Sunteți pe pagina 1din 42

Managerial Decision Making

Chapter 7

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Management Decision Making

Management decision making is a complex mix of


knowledge, experience, creative thinking, and risk
taking. It is often a rapid-fire, fragmented process

More and more companies are pushing critical


decision making down to the level of the organization
most affected by the decision

A decision can be defined as a conscious choice


among alternatives followed by action to implement
the decision

Decision-making process is a series of steps that is


followed, either consciously or unconsciously, to make
a choice and undertake action
2/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Management Decision Making (cont.)

Managers must learn how to deal with a decisionmaking environment that emphasizes communicating,
working with others, and working with incomplete
information

Decisions are often based on impressions, estimates,


and personal experience

Management researchers have developed a set of


useful concepts to understand the phenomenon

Individual decision making differs from group decision


making
3/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Types of Managerial Decisions

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Types of Managerial Decisions

Programmed and Non-Programmed


Decisions

Proactive and Reactive Decisions

Intuitive and Systematic Decisions

5/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Programmed and Non-Programmed


Decisions

Programmed Decisions

One that would be made if a particular situation


occurs and a routine procedure or policy has been
established to handle it
Repetitive and routine
A large number in daily operations
Although they should be made with care and
concern about effectiveness, they should be made
efficiently without needlessly tying up
organizational resources

6/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Programmed and Non-Programmed


Decisions (cont.)

Non-Programmed Decisions
No pre-existing structure or decisionmaking procedure in place
Have significant implications for the future
of the organization and must be made only
after careful analysis

7/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Proactive and Reactive Decisions

Proactive Decision
Made in anticipation of an external change
or other conditions
Can prevent many common problems

Reactive Decision
Made in response to changes that have
already occurred

8/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Intuitive and Systematic Decisions

Intuitive Decision Making

Use of estimates, guesses, or hunches to decide


among alternative courses of action
Voice of experience that speaks to managers
when faced with a decision situation
Dont rely on intuition alone; supplement intuition
with systematic information gathering and analysis

Systematic Decision Making

Organized, exacting, data-driven process


Requires a clear set of objectives, a relevant
information base, and a sharing of ideas among
key managers and other employees
9/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Decision-Making Process

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Decision-Making Process

Clarify the problem or opportunity

Develop alternative courses of action

Evaluate and select a course of action

Implement the decision

Monitor its effectiveness

11/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Step 1: Clarify the Problem or


Opportunity

Problems are defined as the realization that a


discrepancy exists between a desired state and
current reality

Several common biases or mistakes managers make


when identifying and clarifying a problem:

Perceptual inaccuracies
Defining problems in terms of solutions
Identifying symptoms as problems

Consider an issue from a variety of perspectives

Consult various perspectives before making decisions


12/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Step 2: Develop Alternative Courses


of Action

Examine the organizations internal and external


environments for information and ideas that may lead
to creative solutions to a problem

A popular approach to this is known as benchmarking


(identify and study firms who are leaders in a given
area of business)

Managers should encourage creativity and innovation


among employees

Encourage a diversity of approaches to problem


solving can lead to better solutions and courses of
action
13/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Step 3: Evaluate Alternatives and


Select a Course of Action

Select the alternatives that will produce the most


favorable outcomes and the least unfavorable
outcomes

Two cautions should be kept in mind

Keep this step distinct from the previous stepespecially in a


group context
Be wary of solutions that are evaluated as being perfect

Rather than being an optimizer, the decision maker is


said to be a satisficer a person who accepts a
reasonable alternative course of action that isnt
necessarily the optimum course of action

14/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Step 4: Implement the Selected


Alternative Course of Action

A decision is an abstraction if it isnt implemented

Actions must be implemented effectively if it is to


achieve an objective

Implementing decisions involves delegating


responsibilities to people

Here are six steps to effective delegation:

Define the task clearly


Give guidelines to begin to follow
Give authority to accomplish the task
Monitor the tasks, but dont hover
Give feedback along the way
Reward and recognize effort as well as results
15/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Step 5: Control and Assess the


Consequences of the Action

Periodic assessment of the results of the


chosen course of action

If actual results arent meeting planned


results, changes must be made

Two types of feedback that managers use to


gather the necessary information:

Formative
Summative
16/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Influences on Individual Decision


Making

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Influences on Individual Decision


Making

Importance of the decision

Time pressures

Managers values

Managers propensity for risk

18/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Importance of the Decision

Numerous yardsticks for measuring the


importance of a decision exist, including the
amount of resources involved, the number of
people influenced by the decision, and the
time required to make the decision

Managers must allot more time and attention


to significant problems

19/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Time Pressures

Managers must make the most of their


decisions in others time frames

When time pressures are significant,


managers may be unable to gather enough
information

Time management is a priority

Managers who effectively manage their time


feel less stress and tend to make better
decisions than their stress-filled counterparts
20/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Managers Values

An individuals values become guidelines when s/he


confronts a choice

Values are one of the most important influences on


human behavior

Values are the likes, dislikes, shoulds, oughts,


judgments, and prejudices that determine how the
world is viewed

Value-based decision making is methodical and


ensures that organizational values enter into all major
decisions

Although people dont think consciously about their


values and rarely arrange them in any kind of order,
managers should be very aware of their values

Serious conflicts can occur among values

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

21/42

The Managers Propensity for Risk

People vary greatly in their propensity to take


risks

The issue for managers is not whether to take


risks, but how to take reasonable risks

22/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Group Decision Making

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Group Decision Making

A great deal of decision making is achieved


through committees, teams, task forces,
virtual teams, etc.

