Sunteți pe pagina 1din 100

ME1000 RF CIRCUIT DESIGN

This courseware product contains scholarly and technical information and


is protected by copyright laws and international treaties. No part of this
publication may be reproduced by any means, be it transmitted,
transcribed, photocopied, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into
any language in any form, without the prior written permission of Acehub
Vista Sdn. Bhd. or their respective copyright owners.
The use of the courseware product and all other products developed
and/or distributed by Acehub Vista Sdn. Bhd. are subject to the applicable
License Agreement.
For further information, see the Courseware Product License Agreement.

http://dreamcatcher.asia/cw
1

10. RF Oscillators

Main References

[1]* D.M. Pozar, Microwave engineering, 2nd Edition, 1998 John-Wiley & Sons.
[2] J. Millman, C. C. Halkias, Integrated electronics, 1972, McGraw-Hill.
[3] R. Ludwig, P. Bretchko, RF circuit design - theory and applications, 2000
Prentice-Hall.
[4] B. Razavi, RF microelectronics, 1998 Prentice-Hall, TK6560.
[5] J. R. Smith,Modern communication circuits,1998 McGraw-Hill.
[6] P. H. Young, Electronics communication techniques, 5th edition, 2004
Prentice-Hall.
[7] Gilmore R., Besser L.,Practical RF circuit design for modern wireless
systems, Vol. 1 & 2, 2003, Artech House.
[8] Ogata K., Modern control engineering, 4th edition, 2005, Prentice-Hall.

Agenda

Positive feedback oscillator concepts.


Negative resistance oscillator concepts (typically employed for RF
oscillator).
Equivalence between positive feedback and negative resistance
oscillator theory.
Oscillator start-up requirement and transient.
Oscillator design - Making an amplifier circuit unstable.
Constant |1| circle.
Fixed frequency oscillator design.
Voltage-controlled oscillator design.

1.0 Oscillation Concepts

Introduction
Oscillators are a class of circuits with 1 terminal or port, which produce a
periodic electrical output upon power up.
Most of us would have encountered oscillator circuits while studying for
our basic electronics classes.
Oscillators can be classified into two types: (A) Relaxation and (B)
Harmonic oscillators.
Relaxation oscillators (also called astable multivibrator), is a class of
circuits with two unstable states. The circuit switches back-and-forth
between these states. The output is generally square waves.
Harmonic oscillators are capable of producing near sinusoidal output,
and is based on positive feedback approach.
Here we will focus on Harmonic Oscillators for RF systems. Harmonic
oscillators are used as this class of circuits are capable of producing
stable sinusoidal waveform with low phase noise.
6

2.0 Overview of Feedback


Oscillators

Classical Positive Feedback


Perspective on Oscillator (1)

Consider the classical feedback system with non-inverting amplifier,


Assuming the feedback network and amplifier do not load each other, we can write the closed-loop transfer function as:

Writing (2.1a) as:


We see that we could get non-zero output at So , with Si = 0, provided 1-A(s)F(s) = 0. Thus the system oscillates!

Si(s)

Non-inverting amplifier

E(s)

A(s)

So(s)

+
High impedance

Positive
Feedback

Feedback network

High impedance

F(s)

S o s 1 AA s sF s Si s

So
A s
(2.1a)

s
Si
1 A s F s

T s A s F s

(2.1b)

Loop gain (the gain of the system


around the feedback loop)

Classical Positive Feedback


Perspective on Oscillator (1)
The condition for sustained oscillation, and for oscillation to startup from positive feedback perspective can be summarized as:

Take note that the oscillator is a non-linear circuit, initially upon power up, the condition of (2.2b) will prevail. As the magnitudes of voltages and currents in the circuit increase, the amplifier in the oscillator begins to saturate, reducing the gain, until the loop gain A(s)F(s) becomes one.
A steady-state condition is reached when A(s)F(s) = 1.

For sustained oscillation


For oscillation to startup

1 A s F s 0
A s F s 1

Barkhausen Criterion

arg A s F s 0

(2.2a)
(2.2b)

Note
Notethat
thatthis
thisisisaavery
verysimplistic
simplisticview
viewof
ofoscillators.
oscillators. In
Inreality
realityoscillators
oscillators
are
arenon-linear
non-linearsystems.
systems. The
Thesteady-state
steady-stateoscillatory
oscillatorycondition
conditioncorresponds
corresponds
to
towhat
whatisiscalled
calledaaLimit
LimitCycle.
Cycle. See
Seetexts
textson
onnon-linear
non-lineardynamical
dynamicalsystems.
systems.
9

Classical Positive Feedback


Perspective on Oscillator (2)
Positive feedback system can also be achieved with inverting amplifier:

Inverting amplifier

To prevent multiple simultaneous oscillation, the Barkhausen criterion (2.2a) should only be fulfilled at one frequency.
Usually the amplifier A is wideband, and it is the function of the feedback network F(s) to select the oscillation frequency, thus the feedback network is usually made of reactive components, such as inductors and capacitors.

Si(s)

E(s)

-A(s)
-

So(s)

So
A s
s 1 A s F s
Si

Inversion
F(s)

10

Classical Positive Feedback


Perspective on Oscillator (3)

In general the feedback network F(s) can be implemented as a Pi or T network, in the form of a transformer, or a hybrid of these.
Consider the Pi network with all reactive elements. A simple analysis in [2] and [3] shows that to fulfill (2.2a), the reactance X1, X2
and X3 need to meet the following condition:

E(s)

So(s)

-A(s)

(2.3)

If X3 represents inductor, then


X1 and X2 should be capacitors.

X3
X1

X 3 X 1 X 2

X2

11

Classical Feedback Oscillators


The following are examples of oscillators, based on the original circuit using vacuum tubes.

+
-

Colpitt
oscillator
+

Armstrong
oscillator

Hartley
oscillator

Clapp
oscillator
12

Example of Tuned Feedback Oscillator


tra
(1)
Ex
A 48 MHz Transistor Common
-Emitter Colpitt Oscillator

2.0
1.5
1.0

R
RB1
R=10 kOhm

R
RC
R=330 Ohm

C
CD1
C=0.1 uF

C
Cc1
C=0.01 uF

VL
C
Cc2
C=0.01 uF

pb_mot_2N3904_19921211
Q1
R
RB2
R=10 kOhm

0.0
-0.5

VC

VB

0.5

VB, V
VL, V

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.3 V

R
RE
R=220 Ohm

-1.0
R
RL
R=220 Ohm

-1.5

A F

C
CE
C=0.01 uF

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

time, usec

1
0
Si(s)

L
C
L1
C1
L=2.2 uH
C=22.0 pF R=

C
C2
C=22.0 pF

2.0

t
E(s)

-A(s)

So(s)

F(s)
13

Example of Tuned Feedback Oscillator


tra
(2)
Ex
A 27 MHz Transistor Common-Base
Colpitt Oscilator
600

R
RB1
R=10 kOhm

R
RC
R=470 Ohm

VC

VB
C
Cc1
C=0.1 uF

Si(s)

R
RB2
R=4.7 kOhm

400

C
CD1
C=0.1 uF

200

VL
C
C1
C=100.0 pF

C
Cc2
C=0.1 uF

R
RE
R=100 Ohm

-200

L
L1
L=1.0 uH
R=
C
C2
C=100.0 pF

A(s)

-400

pb_mot_2N3904_19921211
Q1
VE

E(s)

VE, mV
VL, mV

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.3 V

C
C3
C=4.7 pF

R
R1
R=1000 Ohm

-600
0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

time, usec

So(s)

