Sunteți pe pagina 1din 178

DIPLOMADO GEOLOGIA DEL

PETROLEO
FORMATION EVALUATION

EVALUACIN DE FORMCIONES
BIBLIOGRAFA

Asquith, G. B., Gibson, Ch., 1982. Basic Well Log Analysis for Geologists. Methods in Exploration. AAPG.
Tulsa Oklahoma.

Asquith, G. B., Log Evaluation for Shaly Sandstones Reservoirs. Continuinig Education Series No 31.
AAPG. Tulsa Oklahoma.

Asquith, G. B., 1985. Handbook of Log Evaluation Techniques for Carboantes Reservoirs. Methods in
Exploration No 5. AAPG. Tulsa Oklahoma.

Bateman, R.M. 1985. Log Quality Control.

Bendek, J.,1992. Perfiles Elctricos, una herramienta para la Evaluacin de Formaciones. Asociacin
Colombiana de Geologos y Geofsicos del Petrleo.

Coates R.G., Xiao L, Prammer M. 1999 NMR logging. Principles and Applications Halliburton Energy
services, Houston , Texas

Dewan J. T., 1983, Essential of Modern Hole Log Interpretation. PennWell Publishing Company. Tulsa
Oklahoma.

Dresser Atlas, 1982, Well Logging and Interpretation Techniques.

Foster N. H., 1999, Formation Evaluation I. Treatise of Petroleum Geology. Reprint Series No 16. AAPG,
Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Foster N. H., 1999, Formation Evaluation II. Treatise of Petroleum Geology. Reprint Series No 17. AAPG,
Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Hilchie D.W.,1989 Advanced Well Log Interpretation. Douglas W. Hilchie Inc. Boulder

EVALUACIN DE FORMCIONES
BIBLIOGRAFA

Merkel R.H.,1979, Well Log Formation Evaluation, Continuing Education Course Notes Series No
31, AAPG. Tulsa, OKlahoma

Schlumberger, 1979, Fundamentos de la Interpretacin de Perfiles.

Schlumberger, 2000, Log interpretation Charts, Sugarland, Texas.

Schlumberger, 1980, Tcnicas de Perfilaje en Venezuela.

Schlumberger, 1981, Fundamentos de la Interpretacin de Perfiles de Buzamiento.

Schlumberger, 1985, Ssmica de Pozo.

Schlumberger, 1987, Log Interpretation Principles / Applications.

Schlumberger, 1985, A Wellsite guide to the recognition of low resistivity pay sands in the Gulf of
Mexico.

Serra O., 1985, Sedimentary Environments from Wireline Logs. Schlumberger

EVALUACION DE FORMACIONES
PROGRAMA

1 Evaluacin de Formaciones
1.1 Introduccin.
1.2 Registros Elctricos
1.2.1 Principios Elctricos
1.2.2 Principios de Interpretacin de Registros Elctricos.
1.3 Registro Litolgico
1.4 Registro Continuo de Hidrocarburos (Mud Logging)
1.5 Registro de Potencial Espontneo (SP)
1.5.1 Calculo de Rw a partir de la curva de SP
1.6 Registros que miden resisitividad
1.6.1 No Enfocados
1.6.1.1 Centralizados
1.6.1.1.1 Normal Corto 16. Rxo
1.6.1.1.2 Normal Largo 64. Rt
1.6.1.1.3 Lateral de 19 pies. (Rt)
1.6.1.2 De Contacto
1.6.1.2.1 Microlog (Rxo)
1.6.1.2.2 Perfil de Buzamiento (Dipmeter)

EVALUACION DE FORMACIONES
PROGRAMA
1.6.2 Enfocados
1.6.2.1Centralizados
1.6.2.1.1Lateroperfiles (Laterologs), LL3, LL7,LL8, DLL.
1.6.2.2 De Contacto
1.6.2.2.1 Microlaterolog, Proximity, MSFL (Rxo).
1.7 Herramientas que miden conductividad
1.7.1Registro de Induccin. 6FF28, 6FF40, ISF, DIL, Phasor
1.7.1.1 Perfiles de Invasin.
1.2.1.2 Rwa
1.8 Herramientas Acsticas
1.3.1 Registro Snico. BHC, LSS.
1.3.1.1 Calculo de Porosidad Snica
1.3.1.2 Cross Plot Delta T vs Resistividad
1.3.1.3 Registro de Velocidad.
1.3.1.3.1 Check Shot
1.3.1.3.2 Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP)
1.3.1.3.3 Offset seismic profiles

EVALUACION DE FORMACIONES
PROGRAMA
1.9 Herramientas Radioactivas
1.9.1 Miden Rayos Gama Naturales. GR; NGR.
1.9.1.1 Calculo del Volumen de Arcilla (V clay)
1.9.2 Miden Rayos Gama Inducidos por Rayos Gamma
1.9.2.1 Registro de Densidad. Calculo de Porosidad
1.9.3 Miden Neutrones Inducidos por R.G. o Neutrones
1.9.3.1 Registro de Neutron. Calculo de Porosidad
1.9.4 Porosidad efectiva.
1.10 Determinacion de Ambientes Sedimentarios a partir de Registros
de Pozo.
1.11 Mecanica de rocas.
1.12 Herramientas para el nuevo siglo (Resonancia Magntica, Cast,
Emi, Rmt (reservoir monitoring tool) etc.
1.13 Transmicion tiempo Real

