0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
97 vizualizări11 pagini
The document discusses the selection of civil engineers for projects. It outlines factors that should be considered, including the engineer's reputation, qualifications, expertise, staffing abilities, and financial resources. It recommends using a qualification-based selection procedure where the client issues a request for qualifications, evaluates submissions, interviews top candidates, checks references, and negotiates scope and compensation with the best qualified engineer. Bidding is not recommended as it may result in subpar services focused only on minimal bid requirements.
The document discusses the selection of civil engineers for projects. It outlines factors that should be considered, including the engineer's reputation, qualifications, expertise, staffing abilities, and financial resources. It recommends using a qualification-based selection procedure where the client issues a request for qualifications, evaluates submissions, interviews top candidates, checks references, and negotiates scope and compensation with the best qualified engineer. Bidding is not recommended as it may result in subpar services focused only on minimal bid requirements.
The document discusses the selection of civil engineers for projects. It outlines factors that should be considered, including the engineer's reputation, qualifications, expertise, staffing abilities, and financial resources. It recommends using a qualification-based selection procedure where the client issues a request for qualifications, evaluates submissions, interviews top candidates, checks references, and negotiates scope and compensation with the best qualified engineer. Bidding is not recommended as it may result in subpar services focused only on minimal bid requirements.
criteria for the selection of qualified Civil Engineers for particular projects. The clients first step is to define the propose scope of the project. In some cases, this ay be a general statement of the performance requirements of the project. At other times, the task to be performed maybe individually identified and define.
FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED IN THE SELECTION PROCESS: 1.
THE PROFESSIONAL AND ETHICAL REPUTATION OF THE CIVIL
ENGINEER AND HIS STAFF AS DETERMINED BY INQUIRIES TO PREVIOUS CLIENTS AND OTHER REFERNCES.
2.
RESPONSIBLE CIVIL ENGINEERS AND ITS EMPLOYEES MUST BE
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERS.
3.
CIVIL ENGINEERS SHOULD HAVE DEMONSTRATED
QUALIFICATION AND EXPERTISE IN PERFORMING THE SERVICES REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.
4.
CIVIL ENGINEERS SHOULD BE ABLE TO ASSIGN QUALIFIED
ENGINEERING STAFF WHO WILL BE IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE PROJECT AND WILL BE ABLE TO PROVIDE AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRES SERVICES WITHIN THE TIME ALLOTTED.
5.
CIVIL ENGINEERS SHOULD HAVE THE NECESSARY FINANCIAL
AND BUSINESS RESOURCES TO ACCOMPLISH THE ASSIGNMENT AND PROVIDE CONTINUING SERVICES.
QUALIFICATION-BASED SELECTION (QBS) PROCEDURE THE
SELECTION PROCEDURE IS CONSIDERABLE
ENHANCED WHEN THE CLIENT IS FULLY FAMILIAR WITH THE PURPOSE AND NATURE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT, CAN DESCRIBE THE PROJECT IN DETAIL, AND CAN PREPARE A PROJECT SCOPE AND OUTLINE OF SERVICE EXPECTED OF CIVIL ENGINEER. IN SOME CASES THE CLIENT MAY NOT HAVE PROFESSIONAL STAFF AVAILABLE TO DEFINE THE PROJECT SCOPE AND DESCRIBE THE REQUIRED SERVICES.
1.
BY INVATATIONAL OR BY PUBLIC NOTICE, STATE THE
GENERAL NATURE OF THE PROJECT, THE SERVICE REQUIRED, AND REQUEST STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE FROM CIVIL ENGINEERING WHO APPEARE TO BE CAPABLE OF MEETING THE PROJECT. THE CLIENT MAY ISSUE A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION (RFQ) OR REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP).
2.
PREPARE A BUDGET FOR TH STAFF TIME AND COST
THAT CAN BE EXPECTED FROM POTENTIAL CIVIL ENGINEER PRIOR TO RECIEPT OF RFQs OR RFPS.
3.
EVALUATE THE STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
RECEIVED. SELECT THREE CIVIL ENGINEERS OR FIRMS THAT MAY APPEAR TO BE BEST QUALIFIED FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT OFTEN MORE THAT THREE CIVIL ENGINEERS OR FIRMS MAY APPEAR TO BE EQUALLY QUALIFIED. IN WHICH CASE MORE CIVIL ENGINEERS OR FIRMS MAY BE
4. ON RECIEPT OF PROPOSAL, INVITE CIVIL ENGINEERS OR
FIRMS TO MEET INDIVIDUALLY WITH THE SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR INTERVIEWS AND DISCUSSION OF THE DESIRED END RESULT OF THE PROJECT AND THE ENGINEERING SERVICES REQUIRED. 5. CHECK WITH RECENT CLIENT OF EACH CIVIL ENGINEER 0R FIRM TO DETERMINE THE QUALITY OF THEIR PERFORMANCE. THIS CHECK NEED NOT BE LIMITED TO REFERENCES LISTED BY CIVIL ENGINEERS. 6. INVITE THE CIVIL ENGINEER CONSIDEREDTO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO DEVELOP A DETAILED SCOPE, LIST OF DELIVERABLES AND SCHEDULE, AND TO NEGOTIATE FAIR COMPENSATION FOR THE SERVICES. 7. WHEN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED ON SCOPE, SCHEDULE AND COMPENSATION, THE CLIENT AND SELECTED CIVIL ENGINEERS SHOULD FORMALIZE THEIR AGREEMENT IN A WRITTEN CONTRACT.
SELECT PROCEDURE FOR LEVEL
OF EFFORT CONTRACTS
IS A TYPE OF CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES IS
A CONTRACT PROCEDURE USED TO SUPPLEMENT A CLIENT STAFF, EITHER BY PROVIDING AN EXTENSION TO EXISTING DISCIPLINES AND CAPABILITIES ALREADY ON BOARD OR BY ADDING SPECIAL DISCIPLINES NOT AVAILABLE ON THE CLIENTS STAFF.
AS
APPLIED TO LEVEL OF EFFORT CONTRACTS, THE QBS
PROCEDURE SETS FORTH THE GENERAL NATURE OF SERVICES TO BE RENDERED, THE TYPES OF SPECIALISTS REQUIRED AND THE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF OURS REQUIRED DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD FOR EACH TYPE AND GRADE OF SPECIALIST, AND THEN REQUEST PROPOSALS FROM QUALIFIED FIRMS.
BIDDING PROFESIONAL
ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL
SOCIETIES, RECOGNIZE QBS AS THE PREFERRED METHOD FOR PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. IN FACT THE NEDA GUIDELINES REQUIRED THE PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES ONLY BY A PROCESS SIMILAR TO THAT DESCRIBED IN QUALIFICATIONS-BASED SELECTION PROCEDURE,
THESE ARE MANY REASONS WHY BIDDING FOR
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES OFTEN PRODUCES UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS FOR THE CLIENT. 1.
BIDDING DOES NOT RECOGNIZE PROFESSIONAL
JUDGMENT, WHICH IS THE KEY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND THE FURNISHING OF PRODUCT.
2.
IT IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSIBLE TO COMPLETELY DETAIL IN
ADVANCE THE SCOPE OF SERVICES REQUIRED FOR AN ENGINEERING PROJECT ESPECIALLY FOR THE STUDY AND PRELIMINARY PHASES, WITHOUT LENGTHY DISCUSSIONS AND NEGOTIATIONS WITH SELECTED FIRM. LACKING SPECIFICS, THE BIDDING FIRMS MUST, IN ORDER TO BE COMPETITIVE, SUBMIT A PRICE FOR THE LEAST EFFORT ENVISIONED. THE RESULTING SERVICES PERFORMED IS LIKELY TO BE TAILORED TO FIT THE MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE BID DOCUMENTS AND WILL NOT NECESSARILY SUIT THE
3. IN-DEPTH STUDIES AND ANALYSES BY THE CONSULTING
CIVIL ENGINEER ARE NOT LIKELY TO BE PERFORMED. THE CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER SELECTED BY LOWEST BID WILL OFTEN PROVIDE ONLY THE MINIMUM SERVICES NECESSARY TO SATISFY CLIENTS SCOPE OF SERVICES. 4. THE CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS ABILITY TO BE FLEXIBLE AND CREATIVE IN MEETING THE CLIENTS REQUIREMENTS IS SEVERELY LIMITED. 5. THE ENGINEERING DESIGNS ARE LIKELY TO BE MINIMAL IN COMPLETENESS WITH THE DETAILS LEFT TO THE CONTRACTOR. THIS PRODUCES A LOWER COST DESIGN BUT TENDS TO ADD TO THE COST OF THE COMPLETED PROJECT. THE LACK OF DESIGN-DETAILS ALSO CAN AND FREQUENTLY DOES, LEAD TO A GREATER NUMBER OF CHANGE ORDERS DURING THE CONSTUCTION AND TO CONTRACTOR CLAIMS AT A LATER DATE.
TWO-ENVELOPE SYSTEM
INVOLVES SUBMISSION OF A TECHNICAL PROPOSAL OF
A TECHNICAL PROPOSAL IN ONE ENVELOP AND A PRICE PROPOSAL IN A SECOND ENVELOPE. THE CLIENT THEN EVALUATES THE TECHNICAL PROPOSALS AND SELECTS THE BEST CIVIL ENGINEER BASED ON THAT CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
IF
THE CLIENT FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE, THE NET
EFFECT IS AS OUTLINED IN QUALIFICATION-BASED SELECTION PROCEDURE, PROVIDED THAT THE CLIENT AND THE BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER HAVE EXTENSIVE DISCUSSIONS TO REACH FULL AGREEMENT ON THE SCOPE OF SERVICE. UPON AGREEMENT OF SCOPE, THE PRICE OF SERVICE SHOULD BE NEGOTIATED TO REFLECT CHANGES FROM ORIGINAL SCOPE USED FOR OBTAINING PROPOSAL.