Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(x)
(w)
(c)
-x-
(a) (e)
(d)
(b)?
(y)
-w-
(b)
(a)
(c)
-y-
[a]
(x)
[c]
(w) [b] (a)
(x) [b]
[b]
[a] [a]
(c)?
[c] [a]
(y) -b- or -x-
(e)?
1071
[c]
(z)
-a- or -w-
(d)?
[c]
(b)
CRASH
The market ran into some troubles at the 61.8% retrace of the last wave down, a level that we had
identified as first resistance. The fact that it reversed at an “exact” 61.8% causes me a little concern--
trading isn’t THAT easy. A “retest” of this level, or the light blue downtrend line, would not be
surprising. This wave model still calls for at least one more leg lower.
(d)
(b)?
(y)
-w-
(b)
(c)?
“a”
“a”
(W)
“c”
“b” .9274
(X)
“b”
In recent reports on the Canadian Dollar, I forgot to keep track of the 23.6% retrace. This was a
mistake as the Canadian Dollar found support into an exact 23.6% retracement (4pips off).
(X) Remember the “23.6 Rule”: In a larger move, if the market can hold the 23.6%, then the larger
trend should be assumed in intact.” Holding the 23.6% is a good sign for bulls. Unfortunately,
there are a lot of other signals that suggest a major top is forming. .9274 becomes critical support
“a” now. Bears must break the Can$ below .9274 to make the case for a deeper correction.
“b”
-A-
(a)
[1]
Using classical charting techniques, .9483 looks to be resistance, and level that should
be sold into, keeping in mind the possible head and shoulder bottom forming.
[4]
(w)
[3] -x-
(y) -a-
[5] (b) .9483
(c) -c-?
-w- Left
Head? -e-?
Shoulder?
(x)
(a)
-d-?
.9326
(c)
-y-
a or w -b-
(b)
Last week (on 1/27/10) I was counting the move down from the highs as an “impulsive” five wave down
that was completed. My concern for the count was with the very first leg down. Those concerns ended
[2] up being justified as this move turned out being something different than an “impulse”….
(a)
This pattern has take the shape of a “complex” correction that ended with a “terminal” (c)-
[1] wave. What this means is that we can expect a 60-80% retrace from the recent lows that
could take the $CAD back to .9598.9689. A sideways/triangular congestion from here
would, on the other hand, be extremely BEARISH, because it would be an x-wave.
[4]
(w)
Reprinted from 2/4/2010
[3] -x-
(y)
-a-
[5]
(b)
(c)
-w-
[2]
(x)
This report should not be interpreted as investment advice of any kind. This report is technical
commentary only. The author is NOT representing himself as a CTA or CFA or Investment/Trading
Advisor of any kind. This merely reflects the author’s interpretation of technical analysis. The
author may or may not trade in the markets discussed. The author may hold positions opposite of
what may by inferred by this report. The information contained in this commentary is taken from
sources the author believes to be reliable, but it is not guaranteed by the author as to the accuracy
or completeness thereof and is sent to you for information purposes only. Commodity trading
involves risk and is not for everyone.
Here is what the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has said about futures trading:
Trading commodity futures and options is not for everyone. IT IS A VOLATILE, COMPLEX AND
RISKY BUSINESS. Before you invest any money in futures or options contracts, you should
consider your financial experience, goals and financial resources, and know how much you can
afford to lose above and beyond your initial payment to a broker. You should understand commodity
futures and options contracts and your obligations in entering into those contracts. You should
understand your exposure to risk and other aspects of trading by thoroughly reviewing the risk
disclosure documents your broker is required to give you.