Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The Resolutions
SETTING UP YOUR
FRAMEWORK
A value is defined by Websters Dictionary as a principle, standard, or quality considered worthwhile or
desirable.
a value debate is a debate between conflicting
principles, standards and qualities considered as desirable.
How do you decide the conflict between two different principles?
Answer: you decide upon standards to weigh the two values.
First, you need to identify what you are trying to evaluate, or what is sometimes called the evaluative term.
In the resolution, Corporations ought to value their responsibility to shareholders over the public interest when the two conflict the
evaluative term is valueover So, in this resolution you want to use a criteria that weighs responsibility to shareholders and public
interest.
Then we need to use a value premise to identify the most important element of the evaluative term:
For example, the corporations resolution. It can be said that corporations have an obligation to shareholders, since they are financially
invested in the company. Therefore, a value of Duty could apply for the Affirmative. (Justice could apply as well)
Then we need to determine a value criteria to identify, define and measure the standards that you need to meet in order to
achieve the value premise.
For our example, we can say the protection of property rights is a value criteria that would best achieve justice or duty the best.
Specifically we should be able to achieve our value criteria (which is kind of like our impact) through affirming or negating the
resolution. Immanuel Kant talks about the institutionalization of provisional property.
Corporations ought to value their responsibility to shareholders over the public interest
when the two conflict.
Justice
Protection of
Provisional
Property
Democracies ought to incorporate provisions for legal secession into their national
constitutions.
In the United States, campaigns that support candidates for public office ought to be
financed exclusively by public funds.
In the United States criminal justice system, jury nullification ought to be used in the face of
perceived injustice.
Resolved: Adolescents ought to have the right to make autonomous medical choices.