WRITING FOR BEHAVIORAL AND

SOCIAL SCIENCES

WRITING FOR BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

Publication
Manual
of
the
American
Psychological Association (APA) has been
designed to advance scholarship by setting
sound and rigorous standards for scientific
communication.

They sought to establish a simple set of

procedures, or style rules, that would codify
the many components of scientific writing to
increase the ease of reading comprehension.

WRITING FOR BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

There are several basic ethical and legal

principles underlie all scholarly research and
writing.

These long-standing principles are designed

to achieve three goals:

to ensure the accuracy of scientific knowledge

to protect the rights and welfare of research
participants
to protect intellectual property rights (against
plagiarism).

Manuscript Elements

Title
Authors
names and
affiliation

Abstract

Discussio
n

Method
Introducti
on

Result

Referenc
e

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
1.

Title
A title should summarize the main idea of
the manuscript by putting a brief/ concise
statement of the main topic.
A title should identify the variables or
theoretical issues under investigation and
the relationship between them.
Example:

Loneliness Influenced by the Number of

People in Photographs.
Effects of Caffeine on Heart Rate.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
1.

Title

Things that need to avoid in writing the

title:

Avoid words that serve no useful purpose. It

can mislead the readers.
Example: A study of .,
: An Experimental Investigation
of,

Avoid using abbreviation.

Example: SPKS (instead

Psychology and Social Work)

of

School

of

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
2.

Authors name and affiliation

o

The preferred form of an author's name is

first name, middle initial(s), and last name;
this form reduces the likelihood of
mistaken identity.
Example:

Omit all titles

Juanita A. Smith, Murnizam Halik,

Example: Dr., Prof.,

Omit all degrees

Example: PhD, PsyD, B. Psy,

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
2.

Authors name and affiliation

The affiliation identifies the location where the
author or authors were when the research was
conducted, which is usually an institution.
Example 1:
Murnizam Hj. Halik, Mohd Dahlan A. Malek and Agnes
Sombuling.
School of Psychology and Social Work, Universiti Malaysia
Sabah.

Example 2:
Murnizam Hj. Halik and Mohd Dahlan A. Malek
School of Psychology and Social Work, Universiti Malaysia
Sabah.
Paul Webley
School of Oriental and Asian Studies, University of London,

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
3.

Abstract

An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the

contents of the article.

It allows readers to survey the contents of an article

quickly.

Similar like a title, it enables persons interested in the

document and readers frequently decide on the basis
of the abstract whether to read the entire article.

Word limits vary from journal to journal and typically

range from 150 to 250 words.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
3.

Abstract
Characteristic of a good abstract:
Accuracy

a)

Ensure that the abstract correctly reflects the purpose and

content of the manuscript/ article.
Do not include information that does not appear in the body of
the manuscript/ article.

Nonevaluative

b)

Report rather than evaluate.

do not add to or comment on what is in the body of the
manuscript/ article.

Coherent, readable and concise

c)

Write in clear and concise language.

Begin the abstract with the most important points.
Do not waste space by repeating the title.

Include in the abstract only the four or five most important

concepts, findings, or implications.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
3.

Abstract
An abstract of a report of an empirical
study should describe:

the problem under investigation, in one sentence

if possible.
the participants, such as age, sex, and ethnic
and/or racial group.
the essential features of study method by
restricting the description to essential and
interesting features of the study methodology.
the basic findings, including effect sizes and
confidence intervals and/ or statistical significance
levels.
the conclusions and the implications or

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
4. Introduction
Introduce the problem

a)

The body of a manuscript opens with an introduction that

presents the specific problem under study and describes the
research strategy.

A good introduction should discuss why is it important to state or

study the problem, relate our research with previous works in the
area, state the hypotheses and objectives of the study and if any
the link to theory and the implication of the study.

Explore importance of the problem

b)

State why the problem deserves new research.

For basic research, the statement about importance might

involve the need to resolve any inconsistency in results of past
work and/or extend the reach of a theoretical formulation.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
4.

Introduction

c)

Describe relevant scholarship

Discuss the relevant related literature, however avoid writing

deep historical of theoretical background.

Citation of and specific credit to relevant earlier works are signs

of scientific and scholarly responsibility and are essential for the
growth of a cumulative science.

