge Current Type Inverter- PWM

Single Polar Modulated PWMs for Inversion


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

43

Design of Inverter

The key components of the inverter are 4 pieces of 600V IGBT.


The IGBT drivers are designed to the module type. Besides, 2
pieces of 2.5mH inductor are used. 2 pieces of relay are used to
control the output voltage connection. Current sense transformer
is used to sense the inductor current. A piccolo mixed signal micro
controller specially designed for power conversion applications is
used.

There are 3 key signals used in the controller loop:


1 Input DC BUS voltage.
2 Output inductor current.
3 Output AC voltage.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

44

Design of Inverter- Key Components

IGBTs : 600V, 70A, 200W, TO-247AC


Isolated IGBT driver circuits.
Two 2.5mH, 5A inductors (one each for line and neutral)
Output CAP: 1uH, 275VAC
10A, 250VAC output fuse
Current sense transformer with burden resistor for output current
measurement.
Output voltage sense circuitry
Output frequency measurement with op-amp based zero crossing
detector circuit
Fly-back power supply for generating house keeping power supplies.
32- bit microcontroller(TMS320F28027) with PWMs support, A piccolo
mixed signal micro controller specially designed for power conversion
applications is used.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

45

Design of Inverter-O/P Frequency Measurement

Zero crossing detect

The zero crossing detection is used to measure frequency


output.
The design uses a comparator to get a falling edge in every
positive zero crossing.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

46

Design of Inverter- O/P Voltage Sense


V at ADC V at ADC
(+ve
(-Ve
Vout Vo,pk
Vfb,pk Vfb,rms Cycle)
Cycle)
0.03311
10.00 14.14 0.0033113 0.047
3
1.697
1.603
0.06622
20.00 28.28 0.0033113 0.094
5
1.744
1.556
0.09933
30.00 42.42 0.0033113 0.140
8
1.790
1.510
0.13245
40.00 56.56 0.0033113 0.187
0
1.837
1.463
0.16556
50.00 70.70 0.0033113 0.234
3
1.884
1.416
0.19867
60.00 84.84 0.0033113 0.281
5
1.931
1.369
0.23178
70.00 98.98 0.0033113 0.328
8
1.978
1.322
0.26490
80.00 113.12 0.0033113 0.375
1
2.025
1.275
0.29801
90.00 127.26 0.0033113 0.421
3
2.071
1.229
100.0
0.33112
0 141.40 0.0033113 0.468
6
2.118
1.182
110.0
0.36423
0 155.54 0.0033113 0.515
8
2.165
1.135
120.0
0.39735
0 169.68 0.0033113 0.562
1
2.212
1.088
130.0
0.43046
0 183.82 0.0033113 0.609
4
2.259
1.041
140.0
0.46357
0 197.96 0.0033113 0.655
6
2.305
0.995
150.0
0.49668
0 212.10 0.0033113 0.702
9
2.352
0.948
160.0
0.52980
0 226.24 0.0033113 0.749
1
2.399
0.901
170.0
0.56291
0 240.38 0.0033113 0.796
4
2.446
0.854
M.S.Ramaiah
School
of Advanced
180.0
0.59602
0 254.52 0.0033113 0.843
6
2.493
0.807
Diff AMP
Gain

