Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
For the case of a body rotating about a fixed axis, we are always free
to arbitrarily call the axis the z axis, so that what we have discussed
up to now (e.g. Ixz, Iyz, Izz) is sufficent.
However, objects may not be constrained to rotate about a fixed axis,
e.g. a tumbling object in free-fall. We can still take the instantaneous
rotation axis as the z axis, but the axis itself can be changing with
time.
In addition, there are certain spin axis directions for which the angular
momentum L and the rotation axis are in the same direction. These
are called principal axes.
Finally, as invariably happens, any symmetries of the object make
these principal axes obvious, and the calculations are a lot easier
when symmetries can be taken advantage of.
What we will find is that one can calculate a single inertia tensor
through a point that takes account of the shape of the object
independent of the axis of rotation, and once that is established, the
angular momentum about any axis through that point can be
determined.
We will also find that there are certain coordinate axes, the principal
axes, for which the inertia tensor becomes especially simple.
November 24, 2009
r
( r )
For any position r = (x, y, z), the terms
can be explicitly
written in the rather ugly form
r
r [( y 2 z 2 ) x xy y xz z ,
yx x ( z 2 x 2 ) y yz z ,
zx x zy y ( x 2 y 2 ) z ].
A double cross-product like this can be written down with the aid of
A (rule
B C() B( A C) C( A B)
the BAC-CAB
). Try it.
Then the general expression for the angular momentum has
components
Lx I xx x I xy y I xz z
I xx m ( y2 z2 )
Ly I yx x I yy y I yz z .
I x y m x y .
where
Lz I zx x I zy y I zz z
etc.
November 24, 2009
Simpler Forms
I zx I zy I zz
Lz
z
1 0 0
1 0 1 0 .
0 0 1
Note that the term tensor refers to a higher-order vector. A vector is
written as a column, as in L and above, while a tensor is written as a
matrix.
November 24, 2009
You can see from the elements of the moment of inertia tensor
I xx m ( y2 z2 )
I x y m x y .
etc.
that it has the property that Iij = Iji. The elements Iii are called the
diagonal elements, so we can say that the inertia tensor is
unchanged by swapping off-diagonal elements mirrored about the
diagonal.
Such a swap (replacing Iij with Iji and vice versa) is an operation
I Tmatrix,
.
called taking the transpose of Ithe
so we can say
A matrix that is its own transpose is said to be symmetric, and this
symmetric property plays a key role in the mathematical theory of
the moment of inertia tensor.
% M / a
O
x
where
denotes
the
mass
density.
I
use
the
symbol
%
to
distinguish from the cylindrical coordinate (although
that is not used here).
In principal, we have to do 9 such integrals (not a happy prospect), but
you can see by symmetry that Ixx = Iyy = Izz, and similarly for the offdiagonal elements.
a
a
a
a
The above integrala is easy
toa do, and
gives
I xx % dx y 2 dy dz dx dy z 2 dz 23 %
a 5 23 Ma 2 .
. [about a corner]
2
2
2
1
I 14 Ma 2
Ma
Ma
3
8
3
3
4
12
2
2
2
1
1
2
4 Ma 4 Ma
3 3
8
3 Ma
Once we have the inertia tensor, we can find the angular momentum
for rotation about any axis through this corner.
L not in same
Examples:
direction as
axis
Rotation about x axis ( = (, 0, 0)): L = I = Ma2/12 (8, 3, 3rotation
)
= Ma2 (2/3, 1/4, 1/4).
L is in same
Rotation about diagonal throughO( / 3 (1, 1, 1)
):
direction as
8 3 3 1
2
2
2
2
Ma
1 Ma 2 Ma . rotation axis
L I
3
8
3
12 3
12 3
6
3 3
2
8 1
I xx
a /2
a /2
dx
a /2
a /2
y dy
2
a /2
a /2
dz
a /2
a /2
dx
a /2
a /2
dy
a /2
a /2
z 2 dz 2 23 %
a 2 (a / 2)3 16 Ma 2 .
but the off-diagonals are all odd functions, so when we change the
limits they all go to zero, e.g.
I xy
a /2
a /2
dx
a /2
a /2
dy
a /2
a /2
dz%xy, %
a /2
a /2
xdx
a /2
a /2
ydy
a /2
a /2
dz 0.
I
0 1 0
1.
