Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Waste Management
&
Lahore Waste Management
Company
Sequence of Presentation
Historical Background of Solid Waste Management
Urbanization and Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Management and Integrated Solid Waste
Management
Existing SWM Practices & Issues
Role of informal sector
Institutional innovation
Achievements of Lahore Waste Management
Company
Development
3000
B.C
2000
B.C
Composting in China
1220
1388
1506
1560
Development
1842
1874
1885
1900
1992
1995
Solid Waste
Management System
Households
Industries
Markets
Institutions
Hospitals etc.
Generation
Sweeping
& City
Cleaning
Storage
Collection
Transfer &
Transport
Resource
Recovery
Disposal
Type of
Container
Nos.
Small (5 cu. M)
829
2.5
2100
370
6.0
2200
Skips
54
0.75
40
Total
App. 4300
Transfer and
Transport
Infrastructure called as Transfer
Station
It is a major facility at which MSW from
collection vehicles is consolidated into
loads that are transported by larger
trucks or other means to more distant
final disposal facilities, typically landfill.
In Punjab there is no Waste Transfer
Station
Transfer Stations
Definition
Transportation of waste from
collection points to Dumpsites
Type of Vehicle
Nos.
Open Trucks
96
2.0
192
384
Compactors
5.0
45
49
6.0
294
1750
118
2.5
708
1800
Tractor Trolley
52
2.0
52
105
Total
App. 4100
Available Fleet
Composting
Composting is the breakdown of organic
material, by bacteria, fungi, and other
organisms in a controlled environment
Why Compost?
To avoid generation of methane at landfill site which
is highly explosive in nature and strong GHG
Composting in Pakistan
Composting in Sweden
Sanitary Landfilling
An engineered method of disposing of
MSW on land, in a manner that meets
most of the standard specifications,
including sound siting, extensive site
preparation, proper leachate & and gas
collection, management & monitoring,
compaction & final cover.
In Multan one Sanitary Landfill has
been developed with the Technical
Assistance of JICA
Details of Waste
Disposal
Sites
Officially Owned Site
Site
Mehmood
Booti
Waste
Receiving
Capacity
(Tons/day)
Status
2500
Operational Since
1995 (Life
Consumed)
800
Tibba Village
700
Needs to be
relocated to Properly
Designed Waste
Disposal Facility
Internationally
Resource Recovery by
Informal Sector
App. 15000 waste scavengers are
operating in Lahore
Approx: 10 % of daily waste
generation i.e. 500 tons / day
Economic activity of Rs. 1.90 Billion
per Year
Background
The CM Punjab, during his previous
tenure, endeavored to improve the
existing SWM system of Lahore as per the
international standards.
Efforts were made to privatize the SWM
services in Lahore to French, Chinese,
Korean and Iranian companies.
Efforts failed due to various reasons such
as lack of capacity within the CDGL, faulty
outsourcing model, political instability and
economic constraints.
Establishment of LWMC
Due to the deteriorating level of SWM service,
the CM Punjab envisaged establishment of a
company on the basis of Turkish Model.
The CM directed to establish a company
similar in approach and methodology of
Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality to
overcome the challenges of cleanliness
LWMC was established under section 42 of
the Companies Ordinance 1984 on March 19,
2010
Why we needed a
company????
Critical capacity gaps within CDGL as
indicated by the analytical work done
by World Bank
To gain financial and administrative
autonomy
Flexibility and independence in quick
decision making
Why we needed a
company????
Professional and entrepreneurial approach
Flexibility of hire fire, procurement, public
private partnership
Independent decision making through a
smart BoD
Accountability through professional
auditors
External accountability through SECP &
other clients and stake holders
Why we needed a
company????
Professionals to manage the company
Improved Human Resource Management
Ring fenced financing to assess & improve
efficiency
Speed of implementation
Seclusion from Political interference at
operational level
Well defined responsibility, authority, resources
and accountability The key to improved
performance
Tasks Achieved
Documentary
on
Model Areas
Complaint
through
telephone
1139
Complaint
through
mail/email
The Resource
Group (TRG)
Complaint processing
Section (SI &
ADO/Contractor & Unit
In-charge
Complaint Resolution
Section
Redressal Fleet /Operational
Staff
Resolution of
Complaint by
concerned Field
Unit and
Feedback
LWMC
For Information
& VTMS and
feedback after
resolution
Real
by LWMC
Analysis
Each
Footage
of
Lakhodehr
Price Evaluation:
Price has been evaluated through following independent
evaluators;
1. M/s. Asif associates
2. M/s. Iqbal a. Naji
Approximate cost determined is Rs. 20 Crore.