F(s)

14

1.8

2.0

Example of Tuned Feedback Oscillator


tra
(3)
Ex
V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.3 V
R
RB1
R=10 kOhm

R
RC
R=330 Ohm

A 16 MHz Transistor Common-Emitter


Crystal Oscillator

C
CD1
C=0.1 uF

VC

VB
C
Cc1
C=0.1 uF

C
C1
C=22.0 pF

VL
C
Cc2
C=0.1 uF

R
RL
R=220 Ohm

pb_mot_2N3904_19921211
Q1
R
RB2
R=10 kOhm

R
RE
R=220 Ohm

C
CE
C=0.1 uF

sx_stk_CX-1HG-SM_A_19930601
XTL1
Fres=16 MHz

C
C2
C=22.0 pF

15

Limitation of Feedback Oscillator

At high frequency, the assumption that the amplifier and feedback


network do not load each other is not valid. In general the amplifiers
input impedance decreases with frequency, and its output impedance
is not zero. Thus the actual loop gain is not A(s)F(s) and equation
(2.2) breakdowns.
Determining the loop gain of the feedback oscillator is cumbersome at
high frequency. Moreover there could be multiple feedback paths due
to parasitic inductance and capacitance.
It can be difficult to distinguish between the amplifier and the feedback
paths, owing to the coupling between components and conductive
structures on the printed circuit board (PCB) or substrate.
Generally it is difficult to physically implement a feedback oscillator
once the operating frequency is higher than 500MHz.

16

3.0 Negative Resistance


Oscillators

17

Introduction (1)
An alternative approach is needed to get a circuit to oscillate reliably.
We can view an oscillator as an amplifier that produces an output when there is
no input.
Thus it is an unstable amplifier that becomes an oscillator!
For example lets consider a conditionally stable amplifier.
Here instead of choosing load or source impedance in the stable regions of the
Smith Chart, we purposely choose the load or source impedance in the unstable
impedance regions. This will result in either |1 | > 1 or |2 | > 1.
The resulting amplifier circuit will be called the Destabilized Amplifier.
As seen in Chapter 7, having a reflection coefficient magnitude for 1 or 2 greater
than one implies the corresponding port resistance R 1 or R2 is negative, hence the
name for this type of oscillator.

18

Introduction (2)

For instance by choosing the load impedance Z L at the unstable region, we


could ensure that |1 | > 1. We then choose the source impedance properly
so that |1 s | > 1 and oscillation will start up (refer back to Chapter 7 on
stability theory).
Once oscillation starts, an oscillating voltage will appear at both the input and
output ports of a 2-port network. So it does not matter whether we enforce |
1 s | > 1 or |2 L | > 1, enforcing either one will cause oscillation to occur (It
can be shown later that when |1 s | > 1 at the input port, |2 L | > 1 at the
output port and vice versa).
The key to fixed frequency oscillator design is ensuring that the criteria |1 s |
> 1 only happens at one frequency (or a range of intended frequencies), so
that no simultaneous oscillations occur at other frequencies.

19

Recap - Wave Propagation Stability


Perspective (1)

tra
Ex

From our discussion of stability from wave propagation in Chapter 7


Zs or s
Source
b1
bs1
bss 12

bss 213
bss 314

Port 1

Port 2

2-port
Network
a1

Z1 or 1
bs
bss 1
bss 212

bss 313

a1 bs bs 1s bs 12 s 2 ...
bs
a1
1 1s
b1 bs 1 bs 12s bs 13s 2 ...
b
b1 s 1
1 1s
b
1
bs

1
1 1s

Compare with
equation (2.1a)

So
A s

s
Si
1 A s F s

Similar
Similar mathematical
mathematical
form
form
20

tra
Ex

Recap - Wave Propagation Stability


Perspective (2)

We see that the infinite series that constitute the steady-state incident (a1)
and reflected (b1) waves at Port 1 will only converge provided
| s1| < 1.
These sinusoidal waves correspond to the voltage and current at the Port 1.
If the waves are unbounded it means the corresponding sinusoidal voltage
and current at the Port 1 will grow larger as time progresses, indicating
oscillation start-up condition.
Therefore oscillation will occur when | s1 | > 1.
Similar argument can be applied to port 2 since the signals at Port 1 and 2
are related to each other in a two-port network, and we see that the condition
for oscillation at Port 2 is |L2 | > 1.

21

Oscillation from Negative Resistance


Perspective (1)
Generally it is more useful to work with impedance (or admittance) when designing actual circuit.
Furthermore for practical purpose the transmission lines connecting Z L and Zs to the destabilized amplifier are considered very
short (length 0).
In this case the impedance Z o is ambiguous (since there is no transmission line).
To avoid this ambiguity, let us ignore the transmission line and examine the condition for oscillation phenomena in terms of
terminal impedance.

Very short Tline

Zs

Zo

Z1

Destabilized
Amp. and
Load

Z Z s Z Z1

22

Oscillation from Negative Resistance


Perspective (2)

We consider Port 1 as shown, with the source network and input of the amplifier being modeled by impedance or series networks.

Using circuit theory the voltage at Port 1 can be written as:

Zs

Z1

jXs

Amplifier with load ZL


jX1

Source
Rs Network

R1

Z2
Vamp

Port 2

Port 1

R1 jX 1
Z1
Vs
Vs
R1 Rs j X 1 X s
Z s Z1

ZL

(3.1)
23

Oscillation from Negative Resistance


Perspective (3)
Furthermore we assume the source network Zs is a series RC network and the equivalent circuit looking into the amplifier Port 1 is a series RL network.

Using Laplace Transform, (3.1) is written as:

Zs

Z1
L1

Cs
Rs

V
Vs

R1

R1 sL1
Vs s
1
R1 Rs sL1 sCs
where
s j
V s

Z2
Vamp

ZL

(3.2a)
(3.2b)
24

Oscillation from Negative Resistance


Perspective (4)

The expression for V(s) can be written in the standard form according to Control Theory [8]:

The transfer function V(s)/Vs(s) is thus a 2nd order system with two poles p1, p 2 given by:

Observe that if (R1 + Rs) < 0 the damping factor is negative. This is true if R1 is negative, and |R1| > Rs.

R1 can be made negative by modifying the amplifier circuit (e.g. adding local positive feedback), producing the sum R 1 + Rs < 0.

sC s R1 sL1 n2
V
1
s R1 sL1
s 2 R1 Rs 1 2
Vs
L1 s s L1 L1Cs s 2ns n2

where

R1 Rs
2 L1

Cs

Damping Factor

1
L1C s

(3.3a)
Natural Frequency

p1, 2 n n 2 1

(3.3b)

(3.4)

25

Oscillation from Negative Resistance


Perspective (5)
Assuming ||<1 (under-damped), the poles as in (3.4) will be complex and exist at the right-hand side of the complex plane.
From Control Theory such a system is unstable. Any small perturbation will result in a oscillating signal with frequency

that grows exponentially.