PETROPHYSICS
Formation and reservoir evaluation
Introduction

Goals
Show that any formation and reservoir
evaluation must respond to the following
questions :
Detection and location of reservoir
Evaluation of their volume
- Thickness
Fluid nature determination
Hydrocarbon volume evaluation
- Effective porosity
- Hydrocarbon saturation
Reservoir productiveness evaluation
- Reservoir permeability
- Reservoir pressure
Economic potential
- Development cost

Oil
Water contact

Oil
Water contact

Oil
Water contact
Gas
Oil contact

These goals correspond in fact to a precise


geological description of the formations
Reservoir rock
Hydrocarbon

Oil
Water contact

Introduction
Petrophysics is the study of the physical
properties of reservoir rocks
Study of physical principles on which are based the
logging tools which measure the petrophysical
properties of rocks
Analysis of the measurements recorded in the wells,
focusing fundamentally on reservoir intervals
Formation and Reservoir evaluation in terms of :
porosity
permeability
volume of fluids in place and producible

General Comments

Petrophysics is concerned by the study of rock physics and physical principles


on which are based the logging tool and by their application.

It would be convenient to never forget that all those physical measurements are
recorded to describe, study and evaluate the economic potential of the rocks
forming the subsurface.

Geology is oversimplified and tries to describe and evaluate reservoirs through


mathematical formulae. Geology is a natural science that cannot be simplified
and put in equations. Many parameters control the formation of minerals, rocks,
beds and resources. In addition, most of the time these parameters are
interdependent.

Modern petrophysics should endeavor to do a better and reliable description of


the geological reality. The petrophysicist and the log analyst should never forget
that any log interpretation is in fact and by nature a geological interpretation.

Importance of a complete well logging set


Well logs are the most important source
of information for reservoir evaluation.
Any economy, realized on a short term,
by reduction of the logging program may
generate, on a long term basis, an
important cost increase of the field
development (dry wells or injection wells
badly located).
The lack of information about the current
transport direction in this meandering
channel system has generated the drilling
of 23 dry wells!
69% success rate in this case!

Dry wells

23 dry wells

Oil wells

53 oil wells

Sand thickness : # 20 m Channel width : # 1000 m


Sand isopach map

Berg, 1968

Important issues for an interpretation approach


This approach is limitative as the number of equations is limited to the
number of logging parameters taken into account
Logging tools have different vertical resolution and depth of investigation.
Consequently, combination of their data is not always valid, as they do not
correspond necessarily to identical volume of rock
Some log data are not representative due to the lack of resolution of
standard tools
A perfect depth matching of log data is sometimes difficult to achieve if
logging speed variations are not recorded by an accelerometer tool,
added to the logging string
Most of the equations are empirical
Logging parameters of minerals are fixed. They do not take into account
possible variations of their elemental composition and, consequently, of
their logging parameters

Review of general notions

Formation evaluation
Definition:
The process of evaluating gas- or oil-bearing formations, and of appraising
their commercial significance
It corresponds to the following steps:
determine the petrophysical properties of reservoir rocks,
evaluate their volume and the nature of their content in gas or oil,
estimate their economical potential.
This evaluation implies the study of all the available data that are of :
- different origins and natures,
- obtained at different scales,
linking constantly the observations made at one scale to those made at
another scale.

Analysis from seismic to cores

Scaling down

Origin
of data
Scale

A complete, accurate and reliable geological description requires a constant


change of observation scale, using different techniques.
Serra, 2002

Reservoir

Definition
A reservoir is a volume
of rock that has sufficient
porosity and permeability
to permit the
accumulation of crude oil
or natural gas under
adequate trap
conditions

Reservoir

Reservoir

Reservoir

Reservoir

bed
bed

ELECTRICAL PRINCIPLES

Resistivity Ohms Law


VAB = r . IAB
VAB

is the potential difference between A and B

IAB

current flowing from A to B


VAB

IAB

Rock of resistance r

A
+

Voltmeter

Resistivity definition

r R

l
A
A

r is the resistance
R is the resistivity
l is the length of the rock
A is the area of the rock cylinder

Rock of
resistivity
R

FLUJO DE CORRIENTE EN UN ESTRATO

En las rocas sedimentarias la conduccin se debe al movimiento


de iones mientras en los metales se debe al movimiento de
electrones
Los iones que conducen la corriente en rocas sedimentarias son el
resultado de la disociacin de sales
Electrolitos: Soluciones de cidos, bases y sales (conducen la
electricidad)
Incremento en la concentracin salina, baja resistencia el flujo de
corriente.
Incremento de la temperatura, baja resistencia al flujo de
electrones (a mayor T, baja viscosidad)

LOG INTERPRETATION
PRINCIPLES

Permeability anisotropy linked to sedimentation units


A meandering fluvial channel

The sedimentation unit is


composed of a collection of
rock fragments or minerals A sedimentation unit
presenting a typical internal
organization (texture and
structure) giving to the unit
some well defined initial
petrophysical properties:
porosity volume, pore size
Direction of highest permeability
and distribution
permeability value and
anisotropy.

