Sunteți pe pagina 1din 64

RF Network Design

Tai Koon Sun


GSM/UMTS RF Engineering - AP

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Level 31 Tower 2
Petronas Twin To
wer, KLCC
Kuala Lumpur, Ma
laysia

Introduction
The high level life cycle of the RF network planning process can be summarised as follows :-

To help the operator


to identify their RF
design requirement
Optional

Comparative
Analysis

Discuss and agree RF


design parameters,
assumptions and
objectives with the
customer

RF Design
requirement

Coverage requirement
Traffic requirement
Various level of design
(ROM to detail RF
design)

RF Design

Site
Realisation

RF Design
Implementation

Slide No.2

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Issuing of search ring


Cand. assessment
Site survey, design,
approval
Drive test (optional)

Frequency plan
Neighbour list
RF OMC data
Optimisation

Comparative Analysis
This is an optional step
This is intended to : Help an existing operator in building/expanding their network
Help a new operator in identifying their RF network requirement, e.g.
where their network should be built
For the comparative analysis, we would need to : Identify all network that are competitors to the customer
Design drive routes that take in the high density traffic areas of interest
Include areas where the customer has no or poor service and the
competitors have service

Slide No.3

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Comparative Analysis
The result of the analysis should include :For an existing operator
All problems encountered in the customers network
All areas where the customer has no service and a competitor does
Recommendations for solving any coverage and quality problems
For a new operator
Strengths and weaknesses in the competitors network
Problem encountered in the competitors network

Slide No.4

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

RF Network Design Inputs


The RF design inputs can be divided into : Coverage requirements
Target coverage areas
Service types for the target coverage areas. These should be marked
geographically
Coverage area probability
Penetration Loss of buildings and in-cars
Capacity requirements
Erlang per subscriber during the busy hour
Quality of service for the air interface, in terms GoS
Network capacity
Growth plan - Coverage and Capacity
Slide No.5

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

RF Network Design Inputs


Available spectrum and frequency usage restriction, if any
List of available, existing and/or friendly sites that should be included in
the RF design
Limitation of the quantity of sites and radios, if any
Quality of Network (C/I values)
Related network features (FH, DTX, etc.)

Slide No.6

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

RF Network Design
There are 2 parts to the RF network design to meet the : Capacity requirement
Coverage requirement
For the RF Coverage Design
CW Drive
Testing

Propagation
Model

Digitised
Databases

RF
Coverage
Design

Slide No.7

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Customer
Requirements

Link
Budget

CW Drive Testing
CW drive test can be used for the following purposes : Propagation model tuning
Assessment of the suitability of candidate sites, from both coverage and
interference aspect
CW drive test process can be broken down to :Test
Preparation

Equipment required
BTS antenna selection
Channel selection

Power setting
Drive route planning
Test site selection

Propagation
Test

Transmitter setup
Receiver setup

Drive test
Transmitter dismantle

Data
Processing

Measurement averaging
Report generation

Slide No.8

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Test Preparation


The test equipment required for the CW drive testing : Receiver with fast scanner
Example : HP7475A, EXP2000 (LCC) etc.
The receiver scanner rate should conform to the Lee Criteria of 36 to
50 sample per 40 wavelength
CW Transmitter
Example : Gator Transmitter (BVS), LMW Series Transmitter (CHASE),
TX-1500 (LCC) etc.
Base Station test antenna
DB806Y (Decibel-GSM900), 7640 (Jaybeam-GSM1800) etc.
Accessories
Including flexible coaxial cable/jumper, Power meter, extended power
cord, GPS, compass, altimeter
Slide No.9

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Test Preparation


Base Station Antenna Selection
The selection depends on the purpose of the test
For propagation model tuning, an omni-directional antenna is preferred
For candidate site testing or verification, the choice of antenna depends
on the type of BTS site that the test is trying to simulate.
For Omni BTS :
Omni antennas with similar vertical beamwidth

For sectorised BTS


Utilising the same type of antenna is preferred
Omni antenna can also be used, together with the special feature in the
post processing software like CMA (LCC) where different antenna pattern
can be masked on over the measurement data from an omni antenna

Slide No.10

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Test Preparation


Test Site Selection
For propagation model tuning, the test sites should be selected so that : They are distributed within the clutter under study
The height of the test site should be representative or typical for the
specific clutter
Preferably not in hilly areas
For candidate site testing/verification, the actual candidate site
configuration (height, location) should be used.
For proposed greenfield sites, a cherry-picker will be used.