Usually a transient or noise signal from the environment will contain a small component at the oscillation frequency. This forms the seed in which the oscillation builts up.

n 2 1

Im

Rs R1 | o 0

Complex
pole pair

v(t)

A small disturbance
or impulse starts the
exponentially growing
sinusoid

Re

Complex Plane

Time
Domain

26

Oscillation from Negative Resistance


Perspective (6)
When the signal amplitude builds up, nonlinear effects such as transistor saturation and cut-off will occur, this limits the of the transistor and finally limits the amplitude of the oscillating
signal.
The effect of decreasing of the transistor is a reduction in the magnitude of R 1 (remember R1 is negative). Thus the damping factor will approach 0, since Rs+ R1 0.
Steady-state sinusoidal oscillation is achieved when =0, or equivalently the poles become
The steady-state oscillation frequency o corresponds to n,

p1, 2 0 jn

n
2

1
L1Cs

n L1 n1Cs X 1 X s

X1 X s 0
o

27

Oscillation from Negative Resistance


Perspective (7)

From (3.3b), we observe that the steady-state oscillation frequency is determined by L1 and Cs, in other words, X1 and Xs respectively.
Since the voltages at Port 1 and Port 2 are related, if oscillation occur at Port 1, then oscillation will also occur at Port 2.
From this brief discussion, we use RC and RL networks for the source and amplifier input respectively, however we can distill the more
general requirements for oscillation to start-up and achieve steady-state operation for series representation in terms of resistance and
reactance:

Rs R1 |o 0
X s X 1 |o 0
Start-up

(3.5a)
(3.5b)

Rs R1 |o 0
X s X 1 |o 0

(3.6a)
(3.6b)

Steady-state

28

Illustration of Oscillation Start-Up and


Steady-State

The oscillation start-up process and steady-state are illustrated.


1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8

Vout, V
Vbb, V

0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

time, nsec

R1+Rs

Oscillation
start-up

Zs Z1

Steady-state

Zs

ZL

Destabilized
Amplifier

t
We
Weneed
needto
tonote
notethat
thatthis
thisisisaavery
verysimplistic
simplisticview
viewof
ofoscillators.
oscillators.
Oscillators
are
autonomous
non-linear
dynamical
systems,
Oscillators are autonomous non-linear dynamical systems,and
andthe
thesteady-state
steady-state
condition
is
a
form
of
Limit
Cycles.
condition is a form of Limit Cycles.
29

Summary of Oscillation Requirements


Using Series Network

By expressing Zs and Z1 in terms of resistance and reactance, we conclude that the requirement for oscillation are.

Zs

Z1

A similar expression for Z2 and ZL can also be obtained, but we shall not be concerned with these here.

jXs
Source
Rs Network

Rs R1 |o 0
X s X 1 |o 0
Steady-state

jX1
V

Port 1

(3.6a)
(3.6b)

R1

Z2
ZL

Vamp

Port 2

Rs R1 |o 0
X s X 1 |o 0

(3.5a)
(3.5b)

Start-up

30

The Resonator

The source network Zs is usually called the Resonator, as it is clear


that equations (3.5b) and (3.6b) represent the resonance condition
between the source network and the amplifier input.
The design of the resonator is extremely important.
We shall see later that an important parameter of the oscillator, the
Phase Noise is dependent on the quality of the resonator.

31

Summary of Oscillation Requirements


Using Parallel Network
If we model the source network and input to the amplifier as parallel networks, the following dual of equations (3.5) and (3.6) are obtained.

The start-up and steady-state conditions are:

Port 1
Gs

jBs

Gs G1 |o 0

(3.7a)

Bs B1 |o 0

(3.7b)

Steady-state

Z2
G1

jB1

ZL

Vamp

Gs G1 |o 0

Bs B1 |o 0

(3.8a)
(3.8b)

Start-up
32

Series or Parallel Representation? (1)


The question is which to use? Series or parallel network representation? This is not an easy question to answer as the destabilized amplifier is operating in nonlinear region as oscillator.
Concept of impedance is not valid and our discussion is only an approximation at best.
We can assume series representation, and worked out the corresponding resonator impedance. If after computer simulation we discover that the actual oscillating frequency is far from our prediction (if
theres any oscillation at all!), then it probably means that the series representation is incorrect, and we should try the parallel representation.
Another clue to whether series or parallel representation is more accurate is to observe the current and voltage in the resonator. For series circuit the current is near sinusoidal, where as for parallel circuit
it is the voltage that is sinusoidal.

33

Series or Parallel Representation? (2)


Reference [7] illustrates another effective alternative, by computing the large-signal S11 of Port 1 (with respect to
Zo) using CAD software.
1/S11 is then plotted on a Smith Chart as a function of input signal magnitude at the operating frequency.
By comparing the locus of 1/S11 as input signal magnitude is gradually increased with the coordinate of constant X
or constant B circles on the Smith Chart, we can decide whether series or parallel form approximates Port 1 best.
We will adopt this approach, but plot S11 instead of 1/S11. This will be illustrated in the examples in next section.
Do note that there are other reasons that can cause the actual oscillation frequency to deviate a lot from prediction,
such as frequency stability issue (see [1] and [7]).

34

4.0 Fixed Frequency


Negative Resistance
Oscillator Design

35

Procedures of Designing Fixed


Frequency Oscillator (1)
Step 1 - Design a transistor/FET amplifier circuit.
Step 2 - Make the circuit unstable by adding positive feedback at radio
frequency, for instance, adding series inductor at the base for commonbase configuration.
Step 3 - Determine the frequency of oscillation o and extract Sparameters at that frequency.
Step 4 With the aid of Smith Chart and Load Stability Circle, make R 1
< 0 by selecting L in the unstable region.
Step 5 (Optional) Perform a large-signal analysis (e.g. Harmonic
Balance analysis) and plot large-signal S11 versus input magnitude on
Smith Chart. Decide whether series or parallel form to use.
Step 6 - Find Z1 = R1 + jX1 (Assuming series form).

36

Procedures of Designing Fixed


Frequency Oscillator (2)

Step 7 Find Rs and Xs so that R1 + Rs<0, X1 + Xs=0 at o. We can


use the rule of thumb Rs=(1/3)|R1| to control the harmonics content at
steady-state.
Step 8 - Design the impedance transformation network for Zs and ZL.
Step 9 - Built the circuit or run a computer simulation to verify that
the circuit can indeed starts oscillating when power is connected.
Note: Alternatively we may begin Step 4 using Source Stability
Circle, select s in the unstable region so that R2 or G2 is negative at
o .

37

Making an Amplifier Unstable (1)

An amplifier can be made unstable by providing some kind of local


positive feedback.
Two favorite transistor amplifier configurations used for oscillator
design are the Common-Base configuration with Base feedback and
Common-Emitter configuration with Emitter degeneration.

38

Making an Amplifier Unstable (2)


This is a practical model
of an inductor
Base bypass
capacitor

At 410MHz
S-PARAMETERS

DC
DC
DC1

S_Param
SP1
Start=410.0 MHz
Stop=410.0 MHz
Step=2.0 MHz

SStabCircle

S_StabCircle
S_StabCircle1
SSC=s_stab_circle(S,51)

StabFact

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=4.5 V

R
Rb1
R=10 kOhm

L
LC
L=330.0 nH
R=

StabFact
StabFact1
K=stab_fact(S)

LStabCircle

L_ StabCircle
L_ StabCircle1
LSC=l_stab_circle(S,51)
Vout
Term
Term2
Num=2
Z=50 Ohm

C
Cc2
C=10.0 nF
L
LB
L=22 nH
R=

R
RLB
R=0.77 Ohm

C
Cb
C=10.0 nF

C
CLB
C=0.17 pF

Positive feedback
here

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1
R
Rb2
L
R=4.7 kOhm
LE
L=330.0 nH
R=

Vin
C
Cc1
C=10.0 nF

Common
CommonBase
Base
Configuration
Configuration

Term
Term1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm

An inductor is added
in series with the bypass
capacitor on the base
terminal of the BJT.
This is a form of positive
series feedback.