Diff Amp
Gain
Vout Rms
Vo,P
k
Vfb,p
k

0.0033112
58
220 Vrms

311.08 V
1.0300662
25 V
0.7284768
V
at ADC = Vfb +1.65 (for
Vfb,rms
21 +Ve
V
Cycle)
V at ADC = Vfb -1.65 (for -Ve
Cycle)

Output Voltage Sense Calculations


Studies

47

Design of Inverter- O/P Current Sense


Io.rms Io,pk

VIfb at
VIfb at
ADC
Rsens
Ifb, Vifb.p Vifb,r ADC (+Ve (-Ve
e
Ifb,pk
rms k
ms
Cycle)
Cycle)
100.00
0.001
0 3.54E-04 0.025 0.035 0.025
1.685
1.615
100.00
0.001
0 7.07E-04 0.05 0.071 0.050
1.721
1.579
100.00
0.001
0 1.06E-03 0.075 0.106 0.075
1.756
1.544
100.00
0.001
0 1.41E-03 0.1 0.141 0.100
1.791
1.509
100.00
0.001
0 1.77E-03 0.125 0.177 0.125
1.827
1.473
100.00
0.001
0 2.12E-03 0.15 0.212 0.150
1.862
1.438
100.00
0.001
0 2.47E-03 0.175 0.247 0.175
1.897
1.403
100.00
0.001
0 2.83E-03 0.2 0.283 0.200
1.933
1.367
100.00
0.001
0 3.18E-03 0.225 0.318 0.225
1.968
1.332
100.00
0.001
0 3.54E-03 0.25 0.354 0.250
2.004
1.297
100.00
0.001
0 3.89E-03 0.275 0.389 0.275
2.039
1.261
100.00
0.001
0 4.24E-03 0.3 0.424 0.300
2.074
1.226
100.00
0.001
0 4.60E-03 0.325 0.460 0.325
2.110
1.190
100.00
0.001
0 4.95E-03 0.35 0.495 0.350
2.145
1.155
100.00
0.001
0 5.30E-03 0.375 0.530 0.375
2.180
1.120
100.00
0.001
0 5.66E-03 0.4 0.566 0.400
2.216
1.084
100.00
0.001
0 6.01E-03 0.425 0.601 0.425
2.251
1.049
100.00
0.001
0 6.36E-03 0.45 0.636 0.450
2.286
1.014
100.00
0.001
0 6.72E-03 0.475 0.672 0.475
2.322
0.978
100.00
0.001
0 7.07E-03 0.5 0.707 0.500
2.357
0.943
100.00
0.001
0 7.42E-03 0.525 0.742 0.525
2.392
0.908
100.00
0.001
0 7.78E-03 0.55 0.778 0.550
2.428
0.872
100.00
0.001
0 8.13E-03 0.575 0.813 0.575
2.463
0.837
100.00
0.001
0 8.48E-03 0.6 0.848 0.600
2.498
0.802
100.00
0.001
0 8.84E-03 0.625 0.884 0.625
2.534
0.766
100.00
0.001
0 9.19E-03 0.65 0.919 0.650
2.569
0.731
100.00
0.001
0 9.54E-03 0.675 0.954 0.675
2.604
0.696
100.00
0.001
0 9.90E-03 0.7 0.990 0.700
2.640
0.660
100.00

Diff Amp CT
Gain
gain

0.250

0.354

1.000

0.500

0.707

1.000

0.750

1.061

1.000

1.000

1.414

1.000

1.250

1.768

1.000

1.500

2.121

1.000

1.750

2.475

1.000

2.000

2.828

1.000

2.250

3.182

1.000

2.500

3.535

1.000

2.750

3.889

1.000

3.000

4.242

1.000

3.250

4.596

1.000

3.500

4.949

1.000

3.750

5.303

1.000

4.000

5.656

1.000

4.250

6.010

1.000

4.500

6.363

1.000

4.750

6.717

1.000

5.000

7.070

1.000

5.250

7.424

1.000

5.500

7.777

1.000

5.750

8.131

1.000

6.000

8.484

1.000

6.250

8.838

1.000

6.500

9.191

1.000

6.750

9.545

1.000

7.000

9.898

1.000

Current Diff
Amp Gain
Iout
Rms

0.0033112
58

4.545455 Vrms
6.4272733
Io,Pk
7V
CT Ratio
0.001
0.0064272
Isense ,pK
73
0.0045454
V
at ADC
= Vfb +1.65 (for 55
+Ve
Isense
,rms
Cycle)
V at ADC = Vfb -1.65 (for -Ve
Cycle)

Output Current Sense Calculations


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

48

Design of Inverter- IGBT Driver

12V Supply

15V Fly- Back


Power Supply

Isolated 15V
Supply

3.3V level PWM


from
Microcontroller

Optical Isolator
(HCPL-350)

Isolated 15V
level PWM

IGBT Driver Module Block Diagram

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

49

Design of Inverter Firmware-Modes

Inverter Firmware- Working Modes


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

50

Design of Inverter Firmware

There are 5 different running modes of the system implemented in the


firmware.

1 Power On Mode:
When the board powered up, it will get into the power on mode first, the
MCU will initialize itself. When the initialization is finished, the system will
transfer to standby mode automatically.
2 Standby Mode:
When the system is in standby mode, all the PWM and Relay are off. The
system is waiting for the command to turn on. Besides, it will detect if the fault
occurs.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

51

Design of Inverter Firmware


3 Soft Start Mode:
When there is a turning on command, the system will go to the soft start mode
first, the PWM and relay will be turned on. When the turning on is OK and no
fault occurs, the system will get into the normal inverter mode
automatically.
4 Normal Inverter Mode:
When the system is in normal inverter mode, it means the system is feeding the
energy out. If there is no fault or turnoff command, the system will stay in this
mode.
5 Fault Mode:
When there is a fault, for example bus over voltage, the system will transfer to
the fault mode immediately. All the PWM is off, the output relay is cut off from
the output. The fault can be cleared by the button. When the fault is cleared, it
will return to standby mode.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

52

Power ON Mode

Standby Mode

Soft Start Mode

Normal Inverter Mode

Fault Mode

1 : Switch Off all PWM()