Direction of
transport stream

Serra 2002

The rock internal organization


The rock internal organization controls the rock
petrophysical properties. It depends on its texture and
its internal structure.
The texture is the general physical appearance or
character of a rock, including the geometric aspects and
the mutual relations among, its component particles or
crystals; e.g. the size, shape and arrangement of the
constituent elements of a sedimentary rock. The term is
applied to the smaller (megascopic or microscopic)
features as seen on a smooth surface
The structure is a megascopic feature of a rock
mass or rock unit, generally seen best in the outcrop
rather than in hand specimen or in thin section

The rock petrophysical properties

Depend fundamentally on :
- porosity
- permeability
- fluid content
- mineral and elemental composition

Porosity types :
- Total porosity : it is equal to the ratio of the
total volume of void space (pores, canal, vugs,
) existing between the solid elements of a
rock, to the total rock volume :
Phit = (Vt Vs)/Vt = Vp/Vt
It includes:
- the primary porosity, Phi1, which is the
porosity that developed during the final stages
of sedimentation or that was present within
sedimentary particles at the time of deposition
- the secondary porosity, Phi2, which is the
porosity developed in a rock after its
deposition or emplacement, through such
processes as solution or fracturing

Secondary porosity

Definition : the porosity is the fraction of the total


volume of a rock non occupied by solid elements
or, in other terms, occupied by pores or voids. It is
the pore volume per unit volume of formation.

Primary porosity

Porosity

Intergranular Porosity

Moldic Porosity

Fracture Porosity

Porosity in carbonate rocks

- Connected porosity : it is equal to the


percentage of pores linked to them.
- Potential porosity : it is equal to the
percentage of total volume of voids
linked to them by small interconnecting
channels of which the section is higher
than a limit below what the fluid cannot
circulate (20 mm for oil, 5 mm for gas).
- Effective porosity : it is the porosity
accessible to free fluids. It excludes
the non connected porosity and the
space occupied by adsorbed water
and clay bound water.

Choquette & Pray, 1970

Permeability

absolute permeability, k, if the fluid is


homogeneous and does not interact with
the rock itself;
effective permeability which expresses
the property of a fluid to flow through a
reservoir in the presence of other fluids;

Q = k(1/m)(A/h)(P1-P2)
Q : flow, m : viscosity, A : surface, h :
flowing distance, P1 et P2 : upstream and
downstream pressures

Saturation (Sw)

Relative permeabilities

the relative permeability which


corresponds to the ratio of the effective
permeability to the absolute permeability.
It depends on the saturation.

Capillary pressure
air-water (psi)

Permaabilities:

Permeability (k)
Capillary pressure
oil-water (psi)

The permeability is the measure of the


ease with which a fluid of a given viscosity
can flow through a formation. It depends
on the capillary pressure.

Saturation
Serra 2002

Saturation
Water wet

The saturation in fluid of a


formation is the ratio of the
pore volume occupied by
this fluid to the total volume
of pores.
If this fluid is water,:
Sw = Vw/Vp
The general formula is :

grain

water

Oil wet

grain

oil

water

oil

Oil wet

I = Rt/Ro

Swn = Ro/Rt = 1/I


Water wet

Saturation Sw

Serra 2002

Determination of general parameters


These parameters are valuable for a depth interval corresponding to a
similar type of depositional environment

Temperature determination
Pressure determination
Rm, Rmf, Rmc Determination
Rw Determination
a, m & n Determination

Temperature Determination
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Porosity, (p.u.)

Relationship between Formation factor & Porosity

Formation factor, FR
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Saturation equations
a Rw
mRt

Archies equation

Laminated shale equation

2 2

Sw
1
V shlam
Rt 1V shlama Rw Rsh

Dispersed shale equation

a Rw q RshdRw 2 q Rshd Rw

2
2
2Rshd
Rshd
im
S w
1q

Waxman-Smiths equation

2
S
1 w BQvS w
Rt F *Rw
F*

n
w

tmsnwt

S wb

C
C
C
C
Dual-water model equation t a w S
wb
w
wt

Sources of information
Resolution
10 m
1m

Seismic data

1m

Standard logs

Volume & surface


attributes

Volume attributes

General external
structure
Major sedimentary
breaks
Idea of the environment

Gross electrobed
thickness
Bulk lithology
Major breaks

1cm

Image data

Cores

Volume & surface


attributes
Precise unit of deposition
thickness
Texture
Internal structure
Structural dip, faults
folds, unconformities

Serra 2002

Links between well log measurements and geology

Well logs strongly depend


on geological attributes
consequently they
constitute a fundamental
source of geological
information

Serra 2002

Any log interpretation is by nature a


geological interpretation
In subsurface, well logs represent the
fundamental source of geological and
petrophysical information

Logging Truck or Cabin

Logging truck and Offshore cabin


from Schlumberger

ECLIPS
Offshore & Land Unit from Baker Atlas

The interpretation model


Before any
reservoir
5 submodels
must bementioned
taken into account
It must
takeevaluation
into account
the sub-models
below

Borehole
model

Geological
model

Tool
model

Reservoir
model
Mathematical
model

Evaluation
Serra 2002

Model linked to well


Type of well

- Vertical

- Deviated
- Horizontal

Hole and caliper profile


Well equipment

- Open hole

Drilling mode

- Bit

Drilling fluid

- Air

Mud type
Bottom depth
Invasion Profile

- Cased hole
- Turbine
- Foam
- Mud
- Normal (water based)
- Oil base mud
- With additive (salt, barite, KCl)
- Temperature
- Pressure

- Abrupt

- Progressive

Type of well

(courtesy of Schlumberger)

Invasion Model and Resistivity Profile

Hole
Axis

Resistivity

Formation

Radial distribution of fluids

Mud

Distance

Simplified profile : abrupt limit

Radial distribution of resistivity

Actual profile : progressive evolution with


annulus

Borehole effects
FLUID MOBILITY :

Serra 2002

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Origin of data
The well logging data may have two origins:
LWD origin, so recorded during the drilling itself, with
problems linked to :
- rate of penetration
- frequency of sampling
Wireline origin, so recorded after drilling with all the problems
linked to this case :
- cave development,
- recording speed variations,
- invasion more or less important.