R
Re
R=100 Ohm

39

Making an Amplifier Unstable (3)

freq
410.0MHz
freq
410.0MHz

L Plane

K
-0.987
S(1,1)
1.118 / 165.6...

s22 and s11 have magnitude > 1


S(1,2)
0.162 / 166.9...

S(2,1)
2.068 / -12.723

Unstable Regions

S(2,2)
1.154 / -3.535

s Plane

40

Making an Amplifier Unstable (4)


S-PARAMETERS

DC
DC
DC1

S_ Param
SP 1
Start=410.0 MHz
Stop=410.0 MHz
Step=2.0 MHz

SStabCircle

S_ StabCircle
S_ StabCircle1
SSC=s_stab_ circle(S,51)

StabFact

V_ DC
SRC1
Vdc=4.5 V

R
Rb1
R=10 kOhm

L
LC
L=330.0 nH
R=

StabFact
StabFact1
K=stab_ fact(S)

LStabCircle

L_StabCircle
L_StabCircle1
LSC=l_ stab_ circle(S,51)
Vout

C
Cc2
C=1.0 nF
pb_ phl_ BFR92A_ 19921214
Q1

C
Cc1
C=1.0 nF

Term
Term1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm

R
Rb2
R=4.7 kOhm

C
Ce1
C=15.0 pF

C
Ce2
C=10.0 pF

Feedback
R
Re
R=100 Ohm

Term
Term2
Num=2
Z=50 Ohm

Common
CommonEmitter
Emitter
Configuration
Configuration

Positive feedback here


41

Making an Amplifier Unstable (5)


S22 and S11 have magnitude > 1
freq
410.0MHz
freq
410.0MHz

K
-0.516
S(1,1)
3.067 / -47.641

S(1,2)
0.251 / 62.636

L Plane

S(2,1)
6.149 / 176.803

S(2,2)
1.157 / -21.427

s Plane

Unstable
Regions
42

Precautions

The requirement Rs= (1/3)|R1| is a rule of thumb to provide the excess


gain to start up oscillation.
Rs that is too large (near |R1| ) runs the risk of oscillator fails to start up
due to component characteristic deviation.
While Rs that is too small (smaller than (1/3)|R1|) causes too much nonlinearity in the circuit, this will result in large harmonic distortion of the
output waveform.
Clipping, a sign of
V2

too much nonlinearity


t

V2
Rs too small
For
Formore
morediscussion
discussionabout
aboutthe
theRRs s==(1/3)|R
(1/3)|R1|1|rule,
rule,
and
andon
onthe
thesufficient
sufficientcondition
conditionfor
foroscillation,
oscillation,see
see
[6],
[6],which
whichlist
listfurther
furtherrequirements.
requirements.

Rs too large
43

Aid for Oscillator Design - Constant |


1| Circle (1)

In choosing a suitable L to make |L | > 1, we would like to know the


range of L that would result in a specific |1 |.

It turns out that if we fix |1 |, the range of load reflection coefficient that
result in this value falls on a circle in the Smith chart for L .

The radius and center of this circle can be derived from:

Assuming = |1 |:

S D
1 11 L
1 S 22L

Tcenter

By fixing |1 | and changing L .

2 S 22* D*S11
2

D S 22

(4.1a)

Radius

S12 S 21
2

D S 22

(4.1b)

44

Aid for Oscillator Design - Constant |


1| Circle (2)

The Constant |1 | Circle is extremely useful in helping us to choose a


suitable load reflection coefficient. Usually we would choose L that
would result in |1 | = 1.5 or larger.

Similarly Constant |2 | Circle can also be plotted for the source


reflection coefficient. The expressions for center and radius is similar
to the case for Constant |1 | Circle except we interchange s11 and s22,
L and s . See Ref [1] and [2] for details of derivation.

45

Example 4.1 CB Fixed Frequency


Oscillator Design
In this example, the design of a fixed frequency oscillator operating at
410MHz will be demonstrated using BFR92A transistor in SOT23
package. The transistor will be biased in Common-Base configuration.
It is assumed that a 50 load will be connected to the output of the
oscillator. The schematic of the basic amplifier circuit is as shown in
the following slide.
The design is performed using Agilents ADS software, but the author
would like to stress that virtually any RF CAD package is suitable for
this exercise.

46

Example 4.1 Cont...

Step 1 and 2 - DC biasing circuit design and S-parameter extraction.


S-PARAMETERS

DC
DC
DC 1

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=4.5 V

R
Rb1
R=10 kOhm

L
LC
L=330.0 nH
R=

C
Cb
C=1.0 nF

LB is chosen carefully so that the


unstable regions
in both L and s
planes are large
enough.

R
Rb2
R=4.7 kOhm

StabFact
StabFact1
K=stab_fact(S)

Port 2 - Output
Term
Term2
Num=2
Z=50 Ohm

R
Re
R=100 Ohm

C
C c1
C =1.0 nF

SStabCircle

S_StabCircle
S_StabCircle1
source_stabcir=s_stab_circle(S,51)

pb_phl_BF R92A_19921214
Q1
L
LE
L=220.0 nH
R=

LStabCircle

L_StabCircle
L_StabCircle1
load_stabcir=l_stab_circle(S,51)
C
C c2
C =1.0 nF

L
LB
L=12.0 nH
R=

StabFact

S_Param
SP1
Start=410.0 MHz
Stop=410.0 MHz
Step=2.0 MHz

Term
Term1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm

Port 1

Amplifier

Port 2

Port 1 - Input
47

Example 4.1 Cont...


freq
410.0MHz
freq
410.0MHz

K
-0.987
S(1,1)
1.118 / 165.6...

S(1,2)
0.162 / 166.9...

S(2,1)
2.068 / -12.723

S(2,2)
1.154 / -3.535

Unstable Regions

Load impedance here will result


in |1| > 1

Source impedance here will result


in |2| > 1
48

Example 4.1 Cont...

Step 3 and 4 - Choosing suitable L that cause |1 | > 1 at 410MHz. We


plot a few constant |1 | circles on the L plane to assist us in choosing
a suitable load reflection coefficient.
This point is chosen
because it is on
real line and easily
matched.

L = 0.5<0
ZL = 150+j0

L Plane

LSC
|1 |=1.5
|1 |=2.0
|1 |=2.5

Note: More difficult


to implement load
impedance near
edges of Smith
Chart
49

tra
Ex

Example 4.1 Cont...

Step 5 To check whether the input of the destabilized amplifier is closer to series or parallel form.
We perform large-signal analysis and observe the S11 at the input of the destabilized amplifier.

LSSP

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=4.5 V
R
RB1
R=10 kOhm

L
LC
L=330.0 nH
R=

LSSP
HB1
Freq[1]=410.0 MHz
Order[1]=5
LSSP_ FreqAtP ort[1]=
SweepVar="P outv"
Start=-20
Stop=-5
Step=0.2

C
Cc2
C=1.0 nF
L
LB
L=12.0 nH
R=

C
CB
C=1.0 nF

pb_phl_ BFR92A_19921214
Q1
R
RB2
R=4.7 kOhm

L
LE
L=220.0 nH
R=

Var
Eqn

C
Cc1
C=1.0 nF

VAR
VAR1
P outv=-10.0

Large-signal
S-parameter
Analysis control
in ADS software.

R
RL
R=150 Ohm

We are measuring
large-signal S11 looking
towards here
P _ 1Tone
P ORT1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm
P =polar(dbmtow(Poutv),0)
Freq=410 MHz

R
RE
R=100 Ohm

50

tra
Ex

Example 4.1 Cont...

