Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Respectfully presented
to the Faculty of
Graduate Studies and Applied
Research
to:
RESEARCH PARADIGM
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
Demographic Profile of
Teacher-Respondents
Age
Gender
Civil Status
Monthly Income
Educational Attainment
Length of Service
Position
No. of ICT Trainings
ICT Program Components
Teachers Level of ICT
Competencies
Technology Operations
Social and Ethical
Pedagogical
Professional
Adequacy of ICT Facilities
a Dep Ed. ICT
Readiness Checklist
ICT Integration in the
Curriculum
DEPENDENT VARIABLES
National
Achievement
Test (NAT)
Performance
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
1. What is the
demographic
profile of the
teacherrespondents
in terms of :
1.1 Age
Percentage
FINDINGS
a large proportion is in
the age bracket 31 to
40. There are 417
teachers in (31 to 40)
age brackets. About
41.20% for age bracket
31 to 40. There are 268
in their (41 to 50), 191
are in their (20 to 30),
and 116 are in their (51
to 60) age brackets. On
the other hand, a small
proportion is at the
retiring age, only 20 are
ranged from 61 to 70
years old which is only
2.0%.
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
1.2 Gender
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
FINDINGS
Percentage
Percentage
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
1.4 Family
Monthly
Income
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Percentage
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
1.5 Educational
Attainment
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Percentage
FINDINGS
majority of the
respondents are
Bachelors Degree holder
with 36.6 % or 370 are at
the prime years of their
service. Meanwhile,
those who earned more
than 20 Masters units
comprised 25% of the
respondents, while those
who have less than 20
Masters units is posted
at 15.9%. About 10.4% or
105 attained a Masters
Degree. On the other
hand, those who attained
Masters Degree with less
than 20 Doctoral units
reached 2.5% or 25
respondents. While at
least 8.1% of the
respondents also
attained Masters Degree
with more than 20
Doctoral units, a very
small proportion of them
gained Doctoral Degree
at 1.6% which constitutes
only 16 respondents.
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
1.6 Length of
Service
1.7 Position
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
FINDINGS
Percentage
To be specific, 558 or
about 55.1% are in the
service for 10 years.
Teachers who served
from 11 to 20 years
which comprised of
28.4% or 287 . Very
few at 29 or 2.8% are
in their 31 to 40 years
in service. Further, only
1 of them is in the
service for 40 years or
more which covers only
0.1%.
Percentage
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
1.8 Number of
ICT Related
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Percentage
Trainings
2. What is the
level of ICT
competency
level of teachers
in selected
public schools?
2.1 social ethical
Mean and
Standard
Deviation
FINDINGS
almost 76.3% or 772
has only 1 to 3 times of
formal trainings on ICT,
140 or 13.8% have
reached 4 to 6 times,
and 56 or 5.5% have
undergone training on
ICT for 10 times or
more than. Only 4.3%
or 44 have undertaken
7 to 9 times of ICT
related trainings.
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
FINDINGS
2.2 technology
and operations
concept
Mean and
Standard
Deviation
*technology and
operations concepts
displayed a mean of
2.41 which is at basic
level.
2.3 pedagogical
Mean and
Standard
Deviation
*pedagogical domain
Mean and
Standard
Deviation
*professional domain
displayed a mean of
2.20 which is at basic
level.
2.4 professional
displayed a mean of
2.14 which is at basic
level.
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
3. What are the
mean percentage
scores of grade
six in the NAT for
four consecutive
years?
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Mean
Percentage
Scores
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
NAT VI Mean
Percentage Scores
(MPS)
60.91
67.64
54.70
58.28
60.06
57.63
43.35
44.32
45.97
47.77
50.92
57.41
51.08
43.31
49.72
58.26
52.42
Mastery Level
Descriptive Equivalent
Average
Moving-Towards-Mastery
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
C5 S1
C5 S2
C5 S3
C5 S4
C5 S5
C5 S6
C6 S1
C6 S2
C6 S3
C6 S4
C6 S5
C6 S6
C6 S7
C6 S8
C7 S1
C7 S2
C7 S3
C7 S4
C7 S5
C7 S6
C7 S7
C8 S1
C8 S2
C8 S3
C8-S4
Overall
62.84
50.36
69.05
75.82
58.01
65.91
66.29
64.55
53.07
53.70
49.13
50.67
40.17
40.72
64.10
54.21
64.67
53.86
61.88
58.20
47.37
52.38
57.20
45.97
48.12
55.05
Average
Average
Moving-Towards-Mastery
Moving-Towards-Mastery
Average
Average
Moving-Towards-Mastery
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
AVERAGE
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
4. What is the
status of Schools
ICT Program in
terms of:
HYPOTHESES
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Mean and
Standard
Deviation
FINDINGS
4.2 ICT
Infrastructure
4.3 Curriculum
Integration
Curriculum Integration,
with 2.10 mean level
**the overall status of
Schools ICT among 42
schools are
progressing based on
the criteria for
readiness.