Measurement While Drilling (MWD/LWD)


MWD INITIAL OBJECTIVES:
It measures physical properties such as temperature, pressure and wellbore
trajectory in 3D-space at the bit and also
DWOB: Downhole Weight On the Bit
DTOR: Downhole Torque
ROP: Rate Of Penetration
CURRENT MWD TELEMETRY:
Cable (only if the drilling bit contains a motor)
Mud Pulses (3 Types) 1 to 10 Bits/sec (depending on the service company)
Electromagnetic Waves (in 1-5 ohm-m) 1-5 Bits/Sec

Measurement While Drilling (MWD/LWD)


Mud Pulse Telemetry System and GeoSteering
Power Pulse Tool

Turbine

RWOB Tool
Mud

Pressure
Positive
Pulse
Mud pulse siren

Time
Mud

Negative pulse: uses a controlled valve (up to 5


bits/sec)

Pressure
Negative
pulse
Time

Positive pulse: uses a hydraulic poppet


Pressure

Continuous waves (Siren):


a rotary valve or "mud siren" turns with the
help of a slotted rotor and stator which
restricts the mud flow. This generates a
modulating positive pressure wave which
travels to the surface and is detected at the
standpipe.

Siren
Time

Measurement While Drilling (MWD/LWD)


Electromagnetic Wave telemetry system
The electromagnetic system transmits real-time
MWD data at low-frequency (2-15 Hz)
electromagnetic waves that propagate through the
formation using the drill-string as a wave guide.
Features
No continuous fluid column requirements
Battery-operated
Two-way data transmission
Repeaters can be used to increase signal strength
Problems
Formation of less than 1ohm-m, high depth

Measurement While Drilling (MWD/LWD)

MWD/LWD ADVANTAGES:
Petrophysical properties can be recorded before practically
any invasion.

Tools-pipe diameter reduces the influence of borehole and


mud.

Real-time information that saves rigging costs, improves


safety (overpressure, gas entry detection, etc)

Real-time lithological description.

Insurance of getting retrievable data in case the well


collapses.

LWD measurements

(courtesy of Schlumberger)

Typical wireline equipment

Platform Express measurements


The lower section of the string can be
an induction or a laterolog-type device,
depending on borehole mud resistivity
and borehole/formation resistivity
contrast.
Hinge joints above and below the HighResolution Mechanical Sonde allow the
tool to better negotiate rough boreholes
and improve pad contact.

(courtesy of Schlumberger)

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Type of tools used

It frequently happens, due to the time


required for basin exploration or field
development, that the tool type has
changed between the first well and
the latest ones.

It also happens that the service


company has changed.

Due to that, a lack of homogeneity


can be observed in the nature and
the log quality which can generate
evaluation problems.

Therefore, it is necessary to make the


data homogeneous in order to
eliminate the errors linked to these
different tool equipments.

This can be achieved only by a


mutual calibration of the different
data.

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Equipment or set of combined tools


A run combined equipment

Platform Express

be aware in a
combined equipment
such as triple
combo , the tool
situated at the top
cannot provide any
information
corresponding to the x
meters of the bottom.
So, it is important to
know exactly the
respective measure
point of each tool in the
combination.

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Some measurements,
especially the nuclear ones,
start by the acquisition of raw
data which are ultimately
translated into log data. The
transfer equations are often
complexes or empirical.
Thus, in the case of neutronic
measurements, what is really
measured corresponds to
counts per second generated
inside different detectors by
epithermal or thermal neutron
capture, taking into account
slowing down, diffusion or
neutron migration lengths.

Slowing down length, L (cm)

Link between raw measures and measures on logs

Sandstone
Limestone
Dolostone

Water filled porosity (%)

Conversion in porosity of counts for neutron


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Model linked to the available well logging set

Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Corrections of environmental effects


Most of the measures are affected by
several factors combined under the
term of environmental effects :

Borehole diameter,
Mud-cake thickness,
Mud salinity,
Mud density,
Temperature,
Pressure,
Formation water salinity,
Bed thickness

The presented charts are for neutron


CNL measurement

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Influence of sampling rate


Sampling rate

For standard tools the


sampling rate corresponds
generally to a sample each 6
in. of vertical displacement. It
can be one sample each 1
in. or even 0.4 in. for the
electromagnetic tool.
Naturally, this affects the
curve shape and the value
measured as shown by the
example on the side.

Tpl curve

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Accuracy and Precision

As for any type of physical measurement, it is convenient to


consider simultaneously the accuracy and the precision of well log
measurements.
Accuracy of a measurement is how close the result comes to
the true value.It is a measure of the correctness of the result. It
depends on how well the systematic error is controlled and
corrected for.
Precision is how exactly the result is determined, regardless of
its proximity to the true value. It depends on how well random
error is analyzed and overcome.
Example: the true value of density of a bed is 2,22 g/cm3. A tool of
type A has measured 2,23 0,01. It is accurate.
Another tool of type B has measured 2, 325. It is precise but
not accurate due to a bad calibration.

