Sunteți pe pagina 1din 54

Operations

Management
Chapter 5
Design of Goods
and Services
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer/Render
Principles of Operations Management, 7e
Operations Management, 9e
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

51

Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you should
be able to :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Define product life cycle


Describe a product development system
Build a house of quality
Describe how time-based competition is
implemented
Describe how products and services are defined
Prepare the documents needed for production
Describe customer participation in the design
and production of services
Apply decision trees to product issues

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

52

Product Decision
Great products are the keys to success
Top organizations typically focus on core
products
Customers buy satisfaction, not just a physical
good or particular service
An effective product strategy links decisions with
investment, market share, and product life cycle
Objective to develop and implement a product
strategy that meets demands of the marketplace
with a competitive advantage
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

53

Product Strategy Options


Differentiation
Shouldice Hospital

Low cost
Taco Bell

Rapid response
Toyota

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

54

Product Life Cycles


Four phases:
Introduction
Growth
Maturity
Decline
May be any length from a few hours to
decades Newspaper; months-PC,
Fashion; years-video tapes; decadesVolkswagen Beetle
The operations function must be able to
introduce new products successfully
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

55

Product Life Cycles

Sales, cost, and cash flow

Successful product strategies require determining the best strategy for


each product based on its position in its life cycle
Cost of development and production
Sales revenue
Net revenue (profit)
Cash
flow
Negative
cash flow

Introduction
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Loss

Growth

Maturity

Decline

Figure 5.1
56

Product Development
System
Ideas
Figure 5.3

Ability
Customer Requirements
Functional Specifications
Scope of
product
development
team

Product Specifications Scope for


design and
Design Review
engineering
teams
Test Market
Introduction
Evaluation

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

57

Quality Function
Deployment
Identify customer wants
Identify how the good/service will satisfy
customer wants
Relate customer wants to product hows
Identify relationships between the firms hows
Develop importance ratings
Evaluate competing products

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

58

QFD House of Quality

What the
customer
wants

How to satisfy
customer wants

Relationship
matrix

Competitive
assessment

Customer
importance
ratings

Interrelationships

Weighted
rating

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

59

QFD House of Quality

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 10

House of Quality Example


Your team has been charged with
designing a new camera for Great
Cameras, Inc.
The first action is
to construct a
House of Quality

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 11

Interrelationships

House of Quality Example


What the
customer
wants

What the
Customer
Wants

Relationship
Matrix

Analysis of
Competitors

How to Satisfy
Customer Wants

Technical
Attributes and
Evaluation

Customer
importance
rating
(5 = highest)

Lightweight
3
Easy to use
4
Reliable
5
Easy to hold steady
2
Color correction
1
Identifies detailed list of product attributes desired
by customer
Focus groups or
1-on-1 interviews

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 12

Interrelationships

House of Quality Example

Relationship
Matrix

Technical
Attributes and
Evaluation

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Ergonomic design

Paint pallet

Auto exposure

How to Satisfy
Customer Wants

Auto focus

Aluminum components

Low electricity requirements

What the
Customer
Wants

Analysis of
Competitors

How to Satisfy
Customer Wants

Defines product in terms of


how the product would
meet desired attributes
Translates customer
preferences into specific
product characteristics
5 13

Interrelationships

House of Quality Example


What the
Customer
Wants

High relationship
Medium relationship
Low relationship
Lightweight
Easy to use
Reliable
Easy to hold steady
Color corrections

Relationship
Matrix

Analysis of
Competitors

How to Satisfy
Customer Wants

Technical
Attributes and
Evaluation

3
4
5
2
1

Relationship matrix
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 14

Interrelationships

House of Quality Example


What the
Customer
Wants

Relationship
Matrix

Analysis of
Competitors

How to Satisfy
Customer Wants

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Ergonomic design

Paint pallet

Auto exposure

Auto focus

Aluminum components

Relationships
between the
things we can do

Low electricity requirements

Technical
Attributes and
Evaluation

5 15

Interrelationships

House of Quality Example


What the
Customer
Wants

Relationship
Matrix

Analysis of
Competitors

How to Satisfy
Customer Wants

Technical
Attributes and
Evaluation

Lightweight
3
Easy to use
4
Reliable
5
Easy to hold steady
2
Color corrections
1
Our importance ratings

