Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
WELL-BEING
GROUP VII
Srikanth Nelanuthula 1402178
Somasekhar Yamanuri 1402174
Sriranjan 1402180
Sumit 1402185
Susheel Rayabarapu 1402187
WELL BEING
The state of being comfortable, healthy and happy
Precursors of Well-being: Approaches to happiness and Life goals
WELL-BEING APPROACHES
HEDONIC APPROACH
.
EUDAIMONIC
APPROACH
(Subjective Well-Being)
(Psychological Well-Being)
Expanding potentials
HAPPINESS APPROACHES
PLEASANT LIFE
ENGAGED LIFE
MEANINGFUL LIFE
Comes
through
deep
engagement, using one's
strengths and virtues in
activities that one finds
challenging and rewarding
Methodology
1. Experimental Design
2. Selection of participants
3. Questionnaires
6. Data Analysis
4. Collecting Feedback
Procedure
Self Knowledge and
Care of the Soul
5 Questionnaires
5 Questionnaires
5 Questionnaires
taught in Winter
were repeated after
were applied before
were again applied
2011, every day of
4 months of
start of classes
on the 14th session
the week , for 3
sessions
weeks
PEI registers as Response Variables: Health and Wellbeing, Purpose In Life, Meaning in
Self Suffering and That of Others, Risk and Protection factors of Drug abuse which are
numerically scored in individual participants Before and After the PEI
Data Analysis
Comparison
Estimate the Effects
of the PEI,
Comparison was
made between
Scores before and
after and four months
later the PEI sessions
Normality
Verified the
response variables
for Normality and
Homogeneity of
variances.
Anova
Statistical Significance
of the grades
comparison Before and
After the Sessions was
done by ANOVA
PCA
A Principal
Components analysis
was conducted for the
six variables and the
factor score of the
components
associated with linear
regression models.
In PCA was obtained that the second components did not have any contribution, since there were no linear association
scores. So the factor score of the first components were analyzed with linear regressions and obtained scores
association of individuals between the phase before vs. after (y = 7.6 e-6 0.68 * x, F = 22, P <0.0001, r2 = 0.45) and
between before vs. four months later (y = 1.4 e-5 0.65 * x, F = 22, P <0.0001, r2 = 0.40) (Fig. 2). This shows that the
intervention on study subjects remains immediately After PEI and Four months later.
Conclusion
ENGAGED LIFE
MEANINGFUL
LIFE
LIMITATION OF STUDY
Other elements of Happiness and well-being were not focussed
The research was limited to students of age 19-30. On voluntary basis. The
student group was chosen and interviewed.
The students who participated in the study are of the same culture, social
level and income (Idiosyncrasies)
From the paper we could conclude that, the scores of PEI is higher during and
after PEI.
No method to sustain the PEI is suggested in this paper.
Genetics,
Family,
Activities,
Work Satisfaction,
Community ties
Environment,
Health
Happiness
Living conditions
Leisure,
Wealth,
Economic Well Being
Unemploymen
t