Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Using Logical
Consequences When Rules
are Broken
Aileen Alfonso
Mara Andrada
September 16, 2008
ED334
Purposes of Logical
Consequences
to make clear the connection between
behavior and consequence
to support children in figuring out how
to behave differently
to show children our belief in their
ability to make better choices
to stop unwanted behavior
Neither Punishment
Nor Permission
Consequences versus Punishment
- teacher’s attitude
- student’s input
Like punishment, the permissive
approach is not productive
Logical consequences are related to the
rule breaking
Natural Consequences
Occur without adult input
- ex. A child who forgets his lunch may get
hungry.
“Often our intercessions are necessary
because natural consequences are not
productive in the ways we might hope.”
(147)
- ex. The hungry child takes a classmate’s
lunch.
The “STOP STEP”
STOP then ENFORCE with actions
Mara
3 Types of Logical Consequences
– VERBAL APOLOGY
– APOLOGY OF ACTION
Reparations
INDIVIDUALS making reparation
A student accidentally knocks over another
child’s block building.
GROUP
A group lesson becomes very noisy
Time-outs
Removing a child from a situation temporarily
to stop disruptive behavior
INDIVIDUAL
A child makes negative or sarcastic comments
GROUP
A group is not able to cooperate.
Summary
When children break rules :
we respond in a way that holds them
accountable and helps them learn from
their experience.
Signaling, reparations, loss of privileges,
or time-out.
Logical consequences STOP-Take
time-Action-Connection-Student Input-
Chance. (STACS Chance)
QUESTIONS?
Activity