22

27 27

32

25

Weighted
rating
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 16

Interrelationships

How to Satisfy
Customer Wants

Relationship
Matrix

Company A

Technical
Attributes and
Evaluation

How well do
competing products
meet customer wants
Lightweight
3
Easy to use
4
Reliable
5
Easy to hold steady
2
Color corrections
1
Our importance ratings
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Company B

What the
Customer
Wants

Analysis of
Competitors

House of Quality Example

G
G
F
G
P
22

P
P
G
P
P

5
5 17

Company B

Company A

Ergonomic design

Paint pallet

Auto exposure

Auto focus

Low electricity requirements

Completed
House of
Quality

Aluminum components

House of Quality Example

Lightweight

G P

Easy to use

G P

Reliable

F G

Easy to hold steady 2

G P

Color correction

Our importance ratings 22 9 27 27 32 25

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 18

Issues for Product


Development
Robust design
Modular design
Computer-aided design (CAD)
Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)
Virtual reality technology
Value analysis
Environmentally friendly design
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 19

Robust Design
Product is designed so that small
variations in production or
assembly do not adversely affect
the product
Typically results in lower cost and
higher quality

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 20

Modular Design
Products designed in easily
segmented components
Adds flexibility to both production
and marketing
Improved ability to satisfy customer
requirements

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 21

Computer Aided Design


(CAD)
Using computers to
design products and
prepare engineering
documentation
Shorter development
cycles, improved
accuracy, lower cost
Information and
designs can be
deployed worldwide
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 22

Extensions of CAD
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly
(DFMA)
Solve manufacturing problems during the
design stage

3-D Object Modeling


Small prototype
development

CAD through the


internet
International data
exchange through STEP
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 23

Computer-Aided
Manufacturing (CAM)
Utilizing specialized computers
and program to control
manufacturing equipment
Often driven by the CAD system
(CAD/CAM)
Benefits:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Product quality
Shorter design time
Production cost reductions
Database availability
New range of capabilities

5 24

Virtual Reality Technology


Computer technology used to
develop an interactive, 3-D model of
a product from the basic CAD data
Allows people to see the finished
design before a physical model is
built
Very effective in large-scale designs
such as plant layout

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 25

Value Analysis
Focuses on design improvement
during production
Seeks improvements leading either
to a better product or a product
which can be produced more
economically

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 26

Ethics and Environmentally


Friendly Designs
It is possible to enhance productivity,
drive down costs, and preserve
resources
Effective at any stage of the product life cycle
Design
Production
Destruction
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 27

The Ethical Approach


View product design from a
systems perspective
Inputs, processes, outputs
Costs to the firm/costs to
society

Consider the entire life cycle of


the product
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 28

Goals for Ethical and


Environmentally Friendly
Designs
1. Develop safe and more environmentally
sound products
2. Minimize waste of raw materials and energy
3. Reduce environmental liabilities
4. Increase cost-effectiveness of complying
with environmental regulations
5. Be recognized as a good corporate citizen
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 29

Guidelines for Environmentally


Friendly Designs
1. Make products recyclable
2. Use recycled materials
3. Use less harmful ingredients
4. Use lighter components
5. Use less energy
6. Use less material
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 30

Acquiring Technology
By Purchasing a Firm
Speeds development
Issues concern the fit between the acquired
organization and product and the host

Through Joint Ventures


Both organizations learn
Risks are shared

Through Alliances
Cooperative agreements between
independent organizations
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 31

Product Documents
Engineering drawing
Shows dimensions, tolerances, and
materials
Shows codes for Group Technology
Bill of Material
Lists components, quantities and
where used
Shows product structure
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 32

Engineering Drawings

Figure 5.8
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 33

Bills of Material

Figure 5.9 (a)


