Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Utility
Theory of consumer choice
Hypothesis: each consumer spends income in
the way that yields the greatest amount of
satisfaction, or utility
Money utility
To analyze demand behavior
Utility
Total monetary utility
Of a quantity of a good to a consumer
Maximum amount of money
Willing to give up in exchange for it
Marginal utility
Of a commodity to a consumer
Maximum amount of money
Willing to pay for one more unit of the good
Table 1
Utility
Law of diminishing marginal utility
The more of a good a consumer has
The less marginal utility an additional unit contributes
to overall satisfaction
If all other things remain unchanged
Utility
As a person acquires more of a commodity
Total utility increases
Marginal utility from that good decreases
Anomalies
Increasing marginal utility
Figure 1
Marginal Utility (Price) per Pizza
$16
A Marginal
A
Utility
(or Demand) Curve: Your
15
14
B
Demand
for
Pizza
C This Month
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
P
E
F
G
H
1
Utility
Marginal analysis
Method for calculating optimal choices
Choices that best promote the decision makers
objective
Marginal Analysis
If marginal net utility is positive
Consumer must be buying too small a
quantity to maximize total net utility
Because marginal utility exceeds price
Consumer can increase total net utility further
Utility
Marginal net utility = MU - P
Marginal utility (MU) minus price (P)
If Positive
MU > P
(MU P) > 0
Total net utility uphill
If Negative
MU < P
(MU P) < 0
Total net utility downhill
11
Figure 2
Total net
utility hill
Number of Pizzas
12
Utility
Optimal purchase rule
If MU > P
Buy more
If MU < P
Buy less
13
Utility
Consumer that maximizes total net utility
Marginal utility schedule = Demand schedule
Marginal utility curve = Demand curve
14
Table 2
15
Behavioral Economics
Are economic decisions really made
rationally?
Evidence
Behavior that is inconsistent with economists
typical rationality assumptions
Behavioral economics
Investigates how consumers and other
economic decision makers really behave
16
Behavioral Economics
Economically irrational behavior
People react in apparently irrational ways
Even though they may be fully aware that
their behavior is irrational
School cafeterias
Placement and presentation of particular
foods can influence what students choose
to eat
17
Behavioral Economics
Stock market investors
When prices are rising, they rush to invest
their money
Herd behavior: when many investors buy or
sell, others, like cattle, are sure to follow
18
19
Consumer surplus
Net gain from purchase
What consumers are willing to pay minus what
consumers actually pay
= Total utility (in money terms) Total
expenditures
21
Table 3
Calculating Marginal Net Utility (Marginal Consumers Surplus) from Your Pizza Purchases
22
Figure 3
Marginal Utility and Price per Pizza
$15.00 A
$4.00 $13.00 B
$12.50 C
$2.00
$1.50 $11.50 D
$0.50
$8.00 E
$5.00 F
$3.00 G
$0
Normal good
Quantity demanded increases
When real income increases
All other things equal
24
Figure 4
$10 A
Naomis
demand
C
9
Z
0
Market demand
K
D
0
M
Price
Z
Price
Price
Alexs
demand
M
15
Quantity demanded
Quantity demanded
Quantity demanded
(a)
(b)
(c)
26
27
Snob appeal
To advertise ones wealth
28
Given
Prices of commodities
Fixed amount of money
29
Table 4
30
Figure 5
7
Pounds of cheese
A Budget Line
A
6
5
4
C
3
K
E
0
31
Points below
Spend < budget
Points above
Not available
32
33
Figure 6
U
Pounds of cheese
6
5
Income = $18
Income = $12
Income = $9
2
1
N
0
E
4
Figure 7
Pounds of cheese
4
3
Rubber band
price = $1.50