Compare the locus of S11 and the constant X and constant B circles on the Smith Chart, it is clear the locus is more parallel to the constant X circle.
Also the direction of S11 is moving from negative R to positive R as input power level is increased. We conclude the Series form is more appropriate.

Compare
Direction of S11 as magnitude
of P_1tone source is increased

Region where R1 or G1 is negative

S(1,1)

Boundary of
Normal Smith Chart

Locus of S11 versus P_1tone


power at 410MHz
(from -20 to -5 dBm)

Region where R1 or G1 is positive


Poutv (-20.000 to -5.000)
51

Example 4.1 Cont...


Step 6 Using the series form, we find the small-signal input impedance Z 1 at 410MHz. So the resonator would also be a series network.
For Z L = 150 or L = 0.5<0:

Step 7 - Finding the suitable source impedance to fulfill R 1 + Rs <0, X1 + Xs =0:

S DL
1 11
1.422 j 0.479
1 S 22L
Z1 Z o

1 1
10.257 j 7.851
1 1
R1

X1

1
Rs R1 3.42
3
X s X1 7.851
52

Example 4.1 Cont...

The system block diagram:


Port 1

Port 2

Zs = 3.42-j7.851

Common-Base (CB)
Amplifier
with feedback

ZL = 150

53

Example 4.1 Cont...

Step 5 - Realization of the source and load impedance at 410MHz.


Zs= 3.42-j7.851
49.44pF

3.42

27.27nH

CB Amplifier
@ 410MHz

1
C
1
C
49.44 pF
7.851

ZL=150

3.49pF

50

7.851

Impedance transformation
network
54

Example 4.1 Cont... - Verification Thru


Simulation

Vpp

BFR92A

Vpp = 0.9V
V = 0.45V
Power dissipated in the load:
2

1V
PL
2 RL

0.452
0.5
2.025mW
50
55

Example 4.1 Cont... - Verification Thru


Simulation

Performing Fourier Analysis on the steady state wave form:


The
Thewaveform
waveformisisvery
veryclean
cleanwith
with
little
littleharmonic
harmonicdistortion.
distortion. Although
Although
we
wemay
mayhave
haveto
totune
tunethe
thecapacitor
capacitor
CCs to
obtain
oscillation
at
410
to obtain oscillation at 410MHz.
MHz.
s

484 MHz
56

Example 4.1 Cont... The Prototype


Voltage at the base terminal and 50 Ohms load resistor of the
fixed frequency oscillator:

1.4
1.2

Vbb

1.0
0.8

Vout, V
Vbb, V

0.6

0.4
0.2
0.0

Vout

-0.2

Output port

-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0

10

20

30

40

50

Startup transient ns

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

time, nsec

57

Example 4.2 450 MHz CE Fixed


Frequency Oscillator Design

Small-signal AC or S-parameter analysis, to show that R1 or G1 is


negative at the intended oscillation frequency of 450 MHz.
0
-100

S-PARAMETERS

L
LC
L=220.0 nH
R=

R
RL
R=150 Ohm

-300

-1000

-400
-1500

-600

-2000
100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

freq, MHz
C
C1
C=2.2 pF

There are simplified


expressions to find C1
and C2, see reference [5].
R
Here we just trial and
RE
R=220 Ohm error to get some
reasonable values.

Destabilized
amplifier

0.000

0.020

0.015
-0.005
0.010
-0.010
0.005
-0.015

0.000
100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

freq, MHz

58

imag(Y(1,1))

C
C2
C=4.7 pF

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1

real(Y(1,1))

Term
Term1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm

-200

-500
C
Cc2
C=330.0 pF

DC_Block
DC_Block1

-500

real(Z(1,1))

R
RB
R=47 kOhm

S_Param
SP1
Start=100.0 MHz
Stop=800.0 MHz
Step=10.0 MHz

imag(Z(1,1))

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.0 V

Selection of load
resistor as in
Example 4.1.

Example 4.2 Cont

tra
Ex

The large-signal analysis to check for suitable representation.


LSSP

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.0 V
R
RB
R=47 kOhm

L
LC
L=220.0 nH
R=

S11

LSSP
HB1
Freq[1]=450.0 MHz
Order[1]=7
LSSP_FreqAtPort[1]=
SweepVar="Poutv"
Start=-5
Stop=15
Step=0.2

C
Cc2
C=330.0 pF

C
C1
C=2.2 pF

VAR
VAR1
Poutv=-10.0

Since
Since the
the locus
locus of
of S
S1111 is
is close
close in
in shape
shape to
to
constant
constant X
X circles,
circles, and
and itit indicates
indicates R
R11 goes
goes from
from
negative
negative value
value to
to positive
positive values
values as
as input
input power
power
is
is increased,
increased, we
we use
use series
series form
form to
to
represent
represent the
the input
input network
network looking
looking towards
towards
the
the Base
Base of
of the
the amplifier.
amplifier.

R
RL
R=150 Ohm

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1

S(1,1)

DC_Block
DC_Block1
P_1Tone
PORT1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm
P=polar(dbmtow(Poutv),0)
Freq=450 MHz

Var
Eqn

Compare
C
C2
C=4.7 pF

R
RE
R=220 Ohm

Boundary of
Normal Smith Chart
Poutv (-5.000 to 15.000)

Direction of S11 as magnitude


of P_1tone source is increased
59
from -5 to +15 dBm

Example 4.2 Cont


Using a series RL for the resonator, and performing time-domain simulation to verify that the circuit will oscillate.

VtPWL
SRC2
V_Tran=pwl(time, 0ns,0V, 2ns,0.1V, 4ns,0V)

1.0

TRANSIENT

R
RB
R=47 kOhm

L
LC
L=220.0 nH
R=
VC

C
Cc1
C=1.0 nF

L
L1
L=39.0 nH
R=10

C
C1
C=2.2 pF

VL
C
Cc2
C=330.0 pF

VB

0.5

Tran
Tran1
StopTime=100.0 nsec
MaxTimeStep=1.0 nsec

VL, V

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.0 V

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1

R
RL
R=150 Ohm

vL(t)

0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
0

20

40

60

80

100

time, nsec
m1
VfL=
fs(VL)
Eqn
freq=450.0MHz
mag(VfL)=0.733

m1

0.8

Large coupling
capacitor

R
RE
R=220 Ohm

0.6

mag(VfL)

C
C2
C=4.7 pF

|VL(f)|

0.4

0.2

0.0
0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

freq, GHz

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

60

Example 4.3 Parallel Representation


An example where the network looking into the Base of the destabilized amplifier is more
appropriate as parallel RC network.
VAR
VAR5
Poutv=1.0
fo=2300

Var
Eqn

LSSP

LSSP
HB1
Freq[1]=fo MHz
Order[1]=8
LSSP_FreqAtPort[1]=fo MHz
SweepVar="Poutv"
Start=-7
Stop=12
Step=0.2

C
Cdec1
C=100.0 pF

V_DC
VCC
Vdc=3.3 V
R
RB1
R=1000 Ohm

L
LC
L=2 nH
R=0.2

S11

C
Cc2
C=1.0 pF
pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
C
Cc1
C=1.2 pF

Q1

C
C1
P_1Tone
C=0.6 pF {t}
PORT1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm
P=polar(dbmtow(Poutv),0)
R
Freq=fo MHz
RB2
R=1000 Ohm
R
C
RE
C2
R=100 Ohm
C=0.7 pF {t}

S(1,1)

R
RL
R=50 Ohm

Direction of S11 as magnitude


of P_1tone source is increased
from -7 to +12 dBm

Poutv (-7.000 to 12.000)

Compare

S11 versus
Input power
61

Frequency Stability

The process of oscillation depends on the non-linear behavior of the


negative-resistance network.
The conditions discussed, e.g. equations (3.1), (3.8), (3.9), (3.10) and
(3.11) are not enough to guarantee a stable state of oscillation. In
particular, stability requires that any perturbation in current, voltage and
frequency will be damped out, allowing the oscillator to return to its
initial state.
The stability of oscillation can be expressed in terms of the partial
derivative of the sum Zin + Zs or Yin + Ys of the input port (or output
port).
The discussion is beyond the scope of this chapter for now, and the
reader should refer to [1] and [7] for the concepts.