Repeatability of the measurement

In order to control the accuracy, precision and validity of the


measurement, a repeat section is recorded on a depth interval (200
feet or 65 meters), covering generally the zone of interest.

The quality of the repeat section is controlled either by superimposing


a transparent of the repeat section on the main log, or by reporting on
a cross-plot the values of the repeat section versus those of the main
log on the same depth interval.

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Calibration steps
Primary calibration standards

Secondary standards

Tertiary standard
Calibrator
straps onto
tool
housing

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Tool vertical resolution

Serra 2002

Model linked to the available well logging set


Origin
Types

of data
of tools used
Set of records Combined tools
Relationship between the actual raw measurement and the
measurements reproduced on the logs
Environmental effects on log quality
Sampling rate
Accuracy and precision of measurements
Quality of calibrations
Vertical resolution of each tool
Depth of investigation

Depth of investigation of the tools

Very thick

Beds

Medium
Thin

Dipmeter

Imagery

0.3

Very thin

Laminae

Stratas (cm)

Thick

100

Laterolog Phasor Induction


Acoustic
Array Induction
30
Compensated neutron
Gamma ray
Litho-density
10
Litho-density (improved. resol.)
Electromagnetism
Microdevices

Thin section

Borehole wall

Thickness (cm)

Standard induction

0.1

ation
g
i
t
s
e
v
of in
h
t
p
e
D
Serra 2002

Measurement alteration

Cave effect
Mudcake effect
Mud effect (barite, KCl, )
Eccentering effect (sonic)
Shoulder bed effects
Temperature and pressure effects
Noise (telluric currents, magnetism, )

Hole

The interpretation model


Before any
reservoir
5 submodels
must bementioned
taken into account
It must
takeevaluation
into account
the sub-models
below

Borehole
model

Geological
model

Tool
model

Reservoir
model
Mathematical
model

Evaluation
Serra 2002

Model linked to the reservoir type

A reservoir is composed of several depositional units,


each being characterized by their own attributes which
control its petrophysical properties.
These characteristics must be taken into account for the
selection of :
The interpretation parameters,
The equations for the computation of the petrophysical
properties.

The Geological Model


Each depositional unit is characterized :
By its original facies :
Its elementary and mineralogical composition,
Its texture,
Its internal structure,
Its volume or its geometry depending on its
depositional environment.
Also by :
The transformations undergone since its deposition,
The deformations due to tectonic or burial stresses.
It depends on the reservoir type

The Mathematical Model

It includes :
The log response equations.
The equations for correction of
environmental effects.
The empirical equations linking the
well logging measurements to the
petrophysical parameters :
Archie and others,
Porosity equations,
Sonic equations, etc.
The uncertainties.
The physical constraints.

Corrections of density for fluid type

The external constraints.

Spin and ribs

Corrections of density for mud cake


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Sonic equations

Porosity (p.u.)

Porosity (p.u.)

Average time
Field observation

Compressional Slowness (s/m)

Chart for porosity evaluation


from sonic data

Aspect ratio

Compressional Slowness (s/ft)

Real measures put on an amplified


section of the left chart

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Clasificacin de Herramientas Elctricas


Spontaneous Potential (SP)
Envian corriente leen Resistividad
No Enfocados
Centralizados
Normal 16
Normal 64
Lateral 19

Rxo
Rt
Rt

De Contacto
Microlog
Dipmeter
SHDT
FMI

Rxo

Enfocados
Centralizados (Serie)
DLL (LLd, LLs)
LL3, LL8, SFL

Rt, Ri
Rt, Ri

De Contacto
MSFL
MLL
Proximity

Rxo,
Rxo, Ri
Ri, Rxo

Envian corriente leen Conductividad


Induccin, Phasor, AIT

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Spontaneous Potential
Hole
axis

Ec = Em + Ej = -K log aw/amf

Hole wall

Mud

Shale

Sand

Sand
Mud-cake
Em = -59.1 log aw/amf

Membrane Potential
Ej = -11.5 log aw/amf Hole wall
Migration Cl

Shale
Porous rock

Measurement of the formation spontaneous potential.


Determination of the formation water resistivity.
Shaliness evaluation depositional environment

Shale
Virgin zone

Measurement principle

Sand

Formation
water

Hole
axis

Mud
Flushed zone

Shale

Shale base line

Migration Na+

Filtrate

Shale

Liquid-junction Potential

Spontaneous Potential
Potential and current distribution in
and around an impermeable bed

Rmfe
SSP = -K log ----------Rwe

Spontaneous Potential
Depends on :
Lithology
Presence of clay
Bed thickness
Porosity, permeability, and compaction
of rocks
Fluid salinity
therefore
SP log is used to :
Detect Porous Permeable beds
Evaluate Formation Water salinity
Evaluate Formation Clay content

Comparison of the repeat section with main log


SP, resistivity and sonic logs

with memorizer

without memorizer

Main Log

Repeat section

Spontaneous Potential

Shale base line

Change of shale base line:


unconformity

Change of shale
base line:
unconformity

Porous permeable reservoir

Doll, 1948

SP shapes
Grain size decrease

These types of evolution can be observed as well on GR curves

Possible interpretation of SP shapes

Pirson, 1977

Remarks on SP approach
The use of the SP curve does not allow a precise and reliable facies
determination due to the following limits.
- The SP deflection is essentially function of the shale percentage of the
beds that is not sufficient for facies determination.
- The SP deflection depends on salinity contrast between formation water
and mud filtrate. Due to that, in some cases one cannot observe any
deflection while facies changes exist.
- In general, the SP curve is not useful in carbonates.
- The SP curve has a poor vertical resolution.
- The SP curve is sometimes replaced by natural gamma ray curve (GR) but,
in that case other limitations exist.