Slide No.11

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Test Preparation


Frequency Channel Selection
The necessary number of channels need to be identified from the
channels available
With input from the customer
The channels used should be free from occupation
From the guard bands
Other free channels according to the up-to-date frequency plan
The channels selected will need to be verified by conducting a pre-test
drive
It should always precede the actual CW drive test to verify the exact
free frequency to be used
It should cover the same route of the actual propagation test
A field strength plot is generated on the collected data to confirm the
channel suitability
Slide No.12

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Test Preparation


Transmit Power Setting
For propagation model tuning, the maximum transmit power is used
For candidate site testing, the transmit power of the test transmitter is
determined using the actual BTS link budget to simulate the coverage
On sites with existing antenna system, it is recommended that the
transmit power to be reduced to avoid interference or inter-modulation to
other networks.
The amount of reduction is subject to the possibility if separating the test
antenna from the existing antennas

Slide No.13

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Test Preparation


Drive Route Determination
The drive route of the data collection is planned prior to the drive test
using a detail road map
Eliminate duplicate route to reduce the testing time
For propagation model tuning, each clutter is tested individually and the
drive route for each test site is planned to map the clutter under-study for
the respective sites.
It is important to collect a statistically significant amount of data, typically
a minimum of 300 to 400 data points are required for each clutter
category
The data should be evenly distributed with respect to distance from the
transmitter
In practice, the actual drive route will be modified according to the latest
development which was not shown on the map. The actual drive route
taken should be marked on a map for record purposes
Slide No.14

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Propagation Test


Transmitter Equipment Setup
Test antenna location
Free from any nearby obstacle, to ensure free propagation in both
horizontal and vertical dimension
For sites with existing antennas, precaution should be taken to avoid
possible interference and/or inter-modulation
Transmitter installation

A complete set of 360 photographs of the test location (at the test height)
and the antenna setup should be taken for record
Slide No.15

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Propagation Test


Scanning Receiver Setup - HP 7475A Receiver Example

HP 7475A Receiver

Slide No.16

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Propagation Test


Scanning Receiver Setup
The scanning rate of the receiver should always be set to allow at least
36 sample per 40 wavelength to average out the Rayleigh Fading effect.
For example: scanning rate = 100 sample/s
test frequency = 1800 MHz
therefore, to achieve 36 sample/40 wavelength, the max. speed is =

40 0.1667
18.52 m / s 66.67 km / h
36/100
It is recommended that : Beside scanning the test channel, the neighbouring cells is also
monitored. This information can be used to check the coverage overlap
and potential interference
Check the field strength reading close to the test antenna before
starting the test, it should approach the scanning receiver saturation
Slide No.17

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Measurement Data Processing


Data Averaging
This can be done during the drive testing or during the data processing
stage, depending on the scanner receiver and the associated postprocessing software
The bin size of the distance averaging depends on the size of the human
made structure in the test environment
Report Generation
For propagation model tuning, the measurement data is exported into the
planning tool (e.g. Asset)
Plots can also be generated using the processing tool or using MapInfo
During the export of the measurement data, it is important to take care of
the coordinate system used, a conversion is necessary if different
coordinate systems are used
Slide No.18

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Propagation Model
COST 231 - Hata propagation model
Lu (dB) = 46.3 + 33.9 log(f) - 13.82 log(Hb) - a(Hm) + [44.9 - 6.55 log(Hb)] log(d) + Cm
where

a(Hm) = [1.1*log(f) - 0.7]*Hm - [1.56*log(f) -0.8]

For medium sized city, suburban centres with moderate tree density
Cm = 0 dB
For metropolitan centres

Cm = 3 dB

The propagation model applies with condition : Frequency of operation (f)


: 1500 - 2000 MHz
Base station height (Hb): 30 - 200 m
Mobile height (Hm)
: 1 - 10 m
Distance (d)
: 1 - 20 km
Slide No.19

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Propagation Model
Hata Model
Lu (dB) = 69.55 + 26.16 log(f) - 13.82 log(Hb) - a(Hm) + [44.9 - 6.55 log(Hb)] log(d)

For medium-small city


a(Hm) = [1.1 log(f) -0.7] Hm - [1.56 log(f) -0.8]

For large city


a(Hm) = 8.29 [log(1.54 Hm)]2 - 1.1
a(Hm) = 3.2 [log(11.75 Hm)]2 - 4.97

for f <= 200 MHz


for f >= 400 MHz

For Suburban
Lsu (dB) = Lu - 2 [log(f/28)]2 - 5.4

For Rural (Quasi-open)


Lrqo (dB) = Lu - 4.78 [log(f)]2 + 18.33 log(f) - 35.94

For Rural (Open area)


