Sunteți pe pagina 1din 21

Sources

• http://www.wikipedia.com

• http://answers.yahoo.com

• http://www.about.com

Information Websites
Industry Overview
Various forms of
information websites
are available online
including internet
encyclopedias, news
providers, open
forums, contributor
forums, and
government websites
Some websites operate

under the copyleft


licensing
Several competitors

emerging
(Citizendium, Google’s
Wikipedia History
• Began as Bomis, transformed into
Nupedia, and launched as Wikipedia
Wiki=Quick (Hawaiian) and
Pedia=Encyclopedia
• A wiki is a website that allows the easy
creation and editing of any number of
interlinked web pages via a web
browser using a simplified markup
language
• Originally Wikipedia.com, but later
changed to Wikipedia.org
• Wikipedia includes 15 million free articles
in over two hundred languages
Wikipedia History
• Wikipedia is a
registered
trademark of the
not-for-profit
Wikimedia
Foundation, which
has created a family
of free-content
Wikia (formerly
projects which are Wikicities) is a free
built by user web hosting service
contributions for wikis
Wikia hosts several

thousand wikis using


the wiki software
MediaWiki
Wikipedia Company
Statistics
Key Individuals
• Jimmy Wales is
historically cited as
a co-founder of
Wikipedia, though
he has disputed the
"co-" designation in
declaring himself
the sole founder.
• Wales is currently the
President of Wikia,
Inc. and Chairman
of Wikimedia

Competition
Competitive Advantage

Easily Accessible by Everyone

Free to Everyone

Correction made by populous


Major Competition
About.com Homepage
Wikipedia Homepage
SWOT Analysis
Strengths:
 Weaknesses:

 Wide variety of  Large contributor base


information  Written mostly by
 Open to anyone amateurs
 Larger contributor  Significant missing
base information
 Articles written by  Edited by anyone
consensus  Vandalism to articles
 Ability to cite sources  Misinformation
 3.3 million articles in  Funding through
English donations
 Free to use
 400,000,000 edits
SWOT Analysis
Opportunities:
 Threats

• Continually being • Lack of funding


updated with new • 400,000,000 edits
information with only 1,700
• 68 million visitors administrators
monthly and (equates to
growing 235,294 edits per
• Received a grant to administrator)
improve quality of • Maintaining and
information verifying accuracy
• Umbrella company is of information
expanding • Competitors with
• financing such as
Yahoo Answers
Website Marketing
Website Marketing
Website Analysis
• Site Structure
– Seek and find information from these sites
– Some featured content
• Ordering Process
– User input through search bar, engine, link to information page
• Delivery and Shipping
– Through the world wide web aka the internet
– Cost to user by Internet Service Provider for useage
• Return policy
– Go back a page, close your browser, control alt delete, throw your
computer out of the window, this list can go on and on…
– Also able to edit information, if the user is unhappy with current
selections
• Security and Privacy
– You are not safe what you post on information sites - available to
general public
– Anonymous is not really anonymous in recent debates
– “All contributions made to a Project, and all publicly available
information about those contributions, are irrevocably licensed
and may be freely copied, quoted, reused and adapted by third
parties with few restrictions. “ -Wikipedia

Website Analysis
Customer Service

 All have multiple options to resolve problems


 Dedicated pages for customer service
 FAQ’s, ask a question, contact numbers for further assistance.
 Search options

Unique Uses of Technology


 All use interactive approach to ask direct questions


 Ask a professional/guide

Content Visibility/Design Elements


 References are at times hidden


 Category Tables are not clearly defined
 Help pages can be more direct.


Ground Finding and
Recommendations
The major difference Like
between Wikipedia and Variety of information
other information websites
Ability for real-time updates
is the combination of open
forum style editing and Availability of sources

dedicated editors Easily searchable

Depending on the
Free to use
information being sought
after it is perceived as an 

unreliable source, Dislike


however, according to a Dead links
2005 study by CNET
Perceived misinformation
Wikipedia is about as
accurate as Britannica. The 

study found averages of


2.92 mistakes per article
for Britannica and 3.86 for
Wikipedia.

Ground Finding and
Recommendations
Without Wikipedia it can
 Recommendations
be assumed that other for Wikipedia:
online encyclopedias
Continue to expand
would be more
popular resources for available
information including information
previously printed Add additional
encyclopedias and
open forums editors
 Increase public

relations to ensure
accuracy of
information
Expand Wiki

software to for-
Our Website
• Information Websites - Team 3
Thank You!

S-ar putea să vă placă și