CONCLUSIONS
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
5. Is there a
significant
relationship
between the ICT
competency of
teachers and
NAT
performance?
HYPOTHESES
There is no
significant
relationship
between
teachers ICT
competency
skills and
schools NAT
performance.
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Pearson and
Correlation
Coefficient
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
There is no
significant
relationship
between the
respondents ICT
competency and
NAT
Performance.
Therefore it was
concluded that
the null
hypothesis
regarding the
cited variables is
accepted
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
6. Do the
following factors
singly or in
combination
predict the
performance in
the NAT in terms
of;
6.1 teacher
related factor
HYPOTHESES
There is no
significant
relationship
between teacher
related factors
and NAT
performance.
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Pearson and
Correlation
Coefficient
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
There is no
significant
relationship
between teacher
related factor (in
terms of age,
gender, family
income, educ.
attainment and
position) and NAT
Performance.
Therefore, it was
concluded that
the null
hypothesis
regarding the
cited variables is
accepted and
partly upheld.
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
6.2 ICT
Competency level
of teachers
HYPOTHESES
There is no
significant
relationship
between
teachers ICT
competency
skills and
schools NAT
performance.
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Pearson and
Correlation
Coefficient
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
There is no
significant
relationship
between the
respondents ICT
competency and
NAT
Performance.
Therefore it was
concluded that
the null
hypothesis
regarding the
cited variables is
accepted
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
6.3 Schools ICT
Level
HYPOTHESES
There is no
significant
relationship
between
schools ICT
level and
schools NAT
performance.
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Pearson and
Correlation
Coefficient
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
Schools ICT
components were not
significant and does
not affect significantly
the NAT performance.
Based on the
perception and
measurements, there is
no significant
relationship found
among the three
components between
Schools ICT Level and
the NAT Performance.
Where p-values are
greater than 0.05 of
-0.732, 0.101, and
0.052 (singly)
In combination where
the obtained p-values
are greater than 0.05.
(0.466, 0.426 and
0.203)
There is no
significant
relationship
between the
schools ICT level
and NAT
Performance.
Therefore it was
concluded that
the null
hypothesis
regarding the
cited variables is
accepted
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
7. Is there a
significant
relationship
between schools
ICT level singly or
in combination
and the NAT
performance?
HYPOTHESES
There is no
significant
relationship
between
schools ICT
level and
schools NAT
performance
singly or in
combination.
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Pearson and
Correlation
Coefficient
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
Schools ICT
components were not
significant and does
not affect significantly
the NAT performance.
Based on the
perception and
measurements, there is
no significant
relationship found
among the three
components between
Schools ICT Level and
the NAT Performance.
Where p-values are
greater than 0.05 of
-0.732, 0.101, and
0.052 (singly)
In combination where
the obtained p-values
are greater than 0.05.
(0.466, 0.426 and
0.203)
There is no
significant
relationship
between the
schools ICT level
and NAT
Performance.
Therefore it was
concluded that
the null
hypothesis
regarding the
cited variables is
accepted
STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
7. Is there a
significant
relationship
between schools
ICT level singly or
in combination
and the NAT
performance?
HYPOTHESES
There is no
significant
relationship
between
schools ICT
level and
schools NAT
performance
singly or in
combination.
STATISTICAL
TREATMENT
Pearson and
Correlation
Coefficient
FINDINGS
CONCLUSIONS
Schools ICT
components were not
significant and does
not affect significantly
the NAT performance.
Based on the
perception and
measurements, there is
no significant
relationship found
among the three
components between
Schools ICT Level and
the NAT Performance.
Where p-values are
greater than 0.05 of
-0.732, 0.101, and
0.052 (singly) While in
combination the
obtained p-values are
greater than 0.05.
(0.466, 0.426 and
0.203)
There is no
significant
relationship
between the
schools ICT level
and NAT
Performance.
Therefore it was
concluded that
the null
hypothesis
regarding the
cited variables is
accepted.
Recommendations
Review and develop ICT for Education Master Plan that will
provide clear plan of action with a shared single vision to achiev
e key priority education outcomes. The planning team should in
clude all possible mixtures of representations from various stak
eholders (most importantly, expertise from seasoned teachers
who have used ICT in their practice). The plan should continue t
o be implemented despite shifts in political leadership.
Increase financial investment at the national level for ICT inf
rastructure, professional development, and digital resources.
Set-up and configure ICT based on factors such: teaching an
d learning needs, technology maturity of teachers, population, a
mong others.
Standardize the year level where computer education subjec
t is being offered to avoid digital divide among schools. There s
hould be equitable distribution of ICT time and resources acros
s all learning areas not only on technology subject.