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Resistivity Measurement Principles


Resistivity measurement principles
in an homogeneous medium
Generator

V RI dr
4r

Equipotential
spheres

Current lines

Clasificacin de Herramientas Elctricas


Spontaneous Potential (SP)
Envian corriente leen Resistividad
No Enfocados
Centralizados
Normal 16
Normal 64
Lateral 19

Rxo
Rt
Rt

De Contacto
Microlog
Dipmeter
SHDT
FMI

Rxo

Enfocados
Centralizados (Serie)
DLL (LLd, LLs)
LL3, LL8, SFL

Rt, Ri
Rt, Ri

De Contacto
MSFL
MLL
Proximity

Rxo,
Rxo, Ri
Ri, Rxo

Envian corriente leen Conductividad


Induccin, Phasor, AIT

Current Paterns

Non focused devices


Current distribution in presence of a hole
Generator

Recorder

Generator

Spacing
Spacing

Normal principle

Recorder

Spacing

Lateral principle

Non focused devices


Current path

Lateral

The medium is generally anisotropic


and heterogeneous
(Ra)c = JiRxo + (1-Ji)Rt
(Ra)c apparent resistivity corrected for borehole effects
Ji pseudo geometrical factor corresponding to the depth of invasion

Measure point
Normal: resistivity is taken in the middle O of
the spacing
Lateral or Inverse: middle of MN

Investigation radius

normal

Non focused devices


Factors influencing the curves shape
-

Thick resistive layers (h>AM)


Thin resistive layers (h<AM)
Conducting layers
Very resistive thick layers

Clasificacin de Herramientas Elctricas


Spontaneous Potential (SP)
Envian corriente leen Resistividad
No Enfocados
Centralizados
Normal 16
Normal 64
Lateral 19

Rxo
Rt
Rt

De Contacto
Microlog
Dipmeter
SHDT
FMI

Rxo

Enfocados
Centralizados (Serie)
DLL (LLd, LLs)
LL3, LL8, SFL

Rt, Ri
Rt, Ri

De Contacto
MSFL
MLL
Proximity

Rxo,
Rxo, Ri
Ri, Rxo

Envian corriente leen Conductividad


Induccin, Phasor, AIT

Non focused devices


Microlog measurement principles

Clasificacin de Herramientas Elctricas


Spontaneous Potential (SP)
Envian corriente leen Resistividad
No Enfocados
Centralizados
Normal 16
Normal 64
Lateral 19

Rxo
Rt
Rt

De Contacto
Microlog
Dipmeter
SHDT
FMI

Rxo

Enfocados
Centralizados (Serie)
DLL (LLd, LLs)
LL3, LL8, SFL

Rt, Ri
Rt, Ri

De Contacto
MSFL
MLL
Proximity

Rxo,
Rxo, Ri
Ri, Rxo

Envian corriente leen Conductividad


Induccin, Phasor, AIT

Focused devices

Measurement principle for electrode


devices:
Current Io is sent perpendicularly to the
formation through thin parallel lines,
sending on each side focalization currents
called bucking currents forcing the current
to flow directly into the formation.
The objective of any deep-reading
resistivity device is to measure the true
formation resistivity, Rt. Tools are
designed to read this as accurately as
possible, but no single measurement
could eliminate the effects of the invaded
zone

Focused devices
Laterologs:
LL3 (1957) uses a central electrode and two long guard electrodes

Focused devices
Laterologs:
LL7 (1957) uses seven small electrodes

Focused devices
Dual Laterologs: DLL (1972)
Three appropriate depths were chosen and were used to
define the invasion profile well enough to estimate Rt.
The sonde records 2 resistivities:
LLd deep at 35 Hz
(return on electrode B at surface)

LLs shallow at 280 Hz


(return on the bridle at the top of
the
toolstring)

Additional auxiliary control loop


to ensure equipotential curves

Bridle

Resistivity Focused devices modern tools

Azimuthal Laterolog (ARI)


Current distribution according
to the measurement type

Fracture

Measurement of the rock resistivity


Detection of hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs
Evaluation of hydrocarbon saturation

Example of ARI log


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Resistivity new sondes

HALS Platform Express (1994)


12 electrodes placed in the center
Ao (acting as azimuthal laterolog)
8 or 16 in vertical resolution

(courtesy of Schlumberger)

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Conductivity Signal Electromagnetic Frequency

Each tool uses a specific


electromagnetic frequency
range.

Induction - principles
Principles of measurement
Induction measurements were
originally intended as a
substitute for laterolog tools in
oil-base mud.
Phase-shift

IT Alternative current at 20kHz


in the transmitting coil

Electromagnetic field
through the formation

IL Eddy-current (formation current)


90 phase-shifted from IT

90

Electromagnetic field
detected by the receiver
coil
Received voltage is proportionnal
to the formation conductivity

180

The electromagnetic field flowing from the transmitting


coil reaches the receiver coils and creates an additionnal
current which has to be eliminated.
Since it is 90 phase-shifted with theAIT
induced
current it can
example
be cancelled using:
- A variometer circuit.
- A phase discriminator.

Geometrical factor
Vertical component
Geometrical factor theory defines a response
function that answers the question "where
does the signal come from."