6
6
0 0 1
Note that, no matter what direction is, L is always parallel to it:
Ma 2
L I
.
6
(, , z), where 2 = (x2 + y2). NB: The two rhos are different!
Then
4
h
2
Rz / h
h
Rz / h
h
%
R
3
4
2
I zz % dz d d 2 2% dz 3 d
z
dz
,
MR
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 h
10
All of the off-diagonal elements are zero. Note that symmetry about
any two axes guarantees that all of the off-diagonal elements are
zero. Then, the moment of inertia tensor is:
R 2 4h 2
0
0
1 0 0
3
I
M
0
R 2 4h 2
0 0 2 0 .
20
2
0 0 3
0
0
2
R
The last form is just for further discussion. A matrix with all zero offdiagonal elements is, as we said, called a diagonal matrix. We can
then write
L I (1 x , 2 y , 3 z ).
What this means is that whenever points along one of the three
coordinate axes, L and are parallel. This brings us (finally) to the
concept of principal axes of inertia.
12 L. 10.33)
The general expression is (seeT problem
L (11 , 22 , 33 ),
Using a set of principal axes, we have
kinetic energy becomes:
T 12 (112 222 332 ).
so the
The recipe for finding the principal axes through some origin O is as
follows: Find the inertia tensor by choosing some axes. If the inertia
tensor is diagonal, we are done. We have already found the principal
axes. If not, we need to diagonalize the tensor matrix.
How do we do that? The clue is that the equation
I ,
must be satisfied for some as yet unknown number . This is called an
eigenvalue equation, and the number is called the eigenvalue. The
vector is called an eigenvector, and will be one of our principal axes.
In practice, we want to know three eigenvalues, and three
eigenvectors, which will give us our three principal axes. As it turns
out, we can find all three at once. The trick is to recognize that we can
convert the number into a matrix by multiplying by the identity
leads to cubic for ,
matrix 1. Since
I 1,
with three roots
(I 1
) 0,
we must have
whose
solution is
det(I only
1) non-trivial
0.
November 24, 2009
8-3*x,
3 8*x-y]
3
8 3
>> det(A)
Ma
=
3
ans
I = 242*x^3-165*y*x^2+24*x*y^2-y^3
3
8
3
8
>> factor(det(A))
12
3 3
3 3
ans = (2*x-y)*(11*x-y)^2
8
Using det(I A
we have
8*x-y,
-3*x, -3*x]
1=) [ 0,
[
-3*x,
8 3
3 8
1 2 16 Ma 2
3
3 .
3
3 (2 )(11 ) 2 0
8
and
11
2 3 11 12
Ma 2 .
In this case, two of the roots are a repeated root. These are the
eigenvalues (moments), but what are the eigenvectors? Plug back into
(I 1
) 0.
We have to solve this equation three times, once for each eigenvalue
(although in the present case where two solutions are repeated, we just
have to do it twice). First,insert
2 ,
3
8 3
(I 1
) 0 3 8
3
3 8
y
z
6 3 3 x
3 6 3 y 0.
3 3 6
z
x 2 y z 0
x y 2 z 0.
The solution to this is x = y = z, hence the unit
vector along this
direction
is
e1 13 (1,1,1),
which is the diagonal of the cube.
3 3 3
x
The other solution is surprising:
x y z
1
Since
3
3 3 3
y 0 x y z 0.
3 3 3
z
0,this means any axis perpendicular to e .
1
spinning top (say the cone we just looked at), spinning freely about its tip.
We will take the axes x, y, z to be fixed to the ground, and take the principal
axes of the top to be e1, e2 and e3, with e3 along the symmetry axis.
Lets first ignore gravity and consider the top to be spinning
around the e3 principal axis (i.e. = e3). Then the angular z
momentum is fixed, as
With gravity off,
L 3 e3 3 .
there is no torque, and L = constant.
Lets now assume that there is a small amount of gravity.
What actually happens is that there is now some
x
torque, so starts to change, and and are no
e3
R
Mg
longer zero. However, lets consider the case where the effect of gravity is
so small that we can ignore these changes.
The torque is R Mg, with magnitude RMg sin . Note that the direction
is perpendicular to R (or e3), hence the direction of e3 begins to change, but
not the magnitude of , i.e.
R Mg L& 3e&3 .
e&3
where
MgR
z .
3
MgR
z e
3 e
3