2
1
E
0
H
5
Indifference curve
All combinations of commodities
Equally desirable consumer
Total utility
Figure 8
Pounds of cheese
7
Three Indifference
Curves for Cheese and
Rubber 6Bands
5
4
T
3
2
Ic
W
0
Ia
5
Ib
6
37
Never intersect
Negative slope
Round toward the axes
Bowed in
38
39
No change in budget
Ratio of prices
40
Figure 9
I
Pounds of cheese
R
B
m
D
E
I
F
B
0
42
Figure 10
Optimal 7Consumer
Choice
I
Pounds of cheese
Ia
Ib
4
T
3
2
W
0
44
Figure 11
Pounds of cheese
curve
E
T
I2
I1
B
0
Figure 12
Pounds of cheese
Optimal
Effects of a Rise
in
Income
When
Rubber
C
Consumption
Bands Are an Inferior
Good
Curve
B
B
0
47
Figure 13
Consequences
of Price Changes
B
Pounds of cheese
3
4
C
0
48
Figure 14
Price of rubber bands
per box
D
Deriving the Demand
Curve for Rubber
Bands
$4.00
t
1.50
D
0
49
Elasticity
Elasticity
Measure of responsiveness
51
Figure 1
Hypothetical Demand Curves for Film
Df
Ds
b
10
Df
1.5
Quantity demanded
(a)
$20
$20
10
Ds
0
Quantity demanded
(b)
52
Elasticity
Demand elastic
Elasticity > 1
A 10% rise in price
More than 10% drop in quantity demanded
53
Elasticity
Demand inelastic
Elasticity < 1
10% rise in price
Less than 10% drop in quantity demanded
54
Figure 2
The Sensitivity of Slope to Units of Measurement at
D
Pauls Pizza Parlor
$16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
B
Price per Pizza
$16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
55
Elasticity
Elasticity formula
Each change: percentage change
Each percentage change
Average values of the before and after quantities and
prices
Absolute value
Elasticity
1. Perfectly elastic demand curve
Horizontal demand curve
Infinitely elastic
57
Perfectly elastic
demand curve
$0.75
Perfectly
inelastic
demand
curve
Price
Price
D
0
0
Quantity demanded
(a)
90
Quantity demanded
(b)
58
Elasticity
3. Straight-lines demand curves
Slope constant
From left to right
Elasticity smaller
59
$6
$30
Price
Price
Straight-line
demand
curve
20
Unit-elastic
demand
curve
10
1
C
0
4 5
Quantity demanded
(c)
D
7
14
Quantity demanded
(d)
60
Table 1
62
Demand is inelastic
Total revenue will increase
63
Figure 4
An Elastic Demand Curve
D
Price
$6
5
S
V
4
3
2
1
T
0
12
Quantity demanded
64
65
4. Passage of time
Short run inelastic demand
Long run elastic demand
66
67
Positive: Substitutes
Negative: Complements
68
Substitutes
An increase in the quantity consumed of
one good
Decreases the quantity demanded of the
other good
69
An optimal decision
The one that best serves the objectives of the
decision maker
Selected by explicit or implicit comparison with
the possible alternative choices
70
71
After 1980
Sales of instant cameras - drop sharply
Price of conventional cameras - drop
73
Elasticity calculations
Polaroid claimed that Kodak was
obligated to pay $9 billion or more
Kodak claimed that it owed Polaroid
$450 million
74
Plott points
Draw a line: demand curve
75
Table 2
Figure 5
T
$8.20
May
Average Price
Plot8.00
of HistoricalFeb.
Data on Price and
R
April
Quantity
7.80
S
March
7.60
7.40
7.20
Jan.
T
7.00
0
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
Problems
Different periods of time
Actual sales figures
Actual demand curve
May have shifted
78
Figure 6
T
$8.20
F
Plot of Historical
Data and True Demand
Feb.
8.00
R
Curves for January,
February,
and March
W
Average Price
7.80
7.60
March
M
F
7.40
7.20
Jan.
T
7.00
0
90
91
92
93 94
95
96
Quantity Demanded in thousands
97
98
79
Too perfect
Advertising spending
Based on sales
80
Data
Demand curve no change
Supply curve shifted
81
Table 3
Figure 7
Legitimate Demand Curve Estimation from
Statistical Data
83