Sunteți pe pagina 1din 30

Management Control Systems,

Transfer Pricing, and


Multinational Considerations
Chapter 22
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Overview
What is a Management Control System?
Centralized vs. decentralized control structure
Transfer pricing:

Function
Setting TPs
Dual TPs
Negotiated TPs (Calculating Min. & Max. range)
International tax issues

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Management Control Systems


A management control system is a means
of gathering and using information.
It guides the behavior of managers and
employees.

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Management Control Systems


Financial data
Nonfinancial data
Formal control system
Informal control system
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Evaluating Management
Control Systems
Motivation

Goal congruence

Effort

Lead to rewards
Monetary
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

Nonmonetary
L.DuCharme

Organization (control) Structure


Total decentralization

Total centralization
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Benefits of Decentralization
Creates greater responsiveness to local needs
Leads to gains from quicker decision making
Increases motivation of subunit managers
Assists management development and learning
Sharpens the focus of subunit managers
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Limitations of Decentralization
Suboptimal decision making may occur
Focuses the managers attention on the subunit
rather than the organization as a whole
Increases the costs of gathering information
Results in duplication of activities
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Decentralization in
Multinational Companies
Decentralization enables country managers to
make decisions that exploit their knowledge
of local business and political conditions.
Multinational corporations often rotate
managers between foreign locations
and corporate headquarters.
Control Problem: Barings Bank (200 yrs old)1995 Nick Leeson caused
over 1 B loss.
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

Responsibility Centers
Cost
center

Revenue
center

Profit
center

Investment
center

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

10

Transfer Pricing
A transfer price is the price one subunit charges
for a product or service supplied to another
subunit of the same organization.
Intermediate products are the products
transferred between subunits of an
organization.
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

11

Transfer Pricing
Transfer pricing should: (1) help achieve
a companys strategies and goals.
(2) fit the organizations structure
(3) promote goal congruence
(4) promote a sustained high level
of management effort
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

12

Transfer-Pricing Methods
Market-based transfer prices
Cost-based transfer prices
Negotiated transfer prices
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

13

Market-Based Transfer Prices


By using market-based transfer prices
in a perfectly competitive market, a
company can achieve the following:
Goal congruence
Management effort
Subunit performance evaluation
Subunit autonomy
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

14

Market-Based Transfer Prices


Market prices also serve to evaluate the
economic viability and profitability
of divisions individually.

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

15

Market-Based Transfer Prices


When supply outstrips demand, market prices
may drop well below their historical average.
Distress prices are the drop in prices
expected to be temporary.
Basing transfer prices on depressed market prices will not
always lead to optimal decisions for an organization.
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

16

Cost-based Transfer Prices


When transfer prices are
based on full cost plus a
markup, suboptimal
decisions can result.
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

17

Dual Transfer Prices


An example of dual pricing is for Larry & Co.
to credit the Selling Division with
112% of the full cost transfer price of $24.64
per barrel of crude oil.
Debit the Buying Division with the market-based
transfer price of $23 per barrel of crude oil.
And debit a corporate account for the difference!
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

18

Negotiated Transfer Prices


Negotiated transfer prices arise from the
outcome of a bargaining process between
selling and buying divisions.

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

19

General Guideline: min. & max.


transfer price
Maximum transfer price = Market price
Minimum transfer price
= Incremental costs per unit incurred
up to the point of transfer
+ Opportunity costs per unit to the selling division
Incremental cost often times = variable cost
Opportunity costs often times = lost CM
Opportunity costs could = lost savings

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

20

Min. & Max. transfer price--examples


Some examples:
(1) Slowcar
(2) S.F. Manufacturing

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

21

Slowcar Company

The Assembly Division of SLOWCAR Company has offered to purchase


90,000 batteries from the Electrical Division (ED) for $104 per unit. At a
normal volume of 250,000 batteries per year, production costs per battery are:
Direct materials
$40
Direct labor
20
Variable factory overhead 12
Fixed factory overhead
42
Total
$114
The Electrical Division has been selling 250,000 batteries per year to outside
buyers for $136 each. Capacity is 350,000 batteries/year. The Assembly
Division has been buying batteries from outside suppliers for $130 each.
Should the Electrical Division manager accept the offer? Will an internal
transfer be of any benefit to the company?

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

22

SF Manufacturing

The SF Manufacturing Co. has two divisions in Iowa, the Supply Division and
the BUY Division. Currently, the BUY Division buys a part (3,000 units)
from Supply for $12.00 per unit. Supply wants to increase the price to BUY
to $15.00. The controller of BUY claims that she cannot afford to go that
high, as it will decrease the divisions profit to near zero. BUY can purchase
the part from an outside supplier for $14.00. The cost figures for Supply are:
Direct Materials
$3.25
Direct Labor
4.75
Variable Overhead
0.60
Fixed Overhead
1.20
A. If Supply ceases to produce the parts for BUY, it will be able to avoid onethird of the fixed MOH. Supply has no alternative uses for its facilities.
Should BUY continue to get the units from Supply or start to purchase the
units from the outside supplier? (From the standpoint of SF as a whole).
(What is the min. & max. transfer price if BUY and SUPPLY negotiate?)

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

23

SF Mfg.continued

Now, assume that Supply could use the facilities currently used to produce the
3,000 units for BUY to make 5,000 units of a different product. The new
product will sell for $16.00 and has the following costs:
Direct Materials
$3.00
Direct Labor
4.30
Variable Overhead
5.40

B. What is the min. & max. transfer price if BUY and SUPPLY negotiate?

C. What should be done from the companys point of view? Why?

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

24

Comparison of Methods
Achieves Goal Congruence
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based:

Often, but not always

Negotiated:

Yes

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

25

Comparison of Methods
Useful for Evaluating Subunit Performance
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based:
Negotiated:
2009 Foster School of Business

Difficult, unless transfer


price exceeds full cost
Yes

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

26

Comparison of Methods
Motivates Management Effort
Market Price: Yes
Cost-Based:
Negotiated:
2009 Foster School of Business

Yes, if based on budgeted


costs; less incentive if
based on actual cost
Yes

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

27

Comparison of Methods
Preserves Subunit Autonomy
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based:

No, it is rule based

Negotiated:

Yes

2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

28

Comparison of Methods
Other Factors
Market Price: No market may exist
Cost-Based:
Negotiated:
2009 Foster School of Business

Useful for determining


full-cost; easy to implement
Bargaining takes time and
may need to be reviewed

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

29

Multinational Transfer Pricing


IRC Section 482 requires that transfer prices
for both tangible and intangible property
between a company and its foreign division
be set to equal the price that would be
charged by an unrelated third party in a
comparable transaction (arms length).
This still leaves a little room to wiggle.
2009 Foster School of Business

Cost Accounting

L.DuCharme

30

S-ar putea să vă placă și