62

Some Steps to Improve Oscillator


Performance

To improve the frequency stability of the oscillator, the following steps


can be taken.
Use components with known temperature coefficients, especially
capacitors.
Neutralize, or swamp-out with resistors, the effects of active device
variations due to temperature, power supply and circuit load changes.
Operate the oscillator on lower power.
Reduce noise, use shielding, AGC (automatic gain control) and biasline filtering.
Use an oven or temperature compensating circuitry (such as
thermistor).
Use differential oscillator architecture (see [4] and [7]).

63

Extra References for This Section

Some recommended journal papers on frequency stability of oscillator:


Kurokawa K., Some basic characteristics of broadband negative
resistance oscillator circuits, Bell System Technical Journal, pp. 19371955, 1969.
Nguyen N.M., Meyer R.G., Start-up and frequency stability in highfrequency oscillators,IEEE journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol 27, no. 5
pp.810-819, 1992.
Grebennikov A. V., Stability of negative resistance oscillator circuits,
International journal of Electronic Engineering Education, Vol. 36, pp.
242-254, 1999.

64

tra
Ex

Reconciliation Between Feedback and


Negative Resistance Oscillator
Perspectives

It must be emphasized that the circuit we obtained using negative


resistance approach can be cast into the familiar feedback form. For
instance an oscillator circuit similar to Example 4.2 can be redrawn as:
Negative Resistance
Oscillator

V_DC
VCC
Vdc=3.0 V

V_DC
VCC
Vdc=3.0 V

R
RB1
R=10000 Ohm {t}

R
RB1
R=10000 Ohm {t}

VL
C
Cc2
C=1.0 pF

VL
C
Cc2
C=1.0 pF

R
RL
R=50 Ohm

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1

R
RL
R=50 Ohm

L
C
L1
Cc1
L=15.0 nH {t} C=4.7 pF
R=0.1

Amplifier

L
LC
L=2.2 nH {t}
R=0.2

L
LC
L=2.2 nH {t}
R=0.2

R
RE
R=100 Ohm {t}

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1
C
C1
C=1.0 pF {t}
C
Cc1
C=4.7 pF

C
C2
C=0.8 pF {t}

R
RE
R=100 Ohm {t}

L
L1
L=15.0 nH {t}
R=0.1

C
C1
C=1.0 pF {t}
C
C2
C=0.8 pF {t}

Feedback
Network

65

5.0 Voltage Controlled


Oscillator

66

About the Voltage Controlled Oscillator


(VCO) (1)
A simple transistor VCO using Clapp-Gouriet or CE configuration will be
designed to illustrate the principles of VCO.
The transistor chosen for the job is BFR92A, a wide-band NPN transistor
which comes in SOT-23 package.
Similar concepts as in the design of fixed-frequency oscillators are employed.
Where we design the biasing of the transistor, destabilize the network and
carefully choose a load so that from the input port (Port 1), the oscillator
circuit has an impedance (assuming series representation is valid):

Of which R1

Z1 R1 jX 1
is negative, for a range of frequencies from to .
1

Lower

Upper
67

About the Voltage Controlled Oscillator


(VCO) (2)

Clapp-Gouriet
Oscillator Circuit
with Load

Zs

ZL

Z1 = R1 + jX1

68

About the Voltage Controlled Oscillator


(VCO) (3)
If we can connect a source impedance Zs to the input port, such that within a
range of frequencies from 1 to 2:

Z s Rs jX s
Rs R1 R1 0

X s X1

The circuit will oscillate within this range of frequencies. By changing the
value of Xs, one can change the oscillation frequency.
The
Therationale
rationaleisisthat
thatonly
onlythe
theinitial
initialspectral
spectralofofthe
thenoise
noise
signal
signalfulfilling
fulfillingXXs ==XX1 will
willstart
startthe
theoscillation.
oscillation.
s

For example, if X1 is positive, then Xs must be negative, and it can be


generated by a series capacitor. By changing the capacitance, one can
change the oscillation frequency of the circuit.
If X1 is negative, Xs must be positive. A variable capacitor in series with a
suitable inductor will allow us to adjust the value of X s.
69

Schematic of the VCO


Initial noise
source to start
the oscillation

TRANSIENT

DC
DC
DC1

VtPWL
Vtrig
V_Tran=pwl(time, 0ns,0V, 1ns,0.01V, 2ns,0V)
R
Rb
R=47 kOhm
V_DC
Vcc
Vdc=3.0 V

Variable
capacitance
tuning network

L
L2
L=47.0 nH
R=

L
Lc
L=220.0 nH
R=

ParamSweep
Sweep1
SweepVar="Rload"
SimInstanceName[1]="Tran1"
SimInstanceName[2]=
SimInstanceName[3]=
SimInstanceName[4]=
SimInstanceName[5]=
SimInstanceName[6]=
Start=100
Stop=700
Var
VAR
Eqn
Step=100
VAR1
X=1.0
Rload=100

R
C
Rout
Cc2
C=330.0 pF R=50 Ohm

C
pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Cb1
Q1
C=2.2 pF

C
Cb3
C=4.7 pF
C
Cb2
C=10.0 pF

R
V_DC
R1
R=4700 Ohm
SRC1
Vdc=-1.5 V

Tran
Tran1
StopTime=100.0 nsec
MaxTimeStep=1.2 nsec

PARAMETER SWEEP

di_sms_bas40_19930908
D1
C
Cb4
C=4.7 pF

R
RL
R=Rload

R
Re
R=220 Ohm

2-port network

70

More on the Schematic

L2 together with Cb3, Cb4 and the junction capacitance of D1 can


produce a range of reactance value, from negative to positive.
Together these components form the frequency determining network.
Cb4 is optional, it is used to introduce a capacitive offset to the junction
capacitance of D1.

R1 is used to isolate the control voltage Vdc from the frequency


determining network. It must be a high quality SMD resistor. The
effectiveness of isolation can be improved by adding a RF choke in
series with R1 and a shunt capacitor at the control voltage.

Notice that the frequency determining network has no actual


resistance to counter the effect of |R1()|. This is provided by the loss
resistance of L2 and the junction resistance of D1.

71

Time Domain Result

1.0

Vout[Index,::]

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5
0

10

20

30

Vout when Vdc = -1.5V

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

time, nsec

72

Load-Pull Experiment
Peak-to-peak output voltage versus Rload for Vdc = -1.5V.

Vpp

Vout(pp)

1
100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

RLoad Rload

73

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (1)

Since the resistance in the frequency determining network is too small,


large amount of non-linearity is needed to limit the output voltage
waveform, as shown below there is a lot of distortion.

Vout

74

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (2)

The distortion generates substantial amount of higher harmonics.


This can be reduced by decreasing the positive feedback, by adding a
small capacitance across the collector and base of transistor Q 1. This
is shown in the next slide.

