Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Solar Cells
Group 1:
Amy Cornforth, Tony Grupp, Ana
DAlmeida
February 5, 2010
Presentation Overview
1.
2.
3.
4.
Solar Cells
Units that have the ability of converting sunlight
into electricity
Made of semiconducting material
Can be used for varied purposes, e.g. to power
watches, to light houses, and to provide power
to the electrical grids
Solar Cells
Limitations
Band gap of the semi-conducting material
Maximum efficiency of a solar cell (single
material) is about 30 %
Good efficiency
High Cost
Low Cost
Less Efficiency
Low Cost
Medium Efficiency
Quantum Dots
Advantages
Adjustable band-gap
Moldable
Facilitate collection and transport of carriers
Increase efficiency of solar cells
by extending the band gap of solar cells
by generating more charges from a single photon
Quantum Dots
Quantum dot sensitized solar cells
(QDSCs) are third-generation
photovoltaic devices
Semiconductor sensitizers
Very tunable
Theoretically increase
efficiency of solar cells up to
44%
Published in:Ivn Mora-Ser, Sixto Gimnez, Francisco Fabregat-Santiago, Roberto Gmez, Qing Shen, Taro Toyoda, Juan Bisquert;Recombination in
Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells.Accounts of Chemical Research 2009 42 (11), DOI: 10.1021/ar900134d , Copyright 2009 ASC
Quantum Dots
How to improve the performance and stability of
QDSCs?
Published in:Ivn Mora-Ser, Sixto Gimnez, Francisco Fabregat-Santiago, Roberto Gmez, Qing Shen, Taro Toyoda, Juan Bisquert;Recombination in
Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells.Accounts of Chemical Research 2009 42 (11), DOI: 10.1021/ar900134d , Copyright 2009 ASC
Published in: Hiroshi Imahori and Tomokazu Umeyama; J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (21).
DOI: 10.1021/jp9007448
Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society
DSSC Basics
Thin-film solar cell
Think sandwich
DSSC Nanostructure
ZnO Nanostructures
Published in: Qifeng Zhang, Christopher S. Dandeneau, Xiaoyuan Zhou, and Guozhong Cao; Advanced Materials. 2009, 21,
40874108. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200803827 Copyright 2009 Wiley-VCH
DSSC Modifications
Replace organic electrolyte solution
2006
Use of nanowires and nanoparticles
Demonstrated good chemical and thermal
resistance
2007, 2008
Use of low-cost organic dyes and solvent-free
electrolyte solution investigated
Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dye-sensitized_solar_cell
DSSC Efficiency
DSSC Summary
Medium efficiency
Low cost
Problems to be addressed:
Liquid electrolyte (freezing, expanding,
volatility)
Poor performance in red region of light
Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dye-sensitized_solar_cell
Image at http://www.iae.kyoto-u.ac.jp/molecule/nedo-mirai.jpg
What is an Oligothiophene?
Definition: Molecules in which two or more thiophene
rings are linked together
Gives rise to many optical and electrical properties
such as fluorescence, semiconductance, and light
emission
Published in: Guda Ramakrishna; Ajit Bhaskar; Peter Bauerle; Theodore Goodson; J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 2018-2026.
DOI: 10.1021/jp076048h Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society
P3HT poly(3-hexylthiophene)
One of the major layers in an organic solar cell to
increase efficiency
In some lower quality solar cells the addition of P3HT
increased efficiency from 0.05% up to 0.29%
The best organic solar cells can reach up to 4-5%
efficiency
PT and P3HT
A) PT
B) P3HT
Both are derived from the
basic oligothiophene
structure
P3HT has a hexane chain
added to the C5 position
of each thiophene ring
Image found at http://www.condensed-matter.uni-tuebingen.de/resources/pictures/molecules/P3HT.gif
Published in: Nenad Vukmirovic; Lin-Wang Wang; J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 409-415. DOI: 10.1021/jp808360y
Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society
What is needed?
Organic solar cells have two main objectives:
1. They must have efficient excitation
delocalization and energy transfer to best mimic
natural systems (such as plants)
2. Must be able to convert solar energy and have
large electron mobility properties (P3HT helps
considerably with this)
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Published in: McGehee, M.; Mayer, A.; Parmer, J.; Rowell, M.; Topinka, M.; Burkhardt, G. Improving Organic Solar
Cells C 2007 Stanford University
Results
Efficiency over the system was nearly triple from
previous experiments, going up to 3% using a 95%
transparent film over the top of the cell
An increase in the carbon nanotube density of 20%
resulted in a increase of conductivity by 15-fold
Increasing the thickness of the P3HT layer aided
electron transfer
Research should be done to improve the
transparency of the top film layer to be above 95%
Sources
Main Article:
1.
Nanotechnology for Next Generation Solar Cells. Prashant V. Kamat and George
C. Schatz. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jp905378n?cookieSet=1#citing
Secondary Articles:
1.
Hiroshi Imahori and Tomokazu Umeyama. DonorAcceptor Nanoarchitecture on
Semiconducting Electrodes for Solar Energy Conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp9007448
2.
Wikipedia. Dye-sensitized solar cell. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyesensitized_solar_cell
3.
Qifeng Zhang, Christopher S. Dandeneau, Xiaoyuan Zhou, Guozhong Cao. ZnO
Nanostructures for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Advanced Materials. C 2009.
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122498586/PDFSTART
4.
Peter, L. M. Characterization and modeling of dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys.
Chem. C 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp069058b
5.
Prashant V. Kamat. Meeting the Clean Energy Demand: Nanostructure Architectures
for Solar Energy Conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jp066952u
6.
Yasuhiro Tachibana, Kazuya Umekita, Yasuhide Otsuka, Susumu Kuwabata. Charge
Recombination Kinetics at an in Situ Chemical Bath-Deposited CdS/Nanocrystalline
TiO2 Interface. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113 (16), pp 68526858
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jp809042z
Group S1 Rebuttal
Most of the comments were positive,
which were appreciated.
Of the negative comments, while we agree
with most, the ones we dont agree with
was our shortened introduction. We
believe that our topic was a continuation
of the solar cell discussion Dr. Seminario
gave on the first day of class, and
therefore a long introduction was not
needed.
Group
Group S2:
Review of Solar
Technology
Chris Heflin
Rachael Houk
Michael Jones
Positives
Group S1 was the first to present, and
therefore had a harder time knowing
what to expect with the presentation.
However, they presented a
professional, well organized
presentation.
Each presenter was knowledgeable
on their respective areas of the topic,
spoke clearly and fluently.
Negatives
The group should make use of the
microphones and vocal projection in order
to be well heard. Everything was very
quiet.
Many of the slides contained only words
and no pictures, making the presentation
less interesting.
Some of the material was a bit more
technical than most were prepared for. A
bit more introduction would be beneficial.
Bradford Lamb
Michael Koetting
James Kancewick
Week 1 Additional Slides
Seminar
Group
Group
Group
Group
Group S4
Review of Solar Cell
Technology
Joshua Moreno
Scott Marwil
Danielle Miller
Group
Group S5
Review of Solar Cell
Technology
Group 5
Pradip Rijal
Jason Savatsky
Trevor Seidel
Laura Young
Group
Presentation Review
The group overall did a very good
job.
They talked about the use of DSSC
and Quantum Dots being used in
Solar Cells but they did not tell us
what they were.
Organization was satisfactory.
Could work on speaking louder.
Group
Critiqued by S6
Michael Trevathan
Daniel Arnold
Michael Tran
John Baumhardt
Group S6
Summary
Group S6