Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
KEEPING SYSTEMS
OBJECTIVES
To make the participants familiar with the
concept of station keeping
To design Spread Mooring Systems and
using Quasistatic Analysis
To train the participants in using the
mooring software package SEAMOOR
Day 2
SEAMOOR training
Case Study
Day 3
SPM
Vessel anchored to the seabed via a single
line
Turret / SALM / CALM
SPM
Figure 1.4: Turret
SPM
Figure 1.10: SALM
SPM
Figure 1.6: CALM
DP
Automatically maintains the position of a
floating vessel by controlling the thrusters
Stand-alone / DP assisted mooring
SPM vs MPM
SPM
MPM
For semisubmersibles
Limited vessel offset
Large mooring spread
Anchors/lines may interfere with pipelines, risers and any
subsea equipment
PERMANENT vs TEMPORARY
(MOBILE) MOORINGS
Permanent ==> Floating Production
Systems (FPS): > 10 years
Mobile ==> MODU (a few months)
FPS
Higher Environmental
Criteria
Dynamic Analysis
Fatigue Analysis
MODU
Lower E.C
(disconnect in case of storm)
Quasistatic Analysis
Not required
Easily deployable/retrievable
MOORING COMPONENTS
MOORING LINE
WINCHING EQUIPMENT
ANCHORING SYSTEM
MOORING LINE
Chain
Rope (Steel wire rope, synthetic fibre)
Combination of the above two
CHAIN
Advantages
Durability
Resistance to abrasion
Contributes to anchor holding capacity
Operational flexibility
Disadvantages
More weight => affects vessels load carrying capacity
(especially in deep water)
Fatigue (for permanent moorings)
WIRE ROPE
Advantages
Lighter than chain
Greater restoring force for a given tension
Handling speed
Better fatigue life
Disadvantages
Much longer line required to prevent anchor lift-up
Wear due to long term abrasion
Requires careful handling
Requires abandoning if damaged at any point other than
near the ends
COMBINATION
SYNTHETIC ROPE
To reduce cost
To avoid anchor pull-out
To add to the holding power
To reduce the vessel excursions
To reduce the buoy excursions
Disadvantage
SPRING BUOY
Surface / Subsurface
Advantages
Disadvantages
WINCHING EQUIPMENT
Windlass / chain jack - for chain
Drum type winch / linear winch - for rope
Traction winch - for combination systems
ANCHORING SYSTEM
Drag embedment anchors
Pile anchors
Suction anchors (caisson foundation)
Gravity anchor
Propellant embedment anchor
CATENARY
T
S
L-S
H
Ground Length
CATENARY
Max. offset
Mean offset
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Line Tension < Breaking strength
Horizontal Tension < Anchor holding power
Anchor lift-up not allowed
Sufficient factor of safety for each of the above
CATENARY - FORMULAE
If H is known :
H
1 H wd
D cosh
w
H
2H
S d d
T H wd
CATENARY - FORMULAE
If is known :
w.d
T
1 cos
2T
S d
d
w
d
D
sinh 1 tan
1
cos
ENVIRONMENTAL FORCE
CALCULATIONS
Bow / Stern
Fcx = Ccx S Vc2
Ccx = 2.89 N.s2/m4
Beam
Fcy = Ccy S Vc2
Ccy = 73.27 N.s2/m4
Bow/Stern; Beam
Fwy = Cw (Cs Ch A) Vw2
Cw = 0.615 N.s2/m4
Bow/Stern
Fwave x = 0.13 Cd B2 L Hs2
Cd is determined from Ts and Th
Ts : wave period, Th = 0.6 L
Beam
Fwavey = Cd B2 L Hs2
Cd is determined from Ts and Th
Ts : wave period, Th = 1.16 (B + 2T)
WAVES
Fig A-2 Wave Force Components
WAVES
Steady Wave Drift
+
Slowly varying drift / LF / Second order (T 1-2 min)
+
WF / HF / First Order (T 10-20 s)
WF & LF RESPONSE
DNV:
Xextreme = (WFextreme2 + LFextreme2)1/2
API
Xextreme = WFextreme + LFsign if WF > LF
= LFextreme + HFsign if LF > WF
CATENARY - QUASISTATIC
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
Choose a line (w, L, breaking strength)
Calculate the total environmental forces = H
Find S, D from catenary formulae
Mean offset (measured from anchor point)
Xmean = L - S + D
Calculate maximum dynamic motion due to
waves (LF + HF)
Assume H
Calculate Smax & Dmax
QUASISTATIC vs DYNAMIC
ANALYSIS
Quasistatic - not accurate enough for deep
water
INTRODUCTION TO
SEAMOOR
INPUT TO SEAMOOR
Fix Global and VCSs
Vessel Data File:
System Data File
CASE STUDY
REFERENCES
Robert Taggart
Conventional Buoy Moorings: glossary of terms design considerations properties and characteristics design and construction
MSC , The Netherlands , n.d.
SD7461 MAR.C
1252
Effective Mooring
Witherby , London,UK , 1989
SD6520 OCI.E
3185
Recommendations for Equipment Employed in the Mooring of Ships at Single Point Moorings3rd
Witherby , London,UK , 1993
SG5000 OIL.R,SD7461 OIL.R
3202
Anchor Manual
Vryhof Ankers B.V. , The Netherlands , 1990
SG2040 van.A
2891
INPUT TO SEAMOOR
Fix Global and VCSs
Vessel Data File:
System Data File
number of elements
break load
minimum tension
friction
for each element,
length
submerged weight per unit length
stiffness
mass and pennant lengths at start of the element
fairlead label
working tension
anchor range from target
anchor bearing from target
water depth
For each
x, y coordinates of the vessel in VCS
x, y coordinates of the body in body coordinate system
For each
x, y coordinates of the clash case in the body coordinate system
clash fairlead label
HOLDING POWER OF
ANCHORING SYSTEMS
Drag anchors - exact performance data can
only be determined after the anchor is
deployed and test loaded.
Tests with smaller anchors of the same type
at the mooring site
T = T0 (W/W0)2/3
Analysis
Intact
Intact
Damaged
Damaged
Transient
Transient
Quasistatic
Dynamic
Quasistatic
Dynamic
Quasistatic
Dynamic
Tension limit
(%break)
50
60
70
80
86
95
FOS
2.0
1.67
1.43
1.25
1.18
1.05
Quasistatic
2.0
1.43
1.18
Dynamic
1.67
1.25
1.05
ANCHOR HOLDING
CAPACITY - FOS (Drag
Anchors)
Condition
Permanent Moorings
Intact
Damaged
Transient
Temporary Moorings
Intact
Damaged
Transient
Quasistatic
Dynamic
1.8
1.2
-
1.6
1.0
-
1.0
-
0.8
-
Wire
Chain
Sand
0.5
0.7
Clay
0.15 0.25
0.3 0.5
Price
Elasticity
Anchor weight
Holding power
5 to 7 tonnes 12 to 17 times
7 to 14 tonnes 8 to 11 times
14 to 20 tonnes
< 10 times
DNV POSMOOR
Shallow water < 70m ==> Stiffness effect of the mooring
system has to be included in the calculation of HF motion
of the unit
Deep water > 450m