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 34

Bills of Material
Hard Rock
Cafes Hickory
BBQ Bacon
Cheeseburger

DESCRIPTION

QTY

Bun
Hamburger patty
Cheddar cheese
Bacon
BBQ onions
Hickory BBQ sauce
Burger set
Lettuce
Tomato
Red onion
Pickle
French fries
Seasoned salt
11-inch plate
HRC flag

1
8 oz.
2 slices
2 strips
1/2 cup
1 oz.
1 leaf
1 slice
4 rings
1 slice
5 oz.
1 tsp.
1
1

Figure 5.9 (b)


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 35

Group Technology
Parts grouped into families with
similar characteristics
Coding system describes
processing and physical
characteristics
Part families can be produced
in dedicated manufacturing cells

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 36

Group Technology Scheme


(a) Ungrouped Parts

(b) Grouped Cylindrical Parts (families of parts)


Grooved

Slotted

Threaded

Drilled

Machined

Figure 5.10
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 37

Documents for Production


Assembly drawing
Assembly chart
Route sheet
Work order
Engineering change notices (ECNs)

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 38

Assembly Drawing
Shows exploded
view of product
Details relative
locations to
show how to
assemble the
product

Figure 5.11 (a)


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 39

Assembly Chart
1

Tuna Fish
SA1

Mayonnaise

Bread

Tuna
Assy

A1
Sandwich

FG
A2

Identifies the point of production where


components flow into subassemblies
and ultimately into the final product
Figure 5.11 (b)
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 40

Route Sheet
Lists the operations and times required
to produce a component
Process

Machine

Operations

Auto Insert 2

2
3

Manual
Insert 1
Wave Solder

Test 4

Insert Component
Set 56
Insert Component
Set 12C
Solder all
components
to board
Circuit integrity
test 4GY

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Setup
Time

Operation
Time/Unit

1.5

.4

.5

2.3

1.5

4.1

.25

.5

5 41

Work Order
Instructions to produce a given quantity
of a particular item, usually to a schedule
ng Ord
i
Wo
r
u
t
c
a
f
u
Man
er rk er
Dept Op
Date

:
d
e
v
o
Appr
JM

1984-1994 T/Maker Co.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 42

Engineering Change Notice


(ECN)
A correction or modification to a
products definition or
documentation
Engineering drawings
Bill of material
Quite common with long product life
cycles, long manufacturing lead times, or
rapidly changing technologies
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 43

Service Design
Service typically includes direct
interaction with the customer
Increased opportunity for customization
Reduced productivity

Cost and quality are still determined at


the design stage
Delay customization
Modularization
Reduce customer interaction, often
through automation
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 44

Service Design
(a) Customer participation in design
such as pre-arranged funeral services
or cosmetic surgery

Service typically includes direct


interaction with the customer

Increased opportunity for customization


Reduced productivity

(b) Customer participation in


delivery such as stress test for
cardiac exam or delivery of a
baby

Cost and quality are still determined at


the design stage
Delay customization
(c) Customer participation in design and
Modularization

delivery such as counseling, college


education, financial management of
personal affairs, or interior decorating

Reduce customer interaction, often


Figure 5.12
through automation
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 45

Application of Decision
Trees to Product Design
Particularly useful when there are a
series of decisions and outcomes
which lead to other decisions and
outcomes

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 46

Application of Decision
Trees to Product Design
Procedures
Include all possible alternatives and
states of nature - including doing
nothing
Enter payoffs at end of branch
Determine the expected value of each
branch and prune the tree to find
the alternative with the best expected
value
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 47

Example of a decision tree in product design


Silicon, Inc., a semiconductor manufacturer, is investigating
the possibility of producing and marketing a microprocessor.
Undertaking this project will require either purchasing a
sophisticated CAD system or hiring and training several
additional engineers. The market for the product could be
either favorable or unfavorable. Silicon, Inc., of course, has
the option of not developing the new product at all.
With favorable acceptance by the market, sales would be
25,000 processors selling for $100 each. With unfavorable
acceptance, sales would be only 8,000 processors selling for
$100 each. The cost of CAD equipment is $500,000, but that
of hiring and training three new engineers is only $375,000.
however, manufacturing costs should drop from $50 each
when manufacturing without CAD, to $40 each when
manufacturing with CAD.
The probability of favorable acceptance of the new
microprocessor is .40; the profitabilityof unfavorable
acceptance is .60.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 48

