INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT

GROUP MEMBER:
MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ AIMAN BIN
AHMRAN
ADILAH ARMA SHAARI
MOHD NAZAMIR BIN AZHAR
MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE MOHD
NASIR
SUPERVISOR :
IR.ASRI BIN ABD RAHIM

INTRODUCTION
PROGRESSIVE BUILDER CONST. founded in 1 Feb
2005 initially to provide professional consulting
services in Civil & Structural Engineering.
providing extensive professional services to both
the public and private sector
The Firm had affiliated and associated with others
professionals and recruited several experience
personnel to form productive team

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ITEMS

CONTENT

PROJECT NAMES

DESIGN PROPOSAL OF STADIUM AT

PAUH PUTRA UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA
PERLIS (UniMAP)

COST

RM5430527.85

PROJECT DATE (START FINISH)

16 FEBRUARY 2015-29MAY 2015

CONTRACT PERIOD

14 WEEKS

PROJECT DIRECTOR REPRESENTATIVE

PEGAWAI JABATAN PEMBANGUNAN

KAMPUS PAUH PUTRA UNIVERSITI
MALAYSIA PERLIS 02600,ARAU,
PERLIS

DESIGN CONSULTANT
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Project Manager
Geotechnical Engineer
Civil Engineer
Structural Engineer
M&E Engineer

1. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ AIMAN BIN

AHMRAN
2. ADILAH ARMA BT SHAARI
3. MUHAMMAD NAZMIR BIN AZHAR
4. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ AIMAN BIN
AHMRAN

CRITCAL PATH METHOD

EARTHWORK
Borelog Data

SAFE BEARING CAPACITY

Safe bearing capacity

- qult = 258 kN/m2
- qallow = 86 kN/m2
- Q = 774 kN
Total Settlement = Elastic +
Consolidation
= 99 mm

 Proposed foundation

Deep foundation (RC pile)

Size = 200 x 200mm
Length = 9 m
Pile cap layout

PILE CAP DETAILING

STRUCTURE DESIGN
CALCULATION OF COLUMN LOAD
USING
AREA METHOD (VIP ROOM
GRANDSTAND)

ROOF FLOOR LAYOUT

TOP ROOF (VIP ROOM)

VIP ROOM
TRF

Material

METAL DECK
ROOFING SHEET
WITH 50 THK.
INSULATION
WOOL
& A LAYER
DOUBLE SIDED
SISALATION ON
CHICKEN
WIRE MESH M.S
PURLIN AT 1200
C/C

Dead Load (kN/m2)

3.9

THK

Live Load (kN/m2)

0.8

DENSITY

Ultimate Load (kN/m2)

References :
Eurocode 1 (Table 2.2.2 &
2.3.1)

50 mm
78

6.465
Label

Area (m2)

Load (kN)

CL1

102.599942

663.30862503

CL2

102.599942

663.30862503

CL3

78.974956

510.57309054

CL4

78.974956

510.57309054

CL5

102.599942

663.30862503

CL6

102.599942

663.30862503

TOTAL COLUMN LOAD

Label

Load (kN)

CL1

663.309

CL2

1141.354

CL3

1073.384

CL4

1127.603

CL5

1180.304

CL6

663.309

CLS1

275.041

CLS2

287.794

CLS3

243.768

CLS4

228.936

CALCULATION OF COLUM LOAD

FROM GRANDSTAND (FIXED SEAT)

COLUMN GRANDTAND

SPECIFICATION OF GRANDSTAND (FIXED SEAT)

Specification
Dimensions :
R

450

mm

900

mm

212

mm

width of stair, w

5800 mm

length of stair, L

2000 mm

Characteristic Actions:
permanent,gk

variable,qk

(excluding
selfweight)

Materials :
fck

25

fyk

500

unit weight of concrete

25

Cnom

25 mm

bar

8 mm

22.94

ACTION AND ANALYSIS

Action & Analysis
Slab selfweight

11.55

Permanent load(excluding selfweight)

gk

12.55

qk

Ultimate Load

22.94

Distributed load

133071.0424991
32

Bending Moment

53228.41699965
27

Average
thickness
y

237 mm

462 mm

TOTAL COLUMN LOAD FROM

GRANDSTAND ( 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR)
Label

Area (m2)Area (m2)

Load (kN)

A1

3.57

163.82

A2

7.21

330.84

A3

7.28

334.05

A4

7.28

334.05

A5

9.12

418.49

A6

10.21

468.50

A7

20

917.73

A8

20.18

925.99

A9

20.18

925.99

A10

25.55

1172.40

A11

6.15

282.20

A12

15.47

709.87

A13

15.6

715.83

A14

15.6

715.83

A15

11.18

513.01

A16

8.46

388.20

A17

16.51

757.59

A18

16.65

764.01

A19

16.65

764.01

A20

12.36

567.16

21

12.29

563.95

22

13.25

608.00

23

8.3

380.86

BEAM DESIGN
BEAM LAYOUT

DESIGN CONSIDERATION
Concrete:
Grade 30 for superstructure
Density = 25 kg/m3
Reinforcement:
Grade 500 N/mm2 for main
reinforcement
Grade 500 N/mm2 for shear link
reinforcement
Concrete cover
30 mm
Design criteria
Loading: EC1

BEAM DESIGN (OFFICE)

Beam size, b x h: 200mmX450mm
This beam size will be used for all
beams from ground to roof beam.

Reinforcement bar:
20mm

Link:
6mm

BEAM DETAIL

References : Eurocode 1 (Table 2.2.2 & 2.3.1)

SLAB DESIGN
LOADING DETERMINATION
Slab self weight
Finishes
Imposed load (EC1)
Ultimate design load, n = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
COVER
Exposure condition (Table 4.1, EN 1992-1-1)
Fire resistance (Table 5.8, EN 1992-1-2)

FLOOR SLAB

Two-way restrained slab

Ly/Lx = 5360 mm x 5000 mm
Thickness, h = 150 mm
Main reinforcement
- H12-225
- H12-250
- H12-300

ROOF TRUSSES OFFICE

ROOF TRUSSES
4.10
kN
G
5.01 kN

4.74 kN

2.96
kN

2.70
kN

10
A
9.73
kN

407
5

B
8.36
kN

536
0

C
11.14
kN

367
5

D
9.78
kN

264
5

SEWERAGE
The proposed sewer linesSYSTEM
is to cater the following : -

Stadium
Office
Manhole
Max. Spacing
:
Not Greater Than 90 m
Minimum Depth
:
1200mm Below Ground Level
Manhole covers :
Heavy Duty Cast Iron Manholes
Design Criteria
Malaysian Standard, MS1228
Design and installation of sewerage system by the Director
General of Sewerage Services Department
Malaysian Sewerage Industry Guideline (MSIG).
following gradients ( Building Spec JKR )

Design Criteria and Formulae :

Stadium= 0.2 per Person
on Table A.1

Note: PE calculation base

Sewerage Treatment VOL 4

Office= 3 PE per 100m2 gross area,

ITEM of Population
DESCRIPTIO Equivalent
NO PERSON/ (P.E) P.E
Calculation

TOTAL P.E

AREA (m2)

STADIUM

120

0.2 per staf

24.0

OFFICE

177

3/100m2

5.0

29.0

The total area for office is 177m 2. The estimated numbers of capacity for this stadium
is about 120 persons. The PE calculations are shown above.

