Sunteți pe pagina 1din 34

Language Planning and

Policy
Language Planning

is all conscious efforts that aim at


changing the linguistic behavior of a
speech community.

English vs. German Immigrants


Language Policy

is the more general linguistic,


political and social goals underlying
the actual language planning
process.

U.S. Government vs. Native American


languages
Two types of Language
Planning
Heinz Kloss
1. Corpus Planning is the internal structure of the
language. Activities include a writing system for
a spoken language, initiating spelling reforms,
creating new terms and publishing grammar
books.

2. Status Planning refers to all efforts undertaken


to change the use and function of a language or
language variety within a given society.
Einar Haugens View

Language planning is a technocratic process


concerned with systematizing and cultivating a
standardized language code to solve problems.

Emphasized the importance of the written


standard over the spoken.
Dialects (regional or social) hamper
communication.
Concerned with equality among standard
languages, non-standard languages are
problematic.

Neoclassical-autonomous approach
Neoclassical Approach vs.
Historical Approach Tollefson
(1991)
Neoclassical Historical

Individual choice Historical-structural


influence of socio-historical
factors on language use
Current language situation Considers past
relationships between
groups
Evaluation is in ahistorical Concerned with issues of
and amoral terms class dominance and
oppression
This model assumes that Political stance is
the field of applied inescapable for those who
linguistics and teachers are avoid political questions in
apolitical advertently support the
status quo.
Autonomous vs. Ideological
Street (1984)
Autonomous Ideological
Literacy is a NEUTRAL Concentrates on the
technology which can be social practices of
detached from social context reading and writing &
recognizes these practices
Literacy can be isolated as are culturally embedded
an independent variable Literacy is a socially
constructed practice
having different meaning
Sets up a dichotomy
between written and oral
for different groups
modes of communication Considers overlap of the
oral and literate modes
Haugens Framework
4 Phases of Language
Planning
1) Selection
2) Codification
3) Implementation
4) Elaboration/Modernization
1. Selection

is the term used to refer to the


choice of a language variety to
fulfill certain functions in a given
society.
2. Codification

The creation of a linguistic standard


or norm for a selected linguistic code.
It is divided up into three stages:

1) Graphisation developing a writing system.


2) Grammatication deciding on rules/norms
of grammar
3) Lexicalisation identifying the vocabulary
Western Apache Writing
System

Prayer for Life


Apache Language Today

The Apache language adopted the Latin alphabet for their


written representation, adding symbols to indicate unique
sounds in their language. This was largely due to the
influence of missionaries translating the Bible into the
Apache language.

There are no standardized spellings. Words are spelled


phonetically.

Chris Harvey www.languagegeek.com


3. Implementation
Promoting of the decisions made in the
stages of selection and codification which
can include marketing strategy,
production of books, pamphlets,
newspapers, and textbooks using the
new codified standard.

Implementation can be either vigorous legal enforcement


(Native Americans in BIA boarding-schools) or
encouragement (Spanish province of Catalonia, where
the use of Catalan is encouraged, but not enforced).
Implementation example

Posters in Language Classrooms


4.
Elaboration/Modernization
Refers to the terminology and stylistic
development of a codified language to
meet the communicative demands of
modern life and technology. Its main
area is the production and
dissemination of new terms.

Elaboration is an ever evolving process


Lexical Modernization
Three strategies:

1) Borrowing
2) Extension of the meaning of a native term
3) Creation of the new terms (neologisms)

1) Portable Document File (PDF)


2) Trash Can - (Ko) - Fire
3) Power Cable - (Kqh bitlool) - Electricitys Rope
Boss
Dialects in Thailand
First Thai script 1283
by Sukhothai's kings, Ramkamhaeng the
Great
1871, in the reign of Rama V
the Command Declaration on Schooling was issued

Rama V
Language planning: Thai

Since King Rama V (1868-1910)


Official language: Thai
regulated by the Thai Royal Institute
Assimilation policy
Political goal
Acquisition planning: Ministry of
Education
1800s, Rama IV imposed English as a new
educational requirement
Language planning: English in
Thailand
Current compulsory education (year
1-12)
Bilingual schools
International schools (88 established)
Adam
CASE STUDY: SOUTH AFRICA
CASE STUDY: SOUTH AFRICA

South
Africa
Multilingual vs. Monolingual

Which context viewed as


problematic?

Who decides?
LANGUAGE AS CODE

VS

LANGUAGE AS SOCIAL BEHAVIOR


Liebowitz (1974)

Language policy as
social control
Ruiz (1984)

Three contrasting views of Language


As a problem
As a right
As a resource
SOUTH AFRICAN
GOVERNMENT
Official stance

South Africa should be a


fully functional multilingual
society
A critique of the official
policy
Too idealistic
Mfanafuthi Mgqwashu
(2004)
REVISITING THE CASE OF SOUTH
AFRICA AND ITS LANGUAGE POLICY
Language Planning and
Policy

S-ar putea să vă placă și