Lrqo (dB) = Lu - 4.78 [log(f)]2 + 18.33 log(f) - 40.94
Slide No.20

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

CW Drive Testing - Propagation Test


Drive Test
Initiate a file to record the measurement with an agreed naming
convention
Maintain the drive test vehicle speed according to the pre-set scanning
rate
Follow the pre-plan drive route as closely as possible
Insert marker wherever necessary during the test to indicate special
locations such as perceived hot spot, potential interferer etc.
Monitor the GPS signal and field strength level throughout the test, any
extraordinary reading should be inspected before resuming the test
Dismantling Equipment
It is recommended to re-confirm the transmit power (as the pre-set value)
before dismantling the transmitter setup
Slide No.21

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Propagation Model
Hata Model
The propagation model applies with condition : Frequency of operation (f)
: 150 - 1000 MHz
Base station height (Hb): 30 - 200 m
Mobile height (Hm)
: 1 - 10 m
Distance (d)
: 1 - 20 km

Slide No.22

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Propagation Model
Standard Macrocell Model for Asset
Lp (dB) = K1 + K2 log(d) + K3 Hm + K4 log(Hm) + K5 log(Heff)
+ K6 log(Heff) log(d) + K7 Diffraction + Clutter factor
where

Lp, Diffraction, Clutter factor are in dB


d, Hm, Heff are in m

It is based on the Okumura-Hata empirical model, with a number of


additional features to enhance its flexibility
Known to be valid for frequencies from 150MHz to 2GHz
Applies in condition : Base station height : 30 - 200 m
Mobile height
: 1 - 10 m
Distance
: 1 - 20 km
An optional second intercept and slope (K1, K2) for the creation of a twopiece model with the slope changing at the specified breakpoint distance.
Slide No.23

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Link Budget
Link Budget Element of a GSM Network
BTS Antenna Gain

Max. Path Loss

Fade Margin

LNA
(optional)

Penetration Loss
MS Antenna Gain,
Body and Cable Loss

Feeder Loss
ACE
Loss

Diversity
Gain

BTS Transmit
Power

BTS Receiver
Sensitivity

Mobile Transmit
Power

Slide No.24

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Mobile Receiver
Sensitivity

Link Budget
BTS Transmit Power
Maximum transmit power
GSM900 and 1800 networks use radios with 46dBm maximum transmit power
ACE Loss
Includes all diplexers, combiners and connectors.
Depends on the ACE configuration
The ACE configuration depends on the number of TRXs and combiners used

No of
TRXs
1 or 2
1 or 2
3 or 4
3 or 4

Network

ACE Configuration

GSM900
GSM1800
GSM900
GSM1800

2 antennas per cell, diplexer


2 antennas per cell, diplexer
2 antennas per cell, diplexer + hybrid combiner
2 antennas per cell, diplexer + hybrid combiner

Slide No.25

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Downlink ACE
Loss (dB)
1.0
1.2
4.4
4.4

Link Budget
Mobile Receiver Sensitivity
The sensitivity of GSM900 and GSM1800 mobile = -102 dBm
The following should be noted : The sensitivity level is not sufficient to achieve
RXQUAL of 4 without frequency hopping
RXQUAL of 5 with frequency hopping

A mobile receiver that moves at 50km/h averages the fading, but a static
one will be under more severe fading influences. Therefore : If the quality of a static mobile needs to be considered, then a quality
margin of approximately 4 - 5 dB is used
The mobile sensitivity would be -97 or -98 dBm

Slide No.26

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Link Budget
Mobile Transmit Power
GSM900 : Typical mobile class 4 (2W)
GSM1800 : Typical mobile class 1 (1W)
Class
1
2
3
4
5

GSM 900 (Watt/dBm)


8 / 39
5 / 37
2 / 33
0.8 / 29

GSM 1800 (Watt/dBm)


1 / 30
0.25 / 24
4 / 36
-

LNA (Optional)
To improve the performance of the uplink
Should be located close to the antenna to : Improve the system noise figure
Compensate the feeder losses
Slide No.27

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Mast Head Amplifier


Achieves quality impovement and cell expansion by improving
receive sensitivity at the antenna
The Mast Head Amplifier is installed in the receive path, close to the
antenna
It compensates for the cable loss between antenna and BTS, for the
uplink path, allowing higher BTS transmit powers while retaining
path balance.
Only effective in uplink-limited cells

