Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
OUTSIDE IITB
TEAM 01
Aniket
Ashwin
Dinesh
Gaurav
Manoj
Monimoy
Vikas
CONTENTS
NEED STATEMENT
STAKEHOLDERS
CONOPS & REQUIREMENTS
FUNCTIONS
FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
CONCEPTS & SELECTION
QFD
PRTOTYPE
LIMITATIONS
REFERENCES
NEED STATEMENT
To design a system that helps to manage the
Vehicle and Pedestrian traffic at the Main Gate
and Y-Point Gate Signals more efficiently than
the existing situation, supposing that it is affected
only by the traffic in between the Gandhinagar
(near Kanjurmarg) signal and Pizza Hut Signal
(Hiranandani,Powai) and from within IIT-B along
with the roads opposite IIT-B Main Gate.
STAKEHOLDERS
ACTIVE
Vehicle Travellers
Pedestrians
Traffic Police
Power suppliers to
Signals
Signal Maintenance
Department
Traffic operations
Agency
RTO Department of
Government
PASSIVE
Shop Owners (Vendors)
Investors
(Private/Government)
Suppliers of equipments
(including Software)
People involved in
Installing the Systems
Public Safety
Daily Weather
CONOPS &
REQUIREMENTS
Vehicles crossing the Signal when it is Red for them and
CONOPS &
REQUIREMENTS
During heavy rainfall or a foggy weather, the signal lights are not
FUNCTIONAL
DECOMPOSITION
FUNCTIONAL
REQUIREMENTS/SPECIFICATIONS
Clearance of Victims from the
Accident spot to Hospital within 30
minutes after the incident
Signal be visible upto 100 m irrespective
of the weather
Sustainability for a day in case of power
loss
24 X 7 surveillance of all incidents
happening in the roads
FUNCTIONAL
REQUIREMENTS/SPECIFICATIONS
Intelligent way to manage the time-delay
Reports of accidents, failures, breakdowns
should be correct without erroneous
results
Density measurements need to be very
accurate
Minimum and Maximum time gap must be
allotted for different scenarios
FUNCTIONAL
REQUIREMENTS/SPECIFICATIONS
Clear way to inform the waiting time in
seconds
Adjustable system in case of a high priority
vehicle
Efficient way of allotting paths at the signal
to avoid intersection of vehicles/pedestrians
Coordinate the signals of Main gate & YPoint gate
A. Inductive Loop
C. Cell
Phone Based
(Triangulation)
D. Bluetooth Based
E. Video/Image Processing
F. GPS based
Concepts
A
R
B
R
D
S
E
S
Weight
Ease of
Installation
1 0.2
0.2
0.2
0.8
0.2 20
Accuracy
3 0.3
2 0.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.4
1.6
0.3 10
0.4 40
1 0.1
3 0.3
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4 10
0.2 10
4 0.4
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.4 10
2.1
2.0
1.9
3.4
Cost
Repairable
Response
Time
All weather
functioning
Score
Rank
1.9
4
D. Gas-Powered Backup
Concepts
A
R
B
R
C
S
D
S
Weight
Ease of
Installation
4 0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
10
Cost
2 0.7
1 0.1
5
0.35
0.35
0.7
35
0.6
0.45
0.3
15
1 0.2
3 0.3
0.8
0.8
0.4
20
0.2
0.2
0.2
10
3 0.3
1.6
5
0.2
0.2
0.2
10
Effectivenes
s
Practicality
Replace
ability
Repairable
Score
Rank
2.15
1
2.0
3
2.1
2
Concepts
A
R
Simplicity
Reliability
Score
Rank
2 0.6
3 2.1
2.7
4
B
R
C
S
D
S
Weight
1.2
0.9
1.2
30
2.1
2.8
2.8
70
3..3
3
3.7
2
4.0
1
E. Mobius strip
lamp
Concepts
A
Weight
Cost
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.9
30
Simplicity
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.8
20
Effectivenes
s
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.6
20
Replace
ability
3 0.45
0.45
0.3
0.45
15
Multipurpose
3 0.45
0.45
0.45
0.3
15
2.8
2.65
3.05
Score
Rank
2.7
3
Main gate
signals
YP gate signals
Main Gate
Algorithm
YP GATE ALGORITHM
SOME INFO
NSITY OF VEHICLES: It is the number of vehicles per unit distance of the road
in road
: 1.5 vehicles/meter
e lanes
: 10 vehicles waiting
ntral lanes
: 20vehicles waiting(considering both)
ain gate road : 20 vehicles waiting
AT YP GATE:
ain road :
entral road :
P gate road :
1.5 vehicles/meter
10 vehicles waiting
15 vehicles waiting
SOME INFO
LOWER THRESHOLD SCENARIO : It
is the scenario when the density of
vehicles of a slot goes below a
particular value thereby creating
congestion
AT MAIN GATE:
Main road
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
AT MAIN GATE:
The amount of time for different slots in an iteration for a normal scenario is
Green signal for the main road vehicles=90 sec
Red signal for main road vehicles
= 60 sec
=25 sec
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
N GATE:
=
=
=
=
Increment
25sec
10sec
10sec
10 sec
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
ATE:
=
=
=
=
Decrement
20 sec
5sec
5sec
5sec
fi
70
15
10
2
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
AT MAIN GATE: HOW ARE WE MANAGING THE INCREMENT AND
DECREMENT IN TIME??
