Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SEMESTER II
MMS (B)
GROUP NO 4
BATCH 2014-2016
Negotiable Instruments
as
Facilitators for Trade and
Commerce
&
10 Years taking forward
Chintan
Mhatre
82
Vinay
Mhatre
84
Prachiti
Niwate
92
Tushar
Oswal
94
GROUP
MEMBERS
Riddhi
Palkar
96
Sumed
h Munje
86
Abhiskek
Nagdeve 88
Aadya
Naik
Vivek Pange
98
Amit
Paratwar
Conclusion
Suggestions
Recommendati
ons
Primary
Research
On Scope
Of
Negotiable
Instrument
s
Introductio
n to
Negotiable
Instrument
s
Evolution of
Negotiable
Instruments
PROJECT
CONTEN
TS
Revolution
in
Negotiable
Instrumen
ts and
Global
Trade
Types of
Negotiabl
e
Instrumen
ts
The
Negotiable
Instrument
Act, 1881
CHAPTER I
Introduction to
Negotiable
Instruments
INTRODUCTION
The term Negotiable Instrument is made up of two
parts,
Negotiable and Instrument
The word, negotiable means being transferable from
certain person
of money only
Time of payment
must be certain
Delivery of the
instrument is
essential
CHAPTER II
Evolution of
Negotiable
Instruments
EVOLUTION OF NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS
Barter Exchange
Pastoralforms
stage
(Earliest
of
civilization)
Agricultural stage
Grain Barter
(9000 - 8000 BC)
Livestock (8000
- 6000 BC)
EVOLUTION OF NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS
Crude
Metal
Coins
Handicraft stage
(1000 - 600 BC)
Guild stage
Precious Metal Coins
(700 BC)
EVOLUTION OF NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS
Domestic
stage
Paper
Money
(806)
Factory stage
Gold (1816)
EVOLUTION OF NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS
Industrial
Revolution
Gold Bullion
(1900)
respect to
Economy & Growth of Commerce
Evolution of commerce is a never ending
CHAPTER III
The Negotiable
Instruments Act
1881
Section 32
a punitive clause which provides that if a person issues any
bill of exchange or a promissory note, payable to the bearer on
demand, shall be punishable with fine.
Title
Money
Notice
Regarding Date
Regarding
Acceptance
Writing and Signature
Evidence
Regarding Dishonor
of an Instrument
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
(AMENDMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS)
ACT, 2002
Section 138
Dishonor of cheque for insufficiency, etc.,
of funds in the account
Doubling the imprisonment term from one year to two years
the period of time to issue demand notice to the drawer
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
(AMENDMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS)
ACT, 2002
Section 141
Offences by companies
If company commits an offence, every person
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
(AMENDMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS)
ACT, 2002
Section 143
Achieve speedy trial by applying
provisions of CrPC
(Code of Criminal
Procedure)
Section 144
Deals with the service of summons
Section 145
Contemplates evidence on affidavit
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
(AMENDMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS)
ACT, 2002
Section 146
Provides for presumption to bank memorandums
Section 147
Provides for compounding of offences under this
Act
CHAPTER IV
Types of
Negotiable
Instruments
HUNDIS
A Hundi is a financial instrument developed in
Medieval India for use in trade and credit transactions
Remittance instruments
Credit instruments
Trade transactions
TYPES OF HUNDIS
Dhani-jog Hundi
Sahyog Hundi
Jokhim-Hundi
Muddati Hundi
Jawabi Hundi
Darshani Hundi
Khaka Hundi
Khota Hundi
DECODING OF HUNDIS
1) Pre-printed
revenue stamp
2) Amount to be pay
3) Name of the
broker
Remittance instruments
4) Signature of the
Drawer
Credit instruments
Trade transactions
3
7
5) Due date
6) Date of
documentation
PROMISSORY NOTE
SECTION 4
An instrument in writing (not being a bank note or a
currency note) containing an unconditional undertaking,
signed by the maker, to pay a certain sum of money only
to or to the order of a certain person or to the bearer of
the instrument.
Parties involved for Promissory Notes
Drawer
Endorser
Payee
Endorsee
revenue stamp
2) Amount to be pay
3) Name of the
broker
4) Signature of the
Drawer
3
7
5) Due date
6) Date of
documentation
Stamp Act
Undertaking or promise
to pay
Acknowledgement of
indebtedness is not
enough
Not an conditional
promise
Promise to pay
money only
Payable on
demand
CASELETTE
The suit has been filed by Aditya against Dhruv on the basis that there was
loan transaction between Aditya and Dhruv under which Dhruv had borrowed
a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- and executed 5 promissory notes, each one for a sum
of Rs.10,00,000/-, with a promise to repay the said amount with interest at
the rate of 18% p.a. It is the further case of Aditya that in addition to the
promissory notes, Dhruv issued 5 cheques each one for a sum of Rs.10,
00,000/-, with a specific understanding that as and when each cheque will be
honored on presentation, corresponding promissory note will be discharged
on payment of interest on the principal amount of the promissory note
calculated from 06.03.2007 till the date of encashment of the cheque.
CASELETTE
On 24.10.1994, the Satvinder had borrowed a sum of
BILLS OF EXCHANGE
SECTION 5
An unconditional order in writing, addressed by one
person to another, signed by the person giving it,
requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay
on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future
time, a sum certain in money to or to the order of a
specified person, or to bearer
Drawer
Payee
Drawee
Endorser
Acceptor
Endorsee
Bill Accepted
k
n
Ba
as
c
s
e
v
ei r. B
c
M
re
m
o
r
f
Goods
Banks Pays
10,000
Bill
Discounted
Mr. A Manufacturer
Mr. A agrees to
supply Mr. B with
goods if he accepts
a 90 days bill for the
full price of $10,000.
5)Drawer
6)Intermediary
Bank
3 parties to a bill
Unconditional order to
pay
drawer
certain in money
order of a specified
person.
New Delhi
November 14, 2002
I, Ramesh , s/o Sadanand of Surat, Gujarat promise to pay Sashikant, s/o Sunil
Kumar of Ahmedabad, Gujarat or order, on demand, the sum of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand only) with interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum, for value
received.
Sd/- Ramesh
Stamp
To
Sashikant
Ahmedabad, Gujarat
CHEQUE
SECTION 6
A Cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on
aspecifiedbanker and not expressed to be payable
otherwise than on demand but it is invariably drawn as a
demand bill of exchange only, herein the drawee is
always a specific branch of a specified bank and the
drawer is the account holder of the same branch of the
bank
REQUISITES OF A CHEQUE.
Instrument in Writing
Unconditional Order
Payable on Demand
Certain Sum of Money
Payee must be certain
Avoidance of cancellations
Open Cheque
Crossed
Cheque
Anti-Dated
Cheque
Post-Dated
Cheque
Stale Cheque
Multilated cheque
E-Cheque
Order
3)Payee line
4)Rupee box
5)Amount in words
6)Account Number
7)Signature line
8)Drawee contact
information and
logo
Cheque Number:
MICR Code
Bank account Number
Transaction ID
person
Signature even of a fictitious
(non-existing) person
Even if a person has signed his
own name on the instrument
CASELETTE
Police on Monday arrested a man for forging a Noida resident's signature on a cheque
and withdrawing Rs 90,000 from his bank account. The accused was caught when he
went to withdraw another Rs 3 lakh from the victim's bank account. Police said the
victim, identified as Radhey Shyam Gupta, owns a building material supply shop in
Sector 9. The victim alleged that the conman had illegally withdrawn Rs 90,000 from
his account on Sunday. "On Saturday, a person approached me and said that he
wanted to buy cement from him. He took the quotation on which I signed. He said to
give my account number to transfer the money, so I it to him," said Gupta. On Sunday,
the victim got an SMS that Rs 90,000 was withdrawn from his account. He immediately
informed the bank and police. During investigation, police found that a person had
Revolution in
Negotiable Instruments
and Global Trade
CHAPTER V
Advance Payment
Direct Payment
Documentary Collection
Documentary Credit
18972
20000
16943
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
7761
7750
8000
7700
8096
8202
7072
6000
4000
2000
0
2011
2012
Institution
Disposal
2013
Pendency
MUMBAI
Institution; 22%
Institution; 19%
CALCUTTA
Pending; 60%
Disposal; 21%
DELHI
Pendency; 58%
Disposal; 19%
Institution; 16%
Institution; 18%
Disposal; 15%
Pendency; 60% Disposal; 22%
Pendency; 69%
SUGGESTIONS
Social networking and Negotiable
Instruments
Twitter
Email
Facebook
Mobile wallets
Biometrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
Governments and some companies are
CASE STUDY
Vijay Mallya vs. Delhi International Airport
Delhi High Court did not hear liquor baron Vijay Mallya's plea challenging
summons issued to him by a trial court in several cheque-bouncing cases in
which he had to appear on February 20, 2012. Justice Sunil Gaur fixed May 8 for
hearing of the matter after the counsel for the parties requested adjournment.
The trial court had summoned Mallya as an accused after GMR-led Delhi
International Airport (DIAL), which operates the capital's Indira Gandhi
International Airport, had moved the trial court after a cheque amounting to Rs
one crore issued by Kingfisher Airlines Ltd on February 22, 2012 was returned
to them a month later containing the remarks "fund insufficient".
CASE STUDY
P.N. Khanna vs. Bank of India
Brief facts of the case are that complainant/ appellant had one account
with opposite party/ respondent and one account with Allahabad Bank.
He filled cheque No. 839595 of Allahabad Bank in his name for Rs.
8,16,000/- and handed over the cheque to Officer of the opposite party
for clearance, who in turn called his peon Rajiv Kumar and got the
cheque dropped in the drop box and counter slip was given to the
complainant. Amount of this cheque was not credited in his account
and on enquiry from Allahabad Bank, he came to know that the cheque
CASE STUDY
Mohd Azharuddin vs. Sanjay Solanki
The Delhi court issued a fresh non-bailable warrant (NBW)
against cricketer-turned Congress MP Mohd Azharuddin
after he failed to appear before it in connection with a
cheque bounce case. Metropolitan magistrate Vikrant Vaid
issued the warrant against the former captain of the Indian
cricket team for March 7 after he failed to appear before it
in pursuance of the earlier NBW issued against him on
Thank you