Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
GROUP 6
Harish Deepak (X010/14)
Kirity Kumar (X013/14)
Shiva Shankar Mahto (X028/14)
1
SM
SM
Market Dynamics
Customer pay for CSA and repair services to achieve these goals
Customer who buy complex and sophisticated equipment such as
Longwall, Continuous miners and construction equipment would like
to go ahead with CSA
Customer who buy general equipment would like to carry
maintenance by their own
These customers do not value for uptime and productivity too much
3
SM
Competitions Heating Up
SM
Competitions Heating Up
Small local workshops were also offering repair services ranging from
simple repairs to complex ones.
Some of them were earlier established by CAT dealers itself & so enjoy
customer acceptance
Customers also had their own mechanics, which they use them for
both maintenance and repair activities
These mechanics were having difficulty to cope with sophisticated
new equipment where having specialized tools is a must
They limited themselves in servicing older equipment
Organized manufacturers ( John Deere, Komatsu, Volvo etc.)
established their own dealer networks and focus on their products
selling to same customers
SM
Total Maintenance
Repair contracts
Product support of all their equipment
The agreements were sold separately from machines & were
delivered through Dealers Product Support Organization
CSA has brought several benefits to customers
Regarding risks and costs of unplanned machine downtime
Resulted in higher levels of loyalty
The current degree of customization and complexity limited the
CSA marketability & Dealers Operational Efficiency to serve
growing no. of customers
The smaller and simple contracts called preventive maintenance
agreements (PM CSA) were purchased by many small customers
These PM CSA involved the provision of CATERPILLAR oils and filters
at predetermined service intervals and were delivered through a
dealer field technician
Visual machine inspection, monitoring of the condition of the
machine and feedback discussions with customers were not built into
contracts
They were considered extra services but were not executed
Virtually include any service which customer wanted and that
consistently.
dealers could provide
Some were even unnoticed by business owners.
SM
Jose Pepe Brousset , Marketing & Operations Director
called Division s Dealer Advisory Panel
The company s five year growth targets could not be
met unless the organization moves from a Product
focus to an integrated customer focus
His goal was to develop, deploy and pilot a plan
using the best practices in service to redefine
the CSA (Customer Service Agreement) value
andto
to deliver
grow CSA
30% per
year these agreements was the
proposition
Learning how
service
through
best approach to making both the company and its dealerships ready
for the challenges involved in delivering service
Expected
services
Perceived
Services
Find out what products customers want. Design and build them. Keep
them running. When they wear out, rebuild or recycle. Do it better
than anybody else
SM
A literature search and conversation was initiated among Sales & Service
Personnel & Product Management
Key attributes were identified such as
a. Reliability
Able to do any job needed
M/C ready when promised
Job done right the first time
Effectiveness of technical services
Perform only necessary work
b. Assurance
Able to do any job needed
Service available when needed
Efforts to increase customer efficiency
c. Tangibles
Clean up after service work
Convenient to mine/ workplace
Completeness of documentation
d. Empathy/ Relationship
Courteous and friendly service
e. Responsiveness
On time delivery
Response on customer issues, complaints/Breakdown
Prompt warranty action
Questionnaires were mailed to 634 customers under CSA
284 usable returns (45%) were received
SM
Expected
services
GAP 1
GAP 2
GAP 3
GAP 4
Perceived
expectations
Inadequate research
Lack of upward communication
Insufficient relationship focus
Inadequate service recovery
SM
THE LISTENING GAP (GAP1)
Using existing surveys conducted by Caterpillar called Customer
Value surveys
The team grouped survey items by the service quality dimension
These surveys was mapped on an importance / performance matrix
IMPORTANCE
opportunity o
Responsiveness
o Relationship
Strength
o Reliability
o Assurance
Limited
action
o Tangibles
PERFORMANCE
Maintain
10
SM
Tangibles : Customer performance perception was high but
had relatively low impact on the overall customer loyalty
Empathy/ Relationship/ Reliability & Assurance : They provide
competitive differentiation but none of them were positioned
as a dominant element of the value proposition All of them
show significant potential for improvement
Responsiveness : The most influential factor on customer
loyalty and underperformed as compared to other factors. The
dimension required urgent attention
CONCLUSIONS
Service reliability, Responsiveness and Relationship needed
improvement
Product differentiation and Quality control cannot offset these
issues
Dealer Product support Operations and Marketing capabilities
has an equal importance
Customer Surveys were sporadically conducted & partially
designed for collecting service feedback & relationship
11
SM
12
SM
THANK YOU
13