Slide No.28

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Link Budget
Diversity Gain
Two common techniques used : Space
Polarisation
Reduce the effect of multipath fading on the uplink
Common value of 3 to 4.5 dB being used
BTS Receiver Sensitivity
Depends on the type of propagation environment model used, most
commonly used TU50 model
BTS2000 : Receiver Sensitivity for GSM900 = -107 dBm
Receiver Sensitivity for GSM1800 = -108 dBm

Slide No.29

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Link Budget
Feeder Loss
Depends on the feeder type and feeder length
The selection of the feeder type would depends on the feeder length, I.e.
to try to limit to feeder loss to 2 - 3 dB.
BTS Antenna Gain
Antenna gain has a direct relationship to the cell size
The selection of the antenna type depends on : The morphology classes of the targeted area and coverage
requirements
Zoning and Local authority regulations/limitations
Common antenna types used : 65, 90, omni-directional antennas with different gains

Slide No.30

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Link Budget
Slow Fading Margin
To reserve extra signal power to overcome potential slow fading.
Depends on the requirement of coverage probability and the standard
deviation of the fading
A design can take into consideration : both outdoor and in-building coverage, which utilises a combined
standard deviation for indoor and outdoor (Default Lucent value = 9dB)
Only outdoor coverage (Default Lucent value = 7dB)
Pathloss slope used, 45dB/dec (Dense Urban), 42dB/dec (Urban),
38dB/dec (Suburban) and 33dB/dec (Rural)
Cell Area
Coverage
Probability
(%)
85
90
95

Combined (outdoor &


indoor) slow fade margin
(dB)
DU
U
SU
RU
2
3
3
4
5
6
6
6
9
9
9
10

Outdoor slow fade margin


(dB)
DU
1
3
6

Slide No.31

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

U
1
3
6

SU
2
4
7

RU
2
4
7

Link Budget
Penetration Loss
Penetration loss depends on the building structure and material
Penetration loss is included for in-building link budget
Typical value used for Asia-Pacific environment (if country specific
information is not available) : Dense Urban
: 20 dB
Urban
: 18 dB
Suburban
: 15 dB
Rural
: 9 dB
Body Loss
Typical value of 2dB body loss is used
MS Antenna Gain
A typical mobile antenna gain of 2.2 dBi is used
Slide No.32

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Link Budget
Link Budget Example (GSM900)
UPLINK
MS Transmit Power
Cable Loss
MS Antenna Gain
Body Loss
Penetration Loss
Slow Fade Margin
Max. Path Loss
BTS Antenna Gain
LNA Gain
Feeder Loss
ACE Loss
Diversity Gain
BTS Receiver Sensitivity

33 dBm
0 dB
2.2 dBi
2 dB
W
X
Y
18 dBi
0 dB
2 dB
0 dB
4 dB
-107 dBm

DOWNLINK
BTS Transmit Power
ACE Loss
Feeder Loss
LNA Gain
BTS Antenna Gain
Max. Path Loss
Slow Fade Margin
Penetration Loss
Body Loss
MS Antenna Gain
Cable Loss
Diversity Gain
MS Receiver Sensitivity

Slide No.33

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

46 dBm
Z
2 dB
0 dB
18 dBi
Y
X
W
2 dB
2.2 dBi
0 dB
0 dB
-102 dBm

Antenna
Antenna Selection

Gain
Beamwidths in horizontal and vertical radiated planes
VSWR
Frequency range
Nominal impedance
Radiated pattern (beamshape) in horizontal and vertical planes
Downtilt available (electrical, mechanical)
Polarisation
Connector types (DIN, N)
Height, weight, windload and physical dimensions

Slide No.34

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Antenna
The antenna selection process
Identify system specifications such as polarisation, impedance and
bandwidth
Select the azimuth or horizontal plane pattern to obtain the needed
coverage
Select the elevation or vertical plane pattern to be as narrow as possible,
consistent with practical limitations of size, weight and cost
Check other parameters such as cost, power rating, size, weight,
mounting capabilities, wind loading, connector types, aesthetics and
reliability to ensure that they meet system requirements

Slide No.35

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Antenna
System Specification
Impedance and frequency bandwidth is normally associated with the
communication system used
The polarisation would depends on if polarisation diversity is used
Horizontal Plane Pattern
Three categories for the horizontal plane pattern : Omnidirectional
Sectored (directional)
Narrow beam (highly directional)
Elevation Plane Pattern
Choosing the antenna with the smallest elevation plane beamwidth will
give maximum gain. However, beamwidth and size are inversely related
Electrical down tilt
Null filling
Slide No.36

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Antenna
Example
90 vs 60 horizontal beamwidth
Bore sight gain vs performance at sector cross over
Indoor : 90 antenna gives a more circular coverage
Vertical Beamwidth
Wider vertical beamwidth, better RF performance in rolling terrain
Excessive Multipath Environment
Reduce horizontal and vertical beamwidth
Long Bridge over Water
Very high gain antennas with extremely narrow beamwidth

Slide No.37

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Receive Diversity
Diversity schemes provide two or more inputs at the receiver so that the
fading phenomena among the inputs are less correlated
Types of Receive Antenna Diversity
Space diversity
Polarisation diversity
Space Diversity
Two receive antenna separated physically by a distance, d
The separation, d, varies with the antenna height

, f( )

where
h = antenna height
d = antenna separation distance
= correlation coefficient of 2 signals received
For practical limitation, the diversity antenna distance for : GSM900 : approximately 3 m
GSM1800 : approximately 1.5 m
Slide No.38

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Nominal RF Design
Link Budget

Propagation
model

Coverage
requirements

Site radius

Nominal RF
Design
(coverage)

Maximum
path loss

Typical site
configuration
Transmit Power
Antenna configuration
(type, height, azimuth)
Site type (sector, omni)

Traffic
requirements

Standard hexagon site


layout
Friendly, candidate sites
Initial site survey inputs

Traffic
requirements

Recalculate the site


radius using the
number of sites from
the traffic requirement
Repeat the nominal
RF design

Coverage site
count
Traffic site
count

Traffic > Cov.


Cov. > Traffic

Slide No.39

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Nominal site
count

Nominal RF Design
Calculation of cell radius
A typical cell radius is calculated for each clutter environment
This cell radius is used as a guide for the site distance in the respective
clutter environment
The actual site distance could varies due to local terrain
Inputs for the cell radius calculation : Maximum pathloss (from the link budget)
Typical site configuration (for each clutter environment)
Propagation model
Example (GSM1800) : Maximum Pathloss = 138 dB
Typical Site Configuration (Urban)
Antenna Height = 30 m
EiRP = 56 dBm

Standard COST231 model


Mobile Height = 1.5 m

Slide No.40

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Nominal RF Design
COST231-Hata model (Urban)
Lu (dB) = 46.3 + 33.9 log(f) - 13.82 log(Hb) - a(Hm) + [44.9 - 6.55 log(Hb)] log(d)
a(Hm) = 0.0432

Rearranging the equation and substituting the value given :35.22 Log(d) = 136.24 - 0.0432 - 138
d = 0.889 km
The cell radius is calculated without using any terrain/clutter information
A margin is taken to take into consideration of diffraction and
implementation margin
A clutter offset (for each clutter type) can be applied
In a standard 3 sector hexagon site configuration, the relationship
between the cell radius and site distance is :Site Distance = 1.5 x Maximum Cell Radius
Slide No.41

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Nominal RF Design
There are different level of nominal RF design : Only using the cell radius/site distance calculated and placing ideal
hexagon cell layout
Using the combination of the calculated cell radius and the
existing/friendly sites from the customer

Slide No.42

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Nominal RF Design
The site distance also depends on the required capacity
In most mobile network, the traffic density is highest within the CBD area
and major routes/intersections
The cell radius would need to be reduce in this area to meet the traffic
requirements
If the total sites for the traffic requirement is more than the sites
required for coverage, the nominal RF design is repeated using the
number of sites from the traffic requirement
Recalculating the cell radius for the high traffic density areas
The calculation steps are : Calculate the area to be covered per site
Calculate the maximum cell radius
Calculate the site distance

Slide No.43

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
Lucent

Objective

Lucent

Link objective to
sites

Prioritise
objective

Lucent

Add sites to
survey schedule

Cust / Lucent

Site Survey

Lucent

Site
Identification
process
RF Design
No

Planning
meeting

High priority
objectives with
linked sites

Cust / Lucent
Yes
Prioritise sites

No

Lucent

Site Package
forwarded to Cust

Yes

Other sites
available for
objective ?

Accepted

Cust / Lucent

Implementation

Slide No.44

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Rejected

Site Realisation
Suitable
Y
Candidates?

Release of
Search Ring

Candidates
Approved?

Next
candidate

Problem
identifying
candidate

Caravan next
candidate

Exhausted
candidates

Y
Discuss
alternative with
customer

Driveby, RF
suggest possible
alternative

Issue design
change

Cell split
required

All parties
agreed at
Caravan

Arranged
Caravan

Candidate
approved?

