Sunteți pe pagina 1din 64

Global Asset Allocation and Stock Selection

Quantitative Stock Selection

Campbell R. Harvey
Duke University
National Bureau of Economic Research

Quantitative Stock Selection


1. Introduction

Research coauthored with

Dana Achour

Greg Hopkins

Clive Lang

Quantitative Stock Selection


1. Introduction

Issue
Two decisions are important:
Asset Allocation (country picks)
Asset Selection (equity picks)

Quantitative Stock Selection


1. Introduction

Issue
Considerable research on the asset allocation
side
Research has paid off in that many models
avoided overvalued Asian markets in mid1990s
Many models began overweighing after the
onset of the Asia Crisis

Quantitative Stock Selection


1. Introduction

Issue
Little research on the stock selection side.
Why?
Sparse data on individual stocks
Information asymmetries among local and
global investors
Extremely high transactions costs

Quantitative Stock Selection


1. Introduction

With recent plummet in emerging markets,


stock selection is important.
If market is deemed cheap, (as many
asset allocation models would now suggest),
which stocks do we select?

Quantitative Stock Selection


2. Stock Selection Metrics

Ingredients for success:


Identify stable relationships
Attempt to model unstable relationships
Use predictor variables that reflect the future,
not necessarily the past
Do not overfit
Validate in up-markets as well as down
Tailor to country characteristics in emerging
markets

Quantitative Stock Selection


2. Stock Selection Metrics

Methodologies:
Cross-sectional regression
Sorting
Hybrids

Quantitative Stock Selection


2. Stock Selection Metrics

Cross-sectional regression:
For country j, estimate:

Ri ,t 0 1 Ai ,t 1 i ,t
where
i denotes firm i;
A is a firm specific attribute (could be multiple)
are common regression coefficients

Quantitative Stock Selection


2. Stock Selection Metrics

Cross-sectional regression:
Used in developed market stock selection
Problem with unstable coefficients
Bigger problem given noisy emerging market
returns

Quantitative Stock Selection


2. Stock Selection Metrics

Sorting:
Used in developed market stock selection
Potentially similar in stability problems
Can be cast in regression framework
(a regression on ranks, or a multinomial probit
regression)

Rank regression may have advantages given the


high variance (high noise) in emerging equity
returns

Quantitative Stock Selection


2. Stock Selection Metrics

Sorting:
Simple methodology that provides a good
starting point to investigate stock selection

Quantitative Stock Selection


2. Stock Selection Metrics

Hybrid:
Create portfolios based on stocks sorted by
attributes
Use regression or optimization to weight
portfolios
Produces a flexible, highly nonlinear way to
select stocks

Quantitative Stock Selection


3. Our methodology

Focus on three emerging markets:


Malaysia (representative of Asia)
Mexico (indicative of Latin America)
South Africa (unique situation)

Quantitative Stock Selection


3. Our methodology

Specify exhaustive list of firm specific factors


Includes many traditional factors
Extra emphasis on expectations factors
Specific a number of diagnostic variables
Includes factors that reflect the type of firm we
are selecting

Quantitative Stock Selection


3. Our methodology

Identify the best stocks and the worst stocks


Do not impose the constraints of a tracking
error methodology
[Tracking error can be dealt with at a later
stage of the analysis]

Quantitative Stock Selection


3. Our methodology

Steps:
1. Specify list of factors
2. Univariate screens (in sample)
3. Bivariate diagnostic screens
4. Battery of additional diagnostics emphasizing
performance through time
5. Bivariate selection screens

Quantitative Stock Selection


3. Our methodology

Steps:
6. Optimize to form scoring screen (in sample)
7. Run scoring screen on out-of-sample period
8. Diagnostics on scoring screen
9. Form buy list and sell lists
10. Purge buy list of stocks that are identified by
predetermined set of knock out criteria

Quantitative Stock Selection


3. Our methodology

Steps:
11. Investigate turnover of portfolio
various holding periods analyzed

Quantitative Stock Selection


4. Past research

Very few papers:


Rouwenhorst (JF) looks at IFC data
Claessens, Dasgupta and Glen (EMQ) look at
IFC data
Fama and French (JF) look at IFC data
Achour, Harvey, Hopkins, Lang (1998, 1999,
2000)

Quantitative Stock Selection


4. Past research

What we offer:
No one has merged IFC, MSCI, Worldscope,
and IBES data
First paper to look at comprehensive list of
firm attributes
First paper to look at expectational attributes

Quantitative Stock Selection


4. Factors

Fundamental factors
Dividend yield
Earnings yield
Book to price ratio
Cash earnings to price yield
Change in return on equity
Revenue growth
Rate of re-investment
Return on equity

Quantitative Stock Selection


4. Factors

Expectational
Change in consensus FY1 estimate - last 3 or 6
months
Consensus FY2 to FY1 estimate change
Consensus forecast earnings estimate revision
ratio
12 months prospective earnings growth rate
3 year prospective earnings growth rate
12 month prospective earnings yield

Quantitative Stock Selection


4. Factors

Momentum
One month/ 1 year price momentum
One year historical earnings
growth/momentum
Three year historical earnings growth rate

Quantitative Stock Selection


4. Factors

Diagnostic
Market capitalization
Debt to common equity ratio

Quantitative Stock Selection


5. Diagnostics

Average return
Average excess return
Standard deviation
T-stat (hypothesis that excess return=0)
Beta (against benchmark index)
Alpha
R2

Quantitative Stock Selection


5. Diagnostics

Average capitalization
% periods > market index (hit rate)
% periods > market index in up markets
% periods > market index in down markets
Max number of consecutive benchmark
outperformances