Social Awareness
RFID System
RFID system introduced to identify
grey areas of efficiency
Verification of unitary performance
based on set parameters
Possibility to make fluid operational
planning based on statistical results
RFID System
Bid Rate
Company
Saggian
DG Khan Cement
Mehmood Booti
DG Khan Cement
Nain Sundar
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
Zone
1
3.40
2199
Zone
2
3.10
2042
LOW INCOME
MODE RAN
L
.
ALL
MIDDLE INCOME
MODE RAN
L
.
ALL
HIGH INCOME
MODE RAN
ALL
L
.
COMMERCIAL
MODE RAN
L
.
ALL
INSTITUTIONS
MODE RAN
ALL
L
.
OVER
ALL
1,36
1,03
1,25
2,35
1,10
1,94
1,28
1,23 1,26
1,96
1,75
1,86
48,20
15,2
2,89
5
Diaper
5,81
5,61
5,75
7,61
7,70
7,64
6,47
8,36 7,10
4,24
2,88
3,56
0,89
0,99 0,96
5,35
Elec.-Electro.
0,04
0,01
0,03
0,10
0,07
0,09
0,03
0,06 0,04
0,08
0,04
0,06
0,00
0,03 0,02
0,05
Glass
0,15
0,19
0,16
0,70
0,27
0,56
0,21
0,23 0,22
0,46
0,07
0,26
1,46
0,95 1,09
0,43
Hazerdous
0,12
0,58
78,44
0,17 0,14
74,8 77,2
9
6
71,54
0,01
76,0
2
0,04
73,7
8
0,10
72,06
0,45
71,6
3
0,06
Bodegredable
0,19
70,7
8
0,13
0,10 0,11
76,5
3
76,15
23,23
Metals
0,04
0,02
0,03
0,05
0,03
0,05
0,02
0,02 0,02
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,26
0,06 0,12
0,04
Non-Combust.
4,63
3,13
4,13
1,29
6,18
2,92
2,49
3,05 2,68
6,14
3,90
5,02
1,36
3,16 2,67
3,42
Paper-Card.
0,70
0,96
0,78
3,56
0,89
2,67
1,17
1,15 1,16
1,88
1,61
1,74
7,95
5,46 6,14
2,34
10 Pet
0,02
0,02
0,02
0,10
0,04
0,08
0,02
0,06 0,03
0,03
0,06
0,05
0,36
0,20 0,24
0,08
11 Nylon
4,64
5,53
4,93
6,48
5,81
6,26
5,05
5,85 5,32
5,87
6,70
6,29
6,59
4,78 5,27
5,58
12 Plastics
0,25
0,53
0,34
1,12
0,28
0,84
0,41
0,24 0,35
0,23
0,17
0,20
0,72
0,34 0,44
0,45
13 Tetrapak
0,21
0,35
0,26
0,61
0,24
0,49
0,39
0,21 0,33
0,46
0,27
0,37
7,05
1,26 2,84
0,77
14 Textile
6,07
6,02
6,05
3,37
6,41
4,39
3,90
4,50 4,10
7,03
6,52
6,77
1,83
2,44 2,27
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Combustibles
TOTAL
75,96
100
3,83
4,71
100,0
100
0
2
3
Indicator
Increase in
amount of waste
reaching at
disposal sites
Permanent
clearance of open
plots
Decrease in
waste storage
Existing
Level
Target Level
60 %
75 %
0%
20%
25%
15%
Operational improvements
Installation of 500 Specially Designed Waste Bins at
Public Places
Completion Time: 3 Months
Operational improvements
Replacement of 200 Worn Out Waste Containers
In house fabrication
Completion Time: 5 Months
Ro
n
ulta
ad
Sundar
Footage
of
Sundar