75

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (3)


The
Theobservant
observant
person
personwould
would
probably
probablynotice
notice
that
thatwe
wecan
canalso
also
reduce
reducethe
theharmonic
harmonic
distortion
by
distortion byintroducing
introducing
aaseries
resistance
series resistanceinin
the
thetuning
tuningnetwork.
network.
However
Howeverthis
thisisisnot
not
advisable
advisableas
asthe
thephase
phase
noise
at
the
oscillators
noise at the oscillators
output
outputwill
willincrease
increase( (
more
moreabout
aboutthis
thislater).
later).
Control voltage
Vcontrol

Capacitor to control
positive feedback

DC
DC
DC 1

TRANS IENT
Tran
Tran1
StopTime=280.0 nsec
MaxTimeStep=1.2 nsec

VtPWL
L
Vtrig
Lc
V_Tran=pwl(time, 0ns,0V, 1ns,0.01V, 2ns,0V)
L=220.0 nH
R
R=
Rb
R =47 kOhm
I_Probe
V_DC
I_P robe
Iload
Vcc
IC
Vdc=3.0 V
C
Ccb
C=1.0 pF
L
L2
L=47.0 nH
C
R=
Cb1
pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
C=6.8 pF
C
Cb3
C=4.7 pF
C
Cb2
C=10.0 pF

R
R1
V_DC
R=4700 Ohm
SRC1
Vdc=0.5 V

C
C c2
C =330.0 pF

R
Rout
R=50 Ohm

R
RL
R =50 Ohm

Q1
R
Re
R =220 Ohm

di_sms_bas40_19930908
D1
C
C b4
C =0.7 pF

76

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (4)

The output waveform Vout after this modification is shown below:

Vout

77

Controlling Harmonic Distortion (5)

Finally, it should be noted that we should also add a low-pass filter


(LPF) at the output of the oscillator to suppress the higher harmonic
components. Such LPF is usually called Harmonic Filter.
Since the oscillator is operating in nonlinear mode, care must be taken
in designing the LPF.
Another practical design example will illustrate this approach.

78

The Tuning Range

Actual measurement is carried out, with the frequency measured using


a high bandwidth digital storage oscilloscope.
410

DD1 isisBB149A,
BB149A,
1
aavaractor
varactor
manufactured
manufacturedby
by
Phillips
Phillips
Semiconductor
Semiconductor(Now
(Now
NXP).
NXP).

405
f
400

MHz

395

0.5

1.5

2.5

Vdc

Volts

79

Phase Noise in Oscillator (1)


tra
Ex

Since the oscillator output is periodic. In frequency domain we would expect a


series of harmonics.
In a practical oscillation system, the instantaneous frequency and magnitude of
oscillation are not constant. These will fluctuate as a function of time.

t V

t cos t

osc are noise,


o
noise
noise
These random fluctuations
and in frequency domain
the effect of the
spectra will smear out.

Ideal oscillator output

fo

2fo

3fo

Smearing

Real oscillator output


fo

2fo

3fo

80

Phase Noise in Oscillator (2)


tra
Ex

Mathematically, we can say that the instantaneous frequency and


magnitude of oscillation are not constant. These will fluctuate as a function
of time.
As a result, the output in the frequency domain is smeared out.
v(t)

T = 1/fo

LPM 10 log

t
fo
v(t)

Leesons expression

Large phase noise

FkT
A

8Q1 L


fo

f offset

f
Contains both phase
and amplitude modulation
of the sinusoidal waveform
at frequency fo

t
fo

Small phase noise


81

Phase Noise in Oscillator (3)


tra
Ex
Typically the magnitude fluctuation is small (or can be minimized) due to the oscillator
nonlinear limiting process under steady-state.

Thus the smearing is largely attributed to phase variation and is known as Phase Noise.
Phase noise is measured with respect to the signal level at various offset frequencies.

vosc t Vo cos t noise t

Signal level

v(t)
- 90dBc/Hz
t

100kHz
fo

Assume amplitude limiting effect


Of the oscillator reduces amplitude fluctuation

Phase noise is measured in


dBc/Hz @ foffset.
dBc/Hz stands for dB down
from the carrier (the c) in 1 Hz
bandwidth.
For example
-90dBc/Hz @ 100kHz offset
from a CW sine wave at
2.4GHz.
82

Reducing Phase Noise (1)

tra
Ex

Requirement 1: The resonator network of an oscillator must have a high


Q factor. This is an indication of low dissipation loss in the tuning
network (See Chapter 3a impedance transformation network on Q
factor).
Variation in X
Xtune

X1

Tuning
Network with
High Q

Variation in Xtune
tune
due
to
environment
due to environment
causes
causessmall
smallchange
change
in
ininstantaneous
instantaneous
frequency.
frequency.

Xtune

X1

f
f

-X1

2|X1|

Tuning
Network with
Low Q
f

-X1

Ztune = Rtune +jXtune

2|X1|

83

tra
Ex

Reducing Phase Noise (2)

A Q factor in the tuning network of at least 20 is needed for medium


performance oscillator circuits at UHF. For highly stable oscillator, Q
factor of the tuning network must be in excess or 1000.
We have looked at LC tuning networks, which can give Q factor of up
to 40. Ceramic resonator can provide Q factor greater than 500, while
piezoelectric crystal can provide Q factor > 10000.
At microwave frequency, the LC tuning networks can be substituted
with transmission line sections.
See R. W. Rhea, Oscillator design & computer simulation, 2nd edition
1995, McGraw-Hill, or the book by R.E. Collin for more discussions on
Q factor.
Requirement 2: The power supply to the oscillator circuit should also
be very stable to prevent unwanted amplitude modulation at the
oscillators output.
84

tra
Ex

Reducing Phase Noise (3)

Requirement 3: The voltage level of Vcontrol should be stable.


Requirement 4: The circuit has to be properly shielded from
electromagnetic interference from other modules.
Requirement 5: Use low noise components in the construction of the
oscillator, e.g. small resistance values, low-loss capacitors and
inductors, low-loss PCB dielectric, use discrete components instead of
integrated circuits.

85

tra
Ex

Example of Phase Noise from VCOs

Comparison of two VCO outputs on a spectrum analyzer*.

VCO output
with high
phase noise

VCO output
with low
phase noise

*The spectrum
analyzer internal
oscillator must
of course has
a phase noise of
an order of magnitude
lower than our VCO
under test.

86

tra
Ex

More Materials

This short discussion cannot do justice to the material on phase noise.


For instance the mathematical model of phase noise in oscillator and
the famous Leesons equation is not shown here. You can find further
discussion in [4], and some material for further readings on this topic:
D. Schere, The art of phase noise measurement, Hewlett Packard
RF & Microwave Measurement Symposium, 1985.
T. Lee, A. Hajimiri, The design of low noise oscillators, Kluwer,
1999.

87

More on Varactor

tra
Ex

The varactor diode is basically a PN junction optimized for its linear junction
capacitance.
It is always operated in the reverse-biased mode to prevent nonlinearity, which
generate harmonics.

