Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PIPELINE
CASE STUDY
MADE BY:
MAHRO AIMAN CE-56/2014-15
AAKEFA QAISER CE-57/2014-15
INTRODUCTION
The Proposed Project consists of the construction of a sixteen-inch pipeline
from the location of a refinery to a consuming center about 525 miles away.
16 inch
Refinery
525 miles
Consuming
Center
of the refinery and some traffic to even more distant consumption centers
since the railway is not always able to provide sufficient tank-wagons.
CAPITAL COSTS
The capital costs of the project are estimated at Rs900 million.
It consist primarily:
The pipeline (Rs300 million)
The transportation and laying of the pipeline (Rs300 million)
Pumps, including adequate standby capacity (Rs90 million)
Terminal tankage and railway facilities (Rs 105 million)
years.
million.
At a shadow rate for foreign exchange of 1.75 times the official rate, these
costs amount to Rs721 million, or Rs309 million more than the financial
costs.
The total economic costs are thus Rsl,134 million (Rs900 million - Rs75
OPERATING COSTS
The annual operating costs of the pipeline (excluding depreciation) are estimated
to be 10 percent higher.
becomes surplus.
The economic value of the thirty-three locomotives is estimated at Rs138.6 million.
The railway estimates that the best alternative is to dispose of 1,000 tank-wagons for
per year with the disposition of an additional 140 wagons in year 10, the total surplus
would be absorbed.
Taking into account their age, condition, and replacement costs, the value of these tank-
TRAFFIC
The area served by the pipeline has been divided into four separate zones of
consumption.
Since zone 1 is within a radius of 150 miles of the refinery, however, petroleum is
distributed in the zone by truck; this is expected to continue even after the
construction of the pipeline since trucks can provide direct distribution to many
points.
The pipeline traffic has been projected to reach 1.65 million tons, or about 730
ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION
CAPITAL COSTS
TANK-WAGON:
Although most of the railway's tank-wagons have a capacity of 18 tons, others have a capacity
of 40 tons; the estimates are therefore presented in terms of 18-ton wagon equivalents.
Under present operations, the turnaround time per tank-wagon for the average return trip of
almost 900 miles is about ten days, thus permitting thirty-six trips a year.
The annual capacity of a tank-wagon is therefore 650 tons. To carry the estimated 1.65 million
tons in the opening year of the pipeline thus requires about 2,500 tank-wagons, plus a 10
percent allowance for repair time, for a total of 2,800 wagons.
Traffic is expected to grow between years 3 and 4 from 1.65 to 1.8 million tons, an increase of
duties and taxes and shadow pricing the foreign exchange component of Rs70,500 by 1.75
times the official exchange rate, the economic cost of a wagon amounts to about Rs123,000.
For the 300 additional wagons required in year 3, this is an investment of Rs36.9 million
LOCOMOTIVES:
One locomotive is required to haul about seventy-five tank-wagons. The annual
into account their age and replacement costs, is estimated at Rs4.2 million each, or a
total of Rs138.6 million.
The capital cost of a new locomotive is estimated at Rs5.58 million. Deducting
Rsl.37 million for duties and taxes and shadow pricing the foreign exchange
component of Rs3.63 million make the economic costs Rs6.93 million.
YARD FACILITIES & LINE CAPACITY:
The yard and line capacity of the railway requires expansion if the railway is to carry
OPERATING COSTS
TANK-WAGONS
The direct operating costs of a tank-wagon, especially repair and maintenance,
OTHER COSTS
the railway incurs other costs such as the maintenance of track, the operation
of signaling and communication equipment, and administrative expenses.
The railway estimates these costs at Rs0.027 a ton-mile.
The railway estimates that the marginal costs-that is, the amount that could be
million
thirty years amount to about Rsl,537.7 million compared with pipeline costs of
only Rs1,173.1 million, with both costs discounted at 12 percent; the net present
worth of the pipeline is Rs364.6 million.
Transport by railway is thus about 30 percent more expensive than by pipeline,
and one-half days, the number of wagons and locomotives required would be
reduced by 25 percent, though the reduction in operating costs would be less.
Since the average round trip is almost 900 miles, this implies a daily movement of
rolling stock, the value of which has been credited to the pipeline, is also reduced by 25
percent; the amount involved (discounted) is about Rs5l million.
The pipeline costs thus go up to about Rsl,224 million, compared with Rsl,260 million
for the railway, and the advantage of the pipeline is sharply reduced, although it is still
justified because pipeline cost is less than railway cost.
The capital costs of the pipeline account for more than 90 percent of total discounted
pipeline costs.
CONCLUSION
The level of traffic affects railway costs almost proportionally while
pipeline costs are largely fixed and have little relation to traffic.
The case for a pipeline thus becomes stronger the greater the traffic. In view
of the large net present worth of the pipeline, construction of the pipeline is
justified even at a lower traffic level.
It seems likely that the pipeline can provide more reliable service than the
THANK YOU!