Decisions made on non-programmed


problems being made by one individual on a
regular basis are unusual

Use of the collective approach to a decisionmaking process is increasing

Many managers spend as much as 80% of


their working time in committee meetings
24/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Individual vs. Group Decision Making

Groups usually take more time to reach a


decision

Consensus decisions with five or more


participants are superior to individual decision
making, majority vote, and leader decisions

Problems with group decision making:

Pressure to conform
Influence of a dominant personality
Status incongruity
Attempt of certain participants to influence others
25/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Individual vs. Group Decision Making


(cont.)

Non-programmed decisions appear to be


better suited to group decision making

As we move from individual to consensus,


the quality of the decision improves

For a complex problem requiring pooled


knowledge, the quality of the decision is likely
to be higher as the group moves toward
achieving consensus
26/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Creativity in Group Decision Making

If groups are better suited to non-programmed


decisions than individuals, then it is important
that an atmosphere fostering group creativity
be created

27/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Techniques for Stimulating Creativity

Brainstorming

The Delphi Technique

The Nominal Group Technique

28/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Brainstorming

Brainstorming promotes the generation of


ideas while at the same time avoiding the
inhibitions many people feel in group settings

The basic rules are:

No idea is too ridiculous


Each idea presented belongs to the group, not to
the person stating it
No idea can be criticized

29/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Delphi Technique

The Delphi technique comprises the


solicitation and comparison of anonymous
judgments on the topic of interest through a
set of sequential questionnaires that are
interspersed with summarized information and
feedback of opinions from earlier responses

30/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Delphi Technique (cont.)

The advantage is having several judges while


removing the biasing effects that might occur
during face-to-face interaction

Basic approach is to collect anonymous judgments


from group members by mail questionnaire

A process administrator then summarizes the


responses as the group consensus, and feeds this
summary back along with a second questionnaire
for reassessment

Respondents independently evaluate their earlier


responses

Underlying belief is that the consensus estimate


will result in a better decision after several rounds
of anonymous group judgment

31/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Nominal Group Technique (NGT)

The NGT comprises processes that bring


people together but do not allow them to
communicate verbally. Thus, the collection of
people is a group nominally, or in name
only

32/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

The Nominal Group Technique (NGT)


(cont.)
A structured group meeting proceeds as
follows:

A group of individuals (7 to 10) sit around a table


but do not speak to one another
Each person writes ideas on a pad of paper
A recorder writes the ideas on a flip chart in full view
of the entire group
This continues until all of the participants indicate
that they have no further ideas to share
Each idea receives attention before a vote is taken
Each participant, in private, selects priorities by
ranking or voting
The group decision is the mathematically pooled
outcome of the individual votes
33/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Information Technology and


Decision Making

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Information Technology and Decision


Making

In decision-making situations, managers cant


possibly use all available information

The challenge for managers is to collect, process, and


warehouse the most relevant information to make
effective decisions in the present and future

Tools for warehousing and retrieving information for


use throughout their firms:

Data warehousing
Data mining
Data marts
Search engines
Software agents
35/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Attributes of Useful Information

Accessible

Timely relevant

Accurate

Verifiable

Complete

Clear

36/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Information Sharing

Organizations that train people in the value of


information and how to use it and share it gain
competitive advantage over those who dont

37/42
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Decision Support Systems (DDS)

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Decision Support Systems (DDS)

DDS is an interactive information system that


enables managers to gain instant access to
information in a less structured format than a
traditional management information system or
database

Must obtain information about the firm,


competitors, and the business environment

May include links to the World Wide Web, and


have built-in artificial intelligence that adjusts
to group behaviors and needs

DDS is inherently user friendly

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

39/42

Decision Support Systems (cont.)

Supports managerial skills at all levels of


decision making by providing instant response
to managers information needs

An executive information system (EIS) is a


user-friendly DDS designed specifically for
executives

Consolidate the analysis provided by a DDS,


interpret it considering the firms strategic
goals, and present the results of executives in
an easily understandable format
40/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

Expert Systems and Artificial


Intelligence

Artificial intelligence allows computers to solve


problems involving imagination, abstract
reasoning, and common sense

Expert systems refers to computer systems


that can make decisions without human
interaction, by imitating human thinking and
offer advice or solutions to complex problems
in much the same way as a human expert
would
41/42

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

End of Chapter 7

Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2003

S-ar putea să vă placă și