Exhausted
candidates

Y
Y

Additional sites
required

Slide No.45

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Produce
Final RF
Design

Site Realisation
Search Ring Form

Site Search Ring Release


Site Id :
1001
Site Name : Hillborough
Design Engineer :
Phase :

Date (DD/MM/YYYY) :
John D

Longitude:
Ground Elevation (mts):

60

Antenna Type

Minutes
55

Seconds
18.28

S/E
S

174

45

40.80

Kathrein
739-495

Recommended Antenna Height

Dummy

Degree
36

Morphology :
High Rise Buiding
Dense-Urban
Suburban
X
Rural
Other
Sector 1
Sector 2
0
0
120

Preliminary Configuration :
Antenna Orientation

Search Area :

1.0

Project ID :

Latitude :

Site ID
Site Name
Latitude/Longitude
Project name
Issue Number and date
Ground height
Clutter environment
Preliminary configuration

01/06/2000

Form.Revision.No. :

Kathrein
739-495

Urban

Industrial

Sector 3
240

Kathrein
739-495

15

As marked on attached map.

Search Radius :
150m
Objective : Hillsborough
0

Attachments:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)

Propagation Plot (GRAND/CE4/____________) :


Copy of Map showing Theoretical Site and Search Area ?
Auckland Street Directory Map No.:
Terrain and Clutter Plot (GRAND / CE4 / ___________) :
MW Transmission connectivity diagram
Any other Document (specify)

No
Yes
48/AW31
No

Remarks:

Project Office
Project / Implementation Manager :
Name :
Date :
Proceed :

Slide No.46

Release Date :
Release To :
Response Due Date :
DCC CN :

Yes

Number of sector
Azimuth
Antenna type
Antenna height

Search ring radius


Search ring objective
Attachment

RELEASE APPROVAL PROCESS


RF
RF Manager :
Name :
Date :

No

Location map

Approvals
Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
Candidate Assessment Report
Includes all suitable candidates for the search ring
For each candidates : Location (latitude/longitude)
Location map showing the relative location of the candidates and also
the search ring
Candidate information (height, owner etc)
Photographs (360 set, rooftop, access, building)
Possible antenna mounting position
Possible base station equipment location
Information for any existing antennas
Planning reports/comments (restrictions, possibilities of approval etc.)

Slide No.47

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
RF and Transmission Final Configuration Form
Site ID:
RF Engineer:

Final RF Configuration Form

Transmission Eng:
Site Acquisition:
Date:
Version:

Base Station configuration

Contact Address/Telephone

Site Address
Structure Type

Building

Existing Tower

Monopole

Structure Height
RF Details
Alpha

Beta

Gamma

LOS 1

LOS 2

LOS 3

Orientation (deg/TN)
Antenna Height(m)
Antenna Type
Downtilt (E/M)
Antenna Location
Feeder Type
Feeder Length (m)
BTS Type
Max.Tx Power (dBm)
Initial RT Configuration
Future RT Configuration
Transmission Details
Far End Site ID
Bearing (deg/MN)
Height (m)

Omni

Azimuth
Antenna height
Antenna type
Down tilt
Antenna location
Feeder type and length
BTS type
Transmit power
Transceiver configuration

Antenna Model
Antenna Size (ft/mm)
Antenna Location
Capacity (E1/T1)
Freq. Band (Ghz)
Additional Comments

Signed
RF Engineer

Slide No.48

Tx Engineer

DCC C/N

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
The suitability of a candidate site is determine based on the coverage
that the candidate will provide (against the design coverage) and the
interference that the candidate site will cause
Antenna selection
Type : omni, directional (options of various beamwidth)
Type : Cross-polarised, vertical polarised
Downtilt : fixed, variable
Gain (low, medium, high)
Antenna installation
Clear of any local clutters, obstructions
d 2D2/, where D is the maximum antenna dimension
Obstacles within the surrounding region can dramatically distort RF
radiation pattern
Position antenna such that at least the main lobe is un-obstructed
1:3 rule of thumb for antenna height vs distance to roof top parapet
Slide No.49

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
Antenna installation
Omni-directional antenna
Normally mounted at the highest point possible
If it is side mounted, the antenna pattern will be distorted due to tower RF
wave reflection and shadowing

Directional antenna
For the new cross-polarised antenna, all the 3 antennas can be mounted
on a single pole

Wall Mounting
Ideal perpendicular to wall surface
Avoid metal building structural objects

Corner Mounting
Maximum 15 from perpendicular direction to avoid distortion

Slide No.50

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
Collocating with other antennas
Spurious emission
Cause rx desensitization (noise floor increase)
Level should be 10dB below thermal noise floor

IMP3
Cause by rx LNA non-linearity
IMP3 level 10dB below thermal noise floor

Receiver overload
Total received power drive amplifier into non-linear gain region
Total rx power 5dB below 1dB compression point of rx amplifier

Use vertical separation if possible (provide better decoupling)

Slide No.51

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
Antenna downtilt

= arctan(h/2R) + BWv/2
= 180 - 2* arctan(R/h)
where

(equation 1)
(equation 2)

R = cell radius
h = antenna height
BWv = antenna vertical beamwidth
Arctan(h/2R)

desired

Interfering
R

Arctan(h/R)

desired
R
Slide No.52

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Site Realisation
Antenna downtilt reduces the interference to neighbouring cells and
enhance the weak spots in the cell
Equation 1 is used to control extreme interference, reduces the
interference at the neighbouring cell (d=2R) by 3dB
Equation 2 is used to improve interference, preserving the coverage at
the edge of the cell (d=R)
RF feeder run : Proposed route
Feeder length
Feeder type

Slide No.53

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Traffic Engineering

Spectrum
Available

Reuse factor

Traffic
Requirement

Maximum number of
TRX per cell

Channel
loading

No of TCH
available

Traffic offered

Slide No.54

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Subscriber
supported

Traffic Engineering
Traffic Requirement
The Erlang per subscriber (during busy hour) is given by :-

Erlang / sub

BHCA Average call holding time( s )


3600

where

BHCA = Busy hour call attempt


Average call holding time = Duration of time (s)
for an average call

Grade of Service (GoS)


GoS is expressed as the percentage of call attempts that are blocked
during peak traffic
Most cellular systems are designed to a blocking rate of 1% to 5% during
busy hour
Outside busy hour, the blocking rate is much lower
Slide No.55

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Traffic Engineering
Frequency Reuse
In designing a frequency reuse plan, it is necessary to develop a regular
pattern on which to assign frequencies
The hexagon is chosen because it most closely approximated the
coverage produced by an omni or sector site
Common reuse factor : 4/12, 7/21

Slide No.56

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Traffic Engineering
Distance to Cell Radius and C/I
The reuse cluster size, N and the D/R ratio are related by :-

D
3N
R
where D is the distance separation between cell centers and R is the cell
radius
As N decreases, the D/R ratio becomes smaller and the C/I ratio goes
down, interference increases
As the number of sector increases, the number of potential interferers
decreases. For example, using a 3 sector configuration reduces the
number of first tier interferers from 6 to 2
In GSM conventional frequency planning, the 4/12 reuse pattern is
typical. Using the inverse 3.5 exponent law, a mean C/I ratio of ~18dB
would be found at the edge of the cell
Advance frequency planning techniques further reduces the reuse factor
Slide No.57

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Traffic Engineering
Example : Available spectrum = 10 MHz
Available channels : 48 channels
Design 1
Proposed Reuse factor = 4/12
Channels required per TRX layer : 12
Number of TRX : 4
Design 2

Proposed reuse factor for BCCH = 4/12


Proposed reuse factor for remaining TRX = 3/9
Number of channels for BCCH layer = 12
Remaining channels = 36
Number of channels for non-BCCH layer = 9
Number of non-BCCH layers = 4
Total number of TRX = 5

Slide No.58

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Traffic Engineering
Channel Loading
As the number of TRX increases, the control channels required increases
accordingly
The following channel loading is used for conventional GSM network
For services such as cell broadcast, additional control channels might be
required
Number of TRX
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Control Channels
Combined BCCH/SDCCH
Combined BCCH/SDCCH
1 BCCH, 1 SDCCH
1 BCCH, 1 SDCCH
1 BCCH, 2 SDCCH
1 BCCH, 2 SDCCH
1 BCCH, 3 SDCCH
1 BCCH, 3 SDCCH

Slide No.59

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Number of TCH
7
15
22
30
37
45
52
60

Traffic Engineering
After determining the number of TCH available and the traffic
requirements, the traffic offered is calculated using the Erlang B table
For example, for a 2% GoS and 3 TRX configuration, the traffic offered is
14.9 Erlang
If the traffic per subscriber is 35mE/subscriber, then the total subscribers
supported per sector = 425

For a uniform traffic distribution network, the number of sites required


for the traffic requirement is :Total sites

Total subscribers
Subscriber supported per site

Slide No.60

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Traffic Engineering
Erlang B Table
N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