Decision Tree Example


(.4)

Purchase CAD

High sales

(.6) Low sales

Hire and train engineers


(.4)
High sales

(.6)
Low sales

Do nothing
Figure 5.14
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 49

Decision Tree Example


(.4)

Purchase CAD

High sales

(.6) Low sales

Hire and train engineers

$2,500,000
- 1,000,000
- 500,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
- 320,000
- 500,000
- $20,000

Revenue
Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
CAD cost
Net
Revenue
Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)
CAD cost
Net loss

(.4)
High sales

EMV (purchase CAD system) = (.4)($1,000,000) + (.6)(- $20,000)


(.6)
Low sales

Do nothing
Figure 5.14
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 50

Decision Tree Example


(.4)

Purchase CAD
$388,000

High sales

(.6) Low sales

Hire and train engineers

$2,500,000
- 1,000,000
- 500,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
- 320,000
- 500,000
- $20,000

Revenue
Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
CAD cost
Net
Revenue
Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)
CAD cost
Net loss

(.4)
High sales

EMV (purchase CAD system) = (.4)($1,000,000) + (.6)(- $20,000)


= $388,000
(.6)
Low sales

Do nothing
Figure 5.14
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 51

Decision Tree Example


(.4)

Purchase CAD
$388,000

High sales

(.6) Low sales

Hire and train engineers


$365,000
(.4)

High sales

(.6)
Low sales

Do nothing $0

$2,500,000
- 1,000,000
- 500,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
- 320,000
- 500,000
- $20,000
$2,500,000
- 1,250,000
- 375,000
$875,000
$800,000
- 400,000
- 375,000
$25,000
$0 Net

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Revenue
Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
CAD cost
Net
Revenue
Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)
CAD cost
Net loss
Revenue
Mfg cost ($50 x 25,000)
Hire and train cost
Net
Revenue
Mfg cost ($50 x 8,000)
Hire and train cost
Net
Figure 5.14
5 52

Decision Tree Example


$2,500,000
Revenue
Because the top
the highest
(.4) branch has
- 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
Purchase CAD
Expected Monetary
EMV
ofcost
High sales Value -(an
500,000
CAD
$388,000
Net
$388,000 vs. $365,000 vs $1,000,000
$0), it represent
$800,000should
Revenue
the best decision.
Management
(.6) Low sales
Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)
purchase the CAD system.-- 320,000
500,000 CAD cost

Hire and train engineers


$365,000
(.4)

High sales

(.6)
Low sales

Do nothing $0

- $20,000 Net loss


$2,500,000
- 1,250,000
- 375,000
$875,000
$800,000
- 400,000
- 375,000
$25,000
$0 Net

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Revenue
Mfg cost ($50 x 25,000)
Hire and train cost
Net
Revenue
Mfg cost ($50 x 8,000)
Hire and train cost
Net
Figure 5.14
5 53

Quiz
Michaels Engineering, Inc. manufactures components
for the ever-changing notebook computer business. He
is considering moving from a small custom design
facility to an operation capable of much more rapid
design of components. This means that Michael must
consider upgrading his CAD equipment.
Option 1 is to purchase two(2) new desktop CAD
systems at $100,000 each.
Option 2 is to purchase an integrated system and the
related server at $500,000.
Michaels sales manager has estimated that if the
market for notebook computers continues to expand,
sales over the life of either system will be $1,000,000.
He places the odds of this happening at 40%.
He thinks the likelihood of the market having already
peaked to be 60% and future sales to be only $700,000.
What do you suggest Michael do and what is the EMV
of this decision?
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.

5 54

S-ar putea să vă placă și