Make a differentiation on how the current use of the evidence in

our study differs from earlier uses . Apart from that, demonstrate
the logical continuity between previous and present work.

When summarizing earlier works, avoid nonessential details;

instead, emphasize pertinent findings, relevant methodological
issues, and major conclusions.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
4.
d)

Introduction
State hypotheses and their correspondence to
research design

By stating your hypotheses or specific question and

describing how these were derived from theory, previous
data or argumentation indicates our approach to solving
problem.

Explain how the research design permits the inferences

needed to examine the hypothesis or provide estimates in
answer to the question.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
Method

5.

The Method section must describes in detail how the study was
conducted, including conceptual and operational definitions of the
variables used in the study.

This is to ensure the reader to evaluate the appropriateness of your

methods and the reliability and the validity of your results.

It also permits experienced investigators to replicate the study.

A good method section consists of:

Identify subsections.
Participant (subject) characteristics.
Sampling procedures.
Sample size, power, and precision.
Measures and covariates.
Research design.
Experimental manipulations or interventions.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
5. Method
Identify subsections

a)

It is useful and reader-friendly if the method section is

divided into labeled subsections.

The labeled subsections consist of:

descriptions of participants/ subjects

any experimental manipulations or interventions used and how they
were delivered-for example, any mechanical apparatus/ instruments
used to deliver them
sampling procedures and sample size and precision
measurement approaches (including the psychometric properties of
the instruments used)
the research design

Detailed descriptions in these subsections help readers to

find specific information and also help other investigators to
replicate the study.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
Method

5.

Participant (Subject) characteristics

Describe the samples adequately as appropriate identification of
research participants is critical to the science and practice of
psychology.

b)

Detail the sample's major demographic characteristics, such as:

age
sex
ethnic and/or racial group
level of education; socioeconomic
generational, or immigrant status
disability status
sexual orientation
gender identity
language preference as well as important topic-specific characteristics (e.g.,
achievement level in studies of educational interventions)

Often, participant characteristics can be important for

understanding the nature of the sample and the degree to which
results can be generalized.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
5. Method
c)

Sampling procedures

Describe the procedures for selecting participants by

stating the sampling method how did you choose your
research participants?

Describe the settings and locations in which the data

were collected as well as any agreements and payments
made to participants (if any).

Describe the ethical standards and safety monitoring

procedures.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
5.

Method

d)

Sample size, power and precision

Along with the description of subjects, give the

intended size of the sample and number of individuals
meant to be in each condition if separate conditions
were used.

Example: the respondents were randomly divided into 2

groups where 10 participants received condition A and other 10
participants received condition B.

State how you determine the sample size.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
5.

Method

e)

Measures and covariates

Describe the methods used to collect data (e.g.,

written questionnaires, interviews, observations) as
well as methods used to enhance the quality of the
measurements (e.g., the training and reliability of
assessors or the use of multiple observations).

Provide information on instruments used, including

their psychometric and biometric properties and
evidence of cultural validity.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
5. Method
f)

Research Design

These are the questions that need to be answered in

order to write a good research design:

Were subjects placed into conditions that were

manipulated, or were they observed naturalistically?

If multiple conditions were created, how were

participants assigned to conditions, through random
assignment or some other selection mechanism?

Was the study conducted as a between-subjects or a

within-subject design?

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
5. Method
g)

Experimental manipulations or interventions

If interventions or experimental manipulations were

used in the study, describe their specific content.

Include the details of the interventions or manipulations

intended for each study condition, including control
groups (if any), and describe how and when
interventions
(experimental
manipulations)
were
actually administered.

describe the content of the intervention or specific

experimental manipulations by presenting a brief
summary of instructions given to participants.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
5. Method
g)

Experimental manipulations or interventions

Provide information about:

the setting where the intervention or manipulation was
delivered.

the quantity and duration of exposure to the intervention

or manipulation.

the time span taken for the delivery of the intervention or

manipulation to each unit.

Example: how many sessions, episodes, or events were intended to

be delivered and how long they were intended to last.

Example: would the manipulation delivery be complete in one

session, or if participants returned for multiple sessions, how much
time passed between the first and last session?

activities or incentives used to increase compliance.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
6.

Result

Analysis of data and the reporting of the results of those analyses are
fundamental aspects of the conduct of research.