In case of high threshold scenario, mentioned amount of time is deducted
from
remaining slots and is used to support the case.
This deduction is made only from the slots in which the density is below
the
lower threshold.
If the increment time is not being supported by the decrement time the
difference is reflected in the increased iteration time
The extra time deducted reflects in reduced iteration time there by
decreasing
the waiting time of vehicles and pedestrians
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
AT YP GATE:
The amount of time for different slots in an iteration for a normal scenario is
Green signal for the main road vehicles=90 sec
Red signal for main road vehicles
= 40 sec
= 15sec
= 25 sec
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
AT YP GATE:
The amount of time increment for different slots in an iteration for an upper threshold
scenario is
Increment
Final time
Green signal for the main road vehicles=
25sec
Green signal for the YP gate vehicles = 10sec
Green signal for central lane vehicles = 10 sec
and pedestrians to cross
115 sec
25sec
35sec
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
AT YP GATE:
The amount of time decrement for different slots in an iteration for an lower threshold
scenario is
Decrement
Final time
Green signal for the main road vehicles=
20sec
Green signal for the YP gate vehicles = 5sec
Green signal for central lane vehicles = 5 sec
and pedestrians to cross
115 sec
10sec
20sec
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
AT YP GATE: HOW ARE WE MANAGING THE INCREMENT AND
DECREMENT IN TIME??
In case of high threshold scenario, mentioned amount of time is deducted
from
remaining slots and is used to support the case.
This deduction is made only from the slots in which the density is below the
lower threshold.
If the increment time is not being supported by the decrement time the
difference
is reflected in the increased iteration time
The extra time deducted reflects in reduced iteration time there by
decreasing
the waiting time of vehicles and pedestrians
ALLOTMENT LOGIC
AT YP GATE: HOW ARE WE MANAGING THE INCREMENT AND
DECREMENT IN TIME??
In case of high threshold scenario, mentioned amount of time is deducted
from
remaining slots and is used to support the case.
This deduction is made only from the slots in which the density is below the
lower threshold.
If the increment time is not being supported by the decrement time the
difference
is reflected in the increased iteration time
The extra time deducted reflects in reduced iteration time there by
decreasing
the waiting time of vehicles and pedestrians
QFD
Whats?(Customer Requirements)
Visibility for all weather
Waiting time awareness
Avoid overcrowding
Surveillance on rule breakers
Maintain uninterrupted traffic flow
Signal failures are minimized
Minimize accidents
Prevent animals on road
Avoid intersection at signals
Safety of pedestrians
QFD
Hows?(Technical/Functional Requirements)
Sustainability during Power cut
Supporting System
Time to identify failures
Visibility range of lights
Color Blind Efficiency
Correct waiting time information
Density Measurement process
Logic Intelligence
Accuracy in data recording
Intersections at signal crossing
Coordination with the next signal
Capability to adjust for emergency vehicles
Ease of replacements for construction
QFD
LIMITATIONS IN
DESIGN
We have not included animals blocking the roads
We have assumed that the pedestrian signals will also
PROTOTYPE
LIMITATIONS IN
PROTOTYPE
There are no pedestrians shown though we
References:
We have used Wikipedia extensively
We have taken help of the Associate Dean (IPS),
IIT Bombay
Prof. Vedagiri, Associate Professor, Civil Dept,
IITB
JRC Traffic Data and notes
We have used VisSim 5.10 for the simulation
Siemens, Control Systems for Interurban Traffic
(ITS)
Pravin Varaiya, et al. Active Traffic
Management