=
Geometrical factor

Radial component

Simple induction tool (2 coils)

Figure showing different sections of equal


geometrical factor.

Figure showing the geometrical factor


for different formation portions around
the 2 coils system

Focalization
For commercial reasons a better vertical resolution and depth of
investigation was needed. Focalization was therefore applied using
additional transmitting and receiver coils.
Here are the results which lead to
first commercial tools in the early
50s. 5FF27, 6FF27, 5FF40,6FF40

Skin effect
The loss in amplitude and change in
phase of an electromagnetic field as it
penetrates into a conductive medium.
The higher the formation resistivity, the
stronger the skin effect
The higher the signal frequency, the
smaller the skin effect

2
2fC

Array Induction Sonde (AIT) 1991

A single emitter
operating at 25, 50
and 100 kHz
2 couples
6 couples working at
2 frequencies.
Overall: 28
measurements

28 measurements

5 curves

Invasion image

Invasion Model and Resistivity Profile

Hole
Axis

Resistivity

Formation

Radial distribution of fluids

Mud

Distance

Simplified profile : abrupt limit

Radial distribution of resistivity

Actual profile : progressive evolution with


annulus

Resistivity At the Bit (RAB)


Images
FMI

RAB

Dips

The RAB tool allows the detection of a fault during the


drilling of the well. The fault is confirmed by the FMI.

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Depth (ft)

Comparison RAB and FMI


FMI images

GR

RAB data

Ring resistivity

Bit resistivity

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Effect of well deviation on the images

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Images in deviated well

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Electromagnetism (ADEPT)

EPT

Endfire array

Scheme of the electromagnetic antenna


tpl = (1 - Vsh)tpma+ Vshtpsh+ Sxotpmf+ (1 - Sxo)tph
A = SxoAw + VshAsh

ADEPT

Broadside array

Schemes indicating the emitted signal


types and the investigated volume as
a function of the endfire or broadside
arrays of the ADEPT tool

Measurement of rock dielectric constant.


Analysis of fresh water bearing reservoirs.
Porosity evaluation

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Acoustic measurements
Compressional
waves

Compressional or longitudinal waves

Shear
waves

Stoneley
waves

Transversal or shear waves

crest

trough

rarefaction
compression

cle
Cy

Undisturbed state
Disturbed state
Compression

stretching

Measurement of rock elastic parameters.


Porosity and lithology evaluation
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Acoustic wavefront simulation


Transmitter
Pressure wavefront

Vm

Plane interface

Mud
Formation
Mud
Formation
Mud
Formation

t1 + t2
t =
2

Mud
Formation

Schematic of the compensated sonic tool


S = (t tma)/(tmf tma)

Compressional
wavefront

Sound slowness measurement.


Porosity evaluation

Mud
Formation

Compressional
headwave
shear

Chang et al., 1985

Vc

Compressional and shear slowness measurement

Schma de la sonde DSI


Example of DSI sonic log
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Lithology determination from sonic data


Dolostone
Limestone

Sa
lt

Gaz bearing
sandstone

Picketts plot

Water
bearing
sandstone

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Natural Radioactivity

Probability of emission
per disintegration

Detectors

Gamma ray energy (MeV)

Theoretical spectrum of radio-elements


Interactions inside the detector

Detection of rocks with radioactive minerals :


shales, micas, potassium feldspars, potassium
evaporites, uranium ores

Th, U and K percentage measured by spectrometry


Spectrum obtained with an INa crystal

Energy (MeV)

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Th, U and K percentage measurement


Spectrum obtained with a Germanium detector

Gamma ray energy (keV)

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Well logging approach


Elemental analysis by spectrometry of natural or induced rays

Counting rate

Prompt gamma rays


from scattering of
fast neutrons
Prompt gamma rays
from capture of
thermal neutrons

Fast activation
Thermal activation
Natural radioactivity

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Different interactions photon - electron

As a function of their
energy, photons or rays
interact with nuclei in
three manners :
pair production
Compton scattering
photoelectric absorption

b = 1.0704(2 e/Nav ) 0.1883


Pe (Z/10)3.6

Principle of Compton scattering


Measurement of density, b
D = (ma b)/(ma mf)

Sonde sketch

Principle of photoelectric absorption


Measurement of photoelectric index, Pe
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Source-detector configuration of the Compensated Density tool (courtesy Schlumberger )

The CDN tool

Measurement of density, b
Measurement of photoelectric index, Pe
Measurement of hydrogen index
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

The ADN tool

Measurement of density, b
Measurement of photoelectric index, Pe
Measurement of hydrogen index (Schlumbergers courtesy)

Review of standard petrophysical measurements

Spontaneous Potential
Resistivity
Conductivity
Acoustic Measurements
Natural Radioactivity
Density
Index hydrogen : Neutron
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Sampling
Well seismics

Different interactions neutron-atom


Neutrons, emitted by a source type Am-Be or by a minitron,
interact with atomic nuclei in different ways as a function of
their energy:
Inelastic-neutron scattering
Fast-neutron particle reaction
Elastic scattering
Thermal neutron capture
Activation

Neutron paths
Color indicates neutron energy :
red, yellow, green, blue from the
highest to the lowest energy

Inelastic-neutron scattering

Measurement of C/O ratio


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Interaction neutron - nuclei

Thermal neutron
capture

Activation

Fast-neutron
reaction

Measurement of element percentage


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Elastic scattering
detector
Scattered neutron
Incident
neutron
Nucleus