Example of Sewerage Calculation

1. Population Equivalent , PE : 5.00
2. Cumulative PE : 5.00+4.00 = 9.00
3. Peak Flow Factor : 4.7 (C.PE/1000) -0.11
4.7(9/1000) -0.11
= 7.9m3/min/PE
4. Design Flow
Peak flow factor x (225liter/day) x(day/24x60x60)
x(m3 /1000)x PE
= 7.95 x (225L/day)x (day/24x60x60) x (m3 /1000) x
9.0
= 0.00018 m3 / s

SEWERAGE LAYOUT

Working Volume and Accumulated

Sludge Volume for Septic tank

Dimension for Septic Tank Cast in-Situ for 29 PE

Dimension for Septic Tank

Cast in-Situ for 30 PE

WATER RETICULATION

WATER DEMAND FOR PROPSED BUILDING

The Estimated Daily Demand For Domestic
Use
No.

Types of Fittings

Qty.

Storage

Demand

Demand

Capacity (Liters)

(lpd)

(gpd)

Shower

24

900

21,600

4,752

Lavatory Basins

20

90

1,800

396

Water Closet

26

180

4,680

1,030

Wash Up Sink

225

225

50

Water Tap

13

90

1,170

257

Urinal

180

360

79

29,835.00

6564

TOTAL WATER DEMAND

b) The estimated water demand for fire
fighting (Class E)

680.00

lpm

Therefore, total water demand for this

development

700.72

lpm

11.68

lps

PEAK FLOW ANALYSIS

Tapping
Point,1

TYPE
OF
PIPE

H.
WILLIAMS,
C

L (m)

D (m)

Q
(Avg)

Q, Peak

Node
A(M) Up

Node
Down

Veloci
ty
node
up

Veloci
ty
node
down

V<
Vmax
= 2.6

hf
(m)

Residual
Head
Pressure
Node Up

Residual
Head
Pressure
N. Down

Minimum
Residual
Pressure >
7.5m

SV

HDPE

120

53.8

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

55.09

50.74

0.00

0.03

OK

0.05

36.50

40.86

OK

HDPE

120

33.9

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

50.74

52.82

0.03

0.03

OK

0.03

40.86

38.78

OK

HDPE

120

17.5

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

52.82

52.74

0.03

0.03

OK

0.01

38.78

38.86

OK

HDPE

120

60.6

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

52.74

49.67

0.03

0.03

OK

0.05

38.86

41.93

OK

HDPE

120

33.8

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

49.67

49.56

0.03

0.03

OK

0.03

41.93

42.04

OK

HDPE

120

28.6

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

49.56

49.57

0.03

0.03

OK

0.02

42.04

42.03

OK

HDPE

120

28.6

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

49.570

51.17

0.03

0.03

OK

0.02

42.03

40.43

OK

HDPE

120

31.2

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

51.170

50.75

0.03

0.03

OK

0.03

40.43

40.85

OK

BUIL
DNG

HDPE

120

34.4

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

50.758

50.88

0.03

0.03

OK

0.03

40.85

40.72

OK

HR1

HDPE

120

5.35

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

51.170

50.88

0.03

0.03

OK

0.00

40.72

41.00

OK

HR
1

HDPE

120

27.7

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

50.886

50.16

0.03

0.03

OK

0.02

41.00

41.72

OK

HDPE

120

9.93

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

50.166

50.15

0.03

0.03

OK

0.00

41.72

41.73

OK

HR2

HDPE

120

14.8

0.2

0.369

0.923

0.031

50.159

50.68

0.03

0.03

OK

0.01

41.73

41.204

OK

FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS

Tapping
Point,1

TYPE
OF
PIPE

H.
WILLIA
MS, C

L (m)

D
(m)

