Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Prepared by:
Fernando & Yvonn Quijano
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
1 of 22
(3) firms that decide to shut down and bear losses just equal to
fixed costs.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
Maximizing Profits
Example: The Blue Velvet Car Wash
TABLE 9.1 Blue Velvet Car Wash Weekly Costs
Total Variable Costs
(TVC) (800 Washes)
$ 1,000
1. Labor
2. Materials
Total Costs
(TC = TFC + TVC)
$ 3,600
$ 1,000
600
$ 4,000
$ 1,600
1,000
$ 2,000
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
400
Maximizing Profits
A profit-maximizing perfectly competitive firm will produce up to the point where P* = MC.
Profits are the difference between total revenue and total costs. At q* = 300, total revenue
is $5 300 = $1,500, total cost is $4.20 300 = $1,260, and total profit = $1,500 $1,260
= $240.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
Minimizing Losses
operating profit (or loss) or net
operating revenue Total revenue minus
total variable cost (TR TVC).
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
Fixed costs
Variable costs
Total costs
$ 2,000
+
0
$ 2,000
Fixed costs
Variable costs
Total costs
Profit/loss (TR
TC)
$ 2,000
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
$ 2,400
$ 2,000
+ 1,600
$ 3,600
$
800
$ 1,200
Minimizing Losses
FIGURE 9.1 Firm Suffering Losses but Showing an Operating Profit in the Short Run
When price is sufficient to cover average variable costs, firms suffering short-run
losses will continue operating instead of shutting down.
Total revenues (P* q*) cover variable costs, leaving an operating profit of $90 to
cover part of fixed costs and reduce losses to $135.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
Total Revenue (q = 0)
Fixed costs
Variable costs
Total costs
$ 2,000
0
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 1,200
Fixed costs
Variable costs
Total costs
400
$
$ 2,400
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
$ 2,000
1,600
$ 3,600
Minimizing Losses
FIGURE 9.1 Firm
Suffering Losses but
Showing an Operating Profit
in the Short Run
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
FIGURE 9.4 The Industry Supply Curve in the Short Run Is the Horizontal Sum of the Marginal
Cost Curves (above AVC) of All the Firms in an Industry
A profit-maximizing perfectly competitive firm will produce up to the point where P* = If there are
only three firms in the industry, the industry supply curve is simply the sum of all the products
supplied by the three firms at each price. For example, at $6, firm 1 supplies 100 units, firm 2
supplies 200 units, and firm 3 supplies 150 units, for a total industry supply of 450.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
TABLE 9.4 Profits, Losses, and Perfectly Competitive Firm Decisions in the Long and
Short Run
Short-Run Condition
Profits
Losses
TR > TC
1. With operating profit
(TR TVC)
2. With operating losses
(TR < TVC)
Short-Run Decision
Long-Run Decision
P = MC: operate
P = MC: operate
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
The long-run average cost curve of a firm shows the different scales on which the firm can
choose to operate in the long run. Each scale of operation defines a different short run. Here we
see a firm exhibiting economies of scale; moving from scale 1 to scale 3 reduces average cost.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
Economies of scale push this firms average costs down to q*. Beyond q*, the firm
experiences diseconomies of scale; q* is the level of production at lowest average cost,
using optimal scale.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
FIGURE 9.7 Firms Expand in the Long Run When Increasing Returns to Scale Are Available
When economies of scale can be realized, firms have an incentive to expand. Thus, firms
will be pushed by competition to produce at their optimal scales. Price will be driven to the
minimum point on the LRAC curve.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
FIGURE 9.8 Long-Run Contraction and Exit in an Industry Suffering Short-Run Losses
When firms in an industry suffer losses, there is an incentive for them to exit.
As firms exit, the supply curve shifts from S0 to S1, driving price up to P*. As price rises,
losses are gradually eliminated and the industry returns to equilibrium.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster