PROJECT CRITERIA

By:
BOY SUBIROSA SABARGUNA, MD, MHA, Ph.D

DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP

NAMA
: Dr. dr. H. Boy Subirosa Sabarguna, MARS
NIP / PANGKAT
: 195810121984101001 /IVB
TEMPAT/TGL. LAHIR : Majalengka, 1958
STATUS
: Menikah
AGAMA
: Islam
JABATAN

PENDIDIKAN

ALAMAT RUMAH

1. PIC FINANCE PIU MERC-FKUI

2. Dosen IKK-FKUI
3. Prgram Pascasarjana UI, Teknologi Biomedis
4. Konsultan Manajemen Rumah Sakit.
: 1. Lulus dokter umum FKUI tahun 1984
2. Lulus Magister Administrasi Rumah Sakit
Pascasarjana UI tahun 1991
3. Lulus Program Doktor UGM tahun 2001
: Jl. TAWAKAL IV No. 18A, KEL. TOMANG,
KEC. GROGOL PETAMBURAN, JAKARTA BARAT
Telepon : (021) 5660332
Hp. : 081317504275
e-mail : sabar014guna@yahoo.co.id
web
: www.sabarguna.com
youtube : KULIAH JELAJAH 99

BISMILLAHIR RAHMANIR RAHIM

ASSALAMUALIKUM Wr. Wb.

CONTENTS

A. PROJECT CRITERIA
B. CRITERIA, SUB CITERIA,
PARAMETER, INDICATOR, SCORE
1. RELEVANCE
2. EFFECTIVENESS
3. EFFICIENCY
4. SUSTANEBILITY
5. IMPACT
C. RECOMENDATION

A. PROJECT CRITERIA

B. CRITERIA, SUB CITERIA,

PARAMETER, INDICATOR, SCORE

1. RELEVANCE
Are we doing the right thing?
How important is the relevance or
significance of the intervention regarding local and
national requirements and priorities?

is a measure of the extent to which development policies or

interventions meet population needs and country priorities, and are consistent
with donor policies
Relevance concern the extent to which a development initiative and its intented
outputs or outcomes are consistent with national and local policies and
priorities and the needs of intended beneficiaries
Relevance also considers the extent to which the initiative is responsive to
human development priorities of empowerment and gender equality issues
UNICEF defines relevance further with reference to national and international
partners policies (including MDGs, National Development Plans, PRSPs and
SWAPs), and global reference such as human rights, humanitarian law and
humanitarian principles, the CRC and CEDAW (UNICEF, PPPM, 2002)
Relevance relates to the importance of the problems to be addressed by the
project, and starts with determining for whom the project is relevant. At the
project should address the specific problems of the target group. At the overall
objectives level the project should address the related but wider problems of
society as a whole

Relevance

SUB CRITERIA-POLICY SUPPORT

SUB CRITERIA-CHOICE OF
TECHNOLOGY

SUB CRITERIA-ENVIROMENTAL
MATTER

SUB CRITERIA-SOCIAL CULTURE

ASPECT

SUB CRITERIA-INSTITUTIONAL
ASPECT

RECOMMENDATION
TOTAL VALUE and MAX. SCORE
NO

SUB CRITERIA

VALUE (%)

MAX. SCORE

1.

Policy Support

10

8 x5 = 40

2.

Choice of Technology

3x5 = 15

3.

Environmental Matter

16

8x5 = 40

4.

Social Aspect

3x5 = 15

5.

Institutional Aspect

2x5 = 10

TOTAL

38%

120

RECOMMENDATION
SCORE
1
2
4
5

=
=
=
=

Bad
Rare
Good
Excellence

RECOMMENDATION
TOTAL
TOTAL = VALUE X SCORE
PASS = TOTAL > 100
NOT PASS = TOTAL <99
If not pass, other criteria is not be calculated

2. EFFECCTIVENESS

MAX. SCORE: 5X5 + 4X5 = 45

3. EFFICIENCY

MAX. SCORE: 11 X 5 = 55

4. SUSTANIBILITY

MAX. SCORE: 15 X 5 = 75

5. IMPACT

MAX. SCORE: 5 X 5 = 55

C. RECOMMENDATION
TOTAL VALUE and MAX. SCORE

RECOMMENDATION
SCORE
1
2
4
5

=
=
=
=

Bad
Rare
Good
Excellence

RECOMMENDATION
TOTAL
TOTAL = VALUE X SCORE
PASS = TOTAL > 100
NOT PASS = TOTAL <99
If not pass, other criteria is not be calculated

ALHAMDULILLAHIROBBILALAMIN

WASSALAMUALIKUM Wr. Wb.