Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Hypotheses
Variables
Independent
Flavor
Brand
Packaging
Texture/Structure
of Chip
Dependant
Taste Preference
Brand Preference
Characteristic Preference
Procedure
Experimentation set-up: Samples were
placed on numbered paper plates
(numbers 1 to 4) in order from left to
right.
Pre-experiment debriefing:
Participants in groups of 4 or 5. Experiment
done.
Experiment execution: After concluding
the second tasting, surveyors were asked
to complete the final form.
Surveys
Survey #1
1) How would you rate the aroma of the chip?
Very Bad
Very Good
Chip 1:
Chip 2:
Chip 3:
Chip 4:
Too thin
Just Right
Too Thick
Dont Care
Chip 2:
Too thin
Just Right
Too Thick
Dont Care
Chip 3:
Too thin
Just Right
Too Thick
Dont Care
Chip 4:
Too thin
Just Right
Too Thick
Dont Care
Survey #2
What brand of chips do you usually purchase? Why?
Lays
Old Dutch
Tims
No Name
Other, Please specify: __________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Packaging
Taste
Sound
Pricing
Smell
Convenience
Nutrition Levels
Others, Please Specify
Results
Results without seeing brand
Difficult to distinguish
preference
scores
Pattern in the scores
Purchase Intention
Purchase Intention Chip 1 (Lays)
4.5
4.5
3.5
3
3.2
3.28
Blind Test
Non-Blind Test
3.5
3
Rating 2.5
Rating 2.5
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
Blind Test
2.96
2.51
Non-Blind Test
Brand Identification
Brand Identification
(Of consumer-indicated favorites included in survey)
Incorrectly
Identified
38%
63%
Limitations
Population:
Participants:
Sample size
Population uniform
Hypothesis guessing
Un-isolated participants
Experiment set-up:
Variety of Brands
Tasting order
Flavor variety
Experiment Recap
Results
Increasing purchase
intentions for Lays,
decreasing purchase
intentions for Tims and
no-name
Inferences
Consumer preference
is heavily reliant on
the brand
Consumers cant
distinguish chip
brands by taste alone
Managerial Implications