1% 1.20% 1.50%
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.15
0.17
0.19
0.46
0.49
0.54
0.87
0.92
0.99
1.36
1.43
1.52
1.91
2
2.11
2.5
2.6
2.74
3.13
3.25
3.4
3.78
3.92
4.09
4.46
4.61
4.81
5.16
5.32
5.54
5.88
6.05
6.29
6.61
6.8
7.05
7.35
7.56
7.82
8.11
8.33
8.61
8.88
9.11
9.41
9.65
9.89
10.2
10.4
10.7
11
11.2
11.5
11.8
12
12.3
12.7
12.8
13.1
13.5
13.7
14
14.3
14.5
14.8
15.2

2%
0.02
0.22
0.6
1.09
1.66
2.28
2.94
3.63
4.34
5.08
5.84
6.61
7.4
8.2
9.01
9.83
10.7
11.5
12.3
13.2
14
14.9
15.8

3%
0.03
0.28
0.72
1.26
1.88
2.54
3.25
3.99
4.75
5.53
6.33
7.14
7.97
8.8
9.65
10.5
11.4
12.2
13.1
14.0
14.9
15.8
16.7

5%
0.05
0.38
0.9
1.52
2.22
2.96
3.74
4.54
5.37
6.22
7.08
7.95
8.83
9.73
10.6
11.5
12.5
13.4
14.3
15.2
16.2
17.1
18.1

7%
0.1
0.5
1.1
1.8
2.5
3.3
4.1
5
5.9
6.8
7.7
8.6
9.5
10.5
11.4
12.4
13.4
14.3
15.3
16.3
17.3
18.2
19.2

10%
0.11
0.6
1.27
2.05
2.88
3.76
4.67
5.6
6.55
7.51
8.49
9.47
10.5
11.5
12.5
13.5
14.5
15.5
16.6
17.6
18.7
19.7
20.7

15%
0.18
0.8
1.6
2.5
3.45
4.44
5.46
6.5
7.55
8.62
9.69
10.8
11.9
13
14.1
15.2
16.3
17.4
18.5
19.6
20.8
21.9
23

Slide No.61

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

20% 30% 40% 50%


0.25 0.43 0.67
1
1 1.45
2 2.73
1.93 2.63 3.48 4.59
2.95 3.89 5.02
6.5
4.01 5.19
6.6 8.44
5.11 6.51 8.19 10.4
6.23 7.86
9.8 12.4
7.37 9.21 11.4 14.3
8.52 10.6
13 16.3
9.68
12 14.7 18.3
10.9 13.3 16.3 20.3
12 14.7
18 22.2
13.2 16.1 19.6 24.2
14.4 17.5 21.2 26.2
15.6 18.9 22.9 28.2
16.8 20.3 24.5 30.2
18 21.7 26.2 32.2
19.2 23.1 27.8 34.2
20.4 24.5 29.5 36.2
21.6 25.9 31.2 38.2
22.8 27.3 32.8 40.2
24.1 28.7 34.5 42.1
25.3 30.1 36.1 44.1

Traffic Engineering - Example


Given

Traffic distribution

Supporting up to 10,000 startup sub


: 2% (0.02)
GOS
Traffic/subs : 25 mErlang(0.025 Erlang)

NORTH

(40%)
Solutions
A = function(GOS, #TCH) - refer Erlang B table
B = A x # Sector
Radio Network Capacity = B/Erlang per Sub

Slide No.62

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

SOUTH
(60%)

Traffic Engineering - Example


BTS Count with Respective TRX Configuration For Traffic Regions
Region
1 North

2 South

Clutter
Dense
Urban
Urban
Suburban
Rural
Dense
Urban
Urban
Suburban
Rural
Total

BTS
Configuration
1/1/1

No of
BTS
4

Radio Network
Capacity

Capacity
Forecast

1/1/1
1/1
1
1/1/1

6
3
1
5

4,351

4,000

1/1/1
1/1
1

10
2
2
33

5,998

6,000

10,349

10,000

Slide No.63

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

Traffic Engineering
If a traffic map is provided, the traffic engineering is done together
with the coverage design
After the individual sites are located, the estimated number of
subscribers in each sector is calculated by : Calculating the physical area covered by each sector
Multiply it by the average subscriber density per unit area in that region
The overlap areas between the sectors should be included in each sector
because either sector is theoretically capable of serving the area
The number of channels required is then determined by : Calculating the total Erlangs by multiplying the area covered by the
average load generated per subscriber during busy hour
Determine the required number of TCH and then the required number of
TRXs
If the number of TRXs required exceeded the number of TRXs supported
by the available spectrum, additional sites will be required
Slide No.64

Lucent Technologies - Proprietary

S-ar putea să vă placă și