Quantitative Stock Selection


5. Diagnostics

Max observed excess return


Min observed excess return
Max number of consecutive negative returns
Max number of consecutive positive returns
Year by year returns

Quantitative Stock Selection


5. Diagnostics

Factor average for constructed portfolio


Factor median
Factor standard deviation

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Summary Statistics: Malaysia Benchmark
400
350
300
250

87% drop

200
150

100
50
0
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Malaysia IFC US$
Data through January 2001

Malaysia FX

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Summary Statistics: Mexico Benchmark
1000
900
800
700
600
500
68% drop
400
300
200
100
0
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Mexico IFC
Data through January 2001

Mexico FX

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Summary Statistics: South Africa Benchmark
300
250
200
150

55% drop

100
50
0
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
South Africa IFC US$
Data through January 2001

South Africa FX

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Malaysia: Factor returns
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Mexico: Factor returns
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. South Africa: Factor returns
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Malaysia: % Periods Benchmark Outperformance
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Mexico: % Periods Benchmark Outperformance
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. South Africa: % Periods Benchmark Outperformance
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Malaysia: Dividend Yield Screen: Index=100 each year
250
200
150
100
50
0

Top

Benchmark

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Mexico: Historical Earnings Momentum Screen:
Index=100 each year
300
250
200
150
100
50
0

Top

Benchmark

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. South Africa: Change in Consensus FY1-3 mo. Screen:
Index=100 each year
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Top

Benchmark

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection

South Africa

Malaysia

50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50

Mexico

6. Book to Price: Low-High Spread

Quantitative Stock Selection

South Africa

Malaysia

50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50

Mexico

6. IBES Revision Ratio: Low-High Spread

Quantitative Stock Selection

South Africa

Malaysia

50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50

Mexico

6. IBES 12-month Prospective Earnings Yield: L-H Spread

Quantitative Stock Selection

South Africa

Malaysia

50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50

Mexico

6. One-year Momentum: Low-High Spread

Quantitative Stock Selection

South Africa

Malaysia

50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50

Mexico

6. Size Effect: Low-High Spread

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Malaysia: Scoring Screen Various Holding Periods
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Mexico: Scoring Screen Various Holding Periods
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. South Africa: Scoring Screen Various Holding Periods
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Malaysia: Scoring Screen
% Periods Benchmark Outperformance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Mexico: Scoring Screen
% Periods Benchmark Outperformance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. South Africa: Scoring Screen
% Periods Benchmark Outperformance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Malaysia: Scoring Screen: Index=100 each year
250
200
150
100
50
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Mexico: Scoring Screen: Index=100 each year
300
250
200
150
100
50
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. South Africa: Scoring Screen: Index=100 each year
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Top

Bottom

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Malaysia: Scoring Screen
900.00

IN SAMPLE

OUT OF SAMPLE

160.00

T OP

FR
800.00

CUMULATIVE RETURNS - IN SAMPLE

700.00

120.00

600.00
100.00
500.00

IFCG MALAYSIA

80.00
400.00

IBES DATA
ADDED
60.00

300.00
40.00

200.00

BOT T OM

20.00

100.00

0.00
12/31/88

0.00
12/31/89

12/31/90

12/31/91

12/31/92

12/31/93

12/31/94

12/31/95

12/31/96

12/31/97

CUMULATIVE RETURNS - OUT OF SAMPLE

140.00

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. Mexico: Scoring Screen

IN SAMPLE

2100.00

OUT OF SAMPLE

250.00

T OP

2000.00
1900.00

1700.00

200.00

CUMULATIVE RETURNS - IN SAMPLE

1600.00
1500.00
1400.00
1300.00

150.00

1200.00
IFCG MEXICO

1100.00
1000.00
900.00

100.00

800.00
700.00
600.00
500.00

BOT T OM

50.00

400.00
300.00
200.00
100.00
0.00
12/31/88

0.00
12/31/89

12/31/90

12/31/91

12/31/92

12/31/93

12/31/94

12/31/95

12/31/96

12/31/97

CUMULATIVE RETURNS - OUT OF SAMPLE

1800.00

Quantitative Stock Selection


6. South Africa: Scoring Screen
IN SAMPLE

350.00

OUT OF SAMPLE

120.00

T OP

100.00

250.00
80.00
IFCG SOUT H
AFRICA

200.00

60.00
150.00

BOT T OM

40.00
100.00

20.00

50.00

0.00
12/31/92

0.00
12/31/93

12/31/94

12/31/95

12/31/96

12/31/97

CUMULATIVE RETURNS - OUT OF SAMPLE

CUMULATIVE RETURNS - IN SAMPLE

300.00

Quantitative Stock Selection


7. Research Directions

1) Comparison of regression method and


multivariate screening process
Panel multinomial probit models
How do we reduce the noise in emerging market
equity returns?

Quantitative Stock Selection


7. Research Directions

2) What are the characteristics of countries that


make some factors work and other not work?

Stage of market integration process


Industrial mix
Openness of economy
Microstructure factors

Quantitative Stock Selection


7. Research Directions

3) What causes the shifting importance of factors


through time, e.g. value versus growth?
Can the cross-section of many stock returns help
us identify when a factor is likely to work?

Quantitative Stock Selection


7. Research Directions

4) Can the country selection process be merged


with the stock selection exercise?
Should buy portfolios be used in top-down
optimizations?
Does country-specific tracking error really matter
in global asset allocation?

Quantitative Stock Selection


7. Research Directions

5) Stability and migration tracking


Should we consider the behavior of the stock
moving from fractile to fractile?

Quantitative Stock Selection


7. Research Directions

6) Should we expand our view of risk in both the


stock selection and country selection exercises?
Mean, variance, skewness?
What are the driving forces of changing variance?
What are the determinants of skewness?

S-ar putea să vă placă și