2 : Switch OFF the output Relay()
3 : Reset All the Flag()
4 : Go to Stand By mode()
5 : Check the Fault Flag()
6 : IF Fault Flag is set()
7 : If all the parmaeter are ok got Soft start mode()
8 : check the Fault and error condition()
9 : Check if the input voltage is Proper()
10 : Switch On the outpur relay()

11 : Switch ON the PWM()


12 : Go to Normal inverting Mode()
13 : Check for proper input voltage from DC bus and Fault flag()
14 : Switch OFF the PWM and Go to Fualt mode any of the condition fails()

15 : Check if the Clear fault Flag occur()


16 : Go to stand by mode if the fault flag gets clear()
17 : Again Start from step 5()

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

PFC- Prototype PF Waveform

Inverter Output Voltage Waveform is clean 220V(High voltage


probe is attenuated to 500x).
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

54

PFC- Prototype PF Waveform

System Output Voltage and Current Waveforms Show PF=0.99,


load connected to the system is a typical Switched Mode Lab
Power Supply
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

55

Inverter Efficiency Curve-Load Sweep

Inverter Output load(Watts) Vs Efficiency Curve


M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

56

AVR System Efficiency at Extreme Inputs

System Output % load(Watts) Vs Efficiency Curve at


extreme Input Voltages
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

57

AVR System Efficiency at Typical Inputs

System Output % load(Watts) Vs Efficiency Curve


at typical input voltages
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

58

Conclusion

Designed and demonstrated AVR system with satisfactory results.


AVR system has following advantages compared to existing solutions
presented.

Provides active power factor correction, helps deliver maximum power


with less THD to the connected loads.
Eliminates need for power factor correction on individual loads.
Operates from wide input voltage range(85VAC to 265VAC), works in all
geographic regions.
Compliant to EN61000-3-2 standard, low harmonics on AC input line.
Saves electricity usage charges.
High safety features including under voltage, over voltage, over current,
over current.
High efficiency, >93% at full load.
Provides clean sine wave @220V+/-1%
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

59

Future Scope of the Project

Both PFC and Inverter boards along with PSUs, IGBT drivers, Control
card can be combined into a single PCB.
With single PCB architecture, one common heatsink can be used and all
heat dissipating components can be attached to it. This helps miniaturize
system size.
PFC controller functionality also can be implemented in the same
microcontroller which is used in inverter board as it has enough
peripherals and memory to accomplish the job.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

60

Project Schedule

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

61

References
1. Kuo- Kai Shyu, Ming-Ji Yang, Jing-Heng Hong and Bau- Hung
Lin(2004), Automatic Voltage Regulator Using a Novel Phase
Shifted PWM Single- Phase Inverter Annual Conference
IEEE, RIYE Electric CO and the National Science Council of
Taiwan, Busan Korea.
2. Dong-Hee Lee, Jin-Woo Ahn, and Tae-Won Chun(2007), A
Variable Gain Control Scheme of Digital Automatic Voltage
Regulator for AC Generator, Dept. of EE & Mechatronics,
Kyungsung University, Busan, Korea.
3. Hamdy Ahmed Ashour, (2005), A New Electronic StepUp/Down Voltage Stabilizer Topology Based On H- Bridge AC
Chopper, Arab Academy for Science and Technology, Dept of
Electrical and Control Engineering, Miami, Alexandria, Egypt.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

62

References

continued

4. Jinn-Chang Wu(2011), Three-Arm AC Automatic Voltage


Regulator, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL
ELECTRONICS.
5. Nang Kaythi Hlaing, LwinLwin(2010), Microcontroller-Based
Single-Phase Automatic Voltage Regulator, Hardware
Technology Department Computer University(PangLong) .
6. Chin-Yuan Hsu(2011), The Design and Implementation of
LLC Resonant Half-bridge Converter with Natural Interleaved
Power-Factor-Correction,Departmentof Electrical Engineering
National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences,
Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
7. Yong-Seong Roh(2012), A Two-Phase Interleaved Power
Factor Correction Boost Converter with a Variation-Tolerant
Phase Shifting Technique, Member, IEEE.
M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

63

References

continued

8. A. R. Prasad(1991), An Active Power Factor Correction


Technique for Three-phase Diode Rectifiers, Member, IEEE,
IEEE transactions on Power Electronics, Vol 6, No 1.
9.
Anitha. U, Sampath kumar Boini(2012), AC to DC
conversion using active PFC, Department of Electrical And
Electronics Engineering, JNTU, HYD, INDIA, Vol.2, Issue.6.
10. Jong C. Wang, Hon-Ji.Chen (2008), Design and Analysis of
AC/DC Converters with Interleaved Power Factor Correction,
Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Yuan Ze.
11. Jong-Hyun Kim (1998), A PWM BuckBoost AC Chopper
Solvingthe Commutation Problem, IEEE transactions on
industrial electronics, vol 45, no.5.

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

64

Thank You

M.S.Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies

65

S-ar putea să vă placă și