Accurate, unbiased, complete and insightful reporting of the analytic

treatment of data (be it quantitative or qualitative) must be a
component of all research reports.

Assume that your reader has a professional knowledge of statistical

methods by avoiding to review basic concepts and procedures or
provide citations for the most commonly used statistical procedures.

Mention just relevant results including those that run counter to

expectation and be sure to include small effect sizes (or statistically
nonsignificant findings) when theory predicts large (or statistically
significant) ones.

Do not hide uncomfortable results by omission.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
6.

Result

Similarly, missing data can have a disadvantageous effect on

the legitimacy of the inferences drawn by statistical tests.

Therefore, it is critical that the frequency or percentages of

missing data be reported along with any empirical evidence
and/or theoretical arguments for the causes of data that are
missing.

When reporting the results of inferential statistical tests,

include sufficient information to help the reader fully
understand the analyses conducted and possible alternative
explanations for the outcomes of those analyses.

Be sure that baseline demographic

characteristics of each group are provided.

and/or

clinical

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
6.

Result

Example in presenting the results from one-way between-group

ANOVA with post-hoc tests:
A one-way between-groups analysis of variance was conducted to
explore the impact of age on levels of optimism, as measured by
the Life Orientation Test (LOT). Subjects were divided into three
groups according to their age, Group 1 (29 or less), Group 2 (30
44), Group 3 (45 and above). There was a statistically significant
difference at the p<.05 level in LOT scores for the three age
groups [F(2, 432)=4.6, p=.01].
Despite reaching statistical significance, the actual difference in
mean scores between the groups was quite small. The effect size,
calculated using eta squared, was .02. Post-hoc comparisons
using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for Group
1 (M=21.36, SD=4.55) was significantly different from Group 3
(M=22.96, SD=4.49). Group 2 (M=22.10, SD=4.15) did not differ
significantly from either Group 1 or 3.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
7.

Discussion

After presenting the results, you are in a position to

evaluate and interpret their implications, especially with
respect to your original hypotheses.

Begin the Discussion section with a clear statement of the

support or nonsupport for your original hypotheses,
distinguished by primary and secondary hypotheses. If
hypotheses were not supported, offer post hoc
explanations.

Similarities and differences between your results and the

work of others should be used to contextualize, confirm,
and clarify your conclusions.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
7.

Discussion

The interpretation of the results should take into account:

a) sources of potential bias and other threats to internal
validity,
b) the imprecision of measures,
c) the overall number of tests or overlap among tests,
d) the effect sizes observed,
e) other limitations or weaknesses of the study.

Acknowledge the limitations of your research, and address

alternative explanations of the results.

End the Discussion section with a reasoned and justifiable

commentary on the importance of your findings. This concluding
section may be brief or extensive provided that it is tightly
reasoned, self-contained, and not overstated.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
8.

Reference

The standard procedures for citation ensure that references

are accurate, complete, and useful to investigators and
readers.

Journal article with DOI (Digital Object Identification)

Herbst-Damm, K. L., & Kulik, J. A (2005). Volunteer support, marital

status, and the survival times of terminally ill patients. Health
Psychology, 24, 225-229. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.2.225.

What is DOI?
A DOI is a unique alphanumeric string assigned by a
registration agency (the International DOI Foundation) to
identify content and provide a persistent link to its location on
the internet.

LOCATION OF DOI IN
AN ARTICLE

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
8.

Reference

Journal article without DOI (When DOI is not

available)
Sillick, T. J., & Schutte, N. S. (2006). Emotional intelligence
and self-esteem mediate between perceived early
parental love and adult happiness. E-Journal of Applied
Psychology, 2(2), 38-48. Retrieved from http://
ojs.lib.swin.edu.au/index.php/ejap

Magazine article
Chamberlin, J., Novotney, A., Packard, E., & Price, M. (2008,
May). Enhancing worker well-being: Occupational health
psychologists convene to share their research on work,
stress, and health. Monitor on Psychology, 39(5). 26-29.

MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
8.

Reference

Book
Shotton, M. A (1989). Computer addiction? A study of
computer dependency. London, England: Taylor &
Francis.

Book Chapter
Haybron, D. M. (2008). Philosophy and the science of
subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.),
The science of subjective well-being (pp. 17-43).
New York, NY: Guilford Press.