Nucleus recoil

Scheme of the elastic scattering

Elastic-neutron scattering
Measurement of hydrogen index
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Link with well logs

Energy of
incident
neutrons

Inelasticneutron
scattering

Relative counts

Inelastic spectrum

Fast-neutron reaction
Energy (MeV)

Measurement of C/O ratio


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Link with well logging

Relative counts

Capture spectrum

Energy (MeV)

Measurement of Si, Fe, Ca, S, Ti, Gd, Cl & H percentage


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Example of density, neutron and photoelectric index

Shale
Sandstone
Cave : Shale
Shale
Sandstone
Shale
Sandstone
Shale
Sandstone
Coarsening-up sequence

Quick-look hydrocarbon indicator (after Schlumberger)

Density and hydrogen index interpretation

Determination of lithology
from density and neutron responses

Fluid sampling

MDT de Schlumberger
Measurement of reservoir pressure and permeability

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Determination of fluid contacts


Depth Pressure plot

Gas

Oil

Water

Slope :
Fluid density

Typical pressure response from a multiprobe test


(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Tison, 1975

Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP)


Acquisition

Vertical Seismic Profile


Interpretation

Determination of wave arrival angles


Determination of accurate P and S velocities linked to mechanical rock properties
Information on structure close to the well
Interpretation of surface seismic profile
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Well logging parameters of principal minerals


Mineral
Quartz
Opale
Orthoclase
Anorthoclase
Microcline
Albite
Muscovite
Glauconite
Biotite
Calcite
Dolomite
Ankerite
Siderite
Gypsum
Anhydrite
Halite
Polyhalite
Barite
Haematite
Limonite

SNP

CNL

tc

ts

Pe

tp

2,64
2,13
2,52
2,59
2,53
2,59
2,82
2,86
2,99
2,71
2,85
3,08
3,91
2,35
2,98
2,04
2,79
4,09
5,18
3,59

-1
4
-2
-2
-2
-1
12

-2
2
-3
-2
-3
-1,3
20
38
21
0
1
5,7
12,9
60+
-2
-3
25
0,2
11
60+

56
58
69

88

7,2

90,4
149

4,4-6
4,4-6
4,4-6
4,4-6
6,2-7,9

7-8,2
7-8,2
7-8,2
7-8,5
8,3-9,4

50,8
49
44

224
72

4,8
3,7
7,2
7,4
7,2
4,35
6,7
14
19
13,8
9,0
25,8
56,2
9,4
15
9,5
12
1065
111
47

4,65

47,9
49

1,8
1,8
2,9
2,9
2,9
1,76
2,4
4,8
6,3
5,08
3,16
8,44
14,7
4,0
5,06
4,7
4,3
266,8
21
13

4,8-6
6,8

7,2-8,1
9,1
8,7

4,3
5,0
16
16
16
7,5
17
21
30
7,1
4,7
22
52
19
12
754
24
6,8
101
71

11
0
2
2,1
6,3
50+
-1,2
-2
14
-1
4
50+

84,9
43,8
52
50
67
69,7
42,9
56,9

91

132,7
79,3
102,6

6,8-7,5
4,1
6,3
5,6-6,3

8,8-9,1
6,8
8,4-8,6
7,9-8,4

9,9-11

10,5-11

Log Resolution
Images have the
highest vertical
resolution
They allow detection
of
very small geological
objects,
thin depositional units
and
surfaces.

Acoustic Images
UBI Sonde

Compensating device
Motor assembly
Gear box assembly
Rotating electrical
connection
Centralizer
Rotating shaft with
built-in electronics
Rotating seal
Transducer
Interchangeable
rotating sub
~75 rps

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Image Comparison

RAB Images

FMI Images

Laminations
Fracture

(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Images are fundamental for a modern and reliable


formation evaluation

Images are much more than a super dipmeter


They allow us to :
- recognize each sedimentation unit and
measure their real thickness and
petrophysical properties
- determine their internal organization
(texture & structure)
- detect and classify each surface
- evaluate their transmissibility properties
- clarify the diagenetic and tectonic features

Rock sampling in a well

Chronological Sample Taker

Mechanical sidewall coring

These types of tools allow the sampling of rock at a desired depth. These rock
samples allow a better evaluation of the porosity and permeability, as well as their
mineralogical composition, the clay type and distribution, the grain and pore size
(Schlumbergers courtesy)

Core log comparison

Well logging advantages

Well logs give a nearly continuous analysis of the formation


They provide accurate information on the depth and the apparent and real
thickness of beds
They allow a precise depth match of core data
The rock volume analyzed is greater than the one represented by cuttings or
cores
They measure rock properties at depth conditions
They provide information on fluid nature
The information logs provide is :
Quantitative
Precise
Objective et Repetitive
Permanent
Economic
Exchangeable
They make the link between geophysics and geology
They allow a precise mapping of geological attributes

Limitations of well logging


They are linked to the following problems :
Different resolutions and depths of investigation of the tools
Validity of the measurement combination
Depth match of log data sometimes difficult to correctly achieve
Bed notion must be replaced by electrobed notion
Measurements are sensitive to borehole environment (mud, mudcake, caves, tool position, invasion, deviation)
Some measurements are not representative of a geological reality
(shoulder bed influence, lack of resolution)
Some of the equations converting the raw measurement in log
measurement are empirical
Information depends on sampling rate

S-ar putea să vă placă și