Q (Avg

Q, Fire
Flow

Area Pipe Node

(M)
Up

Node
Down

Velocit Velocit V <

y node y node Vmax =
up
down 2.6
hf

Residual
Head
Residual
Pressure Head
Node Up Pressure
(m)
N. Down

Minimum
Residual
Pressure
> 7.5m

S
V

HDPE

120

53.882

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

55.1

52.7

0.00

1.44

OK

0.578

36.50

40.17

OK

HDPE

120

33.909

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

52.7

52.6

1.44

1.44

OK

0.364

40.17

37.73

OK

HDPE

120

17.587

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

52.6

52.4

1.44

1.44

OK

0.189

37.73

37.62

OK

HDPE

120

60.624

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

52.4

52.3

1.44

1.44

OK

0.650

37.62

40.04

OK

HDPE

120

33.883

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

52.3

51.9

1.44

1.44

OK

0.363

40.04

39.79

OK

HDPE

120

28.631

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

51.9

51.9

1.44

1.44

OK

0.307

39.79

39.48

OK

HDPE

120

28.631

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

51.9

51.2

1.44

1.44

OK

0.307

39.48

37.57

OK

HDPE

120

31.288

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

51.2

50.9

1.44

1.44

OK

0.335

37.57

37.65

OK

BUIL
DNG

HDPE

120

34.450

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

50.9

50.9

1.44

1.44

OK

0.369

37.65

37.15

OK

HR1

HDPE

120

5.355

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

50.9

50.8

1.44

1.44

OK

0.057

37.15

37.38

OK

H
R
1

HDPE

120

27.720

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

50.8

50.7

1.44

1.44

OK

0.297

37.38

37.80

OK

HDPE

120

9.931

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

50.7

50.2

1.44

1.44

OK

0.106

37.80

37.70

OK

HR2

HDPE

120

14.847

0.2

0.345

11.345

0.0314

50.2

50.2

1.44

1.44

OK

0.159

37.70

37.02

OK

EXTERNAL PIPEWORKS

ROAD DESIGN

DESIGN ROAD
Road need to be designed by considered several
terms which is requirement from clients,
environmental
barriers,
safety,
physical
environmental factors (such as topography, climate,
and soils), traffic requirements, and traffic service
levels.
.

Criteria of the Road and Drainage Design

Rural Areas
Standard Use : R2/U2
Provide very low geometric standard and is applied to be very low
traffic where the chances of two way flow is low.
Categories of road : Minor Roads
Form the basic road network within a Land Scheme or other
inhabited areas in rural areas.
Access control : Non control access
There is basically no limitation of access.

Topography terrain : Rolling

The topographical condition where the natural slopes consistently
rise above and fall below the road or street grade and where
occasional steep slopes ofer some restriction to normal horizontal
and vertical roadway alignment. The natural ground cross slope in a
rolling terrain are generally between 3% - 25%

Traffic : ADT

Design Vehicles :
Refer Figure 3.2 ( SU Design Vehicle )

Design speed : 50 km/h

maximum safe speed that can be maintained over a specified section
of the road depends on the road conditions
The assumed design speed should be a logical one with respect to
the topography, the adjacent land use and the type of road.
Design should be practicable while maintaining the desired degree of
safety, mobility and efficiency.

Capacity
Capacity is negligible due to a very low passenger car unit (PCU) and
frequency.

Level of Service : A
Free flow with low volumes, densities and high speed. Drivers can
maintain their desired speeds with little or no delay

Pavement
Pavement type : Intermediate Type
Pavement(Bituminious Macadam /
Concrete)
Shoulders
Usable shoulders : 2.00m ( Refer
Table 5-4A, Arahan Teknik Jalan 8/86 )

Kerbs
Type of kerbs : Barrier kerb
Kerb : Sidewalks

CALCULATION
Given :
Design speed : 50km/h
Traffic direction at Pauh Sport Complex

Calculation
Step 1 : Development of Design Input
PCV = 16 % (no detailed break-down by vehicle type)
Lane Distribution Factor, L = 1.0 (one lane in one
direction)Table 2.2
Terrain Factor, T = 1.1 (rolling)Table 2.3
Design Life = 10 years
Annual Traffic Growth = 3.0%

Step 2: Determine Design Traffic (Traffic

Category)
ESAL (Base Year) = 0.0672 million
ESAL (Base Year) Busses= 0.0346 million
Total ESALY1 = 0.102 million
Design Traffic over 10 Years; ESALDES
= Traffic Category T 1

= 0.77 million

Step 3 : Determine Sub-Grade Strength (Sub-Grade Category)

Results from Sub-Grade testing;
CBR Mean =9.5%
CBR Standard Deviation = 4.4%
Probability 60% (Normal Deviate = 0.253)
Characteristic CBR value used for design;
= 9.5% 0.253 x 4.4%
= 9.5% 1.1%
= 8.4%
= Sub-Grade Category SG 1
Step 4 : Select one of the pavement structures from Figure 8C
(T 1, SG 1)
Conventional flexible with unmodified PEN 50/70 bitumen;
Bituminous Surface Course (AC-10 or AC-14): 5 cm
Bituminous Binder/Base Course (AC 28): 13 cm
Crushed Aggregate Base or Wet-Mix Base: 20 cm
Granular Sub-Base: 20 cm

PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION

DRAINAGE SYSTEM

DRAINAGE LAYOUT

HALF ROUNDED DRAINAGE LOCATED

ALONG SPORTS COMPLEX

PRECAST DRAINAGE LOCATED TO THE

MAIN ROAD

HALF ROUNDED DRAIN SPECIFICATION

i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.

Diameter,d = 300 mm
Area,A = 0.1
Slope,s = 0.005
Hydraulic Radius,r = 0.075
Disharge = 0.12
Velocity = 1.25

PRECAST DRAIN SPECIFICATION

i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.

Diameter,d = 600 mm
Area,A = 0 mm2
Slope,s = 0.005
Hydraulic Radius,r = 0.071
Disharge,Q = 0.581 m3/s
Velocity,V = 2.055 m/s

Discharge Value And Velocity

Required

MECHANICA
L&

This part covers several

internal elements in the buildings :

ELECTRICAL
GROUND FLOO
R
1ST FLOOR
2ND FLOOR

MECHANI
GROUND FLOO
CAL
R
2ND FLOOR

POSITION OF LIGHTING AND

POWER SUPPLY

GROUND FLOOR

POSITION OF LIGHTING AND

POWER SUPPLY

FIRST FLOOR

POSITION OF LIGHTING AND

POWER SUPPLY

SECOND FLOOR

POSITION OF AIR-CONDITIONING,EXHAUST FAN AND

FIRE FIGHTING

GROUND FLOOR

POSITION OF AIR-CONDITIONING,EXHAUST FAN AND

FIRE FIGHTING

SECOND FLOOR

C
AL
C
U
LA
TI
O
N

Cooling Load Requirement (HP) =

(Room Area) 60
9000

LIGHTING SYSTEM
No of Light Used =

Lux Requirement JKR Area (m2)

((No of Bulb Mentol Lumens Utilization
Factor (CU) Maintenance Factor (MF))

AIR CONDITIONING
Cooling Load Requirement (HP) = (Room Area)
60
9000

WALL MOUNTED SPLIT UN

FI
RE
RE
DRY POWDER AND CO2
SI
FIRE EXTINGUISHER
ST
AN
CE

FIRE RESISTANCE

FI
RE
RE
SI
ST
AN
CE

EXIT SIGN

EMERGENCY
LIGHT

PRELIMINARY DETAILS
ABSTRACT

PRELIMINARY DETAILS ABSTARCT

SUMMARY OF BILL QUANTITY

BILL NO

DESCRIPTION

TENDER AMOUNT (RM)

BILL 1

PRELIMINARIES

429,816.50

BILL 2

EARTH WORK

106,4780.00

BILL 3

TURFING

BILL 4

PILING

146,992.89

BILL 5

STRUCTURE

333,368.95

BILL 5

WATER RETICULATION

BILL 6

SEWARAGE SYSTEM

139,956.00

BILL 7

ROAD

188,183.90

BILL 8

DRAINAGE SYSTEM

61128.00

BILL 9

M&E

10265.00

TOTAL

4544.00

72467.00

2451496.24

THANK YOU