Vj

Aswe
weincrease
increasethe
thenegative
negative
As
biasingvoltage
voltageVVj, ,CCjdecreases,
decreases,
biasing
j
j
hencethe
theoscillation
oscillationfrequency
frequencyincreases.
increases.
hence
Cj
Theabrupt
abruptjunction
junctionvaractor
varactorhas
hashigh
high
The
Q,but
butlow
lowsensitivity
sensitivity(e.g.
(e.g.CCjvaries
varies
Q,
j
littleover
overlarge
largevoltage
voltagechange).
change).
little
Thehyperabrupt
hyperabruptjunction
junctionvaractor
varactor
Cjo
The
Forward biased has
lowQ,
Q,but
buthigher
highersensitivity.
sensitivity.
has low

Reverse biased
Linear region

Vj
88

tra
Ex

A Better Variable Capacitor Network

The back-to-back varactors are commonly employed in a VCO circuit, so that


at low Vcontrol, when one of the diode is being affected by the AC voltage, the
other is still being reverse biased.
When a diode is forward biased, the PN junction capacitance becomes
nonlinear.
The reverse biased diode has smaller junction capacitance, and this dominates
the overall capacitance of the back-to-back varactor network.
This configuration helps to decrease the harmonic distortion.
To negative

At
Atany
anyone
onetime,
time,atatleast
leastone
oneofof
the
thediode
diodewill
willbe
bereverse
reversebiased.
biased.
The
Thejunction
junctioncapacitance
capacitanceofofthe
the
reverse
reversebiased
biaseddiode
diodewill
willdominate
dominate
the
overall
capacitance
of
the overall capacitance ofthe
the
network.
network.

To suppress
RF signals

resistance
amplifier
Vcontrol

Vcontrol
Vcontrol
Symbol
for Varactor
89

Example 5.1 VCO Design for


Frequency Synthesizer

To design a low power VCO that works from 810 MHz to 910 MHz.
Power supply = 3.0V.
Output power (into 50 load) minimum -3.0 dBm.

90

Example 5.1 Cont

Checking the d.c. biasing and AC simulation.


DC
DC
DC1
V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.3 V
R
RB
R=33 kOhm

S-PARAMETERS
S_Param
SP1
Start=0.7 GHz
Stop=1.0 GHz
Step=1.0 MHz

b82496c3120j000
LC
param=SIMID 0603-C (12 nH +-5%)

100pF_NPO_0603
Cc2

4_7pF_NPO_0603 2_2pF_NPO_0603
Term
Cc1
C1
Term1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm

Z11

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1
R
RL
R=100 Ohm

3_3pF_NPO_0603
C2
R
RE
R=100 Ohm

91

Example 5.1 Cont


Checking the results real and imaginary portion of Z 1 when output is terminated with ZL
= 100.
m1
freq=775.0MHz
m1=-89.579

m2
freq=809.0MHz
m2=-84.412

-40
-50
-60

imag(Z(1,1))
real(Z(1,1))

-70
-80

m1

m2

-90
-100
-110
-120
0.70

0.72

0.74

0.76

0.78

0.80

0.82

0.84

0.86

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

freq, GHz
92

Example 5.1 Cont

The resonator design.


S-PARAMETERS

PARAMETER SWEEP
ParamSweep
Sweep1
SweepVar="Vcontrol"
SimInstanceName[1]="SP1"
SimInstanceName[2]=
SimInstanceName[3]=
SimInstanceName[4]=
SimInstanceName[5]=
SimInstanceName[6]=
Start=0.0
Stop=3
Step=0.5

S_Param
SP1
Start=0.7 GHz
Stop=1.0 GHz
Step=1.0 MHz

L
L2
L=33.0 nH
R=
100pF_NPO_0603
C2

VAR
VAR1
Vcontrol=0.2

L
L1
L=10.0 nH
R=
Vvar

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=Vcontrol V

Var
Eqn

BB833_SOD323
D1

C
C3
C=0.68 pF

Term
Term1
Num=1
Z=50 Ohm

93

Example 5.1 Cont


The resonator reactance.

-X1 of the destabilized amplifier

120

m1
freq=882.0MHz
m1=64.725
Vcontrol=0.000000

100

-imag(VCO_ac..Z(1,1))
imag(Z(1,1))

Resonator
reactance
as a function of
control voltage

80

m1
60

40

The theoretical tuning


range

20

0
0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

freq, GHz
94

Example 5.1 Cont

The complete schematic with the harmonic suppression filter.


TRANSIENT
T ran
T ran1
StopT ime=1000.0 nsec
MaxT imeStep=1.0 nsec

DC

Low-pass filter

VtPWL
Src_trigger
V_Tran=pwl(time, 0ns,0V, 1ns,0.1V, 2ns,0V)

DC
DC1

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.3 V

R
RB
R=33 kOhm

b82496c3120j000
L3
param=SIMID 0603-C (12 nH +-5%)
100pF_NP O_0603
Cc2

b82496c3150j000
L4
param=SIMID 0603-C (15 nH +-5%)

b82496c3100j000
L1
param=SIMID 0603-C (10 nH +-5%)
4_7pF_NP O_0603 C
Cc1
C6
C=2.2 pF

b82496c3330j000
L2
param=SIMID 0603-C (33 nH +-5%)
Vvar
R
R1
R=100 Ohm

V_DC
SRC2
Vdc=1.2 V

BB833_SOD323
D1

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1
2_7pF_NP O_0603
C8

C
C5
C=0.68 pF

C
C7
C=3.3 pF

0_47pF_NP O_0603
C9

R
RL
R=100 Ohm

R
RE
R=100 Ohm

100pF_NP O_0603
C4

95

Example 5.1 Cont


The prototype and the result captured from a spectrum analyzer (9 kHz to 3 GHz).

Fundamental
-1.5 dBm

Harmonic
VCO
suppression filter
- 30 dBm

96

Example 5.1 Cont

Examining the phase noise of the oscillator (of course the accuracy is
limited by the stability of the spectrum analyzer used).

-0.42 dBm

Span = 500 kHz


RBW = 300 Hz
VBW = 300 Hz

97

Example 5.1 Cont

VCO gain (ko) measurement setup:

Variable
Variable
power
power
supply
supply

V_DC
SRC1
Vdc=3.3 V

b82496c3120j000
L3
param=SIMID 0603-C (12 nH +-5%)
100pF_NPO_0603
Cc2

b82496c3150j000
L4
param=SIMID 0603-C (15 nH +-5%)

b82496c3100j000
L1
param=SIMID 0603-C (10 nH +-5%)

R
Rattn
R=50 Ohm
4_7pF_NPO_0603
Cc1

Vvar
Port
Vcontrol
Num=1

R
RB
R=33 kOhm

R
Rcontrol
R=1000 Ohm

BB833_SOD323
D1

C
C5
C=0.68 pF

C
C6
C=2.2 pF

C
C7
C=3.3 pF

pb_phl_BFR92A_19921214
Q1
2_7pF_NPO_0603
C8

Port
Vout
Num=2

Spectrum
Spectrum
Analyzer
Analyzer

0_47pF_NPO_0603
C9

R
RE
R=100 Ohm

98

Example 5.1 Cont

Measured results:
fVCO / MHz

950

900

850

55MHz
MHz 40.74 MHz/Volt
kko 55
o 1.35 Volt 40.74 MHz/Volt

800

1.35 Volt

750
0.0

April 2012

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

2006 by Fabian Kung Wai Lee

3.0

3.5

4.0

Vcontrol/Volts
99

References
[1]* D.M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 2nd Edition, 1998
John-Wiley & Sons
[2] R. Ludwig, P. Bretchko, RF Circuit Design: Theory and
Applications, 2000 Prentice-Hall
[3] B. Razavi, RF Microelectronics, 1998 Prentice-Hall,
TK6560
[4] J. R. Smith, Modern Communication Circuits,1998
McGraw-Hill
[5] P. H. Young, Electronics Communication Techniques,
5th edition, 2004 Prentice-Hall
[6] Gilmore R., Besser L., Practical RF Circuit Design for
Modern Wireless Systems, Vol. 1 & 2, 2003, Artech
House

S-ar putea să vă placă și