Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Prof. P. A. Dode
Asst. Professor
&
Dr. H. S. Chore
Prof. & Head
Contents
1.Introduction
2.Necessity
3.Cost impact
4.Factors affecting the expansion joints
5.Aim & Objective
6.Literature review
7.Scope of work
8.Problem Definition
9.Analytical simulations
10.Results and Discussion
11.Conclusions
12.Scope of Future work
13.References
14.List of Publications
2
Introduction
Necessity:
1.Restrictions in Indian code
2.Trend in a building industry for a long
multistoried structures
3.Demanding architecture
4.Serviceability issues
5.Impact on initial and maintenance cost
Necessity:
1.Restrictions in Indian code
2.Trend in a building industry for a long
multistoried structures
3.Demanding architecture
4.Serviceability issues
5.Impact on initial and maintenance cost
10
11
Necessity:
1.Restrictions in Indian code
2.Trend in a building industry for a long
multistoried structures
3.Demanding architecture
4.Serviceability issues
5.Impact on initial and maintenance cost
12
13
14
15
Necessity:
1.Restrictions in Indian code
2.Trend in a building industry for a long
multistoried structures
3.Demanding architecture
4.Serviceability issues
5.Impact on initial and maintenance cost
16
17
Necessity:
1.Restrictions in Indian code
2.Trend in a building industry for a long
multistoried structures
3.Demanding architecture
4.Serviceability issues
5.Impact on initial and maintenance cost
18
Cost Impact:
High Initial cost
High Maintenance cost
High Repair cost
19
20
Aim / Objective:
In view of lack of information in Indian
Standard code of practice and latest trend
in Construction Industry, it has become
necessary to set the guidelines for
Structural Engineers designing the long
buildings without expansion joint. This
exercise has been taken up during this
research work .
21
Literature Review
SR.
NO
1.
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
RESULT/CONCLUSION
IS 3414
Literature Review
SR.
NO
2.
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Expansion
joints in
buildings
Technical
report no. 65
prepared by
National
academy of
sciences,
Washington,
D.C.
Literature Review
SR.
NO
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
3.
Joint design
for Reinforced
concrete
buildings by
Michael J.
Pfeiffer and
David Darwin
For University
of Kansas
YEA
R
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Literature Review
SR.
NO
4.
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
IS 456
2000
RESULT/CONCLUSION
25
Literature Review
SR.
NO
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
5.
Expansion
joints: Where,
When and
How by James
M. Fisher, S.E.
April
2005
RESULT/CONCLUSION
26
Literature Review
SR.
NO
6.
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Expansion
jointWhy
Bother? By
Davco
Construction
Materials
27
Literature Review
SR.
NO
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
RESULT/CONCLUSION
7.
Design
Temperature
for Structural
Elements by
Paul Millman,
Robert Kilcup
A.M.ASCE and
C. Allin
Cornell,
M.ASCE
28
Literature Review
SR.
NO
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
RESULT/CONCLUSION
8.
Thermal
Loading of
Concrete
Roofs by
Malcolm J. S.
Hirst, M.ASCE
29
Literature Review
SR.
NO
9.
NAME OF
AUTHOR/DE
PT
YEA
R
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Thermal
Analysis of
Reinforced
Concrete
Shells by
Maria Anna
Polak
Literature Review
SR.
NAME OF
YEAR
NO AUTHOR/DEP
T
10.
ACI 224.3r-95
on Joints in
Concrete
construction
2001
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Literature Review
SR.
NAME OF
YEAR
NO AUTHOR/DEP
T
11.
Concrete
at 1996
High
Temperature:
Material
Properties and
Mathematical
models
by
Zdenek
P.
Bazant
and
Maurice
F.
Kaplan,
England
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Literature Review
SR.
NAME OF
YEAR
NO AUTHOR/DEP
T
12.
BS 8110-2
1985
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Literature Review
SR.
NAME OF
YEAR
NO AUTHOR/DEP
T
13.
Length
Thermal
stress
relations for
composite
bridges by
Jack Emanuel,
F.ASCE &
Charles M.
Taylor,
A.M.ASCE
1985
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Literature Review
SR.
NAME OF
YEAR
NO AUTHOR/DEP
T
14.
Temperature
and shrinkage
study for
300m long
building by
M/s. LERA,
USA
2008
RESULT/CONCLUSION
Scope Of Work:
1.Impact of temperature load on building
expansion/ elongation
2.Impact of temperature load on shear
force in columns and shear walls
3.Impact of temperature load on
reinforcement consumption in
- Flat slab
- Beam
- Shear wall & columns
4. Impact of temperature load on axial
stress in flexural elements
36
Problem definition
Study of Multi-level car park buildings
open from all sides without any skin wall/
faade:
Model 1 80m Long building
Model 2 160m Long building
Model 3 240m Long building
37
Building
Features:
1.
Type of Structure
2.
Earthquake zone
III
Response
reduction
Importance
factor
3.
Layout
4.
5.
Ground floor
height
3.0m
6.
Parking floor
height
3.0m
7.
External walls
8.
Internal walls
38
12. Design
Philosophy
13.
Size of ext.
column
900 x 1500
14.
Size of int.
column
900 x 900
15. Thickness of
shear wall
300 x 750
250mm
500mm
39
Analytical simulation:
1.Three identical models using ETABS
2.Increase in length by 80m in each
model
3.Floor slabs as Finite shell elements with
applied Temperature Loads
4.Column and beams are modeled as line
elements
5.Shear walls finite element piers
6.Load combinations as per SP24 &
IS 875 Part V are defined in ETABS.
7.Earthquake forces using Seismic coefficient method as per IS 1893:2002
40
Analytical simulation:
Contd
8.Specific Temperature load combinations:
0.75 (1.05 Dead Load + 1.7 Live Load + 1.4
Temp. Load)
1.4 Dead Load + 1.4 Temperature Load
41
42
43
44
45
Model
Expansion
(mm)
1.
Model I (80m)
7.8
2.
Model II (160m)
16.0
3.
24.0
46
47
48
Without
temperature
Desi
Critical load
gn
combination shea
r KN
1.2(DL+LL2097
EqY)
1.2(DL+LL2097
EqY)
1.2(DL+LL2097
EqY)
49
50
Case I
Case II
Case III
51
3. Reinforcement consumption in
column &
shear wall
Case
Reinforcement
consumption Kg/cu.m
Length
With
Without
temperatur temperatur
e
e
Case I
80
158.0
156.0
Case II
160
134.3
156.0
Case III
240
133.9
156.0
52
53
54
6. Increase in Reinforcement
Consumption in beams
Reinforcement
Case
Case I 80m
Case II 160m
Case III 240m
Consumption kg/cu.m
With
Without
temperatur temperatu
e
re
%
Increase
230.3
204.5
12.6
223.9
178.1
25.7
224.8
177.7
26.5
55
6. Increase in Reinforcement
Consumption in Flat slabs
Length
'm'
% Increase
at Level 1
% Increase
at Terrace
Case I
80
11.81
15.13
Case II
160
18.22
22.04
Case III
240
25.46
30.67
Case
56
Conclusions:
Present study confirms that elimination of
expansion joint is a viable solution in
case of lengthy structures subjected to
ambient temperature. However,
Structural Engineer shall keep an eye
on various parameters like:
57
References
Lewerenz,
59
PCA.
60
IS
61
Edward
and
62
List of Publications:
Paper
63
Thank you
..
64